If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Author assured me at the time that "Screaming" was not a punch line the reader would have to guess but a popular nickname for Sutch. Nevertheless, it still hits me as an article named Botox-faced Nancy Pelosi would hit you. The article is well-written, but its humor wrestles with its dripping scorn. Needs an Intro; the current Intro belongs in a section "Early life." SpıkeѦ 15:54 6-Apr-15
The intro summarises his life. The first line is a parody of Wikipedia article first lines and the rest describes how well known he is and what he was famous for. What needs doing? SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 16:31, April 6, 2015 (UTC)
Just realized this, and realized what you are doing, which is not merely a foray into obscure British party politics. I added a couple of links to make this clearer. SpıkeѦ 12:26 7-Apr-15
I confess: I don't know what the title refers to, nor what the "historical document" referred to in the Intro is, if not the article itself. It is a fun read about old coots longing for the Good Old Days, but the above questions make me wonder whether it is yet another punch line waiting to be searched for. I'd prefer a real-world cover and not just a title with alliteration. SpıkeѦ 23:41 18-Apr-15
Not all the way there yet. Started life with over-emphasis on Wacky Treaties, bickering scholars, and nonsense numbers. I'd like to see satire themes in addition to the move of magazines to the Internet, such as the conflict between delivering the truth and delivering what the page-flipper wants to see, magazines as a fashion item for the reader, or Boy Scouts hawking subscriptions to useless magazines as a fundraiser. Repeated reliance on Viz as an automatic joke will be lost on Americans. SpıkeѦ 12:59 31-Mar-15
I think Wikipedia has a really funny opening: "Charles Hollis "Chuck" Taylor (June 24, 1901 – June 23, 1969) was an American basketball player and shoe salesman/evangelist." DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:52, April 6, 2015 (UTC)
I had to look up what sneaker meant. I gathered it had to do with shoes. I guess over here we'd say "trainers". SirScottPat (converse) VFHUnSNotMWotMWotY 07:09, April 6, 2015 (UTC)
Nom & For. The latest by EStop, a Roadrunner-like series of pub-crawls in space. Gallows humor and custom illustrations. SpıkeѦ 12:55 9-Mar-15
For.. Must vote for my first full article (with Spike's assistance). Great fun to write and hope well received. Feeling more comfortable commenting on other work, now I understand the challenge. EStop (talk) 19:57, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
For. "If he simply chose not to vote for Barack Obama as he is completely untrustworthy like so many others of his type, that wouldn't be a racist decision." very clever |(get dtf) 12:03, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
It has a funny concept, following I have a dream with the response, "Have you sought help?" But articles "in the style of the thing they are about" have one funny concept as well. This is good writing, but descent into insanity does not make for a funny read, and the portion that would appear on our main page unfolds especially slowly. I don't get the monkeys, nor the purported explanation at the end, unless it is to say that reality is insane and the crazy man is the only accurate observer. Now my head hurts as well. SpıkeѦ 22:05 22-Feb-15
Despite not having got it, you explained it better than I could! "Reality is insane and the crazy man is the only accurate observer" - that's quite it. The interpretations are not very clear, but that's deliberate: in my vision, the man, who always relied on logic, becomes crazy being unable to comprehend racial discrimination. The monkeys are an incarnation of the racial prejudice, but also the only "logical" way out of this mess for the main character: if we don't treat them like humans, than they can't be humans, can they? Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:12, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
Hence, by the way, the name of the article. The main character's insane dream and Dr. King's famous one actually coincide (which becomes more obvious towards the end). Anton(talk) Uncyclopedia United 16:15, February 23, 2015 (UTC)