If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Self-nom and For. EStop calls this a "great mix of informative political ineptitude across the spectrum with a Keystone Cops style reaction." That reflects a panoramic knowledge of American cinema. Spıke01:36 21-Aug-15
For. A great mix of informative political ineptitude across the spectrum with a Keystone Cops style reaction, a bit like American cinema. --EStop (talk) 18:28, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
For. Health and Safety over-thinking has often been a source of good humour. SirScottPatVFHNotMWotMWotYUotM 10:12, August 28, 2015 (UTC)
Self-nom and For. Save from VFD, an intimate study into the many nooks and crannies of intersexuality in today's society. Spike takes 1/2 credit for ideas, expansion and assistance during the final polishing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byEStop (talk • contribs) although it's hardly a mystery.
For. No, I don't take 1/2 credit for mere copy-editing. And we're not done. Spıke13:16 20-Aug-15
For. This is actually my first HowTo article. I admit it's a little rough in places as a result, but since everybody else liked it so much I might as well vote for it too. :) Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 04:37, September 3, 2015 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
No against votes
Thank you all for the feedback, too! I'll use it to refine my future submissions further. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 04:37, September 3, 2015 (UTC)
Don't like how it begins (with serious geopolitics and attributing a single mindset to the UK); don't like how it ends (with a joke labeled a joke, and then videos to watch). In between, it has an episodic structure, but not enough episodes. Spıke19:21 13-Aug-15
Comment. I tweaked the ending. The intro seems important to preserve as it is, as it announces the concept. Anton (talk) 10:28, August 14, 2015 (UTC)
For. Well written, funny with an educational tone. Enjoyed that! --EStop (talk) 17:33, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
For. TBH, not sure if this was as good as mold or turtles, and was half-thinking I would come back to expand it some more since it seemed to me a bit short yet. But if others think it's ready then it's good enough for me. Biology really does seem to be my strong suit. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 02:12, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
...ah, that's what was missing! Forgot to mention that bees are good as clothing, too. Now it's really ready. :) Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 02:43, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
No against votes
Comment. Articles can be worked on whilst they wait for the votes to mount up (or not). RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:59, August 5, 2015 (UTC)
Self-nom and for. A great deal of effort was put into cleaning up and restructuring this article, while preserving the original article's spirit. A fun read with fancy episode tables like Wikipedia's, and an epic CGI movie synopsis tying everything together. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 16:29, June 7, 2015 (UTC)