Uncyclopedia:VFP/Failed/archive18

For-We don't take time to look at simple things we can use alot--Killer 3.14 22:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

1. Against This looks like a piece of **** some 3 year old made. Staircase CUN^t 22:56, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
2. GARBAGE-- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!)
3. Against. per above. --Mn-z 02:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
4. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:15, Aug 24
5. Nope — Such a generic theme it isn't funny, poor execution, text/icon-based, lacking novelty, lacking love, lacking context, lacking any kind of in-humor, shall I go on? Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 03:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -4. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom +4 I believe this failed VFP back in 2007 with 13 for and 11 against votes. But we've renommed worse.--Mn-z 02:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
2. For; I believe this is a complete 180 degree reversal of my 2007 vote on this image. And that's in Celsius. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Sadly, I think that this pic is only funny in the context of the article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:59, Aug 23
2. No It's just not that funny --Sence I con't type something witty; I will comment on my lack of pants. 05:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. A 720 degree reversal of my opinions of Scottish highlands health care, and that's in fahrenheit. But then that's another story. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
4. Uggg... — Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 19:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
5. -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!)

Abstain. Yes, it's mine. I think it's funny, but without context... Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc!

But its a giant kitten in a silly hat. --Mn-z 23:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

It is. And most of the time I spent making the pic was trying to "make" a shadow for the hat on the cat's head that looked right. Damn you, shadows! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

1. For - I want to see if anyone gets the joke. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

1. No I don't see how that is remotly funny.--//Sence I con't type something witty; I shall comment on my lack of pants. 04:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. ok, the image isn't horrible, and it looks like it required some skill to make, but it just isn't that funny.. --Mn-z 05:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
3. Against; I do truely think this image's meaning is lost on me. And I read the caption. And I still have no idea why I'm looking at a potato with the letters "PC" written on it and a puzzle piece shaped piece of skin removed between the two letters. It just doesn't make sense. When I coined the phrase "potatochopin'" I had no idea it would inspire this. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

   Are you familiar with the specific joke? This image is a parody of the Adobe Photoshop CS4 logo (a rather uninteresting logo in my opinion) (link here). Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

   I got it. And I think it's quite nicely done. But I'm not voting for it as a feature. Sorry. Guybles _CUN 14:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

4. Against. It's nicely done and all, it's just not funny. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:29, 26 Aug

Yes, I'm nomm'ing another 'shop. Aren't I an asshole? Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 03:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

1. Fixed up the issue with the sloping background, so now we have straight background, straight fence, straight people... And finally, the straight tower of Pisa Pup t 22:35, 28/08/2009

1. Against. It's not funny to me. Where's the punchline? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:06, Aug 29
2. sorry not funny, but good picture! -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 14:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
3. Italy Don Puttano cHeDDs 17:33,29August,2009
4. Against. Couldn't you get basically the same picture by just taking it from the appropriate angle? In any case, it's not funny on it's own. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:49, 29 Aug

1. actually one of those people doesn't look too 'straight' to me -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 14:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

rm-3

1. SelfNom + 4 - This went through Reefer's Desk (read: Modus) and so now I present it as an offering to the whims of the great and powerful VFP. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:02, Sep 8
2. For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:14, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against until you can fix the kilt, which looks extremely awkward right now. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:01, Sep 8
2. Yeah, the kilt looks weird, but I like the usage of Orange Amps. Pretty funny, but needs some more tweakin'. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 05:00, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against Per Leddy and RDB. --^Dame 13:26, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. per the kilt. --Mn-z 13:52, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
5. Against but I will TOTALLY vote for when these little issues get fixed, I love the idea! -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 17:12, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

• Thanks for the comments, guys. Somehow Modus forgot to mention the kilt amidst all his other nitpicking. I'll fix it soon and renom it then. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 13:45, Sep 9

  Hey! I told you his kilt was done wrongly in my first comment. Jerk. That's the last time I give you a lift to the airport. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:10, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

  Whoops! Silly me. I must have blocked that from my memory or somesuch. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:38, Sep 9

• To nitpick, there are quite a few photomorphing artifacts in the image if you look closely (i.e. white pixels near the outline of objects, inconsistent blurring, et cetera). You might be able to hide that if the pic was smaller. --Mn-z 00:14, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:25, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

1. SN+F Drunkenfitofrage 02:38, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

Failed. Not original. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:32, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

1. nom and for because its touched something close to my heart--Shitaku 04:27, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
2. For. --Mn-z 04:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
3. For Staircase CUN^t 04:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
4. For.  –              zh             /SG/08:33 August 17
5. For. I laughed. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:40, Aug 17
6. For. -- GBA2005 I Want You! 14:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
7. For. Drew a chuckle. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:34, Aug 18
8. Sexcellent. Funny story, that "s" was at first a typo, but I just rolled with it. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
9. For --Sence I con't type something witty; I will comment on my lack of pants. 05:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
10. For I lolled.    Orian57    Talk   21:45 15 September 2009
11. ' For.'Meh but LOL but don't know why? ][ Grrrr--BusRider 13:52, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

