This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Now before you say this looks like a piece of **** that some 3 year old made.Think about it.This could be used for an award for being unfunny or mean, bad puns, unfunny artilces, the userpage of an unfunny person, an UIB and much more.
Nope — Such a generic theme it isn't funny, poor execution, text/icon-based, lacking novelty, lacking love, lacking context, lacking any kind of in-humor, shall I go on? Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 03:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Illegal Alien Cat From Outer Space iz in yur place of employment, stealin' yur jobz. Oh, he's also destroying several towns, but nobody cares about that.
Nom +4 I believe this failed VFP back in 2007 with 13 for and 11 against votes. But we've renommed worse.--Mn-z 02:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
For; I believe this is a complete 180 degree reversal of my 2007 vote on this image. And that's in Celsius. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
Against. Sadly, I think that this pic is only funny in the context of the article. •••Necropaxx(T){~}03:59, Aug 23
No It's just not that funny --Sence I con't type something witty; I will comment on my lack of pants. 05:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. A 720 degree reversal of my opinions of Scottish highlands health care, and that's in fahrenheit. But then that's another story. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Yes, it's mine. I think it's funny, but without context... SirModusoperandiBoinc!
But its a giant kitten in a silly hat. --Mn-z 23:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
It is. And most of the time I spent making the pic was trying to "make" a shadow for the hat on the cat's head that looked right. Damn you, shadows! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
No I don't see how that is remotly funny.--//Sence I con't type something witty; I shall comment on my lack of pants. 04:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. ok, the image isn't horrible, and it looks like it required some skill to make, but it just isn't that funny.. --Mn-z 05:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Against; I do truely think this image's meaning is lost on me. And I read the caption. And I still have no idea why I'm looking at a potato with the letters "PC" written on it and a puzzle piece shaped piece of skin removed between the two letters. It just doesn't make sense. When I coined the phrase "potatochopin'" I had no idea it would inspire this. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 21:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Are you familiar with the specific joke? This image is a parody of the Adobe Photoshop CS4 logo (a rather uninteresting logo in my opinion) (link here). Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 01:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I got it. And I think it's quite nicely done. But I'm not voting for it as a feature. Sorry. GuyblesCUN 14:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. It's nicely done and all, it's just not funny. -OptyCSucks! CUN15:29, 26 Aug
Fixed up the issue with the sloping background, so now we have straight background, straight fence, straight people... And finally, the straight tower of Pisa Pupt 22:35, 28/08/2009
Against Votes: 4
Against. It's not funny to me. Where's the punchline? •••Necropaxx(T){~}02:06, Aug 29
Against. Couldn't you get basically the same picture by just taking it from the appropriate angle? In any case, it's not funny on it's own. -OptyCSucks! CUN20:49, 29 Aug
Comments
actually one of those people doesn't look too 'straight' to me -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!) 14:38, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
SelfNom + 4 - This went through Reefer's Desk (read: Modus) and so now I present it as an offering to the whims of the great and powerful VFP. •••Necropaxx(T){~}05:02, Sep 8
Yeah, the kilt looks weird, but I like the usage of Orange Amps. Pretty funny, but needs some more tweakin'. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 05:00, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against Per Leddy and RDB. --Dame 13:26, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against. per the kilt. --Mn-z 13:52, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
Against but I will TOTALLY vote for when these little issues get fixed, I love the idea! -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!) 17:12, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Thanks for the comments, guys. Somehow Modus forgot to mention the kilt amidst all his other nitpicking. I'll fix it soon and renom it then. •••Necropaxx(T){~}13:45, Sep 9
Hey! I told you his kilt was done wrongly in my first comment. Jerk. That's the last time I give you a lift to the airport. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:10, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
Whoops! Silly me. I must have blocked that from my memory or somesuch. •••Necropaxx(T){~}21:38, Sep 9
To nitpick, there are quite a few photomorphing artifacts in the image if you look closely (i.e. white pixels near the outline of objects, inconsistent blurring, et cetera). You might be able to hide that if the pic was smaller. --Mn-z 00:14, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
Regular K is an ordinary cereal, created and marketed by Kelog's Cereal company. It is widely known for its ordinary white box, plain wheat flakes, and gray super-ball complimentary with every purchase.
