Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
  • Sign below an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be ignored, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
    • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be SHOT.

Survivors will be given a DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.
Then we shoot them again.


Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

Allah: The Annotated Version

Score: +1
  • Nominate and For I really liked this one! MwM 09:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, it was nominated recently and failed Modusoperandi 15:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. How did I miss that last vote? --Jordanus 15:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Still. ~ T. (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Zakk Wylde

Score: +3
  • NOM and FOR I haven't laughed quite so hard in a fortnight! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --OsirisX 09:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Me likey. Dumitru 15:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Sandy City, Utah

Score: +2
  • Nom + For. Self-nom. Skewers suburbs and Utah 'culture'. Almost too easy. Zaui 19:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • conditional for great premise and some funny images to back it up but needs something more - what? i don't know :( -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


Life (video game)

Score: +3
  • Nom and for --Cioclod 15:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This could be tweaked a little, but it's easy to see the work that's gone into it. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • half for comment keep with it and you will get my full for cuz it's a great idea so far! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes! - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hell yah! For I wrote it and it is my little baby. Dumitru 15:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

15th century

Score: -1
  • Ye Olde Nomination and a big For - because it's the funniest thing that could happen to me while referencing to 50 Cent. And because I have to wait one week for a self-nom. And because I like to see my name on pages and shit. Lookie: Dumitru 04:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It just doesn't work. Nice idea, but...just doesn't work. *shrug* Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a verb.Icons-flag-gb
  • eh, no sorry, just didn't strike me as funny :( -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Cap'n Crunch

Score: -2

Ernest Hemingway's Cookery Corner

Score: +6
  • Self nom. Just to see. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This article made me chuckle. Considering how rarely I actually open my mouth upon finding something funny, consider it an achievement. --Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a verb.Icons-flag-gb 09:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This amused me, and, since I've never read Hemingway and therefore am sure I didn't get a lot of the jokes, that makes this a winner for me.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 05:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Squeeze some ketchup out in a line. Roll up the bread nice and tight. That’s it. Man creates food." Go go gadget literary humor! —rc (t) 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For You can't argue with this. Feel the quality in that cloth. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG FOR -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another quality product from the pen of Hardwick. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 15:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Trojan War

Score: +3.5
  • Nomination... An excellent article, very humorous, and plenty of pictures to make the reader continue reading. Contains no factual information whatsoever, besides the fact that Hector dies. And, yes, a self-nomination.
  • For. Very funny article. Love it. Llama Llover
  • For Llama? are you the same guy who nom'ed it? Good show. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 09:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For can we have this one laminated? --HPSigHP talk 13:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Could have been more polished... - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Favours randomness over wit FreeMorpheme 19:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - for the same reason, too random. The basics of the Iliad are in place but it needs to be sharper. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Why not? Efitu (TW@) 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC) The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.150.7.40 (talk • contribs) May 23 2006
Vote by IP. --Splaka
  • For. This actually amused me.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Rataube 20:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - MwM 16:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Finland

Score: -1
  • Nomination and for. I cracked up most of the article, and I think this article needs some honoring. The Insane Velair Wight 05:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Das Boot 06:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment dude, this article is a little too long to be read. Just saying. --The Stig | Abt me Rant 12:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I've seen other countries done better --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The sad truth is that people only care about their own countries. Don't get too worked up about it; writing about the humourous foibles of our own humble nations is a fairly benign form of national vanity. Modusoperandi 14:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Tesco Value Ferrari

Score: +2
Comment. It doesn't exist, but yes, that's supposed to be the general gist of it. :-) --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 16:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Note: The article has now been adjusted to take a slightly different angle. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 19:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

White Slave Movement

Score: +8
  • Self Nom and for I really like this idea. Perhaps it could be expanded. Stephensface 02:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Great Concept Das Boot 06:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Concur and For an excellent piece of work. --epynephrin 14:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This amused me, I must confess.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Gotta keep those honkeys in their place! --Captain Finding Nemo 03:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. What he said.^^^ --The Stig | Abt me Rant 13:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Oh, yeah...Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Patriotism

Score: +7
  • Nom + For-Great collaboration on this rewrite--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ T. (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Haha I have a few of those awards. Severian 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Everybody loves Patriotism. Well, everyone but the Commies.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For King and Country! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment And here I didn't even know you people HAD a King...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Vague for --L 07:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For you gotta love those flags! --Plyr3005 00:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Decapitation Disease

