If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
locked in the cyanide and happiness room.
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Self-Nom and For After mocking the living daylights out of the EU, I decided to have a prod at that other international organisation Her Majesty's graceful Kingdom is part of. Hope you enjoy! SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 13:06, July 16, 2014 (UTC)
An interesting piece of writing, kind of like the Magna Carta dipped in soup, dried out, and then reassembled so the gents and ladies get screwed. Which has nothing to do with this page which, from what I've read of its grid, is first rate. Aleister 18:32 16-7-`14
Against. Have to agree with Spike here. It is ranty, and later simply dull. Not a bad effort, but not great either. Dave From Mars (SPEAK!) 21:49, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
Against. Not bad but could be a lot cleverer. The first sentence reveals the concept entirely: "Microsoft Windows [...] is the collective name for a series of failures..." Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:08, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
Against. Obvious vote rigging aside, this is not very good. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 07:57, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
Against.. I agree, this could be improved. Loved the trkkie bluescreen animated GIF, though. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 16:25, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
Against. There is something dodgy going on in the "For" section of this nomination and the article is too ranty. SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 19:05, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
Comment. What? A ban for double voting? Couldn't you just strike his vote out since it was the first time happening? 22.214.171.124 19:25, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
I considered the totality of his work. Spıke¬ 01:29 2-Jun-14
Comment. Shouldn't only logged-in users vote? And, what counts as a "0.5" vote? Phrank Psinatra (talk) 09:25, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
An IP editor's vote counts as half a vote. Anonymous votes are allowed, unless they are made by a user who has already voted while logged in, but it's not simple to determine whether this is the case or not. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:46, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
For. If not for Mimo's vote, I would have abstained, because though the article is very funny, I am not sure it should be featured. However, I don't agree that an article should not be featured (or should be deleted, if it's on VFD) just because it's short. In this case, I don't think it will work as well, if it is made longer. Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 10:11, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:20, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
For Votes: 5
Self-nom and for A previously VFD article, rewritten when I had too much inspiration. I hope that excess of inspiration won't be a problem if you will be reading the article! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 11:20, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
Well written and illustrated. I like Megan Fox for her mind. Aleister 13:47 20-5-14
Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:37, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
For Votes: 5.5
For. Not having received Puppy's consent, I am nominating this article with his permission. This has been in the state of hibernation for a long time since the first nomination, but I think that now it's ready. All of the actual letters were written by Pup, I only made the responses (and some changes to the formatting). Enjoy! Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 18:37, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
Against.Tour de France was a feature. This one is close but not yet. Too many jokes seem to me to be telling the reader about a funny thing that really did happen in his life rather than making original jokes or humour about him. Keep going with it! SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 09:35, April 18, 2014 (UTC)