Sexcellent. Funny story, that "s" was at first a typo, but I just rolled with it. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
For --Sence I con't type something witty; I will comment on my lack of pants. 05:58, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Against; the text on the top of the box needs to be changed (although I'm not sure why it wasn't just left as "Kellogs" everywhere), and "Regular" should either be added to the box, or a picture of a sleeping cat. Those are all really just design tips though, because this joke has already been done somewhere (some stand up comedian I think) and I didn't find it funny as a picture. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 23:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
It doesnt need a "regular" because this is the original K, and the special K is an add on. And why a sleeping Cat? —The preceding unsigned comment was added byShitaku (talk • contribs)
Yeah, the misspelling was intentional. I linked to the article-in-the-making in the caption, where context will be provided. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Against. While that is funny, I don't think is appropriate for the mainpage. --Mn-z 04:58, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
While I don't think it's a problem to present that on the front page, it's not very well made and I don't see anything funny in it. ~ 06:51, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
Against. While it's well made, I don't think it's funny or presentable on the main page. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 13:28, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
For. I love these kind of pics./[/zh] 10:46 October 4
Against Votes: 7
One of your better ideas is "Even before Einstein the idea of a light bulb was there."? --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 20:23, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
Against. text based. --Mn-z 05:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
What the fucking shit Einstein had nothing to do with the development of the lightbulb --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
What the fucking shit and the image is unoriginal --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
What the fucking shit and text based --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
What the fucking shit and even if we ignore all that the idea is still not funny. --SirDJ~Irreverent 11:42, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Against. Unoriginal, unfunny, text based, and the caption doesn't work either. --UU - natter16:25, Oct 4
Against. Not feeling the funny here. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:28, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
weak abstain (what the hell does that mean?) Nice pic, but what does Einstein have to do with lightbulbs? Caption could use work. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:06, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
- I giggled so hard my pizza got all fizzy. Sj 09:06, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
against more like a gif movie than an image. --Mn-z 14:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I would question the originality of this one. The uploader's log shows no other apparent original photochops, or involvement with image requests or the reefer desk. While this wouldn't require much skill with the right software, it would be time consuming. --Mn-z 14:33, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
UNORIGINAL IDEA IS UNORIGINAL — Not to mention the fact that it isn't an especially funny caption to my mind. 97.124.147.216 05:13, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Nomming and For-Took a while to design and make but I am very happy with the end result. Think it asks a good question as well as being very funny! :) Please vote for and comment! P.S. The version you see here may not be displayed correctly. Please click the image to see the current version. --Dani 15:45, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5
Against You took a mugshot and wrote some text on it. That's not really image manipulation, so... --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 14:55, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
Against. I like the concept and think how you put this on a book is much improved over the previous version, but even at full resolution the text is unusually small for a book cover and difficult to read. There's a principle in medieval heraldry and modern advertising of what colors to use on top of which others--if you have questions feel free to post on my talk page. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 00:54, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
Against per above, text is too hard to read. --Mn-z 04:50, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
Against It's not particularly funny, it's just stating the feelings of some people out there. It'd be like me putting a picture of George Bush and putting "reaterd loll!!!11!". Where the Wild Colins Are -LET THE WILDRUMPUS START! 22:00, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
Its the idea that matters to me, forget all those fancy effects that others throw in just to make it look more impressive. However i have thought about it and i take your point....behold the new version. A simple technique, the image was warped onto a book cover in photoshop! Hope this does it for you. Any further points or ideas please say so in the comments section! Thanks guys! P.S. The version you see here may not be displayed correctly. Please click the image to see the current version. --Dani 17:24, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
I don't want to vote against, but I really feel it is premature for the VFP. It has the little hints of stuff not quite perfect that would keep it out of VFP, even if everyone loved the idea and way it was pulled off. I'll leave some comments on your talk page (again) -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)17:33, Oct 14
