# Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

• Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
• Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
• When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
• Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
• When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
• Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
• Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
• If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION. If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.
Violators of this policy will be bombed.

# Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must spend at least one week on pee review before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

## UnNews:Stupid kid drowns in pond

Score: +10 children dead in ridiculously small amounts of water
• Nom & For. Hah. Hahahah. This is one of the funniest UnNews articles I've ever seen. love, gustav talk at menope 23:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I might as well vote for my own stuff. Since when am I nominated for anything? I am going to seize the day, I say. --Danny Himself 23:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Monstrously cruel and distasteful, this has all the features we look for in our featured articles.-- 23:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. --So So 23:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Very Strong For Hilarious in an evil and sadistic sort of way. -- 23:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against UnNews stuff is NOT featured article content. Jedibob5 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Anybody who votes down something based on length is a LOSER. Just to preempt anybody who might. Also, this vote initially conflicted with the above vote, so also anybody who votes down something just because it is UnNews is a RETARD. -- 23:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
It's also against the rules. So that vote doesn't count.. For --—Braydie 00:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Braydie's right, please read the final two bullets at the top of the page. —rc (t) 00:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Very Strong For What STM said. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. So that's what a short UnNews story looks like. Most of mine go on for ever. This one's funny, too.-- 01:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:Gay Marriage Responsible for Global Warming

Score: +4 degrees of added hotness
• Nom & For. This is an old QFH that I think needs another chance.-- 14:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong, strong for. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 20:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

*Strong Against See my post above. Jedibob5 23:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• For In case you didn't read the last two bullets at the top of the page, you will see that UnNews, etc. pages are eligible for VFH as well. -- 00:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, meh.-- 01:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. --goshzillacorrespondence 02:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Score: +5

## UnBooks:Pulp Novel, the case of the dashing dame

Score: +13 private eyes who think this comedic reductio ad absurdum on the genre of crime-soaked, cheesy metaphor-drenched pulp fiction is easy on the eyes. Easy on the eyes like that bombshell blonde in the red dress who walked in like she owned the place. You could hear the silence as every head in the bar turned, just for a chance to watch her walk by and smell her perfume. She smelled like heartache and roses. Roses got thorns, see? And this gal had thorns in spades.
• SN+F This is a nom, a self-nom, see? That's how we do it in the big, cruel city. We nom at night. Night is dark, and black like her heart. A dark night sky watched over by the sad, dark eye of the moon, staring. Staring down at a city crisscrossed with crummy streets full of dirty secrets that drain away into the filthy gutters of men's souls. Which also have secrets. A sad moon because it knows your dark secret. Secret like you not telling your girl that you cry yourself to sleep sometimes. How do I know that? 'Cause I'm a detective, see? A private dick, a gumshoe. No time for niceties; when there's a gun to my head, I roll the dice, put all my cards on the table and shoot from the hip until the fat lady sings. I know you like I know this city, and I know this city like the back of my hand. Sure, a map would work better. Maybe then I'd stop driving into the river. But that's not how we do it in the private eye game. We don't have time for maps. Too busy solving crime. (donations, expired medicine, letters of support and votes can be sent to Modusoperandi c.o. Bellevue Hospital for the Criminally Longwinded) 15:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR, already! - Jesus Horatio Christ, anything to shut you up! :) User:Tooltroll/sig 15:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Absolutely hilarious. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 18:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, eh? --Sir Zombiebaron 18:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• The vote's for, see? A vote like the ones that got the crooked mayor back into office. --Alksub 22:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, and could you please make a noir-style film of this using the YouTube feature? Thanks.  ;)-- 00:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment I did, but they deleted it because you can see my bum.-- 05:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For, and agree with Brad. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 01:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- Lacey clicky 06:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Nearly every UnBook is good, and this is no exeption.--Imp88 12:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! Never before have I actually used the little attention span that I have to pay attention to something for so long. I actually read the entire th- A rotary phone!? Neat! --The Cyber Mage 02:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## New Cooler Edition