Score: +7

Self-nom and for. --Emmzee 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

  • For. Fine, have your funny article featured. SEE IF I CARE!!!!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Aye, tis the awesome...-ness. Demonbob 22:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Future Rula 17:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For People have told me that's what they thought "Caputosis" meant. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon21:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For About time a good article showed up on VFH. Excellent. --ENeGMA 22:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • ick For --HPSigHP talk 13:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Obesity Fines

Score: +7
  • Self Nomination and For - Pointless Background Info you're probably not interested in: I got the idea for this article when I got pulled over by a morbidly obese cop for doing 122.9km/h. I got a $170 fine and 37 demerit points.....fags Enjoy. Das Boot 04:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this is something we desperatly need in our ever increasing fat society. --OsirisX 08:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For--- Jaques Pirat IS NOT FRENCH! TP, F@H 11:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For but I also took the liberty of adding a section on George W. Bush's Obesity Tax program. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. This article is too long, but I can't argue with the funny. It's got "it".--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Meh. I laughed at the picture at the top, though. --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~14:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Special:Log/delete

Score: +8
  • N+F: seeing that Main Page isn't going to make it... I think it's a hilarious example of comic relief, and I had much rejoincing when reading deletion... er, huffing summaries. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --OsirisX 08:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete!; the whole thing contains nothing but bad memories. --DW III CUNOUN 10:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I WILL go for this one, as the deletion log summaries are often some of the best quality work at the site. :p--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, your self-deprecating edit summaries when you have difficulty typing an error-free message (like to RC, re: the new Yahoo! design) are quite amusing as well. :) ~ T. (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Glad to contribute ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, just because I'm an ass right now. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, but Special:Log/block is funnier. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. I think list articles are a bit dry. --L 07:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, funny stuff. - Surreal Hamster 03:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Relevance to the government bludging even more money out of the average Kiwi User:Guru 21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC) (actually posted by 222.152.81.215)
    • Comment:- I think you voted for the wrong article - see above. Das Boot 04:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'd prefer the mainpage or VFH, but I'm glad that one of these gimmicks can be on the front page at least once, specially after so many failed nominations.--Rataube 16:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This page has new deletion log summaries every day. --Sbluen 17:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I'd prefer to see real articles get featured. 219.89.25.56 05:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. One of the most frequently updated articles - hours of amusement can be had with this. Spang talk 08:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - - Real Articles Please!! Das Boot 04:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Change a lightbulb

Score: +11
  • Awesome - I know that I'm only supposed to nominate one article but this one is hella funny, too. --Sparky2002b 01:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the general populous was in need of an article like this. --OsirisX 08:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Doubleplusfor, made me laugh so hard I cried.--Emmzee 14:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Beautiful. Another winner.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Anarchy on a bun. Swordmaster 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh Hell YES! ---Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Dunno what I could have done without it! Demonbob 00:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! A quality article! --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~14:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For I was amused. --epynephrin 18:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because it's absolutely wonderful! Cheer BearC cheer*huggles* 21:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Funny. --ENeGMA 23:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, yes, yes, yes! --HPSigHP talk 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Get Banned

Score: +4
  • For- Every newbie should read this. --Sparky2002b 01:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Some suggestions cannot be done because the pages are protected. --Sbluen 03:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For ~ But only because it's mine, not because it should be featured. Every newbie should read it, though.  :) ~ T. (talk) 05:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I nommed this the first time, and it's only gotten better since then.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Also for. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Just say NO to inside jokes. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon21:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~ Fair enough, but please vote against all of the self-reference articles here, and don't single this one out. Or, you may be banned.  :) (Kidding). ~ T. (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For I thought it was fairly funny-Sgore 20:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For I almost got banned last night ;-) -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 12:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I am still against.--Rataube 20:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Handgun