Against. per above, and I believe this, or a very similar image, was nommed before. --Mn-z 18:25, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
It was exactly the same picture. zombiebaron. User:Zheliel • Talk 05:12 October 20
Against.. Are we being serious here? I mean funny? Also I've been here over a month, and I've only seen one featured image that was voted on here. How's that work? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 03:26, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
Against. While I fully support devout Christian octopi, I am steadfast in my againstness to them being featured images, particularly when such octopi are MS Painty. WHAT now???Wednesday, 06:14, Oct 21 2009
Against. Because there's nothing worth voting for here. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:44, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
Against. If you can explain to me how this is in any way funny, I'll gladly change my vote. -OptyCSucks! CUN21:58, 21 Oct
Nomm'ing and 4 - I spent too long on this image and know it is a good concept. If you have any ideas on improvements, I'll do 'em on the spot. Please leave them in the comments. This image sat on the Reefer Desk for over 2 weeks. Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 19:50, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
Against (again). I think it's not a good concept. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:45, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
Against. Can't say I like it. It is extremely well done, but just doesn't make me laugh. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Monday, 22:15, Oct 5
Against a tired, pretty bland joke. - Pootah 22:50 October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Maybe. It ties into the fact that Tigger has the worst case of ADD known to cartoons. This image is an attempt to explain why. Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 01:44, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
He's a cartoon character on a kids' show. They all seem stoned when you're older. Slinky Dog from Toy Story is one example. Totally wasted! Also I don't think I've ever watched Winnie the Pooh. I know the characters, but I think I was always a Barney guy. - T.L.B.WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:50, Oct 8
Dude, Winnie the Pooh is super mellow and laid back and he always has a craving for honey. Total stoner. Tigger is obviously on crack. Which is another reason this picture fails. -OptyCSucks! CUN20:33, 8 Oct
KATNIP ≠ POT 97.124.135.187 03:26, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
loldrugs It show drugs therefore it funny. --SirDJ~Irreverent 00:00, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Against. Something about Phish fans and bumper stickers. -OptyCSucks! CUN00:01, 7 Oct
Against. Well done, but not funny to me. I think the reasons why have been adequately covered above and below. --UU - natter10:24, Oct 22
Comments
While I realize it's kind of a kill to explain a joke, I felt it was necessary to point out that this joke plays into the fact that Tigger seems constantly hi, and this being an attempt to explain why. I would not for example, find this joke funny if it was Piglet taking the catnip. It is a contextual joke, but I think most of you didn't get that. Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 22:35, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Have you considered the possibility that it's just not funny? -OptyCSucks! CUN22:43, 7 Oct
Yeah, quite thoroughly actually. Even though I don't discount that as a possibility, I consider that unlikely because I've received several commendations for it. The other thing is, humor is entirely subjective and personal. The way it works is, you vote for something if you like it, against if you don't, but doing so doesn't mean your opinion becomes the sole view of something, you merely represent your own personal taste through your vote. That's it. Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 01:36, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Apart from the fact that the favorite joke of people who are wasted is, "Man, I am so wasted!"--the thing that puts me off is the fine background. Is this humor or (whispers) art? Spıke¬ 01:18, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Kind of both. I was hoping the background would add to the atmosphere, so I intentionally made it look a bit distracting and overwhelming. I have to say I'm a bit confused by what your saying, do you mean you don't like it (the background), or you think they don't work together? Rbpolsen♦Come Rant·Come Look at all My Crap 01:35, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Technically it's brilliant--but it does, exactly, distract and overwhelm. Spıke¬ 01:42, October 8, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah. Um. There's no way that's original. I don't have time right now to go a'googlin for proof, though. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:36, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
It's from Uwe Boll's adaptation of Postal 2. Pootah 20:39, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
No. The next person to nominate this gets to see my mother naked. That's a threat. She's a big woman. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 05:38, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
Against. I suggest you pay special heed to Modus's words. His disrobed mother is almost as bad as Olipro. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Monday, 17:29, Oct 26 2009
Zombiebaron per Modus. --Mn-z 17:32, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
O HAHAHAHAHAHA! Just as funny as the first time. -OptyCSucks! CUN17:46, 27 Oct
Against. per above. --
Italy 
For. --