Score: +8 Vampyre Hunting Jews
• Nom and For. I believe this can get even better than it is now, but it's awesome enough for feature right now.-- 15:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 15:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I agree with Brad. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR How much cooler can you get? I need this translation! -Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 21:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Jesus wept with laughter when he read this! Rad 02:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Cause I helped write it, with hopefully more to come --Jobot37 05:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, of course. -- Lacey clicky 06:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## Tae Pwn Do

Score: -1 muggers kicked in the ballsack
• Nom & For- one of the best articles I think I've ever read -- The Llama Llover!!! 23:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against anything with the words "Tai" or "Do" in it. — 01:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment- you shouldn't generalize with articles, you know... it's in the rules. Why don't you read the aricle first? --The Llama Llover!!! 01:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For; So So is still my favorite writer, hands down, of all time. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment:So So is what all the kids are into these days! (But seriously, much appreciated) --So So 08:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not enough words.. too many pictures. Lacey clicky 06:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Fart without anyone knowing it

Score: +8 silent killers
• Nom & For, ^_^ 22:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - My pretty-funny article :P. It's 22:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - the sake of shred :) The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.138.146.217 (talk • contribs)
• Weak against. --L 03:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For And it's true. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Haha, i like the grannies, do you know what Jenna Jameson farts out? User:AmericanBastard/sig 06:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. :] -- Lacey clicky 06:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice artwork -- di Mario 09:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Taught me how to fart properly Ethereal 11:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Fart. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Cheat At Scrabble

Score: +13 with the triple letter score
• Self nom - Well here's another HowTo, seeing how well it does. Oh, and it spent 1 week on Pee Review. --—Braydie 07:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
and For --—Braydie 01:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For I've said it before - This is a great article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 17:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For A very funny article, with some pictures and words to boot! --Sir Zombiebaron 18:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 21:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, although I can't comment until the end of the trial.-- 08:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Yayayayaya. love, gustav talk at menope 04:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. :] -- Lacey clicky 06:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - One of the good HowTos. It's 07:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• F-o-r with the F on a triple-value square...lemme see...29 points! Yaay! I win! This howto really works! -- di Mario 09:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Hindleyite Converse 12:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• F-O-R I was palming those letters. -- 00:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Annual One-Day-Only Winter Holidays Earlybird 5:00 AM 99% Off Sale

Score: +9 rushed parents looking desperately for a Wii the day before Christmas
• Self Nom and For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm already waiting in line for the sale. Can somebody bring me pizza and a blanket? -- 05:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Had lots of meat, I like. Lacey clicky 06:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bah, a million alone for North America and I still can't find one. Probably because I didn't camp out,--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Santa compelles me to buy it. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 11:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - Will try this on the 24th. If it's not working... grrr... - It's 04:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. --goshzillacorrespondence 01:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Godless consumerism. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Vote whore. -- Codestream 02:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## Hubert Horatio Humphrey

Score: 0 Delegates Sent through tables
• Writer,Nom&For Added a little more depth into his wrestling career including a year long stint with a stable called Degenration-W.--Lt. Wyoming 23:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Next time try to properly format your VFH section. -- Lacey clicky 00:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Agh.. Dunno. It doesn't really come off as anything special to me. -- Lacey clicky 00:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For This is funny shit to me.--Gaberou 01:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:Katie Holmes confirmed as Secretary of Defense

Score: +5 body thetans
• Nominate, For One of the best, funniest and most panchromatic UnNews articles to rear it's ugly typeface in a while. A noob wrote it too, which scares the Hell out of me. Is UnCyclopedia a magnet for EVIL? Get saved! 20:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Scary - David Gerard 00:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Next step: Katie President! --Zig 13:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Can anybody float me forty grand so I can get rid of these thetans?-- 17:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. [Insert obscure Russian political joke here] - User:Guest/sig 17:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Surprisingly good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## Holocaust Tycoon

