If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
caught by an ant-lion.
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
For. Nice job. I was actually hesitating about my vote before the part about "black syrupy substance", though. A bit more subtlety will help! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:22, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
For. It's funny and accurate. 18.104.22.168 02:24, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
I wouldn't call it weak. The concept just presents a literal understanding of the term "Lava lamp" and then talks cleverly about it. Simple - yes, but also funny and effective. In addition, it isn't like the author is unaware of the fact that lava glows (I think so, at least). Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 19:27, December 9, 2014 (UTC)
Voter cast this vote in an evening in which his other contributions were to create a stub and nominate it for honors (both deleted). I posted a request on his talk page that he explain his vote, which has now timed out. Spıke¬ 10:00 29-Oct-14
Needs more content; would fit better in HowTo:. Spıke¬ 13:14 10-Oct-14
Against: I liked the direction it took, but seems to be lacking something... maybe a sensationalist approach? TheCan 01:34, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
Well, I meant moreso. Once I saw it begin on the evils of food, I expected the kind of thing you see trying to stir up paranoiacs: I'd say the muted, clean-cut style needs some more jagged writing. TheCan (talk) 19:58, November 11, 2014 (UTC)
I expect that if I did that I would incur the disapproval of a different editor. I'm between Scylla and Charybdis here. -–Llwy-ar-lawr•talk•contribs•22:0211 Nov2014
Good point. Well, I've re-read it and although I'm not against it, it needs a little something more, but I'm not sure what... I'll abstain for now. Maybe when I finish Wallace and Gromit I'll know what it is that itches me (and I'm not talking about my rash). TheCan (talk) 05:09, November 12, 2014 (UTC)
Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:05, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
For Votes: 5
Half-self-nom and for A debate on a very controversial topic, that has aroused recently. I worked on it with another person off-site, who, if he makes an account on Uncyclopedia, will probably be called GV. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:05, October 4, 2014 (UTC)