Score: +8
  • Nominate and For. A fine article. FreeMorpheme 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was, however, the author. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against as puns are the lowest form of humour Modusoperandi 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
so's your face - jack
I think that I've just been zinged. Colour me...apathetic... Modusoperandi 22:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. FEATURE! - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 20:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For its so basic, why hasn't it been done before? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For!. Spang talk 22:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I knew what the joke was going to be before I even opened the article. 'Hand Grenade' was funnier and done first. --ENeGMA 20:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good article Das Boot 05:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Just isn't hitting me with the "funnae".--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good stuff.--Emmzee 22:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For i think the single barrel variety is more common... Stephensface 02:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nifty. Reminds me of Air Guitar. --L 07:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Highly original, I like it! --Olipro Icons-flag-gb Anchor (Harass) 12:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ I like the single-action models myself. The moving thumb really lets people know that I've blown their head off for their stupid driving. ~ T. (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Banana Skin Joke

Score: +17
  • Nomination and For. A universally humorous gag. --Hindleyite Lowrate Talk 11:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Long, but well done (and well-researched).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --L 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because the apple skin joke just isn't as funny. --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Flabius-Danner 17:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I need to vote for something and this article made me laugh.--Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a verb.Icons-flag-gb 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. I like it, but I feel it needs a little finessing. FreeMorpheme 20:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Of course! As such, I laughed, I rewarded...--HPSigHP talk 00:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Indifferent eh.... Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Really really very very good. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 20:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - One of the classic scandals of all time. Great Setup. >> Sp1r1tofRad1o 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I wrote it so I promote it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hehe, bananas are always funny! For! Cheer BearC cheer*huggles* 21:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Old joke. Not funny anymore. But how is this article so hillarious? Stephensface 20:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - good stuff. --Nydas 09:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. (cues the small group of woodland creatures) ~ T. (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against funny, but not funny -- TKF 23:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. funny --Mushroom 11:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Rataube 21:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Main Page

Score: +5
  • Nomination and For, because it is a true work of art, that deserves to be seen on the main page. --ZB 04:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Marvelous. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is even better than the Featured Articles article.--Sbluen 05:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Always the nominee yet eternally doomed to second place, thus is the tragedy of the main page --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Fo- wait a second... You didn't put the {{VFH}} tag on the page! --L 09:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. This joke was hilarous when I first got here last summer. This joke is probably over a year old.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 11:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Ultra-Strong-For - I actually nommed this about a month ago. Hopefully things will turn out differently this time. --User:Nintendorulez 15:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Too obvious. Let's at least try to make self-reference witty. --ENeGMA 18:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against as always. —rc (t) 20:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against and I'll be against the next time you nom it, just like I was last time. And the time before that. --KATIE!! 16:00, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against because it will destroy the fabric of space-time if this is featured. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 13:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against because it has been the 'featured article' since the dawn of Uncyc. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 13:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Change to For. Right, I can see how this might work now, and I agree with Spang. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 10:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against technically it's not an article, but a page. --Severian 15:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Technically, it's an article because it's in the main namespace. And technically, UnNews pages aren't articles, but they get featured occasionally. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Well I'll vote For for this, because I voted for Yahoo!, and this is the same bloody thing.It just consumed the main page. --Severian 15:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm always For a good ol' paradox. --TKF 16:25, 15 May (UTC)
  • For. We have to do this at least once. Same with VFH--Rataube 20:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Why not? Efitu (TW@) 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Of course! As such, Of course! --HPSigHP talk 00:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It may be obvious, but it's amusing and once it's featured it'll never have to be put back up here again. I imagine this'll keep happening until it is. Spang talk 04:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Oh, please. :P--Winston 11:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against The mainpage should be the featured article on, and only on, April 1 Modusoperandi 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I agree with spang; it's not a bad joke and once it's been featured people will stop nominating it :| - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 19:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • for because the fabric of space-time is overrated. --epynephrin 18:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • No it will be funny for about 20 seconds. In fact it's already not funny. --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 18:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. But we would have to put a picture of the main page with the main page as the featured article, so that it goes on forever. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)
  • For Having the Main Page featured on the Main Page will be the greatest thing that has ever happened to me. - Surreal Hamster 03:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional For if someone explains to me how this'll work.--Anon32 15:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
    • It's up to Rc to decide, I suppose. Having a thumbnail of a Main Page screenshot would work. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
      • I'm guessing it will be a miniaturized version of the box at the top of the main page, then maybe the Featured Article box (which would of course be the same thing that day), or maybe the "In the news" box, but in the end it is as Guest said up to Rc. - Surreal Hamster 17:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, excellent article. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For --LOLMOLE 21:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I'm getting tired of joke nominations. --Spencer (yiff) Sigpaw Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 23:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. We've got to keep stuff like this off the front page, think of the children. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 20:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