Score: +10 million successful exterminations
• Nominate, Very Strong For; Why hasn't this been nominated yet? You guys are slipping. Nonymous 06:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Alksub 06:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For in all its, uh, glory - David Gerard 08:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I thought it was a featured article. Prolix 09:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Here's why you thought it was: Babel:Hi. They used to do these things called "reskins", you see. Jedravent 21:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against this kind of humor on the frontpage.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 10:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh, that Mhaille! Where will his appaullingly racist racism take us next? We all know where it's taking him though! --Anyone 17:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Genius. Blue Fang should definitely buy this copywright. --FoxyBabe 19:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh-My-Fucking-YHVH, this is what I call devious. \m/ herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 19:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR Incredibly wrong depraved you-don't-want-to-laugh-but-you-can't-physically-stop-yourself humour that just has to go on the front page. Though where the Iranian nutcase claiming it never got released? --Billsheppard 19:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Dead Souls. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I understand that it's satirizing white supremacist video games, but I'm deepy uncomfortable with referring to Holocaust victims as game pieces, even as satire. I suspect featuring the article will cause more trouble than it's worth.--Procopius 01:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It lacks that special something that makes an equally discomfort inducing satire like Jingo, well, brilliant.-- 01:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Good concept, but didn't make me laugh much and made me feel yucky when i did. Phal112 08:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's mentionable as wonderful. ♥. How I love those tycoon games :] I'm a sick fuck. I like to make them have sex and eat the dog. -- Lacey clicky 09:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. It's hilarious at the beginning but starts losing its momentum at the Units section... --Zig 13:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.....kudos to Brad for the original idea. -- Tits McGee 13:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment. In my defense, it was part of a comment on how tasteless an article for VFH was, "This is the most tasteless idea since Holocaust Tycoon (video game)." It was Mhaille's dedication and hard work that brought this beauty to life.-- 19:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For cause Mhaille is one funny goy. --Sir Zombiebaron 13:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• God help me, but this is definitely a for. --UtarEmpire 05:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It shuoldn't be funny, but it is. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 10:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. While it is well written, there are limits to satire. Even in Uncync. -- 13:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against-It's well done mind you, but I don't find it very entertaining when I feel terrible after laughing at something.--Ganall 23:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## Prog Rock

Score: +13 hour keyboard solo
• Nom and Strong For; Hilarious. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Although, I think it should also contain a section on prog metal as well. -- 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. The tabulature alone is a joy. Lemon. 01:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For my favourite music genre. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only for the tabbing. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. The musical notation made me laugh out loud.--Procopius 00:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Pro. herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 01:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I think it gets a little sketchy in the middle. Alksub 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 08:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 19:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - Prog rules! The article makes me laugh for 28 minutes non-stop while listening to Close to the Edge. It's 11:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. -- eh.. :/ Lacey clicky 11:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For....long winded and whithering. -- Tits McGee 13:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For it is so realistic --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 21:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

## UnBooks:The O. Henry Collection

Score: +7 ironic Christmas presents received
• More or less a Self Nom and For I wrote the most of the hobo segment, e|m|c did the majority. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• 100% For - I love it. Whoever wrote this should receive a Nobel Peace Prize. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Mildly weak 4. --L 14:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 01:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for, OMG, it's taken multiple sittings to read through it all. It's good, don't get me wrong, but it would be better as a series, rather than one ginormous page.-- 07:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, though I agree with Mod's assessment. Still, good stuff.--Procopius 00:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I couldn't stop reading it. Jedravent 02:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## 001

Score: +016
• Renom & For. An outstanding article that never should have been taken down in the first place.-- 14:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• ReFor Madness!--Procopius 14:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against.InfiniteMonkey 20:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, although I forgot whatever it was I said as a comment for this last time. I'm sure it was both witty and inappropriate.-- 21:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Not bad, but I think it's too manic and unfocused for a feature. Lemon. 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For! 001 and I went to the same elementary school. She's Dutch too, whaddayouknow. -- di Mario 21:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• 004. --L 05:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Could have sworn I already voted for this.--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For yet again.--Nydas 10:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Winston 11:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against. herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 17:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, I did! I know I did! --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- The Llama Llover!!! 19:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --Alksub 06:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I feel bad that it became +010 with my vote :(.. I miss +009. -- Lacey clicky 00:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Does this mean we can't make any more jokes about Daniel Craig?lol--Gaberou 02:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For because small rodents with unusual abilities are always funny (until the eleventh or so time). -- 15:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I love jokes relating to rodents! -- 11:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Yup, a very clever piece of proes. --Sir Zombiebaron 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For I actually was in a Bond movie once as an extra. I did the town drunk in "Diamonds are Forever". They cut my scene from the final release though. Can't remember why... -- di Mario 09:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For because rodents are always funny, except that Mickey Mouse.--Ganall 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Free World