1. Eh. I didn't. --Algorithm 06:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
2. sorry -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!)
3. Against; the text on the top of the box needs to be changed (although I'm not sure why it wasn't just left as "Kellogs" everywhere), and "Regular" should either be added to the box, or a picture of a sleeping cat. Those are all really just design tips though, because this joke has already been done somewhere (some stand up comedian I think) and I didn't find it funny as a picture. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

   It doesnt need a "regular" because this is the original K, and the special K is an add on. And why a sleeping Cat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shitaku (talk • contribs)

   Okay, that makes sense. I still don't find it funny. And my quip about a "sleeping cat" was a reference to an entirely different kind of K. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

4. Against. Sorry, I just don't see why this is funny. There's no I in RAPE (lol contribs) 19:50 Aug 20, 2009
5. holy shit this has been up for a long ass time -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 05:02, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
6. Self-against Love the article but the pic doesn't really work on its own. And I should really fix the top text. --^Dame 13:23, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
7. Nah. It's a little obvious and the article needs to be more satirical Ye have little faith 02:50, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
8. against. solid photshoppery, not feature material. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 06:33, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain For one reason: On the front it says "Kelogs", o the top it says "Kellogs". Yeah. Staircase CUN^t 04:47, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
  • I believe that is intentional. I.e. removing the "fancy" double letters. --Mn-z 04:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm confused as to why that is. Whatever. Staircase CUN^t 04:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
    • If he was removing the letters, he could do it on all sides of the box. This is just lazy. --Algorithm 06:16, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
      • She. Assumptions are lazy too. --UU - natter 08:31, Aug 18
        • I lold. --Shitaku 08:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the misspelling was intentional. I linked to the article-in-the-making in the caption, where context will be provided. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

A month and some, +3. Fail'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:10, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

AAAAAA! AAAAAAAA! --Click me^{NO NOT ME!!} _{I don't care if you click me} 14:11, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

1. No. It's text-based, and there are a slew of better images at AAAAAAAAA! Don't nom those either. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 15:00, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
2. AAAAAAAA! AAAAA! AAAA AAAAAA! AAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAA (AAAA!)

AAAAAAAAAAAA! --Click me^{NO NOT ME!!} _{I don't care if you click me} 14:11, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

By the power vested in me by whatever or something, I declare this image failed. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:41, Sep 28

1. for we needed more VFP noms -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 03:21, Sep 29
2. For. I laughed. --Docile hippopotamus 07:36, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
3. Where did you guys find this picture of me??!?! -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 07:59, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. While that is funny, I don't think is appropriate for the mainpage. --Mn-z 04:58, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
2. While I don't think it's a problem to present that on the front page, it's not very well made and I don't see anything funny in it. ~ 06:51, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. While it's well made, I don't think it's funny or presentable on the main page. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 13:28, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
4. While I don't have a problem with there being a semi-nude picture on the front page, I just think this is ugly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:59, 29 September 2009
5. Oh, I get it. Black people love chicken. Against. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:28, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
6. Newfag. I saw this on /b/ a year ago. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:33, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3 Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:56, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

1. n+f 202.61.210.15 03:15, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

   I voted against it but now whenever I see it I keep laughing and I don't know why.--Click me^{NO NOT ME!!} _{I don't care if you click me} 21:56, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

1. Um... No. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:02, Oct 1
2. Hey, dumbass, why didn't you vote for it? —RomanDogBird (Talk•Morgan Freeman•eat my shorts nigga•Hawkman•suck my balls) 02:58, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

   The picture is so awesome that the IP forgot. I helped him out. I does! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:54, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

3. against. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:53, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3.5. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

1. Definitely one of my better ideas --Click me^{NO NOT ME!!} _{I don't care if you click me} 19:38, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
2. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA —RomanDogBird (Talk•Morgan Freeman•eat my shorts nigga•Hawkman•suck my balls) 20:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. --Docile hippopotamus 05:44, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I love these kind of pics./[/zh] 10:46 October 4

1. One of your better ideas is "Even before Einstein the idea of a light bulb was there."? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:23, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. text based. --Mn-z 05:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
3. What the fucking shit Einstein had nothing to do with the development of the lightbulb --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

   What the fucking shit and the image is unoriginal --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

   What the fucking shit and text based --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

   What the fucking shit and even if we ignore all that the idea is still not funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

4. Against. Unoriginal, unfunny, text based, and the caption doesn't work either. --UU - natter 16:25, Oct 4
5. Against. Not feeling the funny here. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:28, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
6. No — The very concept isn't funny, text-based, confusing, idiotic. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 00:41, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
7. Unoriginal • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:17, Oct 5

