This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Against - Not sure why the image doesn't appear on the VFP page, but I urge people to click this link before voting based on that fact. On anouther note, it doesn't make me laugh. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 19:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Against Not funny. Ethereal 13:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
An unfortunate miscommunication lead to the original theater poster having a terrifying kitten rather than the planned terrifying Mexicalian. Errors on later posters include a basketball instead of the houses and a block of cheese instead of the text. All three posters are highly prized by collectors, with ones in mint condition fetching up to eight dollars at auction.
4, found it pretty funny, context or no. MO himself said it best: "a enormous sombrero'd kitten poised to crush the cookie-cutter hell of suburbia". Just look at the dichotomy of the image. Oh, and MO made a grammar mistake. FIX IT OR BE...I dunno...something bad... - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 01:39, Oct 26
Against. The article is good, and it's still a good chop, but it just doesn't stand alone as a picture outside the context. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Against. As if anybody seriously expected me to vote for a text-based joke. Also, the text-based joke isn't even very funny without the added text of its article. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 21:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Against Its good, but not that good --Nytrospawn 02:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Against Yeah, outside the page context, yadda yadda. -RAHB 20:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Against Don't find it funny at all. Ethereal 04:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Against; sorry. --Algorithm 22:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Against. I've had enough of cats on the internets. ~
Changing vote to abstain. I'm really unsure whether this is funny outside the context of its page, but I'm too close to see the kitteny forest for the equally kitteny trees. I must admit, however, that an enormous sombrero'd kitten poised to crush the cookie-cutter hell of suburbia is adorable. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Against First of all, like the giraffe image I hate so much, the blood takes the image's quality down to kindergarten. Other than that, it really has no comedic value on its own. -RAHB 22:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Are magazines filled with news about real people, places and things, burning you out? Try UnNews Sunday Magazine; now with 94% less real news about those very things! Available on newstands today! Get your copy now! Excitement! I get paid by the word!
Oh shit, I can't think of anything witty that applies to this situation, as Cs1987 hath already stolen my usual line...uhh...errr...Cs1987. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 01:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Comment I've asked Modus to pull this nom. Evidently its pretty bad when Zombiebaron can't think of anything bitchie to say about it. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 02:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
For Once more, I fail to see what's funny about this. -RAHB 21:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Against. A well done 'chop, but without the article, it's just not funny. (Yes, I know that slightly contradicts my weak self-for on the Red Baron image elsewhere, but that's why it was weak!) --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 12:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Against The quality of the photoshopping could be a little better with regard to the lettering; also, this kind of anachronism doesn't quite hit my funny bone in the right spot. As Under user said, this image needs the article text in order to make complete sense. Pentium5dot1 02:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. The quality of the images has much, much improved since it was last up here. Too bad it still isn't funny. (gee, that sounded awfully cold) --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. Meh, can't see what's funny here --Druss 09:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Against, regrettably...the 'chop is good but the laughter is mute.--SirShandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
When I said that the quality could be better, I was probably looking at the same version of the image as Thekillerfroggy, so I need to explain in more detail: The letters U and G obviously look thinner than the rest of the letters, and their inside edges look a little ragged. I don't think it makes sense to treat them as dogtags with the chains hanging off of them; that only works well for the letter O. Also, an apostrophe is missing. --Pentium5dot1 06:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. Not a bad image per se, but a) it didn't make me laugh and b) I can think of several more appropriate corporate logos for a Borg ship. Sorry. -- Sir CodeineK·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
As you can see on this snapshot made by Pentagon's satellite camera, Osama bin Laden is regular guest of Moscow. Usually he comes in the very beginning of September to meet some old friends, recover health and get some inspiration for next great works. On the picture Osama giving candies to activists of Putinjugend.
The best home appliance and computer accessory this season, the Apple iToast is scheduled to replace the Apple AirPort late this year. It was originally only supposed to be a router, but it overheated so much that Apple employees started using it to make toast with it when they arrived in the morning. Though this practice was looked down upon by Steve Jobs, he soon realized that combining an extremely popular kitchen appliance with amazing internet technology would lead to a huge amount of sales. He was correct, and some people only use the iToast to make their morning meal, and don't care about the wireless part, mainly because it's the best looking toaster on the market!
For. Well of course I'm for it, because I made it... P2justin 21:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Against Votes: 6
Against. The image makes no sense whatsoever on its own, and the joke (which I got after reading an entire paragraph of caption) is not really that funny to begin with. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 21:11 Jan 09, 2008
Against As per DrS. It is well done, and I admit I laughed at reading the paragraph, but we're featuring images, not paragraphs. -RAHB 02:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Against Not iEverything can be made funny by adding an Applesque lowercase "i" to the front. iSn't that right, everyone? --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 02:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Against The drumsticks are too obviously photoshopped. --Zyrac 21:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Against Per Zyrac. It's a good idea, but the chopping needs work. MrNFork you! 22:50, Jan 10
Against - There's two things. The first, is that the drumsticks are to light. The stand out. Try using that "darker" tool thingy. Also, while you're at it, you might want to come up with an idea that makes me laugh. Sure, this is a great idea. Hell, I acctaully did this once at some kid's birthday when I was 7. But that's a different story. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Suggestions noted. There's also the matter that the positioning of the crispy one in relativity to his fingers is really starting to bug me. I was planning on working on this a bit more before Thinker nommed it anyways. I'll get to it.....whenever. -RAHB 00:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh yeah, blame it on me. >:( --THINKER 03:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
What, you mean there are other people I can blame things on? Shit! I've been blaming everything on you all these years. You owe me a lot of money in gambling dues. -RAHB 03:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)