If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
Any and all violators of policy will be
crushed by Tetrominoes.
Self-nomination regulation: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) no longer require a pee review. Pee Review is still highly recommended for newer users. Do not clog up VFH with poor quality self-nominated articles... or else.
VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
For. Well written, funny with an educational tone. Enjoyed that! --EStop (talk) 17:33, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
For. TBH, not sure if this was as good as mold or turtles, and was half-thinking I would come back to expand it some more since it seemed to me a bit short yet. But if others think it's ready then it's good enough for me. Biology really does seem to be my strong suit. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 02:12, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
...ah, that's what was missing! Forgot to mention that bees are good as clothing, too. Now it's really ready. :) Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 02:43, July 25, 2015 (UTC)
Self-nom and For. Plucked from "articles to fix", describing colloquialisms as a cutlery based religion. Too good an opportunity for having fun with language to waste. EStop (talk) 15:14, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
For. Has authoritative (and fun) encyclopedic commentary rather than being just another "page in the style of the thing it's about." Spıke15:18 7-Jul-15
Self-nom and for. A great deal of effort was put into cleaning up and restructuring this article, while preserving the original article's spirit. A fun read with fancy episode tables like Wikipedia's, and an epic CGI movie synopsis tying everything together. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 16:29, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
For. A thorough study of alternatives to the obsolete election rule that the winner wins. Still America-centric, as the contest judges complained, but sprinkled with anecdotes of how things work in other countries, such as Louisiana; and now with a final section on party-list voting. SpıkeѦ 11:45 26-May-15
For. Finally got around to this in a fit of IRL procrastination. This is quite the work of art, lampooning everything that is wrong with elections in general. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 00:06, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
Against. Author's crusade against "Wikia's prudery policy" (our webhost's refusal to host soft porn on author's other websites) at the Village Dump recurs here twice before the beginning of Section 1. Let's not flog these grievances on our main page. SpıkeѦ 11:02 7-Jun-15
OK. The only reason I am against that is that the average reader would not know about the controversy surrounding our prudence policy. If Miley were to change it to a quip about the NSA then the joke would work as the reader would know about it. SirScottPatVFHNotMWotMWotYUotM 12:43, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
"The average reader," in my opinion, is the target of our main-page features. I concur with the proposed edit and would strike my vote, but you will have to make it, as author resigned when I rebuffed (no, I mean huffed) the latest broadcast in her struggle against Wikia. SpıkeѦ 13:04 8-Jun-15
Somebody forgot to add VFH to the top of the article. :) Also could someone add a space between VFH and the Noble Gases table of the elements? DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:31, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
For. I feel it could do a bit better if it had a lot less anal ruptures 184.108.40.206 07:23, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
Against. I'm not familiar with the subject matter, and felt that this might have been too niche for my taste. The use of strikeout is a little heavy too. It's not terrible, but I can't see this being featured. Chunkles☎ talk✏️ contribs 20:59, July 12, 2015 (UTC)