Segregation

Score: +12
  • Nominate and For because PLS should dominate the clearly inferior non-PLS articles on the front page. (also it's a great article) --EvilZak 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Heh, this was going to be my next nomination but you beat me to it. —rc (t) 19:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For It's a good, funny idea, but it's a bit short. - Lenin & McCarthy 19:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Short but sweet, and PLS to beat Modusoperandi 19:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oh, absolutely. I loved this one.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For- I wish it was longer, but it's still great!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for Its a great base, but it needs to explore what happens to the Pure white when something hot and red gets thrown in with them - the stain of miscoloration. FOR!Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Okay, seeing the support for this article, I must now expand it to win over those wary of its shortness. Strong Rad 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wow - very witty! --Jester 02:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great - very me. --Witt E, 21:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Spin 23:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Not yet. Needs more work. Good start though.--Anon32 00:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
    • For now that it's been improved.--Anon32 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Against since it's hasn't actually been improved.--Anon32 00:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. A good article, but I think a lot more could be written on this topic. Bloopy icon Bloopy 08:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. A nice, meaty follow-up piece to Folding@home, but a little short. ~ T. (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Well written and clever in spots, but to me the overall concept is kind of cheesy. --So So 03:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. yé! - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

*For, funniest article i've read in a while. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Jack, I love you as much as the next guy, but only one for vote per article, please. :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong, yet supple for. Some damned fine rightin', fer them's want to reed a funy artikel. LMSO, silently of course. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sbluen 20:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Wolf

Score: +8
  • Just crying wolf! here for I am the boy who cried wolf! --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Ehhh... sure. But next time make the nomination a bit smoother, eh? --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 02:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I LOVE EVERYTHING NOW!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Warren Zevon is awesome.--Severian 04:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Greatness of a kind that gives paws for thought. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 15:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Yes. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes 30 April 2006
  • Against. Fairy tale references in there too... Ugh. --So So 11:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hilarious. The picture of the coyote alone is worth a VFH vote. --ENeGMA 21:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It's just not really very funny to me.--Spin 22:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 08:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • ++For. well proper proper. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • weak Against meh... it's OK, but not funny enought for VFH IMHO Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sbluen 20:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --KATIE!! 01:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Oscar Mayer

Score: +15


John Cage

Score: +16

Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • 2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss. It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! --Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  • 2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Amusing. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Couldn't you work in a Mortal Kombat Johnny Cage reference?--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 02:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Because I'm awkward. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because it zings with harmonious counterpoint.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against This article had a LOT of natural potential, which was completely quashed by stupid kitten huffing references that had no relevance to the complete insanity of this already bfi person --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Man Babies 2cents.PNG 15:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very good, affectionate, i didn't know who the fuck he was but it still made sense and ammused - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FORE! Hilarious. I especially liked the part where the trumpets don't come in. --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I only wish he could have written a symphony for 10 people banging their heads against a wall in unison...A great article for the front page -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - the list of songs made me chuckle. --Nydas 09:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - brilliant --TKF 13:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Confusing --Mushroom 11:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Goa Tse

Score: +15
  • Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I cannot in good concience keep this against vote on this article as this is probably the best article on this page right now. Abstain.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Although I support Yeah - votes - this one is double. --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Indeed it is... —rc (t) 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For ancient chineese secret? I just wish that the title wasn't so offensive --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Peek & Pie PupX Man Babies 2cents.PNG 15:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wholistic combination of the sacred and the profane --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice,Nice --Severian 19:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Rataube 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I don't know what a goatse is, I know it isn't very funny outside this site, and this article is funny enuogh that I don't need to know.--Witt E, 05:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. how long has this thing been on this list? Ant to Nintendorulez, calm it or i'll have the feature Euroipods again. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Lenin & McCarthy 06:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • NO ~PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. C'mon folks, it's not what you think. By the time I reached the "Great Works" section, I was laughing my ass off. Get over the title and read it. :) ~ T. (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I admit I was scared at first but this is frickin' hilarious. --Hobelhouse 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Surprisingly refreshing material on an old joke. --TKF 22:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Colossus of Barbie

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 01:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Archives

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools
projects