• weak abstain (what the hell does that mean?) Nice pic, but what does Einstein have to do with lightbulbs? Caption could use work. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:06, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry, I changed it to Edison , I always get them confused--Click me^{NO NOT ME!!} _{I don't care if you click me} 16:32, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

--- Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:52, October 5, 2009 (UTC)

1. 4

- I giggled so hard my pizza got all fizzy.  Sj 09:06, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. against more like a gif movie than an image. --Mn-z 14:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

• I would question the originality of this one. The uploader's log shows no other apparent original photochops, or involvement with image requests or the reefer desk. While this wouldn't require much skill with the right software, it would be time consuming. --Mn-z 14:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, Not original. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:08, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom and MOMMY? - Weasel baby. 'Nuff said. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 08:28, Oct 10

1. EPIC FAIL! actually, it's a nice picture, but not even a chuckle, sorry -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 17:29, Oct 10
2. --Roman Dog Bird 18:05, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
3. UNORIGINAL IDEA IS UNORIGINAL — Not to mention the fact that it isn't an especially funny caption to my mind. 97.124.147.216 05:13, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

   Whoops, sorry, forgot to sign in. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 05:13, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

   Hey, waitaminnit, unoriginal? What do you mean by that? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 05:27, Oct 11

4. Against. per above. --Mn-z 21:22, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc!

1. Nomming and For-Took a while to design and make but I am very happy with the end result. Think it asks a good question as well as being very funny! :) Please vote for and comment! P.S. The version you see here may not be displayed correctly. Please click the image to see the current version. --Dani 15:45, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

1. Against You took a mugshot and wrote some text on it. That's not really image manipulation, so... --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 14:55, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. I like the concept and think how you put this on a book is much improved over the previous version, but even at full resolution the text is unusually small for a book cover and difficult to read. There's a principle in medieval heraldry and modern advertising of what colors to use on top of which others--if you have questions feel free to post on my talk page. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:54, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against per above, text is too hard to read. --Mn-z 04:50, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
4. Against It's not particularly funny, it's just stating the feelings of some people out there. It'd be like me putting a picture of George Bush and putting "reaterd loll!!!11!". Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 22:00, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
5. Text-based. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 02:59, Oct 16

Its the idea that matters to me, forget all those fancy effects that others throw in just to make it look more impressive. However i have thought about it and i take your point....behold the new version. A simple technique, the image was warped onto a book cover in photoshop! Hope this does it for you. Any further points or ideas please say so in the comments section! Thanks guys! P.S. The version you see here may not be displayed correctly. Please click the image to see the current version. --Dani 17:24, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

• I don't want to vote against, but I really feel it is premature for the VFP. It has the little hints of stuff not quite perfect that would keep it out of VFP, even if everyone loved the idea and way it was pulled off. I'll leave some comments on your talk page (again) -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 17:33, Oct 14

Rm, -4. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:32, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

1. Text based, but Zombiebaron.[MODUzOPERANDI, teh] 13:34 October 17
2. for feature plz -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 18:03, Oct 17
3. Like Totally Foar - It's tasteless and uninteresting, therefore it belongs on the front page. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 19:44, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. --Docile hippopotamus 23:27, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
5. zombiebaron --Roman Dog Bird 17:53, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

1. Zombiebaron. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:37, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. as per Modusoperandi Robertodole 03:21, October 18, 2009 (UTC)
3. Lolno. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 08:05, Oct 18
4. Against. If this wins it might be time to shut down VFP. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:17, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

   Shhhhhhhhh! Damnit, you figured us out!!!! Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 02:24, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

5. Against. per above, and I believe this, or a very similar image, was nommed before. --Mn-z 18:25, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

   It was exactly the same picture. zombiebaron. User:Zheliel • Talk 05:12 October 20

6. Against.. Are we being serious here? I mean funny? Also I've been here over a month, and I've only seen one featured image that was voted on here. How's that work? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:26, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
7. zombiebaron. --^Dame 11:58, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
8. zombiebaron.. Awesome nomination however. MrN  Fork you! 12:08, Oct 21

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:59, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For I don't know, just vote for . I used Ms Paint and the awesome MS Office Picture Manager for this.-Almost Sir Random Crap
2. For. [b]- zhelili ??? 05:21 October 21

1. Against. While I fully support devout Christian octopi, I am steadfast in my againstness to them being featured images, particularly when such octopi are MS Painty. WHAT now??? Wednesday, 06:14, Oct 21 2009
2. Against. Because there's nothing worth voting for here. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:44, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. If you can explain to me how this is in any way funny, I'll gladly change my vote. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:58, 21 Oct
4. Against. As per Optimuschris. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:58, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
5. Against. Also per. --^Dame 10:00, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:13, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