Score: +11
• Renom and for, because this article rules. And, it still has the thing about the cars that I came up with. :) -- Hindleyite Converse 13:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For This is close to the best article currently listed on VFH. Feature it! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4. Feature it! --L 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now, this is more like it.--Winston 12:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I could of swore I voted for these articles before... --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. The money section is brilliant.--Procopius 00:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, though 001 is better. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• \$For --Alksub 06:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've voted for this before, haven't I? --goshzillacorrespondence 00:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. --So So 00:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

## Enid Blyton

Score: The Naughty Nine
• N & F. I can still remember reading with baited breath when Julian first showed Dick the secret passage. A beautiful moment from my childhood. -- 20:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It reminds me of my childhood. My terrible, terrible childhood.-- 07:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For because I wrote it. Thanks for the nomination.--Nydas 13:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Rather! 15Mickey20 21:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• For--Winston 12:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For greater Anglo-American understanding. I enjoyed this despite having almost no knowledge of the subject.--Procopius 00:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I loved these things when I was six. Oh Ghod. - David Gerard 08:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

## New Hampshire Merchant Cat

Score: +11 racist litter boxes
• Self-nom and For. I've liked this for a long time, and no one on Pee Review seemed to hate it, so, um, there's a peek into my subconscious.--Procopius 16:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 16:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 17:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For So randomly funny --Gaberou 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For cat satire. -- 05:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For pretty kitty cats! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 01:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. I read this back when it was first written and thought it was highly excellent. --Anyone 18:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Just to see it on the front page. --goshzillacorrespondence 00:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Seems to be a trend for me to end up being the 10th.. ♥ for this article. -- Lacey clicky 00:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• foR It's quite good, and consistent--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

## The Critique of Pure Reason

Score: +9 ontological proofs of the article's excellence
• Nominating and for. Let's prove that we are not just a bunch of jesters, but a bunch of damn smart jesters. herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 19:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Four and second. I contributed a very small part, which I personally think is the most brilliant piece of controversy mankind has ever seen since the invention of Divorce by King Henry VIII. -- di Mario 19:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I really enjoy voting for myself. Really. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Wait -- does the VFH page exist or has my mind projected its experience onto it?--Procopius 13:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• 4 1337! But seriously, on a cerebral plain I think I contributed some Deep Thought to this article. -- di Mario 17:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For "If man cannot vote thrice, then man cannot vote at all" - Ludwig von Wittgenstein. -- di Mario 17:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Indeed. --Anyone 18:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For- Thusly, Fuck Fuck Fuck--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -It's bloddy brilliant -- Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH04:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

## U.S. Presidential Election, 1948

Score: +9 pathetic re-election campaigns
• Self-nomination, and affrimative vote. Yep, I did another one. Let it sit in Pee Review for a week, too. --Kwakerjak 18:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, which I hope isn't the kiss of death...I found it funny--Shandon 22:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. USS Dewey Kicks Ass. And also obscure links. These are what make an article great. --Anyone 21:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Wait, didn't I already vote for this one? I could've SWORN I did...-- 23:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I never realised just hoe hilarious American elections are. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've been watching this one for awhile.--Procopius 13:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For; just as good as all the other U.S. Presidential Election, 19XX/200X articles, if not better. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against more U.S. election coverage.--Winston 12:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For more US election coverage. Johnleemk 10:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Its nice, and I get some of the jokes even though I'm Canadain. --Sir Zombiebaron 13:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amerikkkan elections! --goshzillacorrespondence 14:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