1. Nomm'ing and 4 - I spent too long on this image and know it is a good concept. If you have any ideas on improvements, I'll do 'em on the spot. Please leave them in the comments. This image sat on the Reefer Desk for over 2 weeks. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 19:50, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:18, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
3. For. --User: VanSisean 01:11, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
4. For. per above. --Mn-z 02:12, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
5. Man, that's, like, totally a For and, like, stuff. I need chocolate... Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:05, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
6. For.[/zh] 07:46 October 7

1. Against (again). I think it's not a good concept. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 17:45, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Can't say I like it. It is extremely well done, but just doesn't make me laugh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 22:15, Oct 5
3. Against a tired, pretty bland joke. - Pootah 22:50 October 7, 2009 (UTC)

   The votes of unregistered don't count. I think. Correct me if I'm wrong. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:44, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

   They do as half a vote. Do not remove votes of your own accord next time. ~ 09:28, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

   Sorry about the half-vote. I am registered, I just forgot to sign my vote. - Pootah 22:50 October 7, 2009 (UTC)

   That all good and fine. I only wish I had known that IPs get votes earlier. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rbpolsen (talk • contribs)

4. It's a cartoon character. And it's high. Am I missing something, here? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:22, Oct 6

   Maybe. It ties into the fact that Tigger has the worst case of ADD known to cartoons. This image is an attempt to explain why. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:44, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

   He's a cartoon character on a kids' show. They all seem stoned when you're older. Slinky Dog from Toy Story is one example. Totally wasted! Also I don't think I've ever watched Winnie the Pooh. I know the characters, but I think I was always a Barney guy. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:50, Oct 8

   Dude, Winnie the Pooh is super mellow and laid back and he always has a craving for honey. Total stoner. Tigger is obviously on crack. Which is another reason this picture fails. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:33, 8 Oct

   KATNIP ≠ POT 97.124.135.187 03:26, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

5. loldrugs It show drugs therefore it funny. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 00:00, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
6. Against. Something about Phish fans and bumper stickers. -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:01, 7 Oct

   As I'm sure you know, we've been over this. I thought I already addressed that. Oh well... Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:44, October 7, 2009 (UTC)!

7. loooollllllllll u guys are facepalm fail k bye --Roman Dog Bird 15:38, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
8. against is this the 5th time or something that this has been nommed? -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 19:16, Oct 17

   2nd Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 05:11, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

9. Against. Well done, but not funny to me. I think the reasons why have been adequately covered above and below. --UU - natter 10:24, Oct 22

• While I realize it's kind of a kill to explain a joke, I felt it was necessary to point out that this joke plays into the fact that Tigger seems constantly hi, and this being an attempt to explain why. I would not for example, find this joke funny if it was Piglet taking the catnip. It is a contextual joke, but I think most of you didn't get that. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 22:35, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

  Have you considered the possibility that it's just not funny? -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:43, 7 Oct

  Yeah, quite thoroughly actually. Even though I don't discount that as a possibility, I consider that unlikely because I've received several commendations for it. The other thing is, humor is entirely subjective and personal. The way it works is, you vote for something if you like it, against if you don't, but doing so doesn't mean your opinion becomes the sole view of something, you merely represent your own personal taste through your vote. That's it. Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:36, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

• Apart from the fact that the favorite joke of people who are wasted is, "Man, I am so wasted!"--the thing that puts me off is the fine background. Is this humor or (whispers) art? Spıke ¬  01:18, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

  Kind of both. I was hoping the background would add to the atmosphere, so I intentionally made it look a bit distracting and overwhelming. I have to say I'm a bit confused by what your saying, do you mean you don't like it (the background), or you think they don't work together? Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 01:35, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Technically it's brilliant--but it does, exactly, distract and overwhelm. Spıke ¬  01:42, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:41, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

1. DEFINITELY YES. [definitely not you]??? 02:26 October 25

No against votes

• Yeah. Um. There's no way that's original. I don't have time right now to go a'googlin for proof, though. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:36, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
• It's from Uwe Boll's adaptation of Postal 2. Pootah 20:39, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Rm, not original. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:18, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

1. Zombiebaron. --Zombiebaron 02:29, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
2. -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 04:10, Oct 26

1. Against again. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:37, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
2. No. The next person to nominate this gets to see my mother naked. That's a threat. She's a big woman. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:38, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. I suggest you pay special heed to Modus's words. His disrobed mother is almost as bad as Olipro. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 17:29, Oct 26 2009
4. Zombiebaron per Modus. --Mn-z 17:32, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
5. O HAHAHAHAHAHA! Just as funny as the first time. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:46, 27 Oct

Rm, -3. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:31, October 28, 2009 (UTC)