# Previously Featured

## The Vagina Monologues

Score: +16 genitalia that won't shut the hell up

Featuredrc (t) 07:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For because puns rock. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Literalism strikes again. Fucking unions. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --monika 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For The later half redeems. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Heh. I felt like I needed to build some foundation before the payload delivery, but I'm sure the intro could be tightened up. :) ~ 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I put a lot of thought into this, but welcome any additions or edits to make it better. ~ 16:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, obviously. -- 14:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Foreplay -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For...Todd's got culture, all of the sudden...--Shandon 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• For...lots of culture...--Kevin Bell 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. This is great stuff. It's got Vaginae. It's got Monologs. What's not to love? --Anyone 20:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. OMGWTFROTFLMAOZEDONG11!! Mr T is on a roll!! first Idiot's Guide and now this? (though this one's of a much better quality & also, it's clear that he's NEVER getting laid, ever, and he knows) -- mowgli 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~ Yes. Sad, but true. I even complained about it in one of my recent newscasts. Sadly. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just not getting it. Sorry. --goshzillacorrespondence 10:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• You must be horribly retarded or possibly you've never even heard of it. Tragic.. Lacey clicky 00:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Winston 12:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Let's see -- tonight I've voted for Penis joke and The Vagina Monologues. That about covers the options.--Procopius 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Ahh, I wish my vagina could talk. Lucky bitches. -- Lacey clicky

## Henchmen

Score: +17 thugs

Featuredrc (t) 07:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For; This article's gotten strong reviews at Pee Review, and I loved it, so I decided I'd finally nom it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For - winnah! - David Gerard 01:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for - basically solid concept with good jokes, but the graphics don't add much, and it could be cut down and tightened up considerably. InfiniteMonkey 03:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Excellent.-- 08:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 17:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. 15Mickey20 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. We need more of this type of article. Just good solid writing, no gimmicks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. I've always been a minion, myself.-- 08:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Keep the chain going. --goshzilladisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• For, ^_^ 21:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I liked it better before all the changes by the IP, but at the same time I couldn't write my way out of a urine-soaked paper bag (and I've tried too!) --Anyone 19:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good article in need of savage editing to make it shorter and tighter.--Winston 13:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now we know about their sorry lives. Swordmaster 21:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 00:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - Dependable and expendable--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - How true and utterly timeless.--Gaberou 05:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

## Dear John letter

Score: +18 versions enjoyed

Featuredrc (t) 07:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For. Ninety seven hilarious articles for the price of one. Highly original. Technically accomplished. Fun to edit. Kind to children. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Wasn't sure, but the second last paragraph sold me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For a new humourous letter with every pageload. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For- I make it $9.35251 {{\times 10^{{19}}}}$ articles for the price of one. --Sir Jam 11:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• 4 - Oh, that is fuckin' clever!User:Tooltroll/sig 11:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --Zyrac 20:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against too close to reality for my taste. Been getting letters like that for the past 18 years. I co-operated with authorities, and still...No -- di Mario 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Wow, for. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --goshzillacorrespondence 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against' -- Oh, ye Gads!!! Anyway, it's too short for an article, too long for a dear john letter. At least to me. Feureau 04:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Clarification ~ Actually, it's as long as several of its competitors combined: 15:04, 12 November 2006 ‎Dear John letter (hist) ‎[16,775 bytes] ‎Todd Lyons ~ but the content is random. It's meant to be re-loaded and re-read several dozen (97?) times.  :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. This article screams at that heartless bitch to be on the front page.--Procopius 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For --—Braydie 13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For Brilliant idea brilliantly executed. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:43, 1 December 2006
• Five it's like a For but one integer more emphatic.Nullius in Verba 19:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
• For; I think that this is a fine letter. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• For--Winston 12:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
• For, but only because it occasionally mentions "restraining order". Ahhh, good times.-- 07:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I like random, but it can be sometimes too random. Still good though. --Anyone 18:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! Very good, but by the time you read this ill be looking at the next article.The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drewcoll (talk • contribs) - dif
• Weak For Okay, I love the idea.. but I dislike how this would work on the front page. But I'll leave it up to the admins to figure that out :] Though I am still a little meh about it. -- Lacey clicky 00:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For a classic article Phal112 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• For unrequented love. -- Tits McGee 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Floor Mr. Bob approves.--Mr. Bob 16:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

# Archives

 Awards, Decorations and Honours Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars Ranks &Honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · Hall of Shame Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions