Score: 1 painted-on Powerpoint slides

1. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 3 music cue

1. Nom and For I haven't laughed this hard at an article in a long time. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For more social satire. Cue insidious music...Dun-dun dun! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)\
3. For...solid writing, lots of appropriate pics, and Tuco. How can you go wrong with poor old Tuco.--Sir Shandon 10:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 2 pointless layouts

1. O.nu[brm } Urp, following a positive pee review and some fixing-up after said review. In case you have trouble comprehending this article, I included a handy link at the bottom in case you don't feel like Googling. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Sure, why not? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 02:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
3. DIG yes please! :) --THINKER 02:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Urp Karma-AH 07:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against. It should appeal to the nerd in me, but...it's more of a gimmick than a page. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against...although my vote could be changed. Here's what happened: I looked at the article. It hurt my eyes and I went away in glazy-eyed incomprehension. Then I came back to view the link and discovered what the deal was. Somehow it needs to be made more obvious what the article is about....maybe a line at the top, something like "So, I bought myself this shiny new keyboard! Hmm. Something's different. Let me plug it in..."?--Sir Shandon 10:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 0

1. Nom and for funny article about Wonka's pride and joy.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against starts off very strong and then blah. Second half need punching up. My vote can be bought if its worked on. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 6 emos who didn't get the joke

1. Nominating and for. Nice rewrite by Nakedman. Notice that this article is not random at all: it's perfectly coherent with its title and draws its humor for what it doesn't deliver. Ignoring the band is a very ironic comment on its real relevance. -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 19:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Amen-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Very cute. Rogpyvbc 22:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For So sweet, so tender, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Yeah, boy but is it going to become a tradition to take doomed articles and rewrite them with chemistry topics? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 00:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For - never in a million years did I think I would vote for an emo band article. This isn't an emo band article, though, so I'll still stand by that. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Ooooooo...... that is funny. For. --Andorin Kato 05:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against I don't get the article. Really, I don't. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guymandude (talk • contribs)

1. Abstain. I was going to vote Against. Then I read the talk page & thought the talk page was more funny than the article. Then I read the article again. Maybe I'll vote For if it gets another appropriate picture or something to grab the reader a bit better.--Sir Shandon 10:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 7 Dragon Dung masters

1. Brad made me do it. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 02:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. I did not. Also, for.--<<>> 02:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. You did too. Probably. Maybe. I wasn't there. Also, for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Hi YA! I vote for articre now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig --THINKER 01:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Hai. --Emmzee 13:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For...All right, Brad: after a day or two of letting this percolate in voting, I've concluded this is better than most.--Sir Shandon 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 7 dead children

1. nom and for : This is one of the funniest articles I've ever read --Uncle J 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Maybe one day I'll watch the movie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For, because I like dead baby jokes. Or really anything involving baby jokes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. --Emmzee 22:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig in the words of the wise Rafiki; "change, is good." Much better updated. --THINKER 11:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Change of heart (again). Change at the end makes it more complete. I like it. --Mr.Vib 12:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Iffy Against While it's funny, it's mainly a quote and lacks any sort of mock tone that would put it over the top for me. Call me crazy. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against per Mr. Vib --THINKER 01:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

• Okay, okay, I fleshed out the text and dropped the "this reporter" bit. I didn't wanna, but I am bowing to peer pressure for the greater good of Uncyclopedia. Jeez, the things I do for this website...back in my day it was "this reporter this" and "this reporter that". Kids these days! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 manly crystalline chaw-tobacco breaths

1. nom and for : This made me weep. It's sheer whatever it is, is whatever it is. Lovely touch, the audio as well. Sieg heil! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 23:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. sDig Here's hoping it isn't only me and zim laughing. :) --THINKER 23:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For --THE 23:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Humor like this only can be found in God's country.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Diabeetus -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Change of Heart. I took a second read and imagined the cowboy narrating. Needless to say, it made the difference. --Mr.Vib 00:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For, though it's been bugging me that a lot of really good articles have been too short lately, like this very short article. If the trend continues I may start voting "against" stuff on the grounds of being too short. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Gotta check the audio later. --So So 06:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For...yeah, it's different. And funny.--Sir Shandon 10:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• This is an ad parody that was made with recording in mind; I figured that the joke would wear thin with a 7 minute recording, ya know? And while I do agree that some small articles could use expansion to heighten their funny, I think that some shorties-but-goodies are warranted (like this one; if only because I entertain myself...and the opposite is a hard pill to swallow). :) --THINKER 01:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 2 syllables

1. Self-nom for re-feature: I know that this article has already been featured, but that was way back in 2005 when the voting system was not very established. A few weeks ago I looked at some old articles of mine and found that, though good in 2005, some were mostly cruft now, and would not survive VFD if they were not "featured" articles. I decided to refurbish Phonics and try to bring it to 2007 quality. Hopefully this is only the first in many refurbishing efforts of my 2005 featured articles. See the difference for yourself. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 16:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For A completely new article! This one is worth featuring; the old one would have almost made VFD. Rogpyvbc 18:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig I didn't see it when it was first featured, and its damn funny now. --THINKER 22:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Sure It's a good idea now. And isn't there a template for multiple features? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 02:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Yes. I am doing it now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Delist Already featured. Don't be greedy, STM. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Delist It's good that you're sprucing up your old stuff, and I hope others follow your lead. But I don't think re-featuring an article is a good precedent to set. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Delist For ruining what was already a perfectly good article the first time around! Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Unconvinced True, this article is leaps, bounds, and phonics better than the old version, but still, I don't know if this is exactly right. Should we really go to this sort of highlighting method? Doesn't seem fair, when the honor hath already been bestowedeth.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Conditional for per consensus that refeaturing is OK. This article certainly deserves it, both for being outstanding and for being so different than it used to be. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Where is this consensus? If I can see it, the answer is yes.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Erm, I meant pending consensus... that is, if we reach a consensus. I'm proposing a consensus on this, and if we say yes then my vote is For. Sorry. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 02:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Clarification I would be more than willing to "un-feature" the old Phonics and apply the feature to only this version, if that changes anything. I just think that as the standard is raised, old featured articles should be held to that standard. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, this is a good point. The originally featured article is appalling. If many of the other 2005 features are this bad then perhaps the featured status of all of them should be reviewed.--Kelpan 15:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, the difference is overwhelming and the first one does suck (sorry original author). You know what, screw it. I'm voting for it!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Conditional For if a template is there for both features, like in Kitten Huffing. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Ah! I had forgotten about Kitten Huffing. It seems there's a precedent. And in that instance, the two featured versions weren't significantly different from each other. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 11 Cosby Kids

1. Nom and For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Heh. -- 20:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Fat people make me laugh --Don alun 10:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For Yea! The pictures are gone!--Dr. Fenwick 20:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For, a wonderful slice of pie. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig seeing things like this make me smile. Good stuff. --THINKER 22:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Returning the favor...and I also like it. --Mr.Vib 23:22, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Self-for Wow, lots of votes. I'm glad I you guys liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For Very funny article! I even took the time to read it, yo! --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Hey hey hey! The article's as educational as the show. YouFang 19:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
12. YES I find this most entertaining. The Oblong Lobster 19:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Sadly Against Though it's really funny those last two images made me change my mind.--Dr. Fenwick 20:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
2. All around mediocre. --So So 07:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 lying atheists

1. Self Nom and For The Oblong Lobster 17:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. FnORd, I think this is fantastic. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 18:29, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig pretty funny, good pix. --THINKER 18:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. I liked it Thus, I voted for it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. Glad to see you took the initiative. --The Dit 03:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For Rogpyvbc 07:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Holy shit. This is good. --So So 10:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Definitely an original, well-planned idea...and, sadly enough, believable. --Mr.Vib 12:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For Awesome. --Hell0ihateyou 20:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Yup like it --THE 20:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. Could use a bit of pruning though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:38, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against. Good idea, but "bits" like the Journal and Bunkhead seem either out of place or fillerish. That last part isn't a real word. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Meh. --L 04:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Starts out strongly, really trails off towards the end. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Do the votes of Australians count? Or should I assume such votes to be an impossibility anyway? Rogpyvbc 07:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10 animo acids

1. Nom+for. Oh comon, even you have to admit this take on anime led to some great chemsisty.--<<>> 22:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For Very nice <insert obligatory Borat joke here>-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong For, even though it's just begging to be IP raped. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Self-for. I've been working on this on and off for almost two months now, and I'm flattered to see that it was nominated so quickly! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For. All praises to anime, although I got the feeling the idea was somehow stolen from me... --The Dit 07:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
6. -- 20:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. Very clever. --Andorin Kato 20:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I've seen the article before, and trust me, this is a vast improvement. I think it should get a full protect after (if) is gets to the front page though. Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 15:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Very Strong For. This is an amazing improvement over the original article. Finally, one that doesn't say anime fans are [insert insult here]. That in itself deserves a feature, if even just to keep it that way. I really do like the chemistry, though, very original! -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For. Nice work chaps. His Grace, the Duke 11:37, May 24 2007 (BST)

1. Against --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. -~ 12:54, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Against per UF in the Pee Review: Excellent concept, could be funnier (still). --THINKER 18:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Halfhearted Against. Not good, but not terrible. Just boring. --Emmzee 01:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• @Jedravent: Is that supposed to be ironic, or is it a mistake? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Mistake. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 16:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• I agree with the person above that this article definitely needs a full protect. -- TheSlyFox 00:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 10.5 blobs of Sponk

1. Nom & For - Made me laugh, definitely a quality article... not to mention the highly unique writing style -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 02:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For - Blah blah blah - It's gneomI 02:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
4. --L 07:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Definitely worth it! Very funny. --JewBoy 14:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. -- Mitch 15:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For- Ihave to admit I was afraid I wans't going to like it, but who can dislike quality sperm jokes?--Gaberou 20:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Very nice -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
9. Yes - Made me spunk! The Oblong Lobster 17:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Why didn't i vote for on this before? I mean i read it, then forgot to vote. --Emmzee 23:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Fro --THE 20:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For -- 131.170.90.2 01:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Sorry But this one doesn't do it for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

• I decided to be italic, and transformed the Sperm article into this. --L 07:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 humorous brain-shaped hats

1. Self nom & For A brilliant idea by El Zoof, expanded and rewritten by yrs. truly --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Approved. -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For. Well, what the hell did you expect? I merely laid the corpse out on the slab, it was Cap'n Ben who attached the electrodes and sent it lumbering towards the Village People. --El Zoof 05:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For It should be featured without a doubt. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Oh my god, this is brilliant. For. --Emmzee 13:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig very good stuff --THINKER 18:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
7. EAT THAT! - I would say yes. The Oblong Lobster 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Devilishly brilliant. Near-perfect comedy. YouFang 01:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For The White House Brain Roll sealed the deal. Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. ~ 13:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Feb 14. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 18:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Don alun 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Took me too long to get to this baby.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

1. I was going to nominate it myself around Valentine's Day, but if y'all think it's ready now, okay. Kip the Dip 12:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Would be perfect for Valentine's Day. But that's a while off.The Oblong Lobster 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 "Awwwwwwww"s

1. Nom and for. Absolute genius...
2. For Why not? Kip the Dip 14:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Nice.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For I was there when this was sporked from the womb. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For I hate all that manga-crap or whatever that cartoon girl thing is. But it is so well written and entertaining, and that has to be the point. The Oblong Lobster
6. --L 10:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Yeah, shut up, kids. Mostly because the anime fanfic thing with bizarre combinations devoid of plot and such severely needs to be brought down a peg. On a related note, have you read my new fanfic, Hot Dragon-God on Para-Elemental Secks? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 15:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Support. I originally saw this back on WP, as a diff on the Jimbo Wales page. Kinda scary to think that this was over there... even if it was reverted in about three tenths of a second... --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:48, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For - It's gneomI 03:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
10. 4 --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

1. What the hell did I just read? Crap, that's what. --Emmzee 18:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Against this article makes me more uncomfortable than entertained. --THINKER 01:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. The author who originally posted it to Wikipedia said the intention was to parody fan fiction. I'd say he did an excellent job! -- TheSlyFox 13:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Also, for those who don't know, this is Wikipe-tan. -- TheSlyFox 14:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
3. I will only for it if someone replaces the real Jimbo on the picture with an animesque drawing. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 15:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Moved it to UnBooks because it seemed more appropriate that way.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17 million people saying "WOW"!

1. I've always wanted to nominate something a few minutes after it was released, and I think this fits the bill. Great idea. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
2. sDig wow, thanks man. :) --THINKER 04:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Oh yeah --Kelpan 15:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For I saw the word Matrix and I was sure I would hate it. The Oblong Lobster 19:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Fror --THE 19:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Weak For Funny enough to make me say yes. Not LOL funny ever, but made me smile wider than a supermodel on acid, so yes.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk)
7. For Damn, this is a good news thingy! Funny.... Guymandude 23:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For, shiny fur, strong legs and body, good teeth. Wait, I'm not at the dog show, am I? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. -- Mitch 13:01, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For A good idea and well written says I. c doggy dawg
12. For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Not a riot, but a constant chuckler, well executed. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:51, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For Very insightful and well written. Not, of course, for the Jenny Craig croud (boo hoo) --Largedadjuggalo 01:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For. Nice job. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For Good Stuff! Don alun 10:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
17. Whoa. --Emmzee 12:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
18. See Above  Weasel 3689 03:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
19. For In Soviet Russia, pill takes you!--CopperCore^{(Talk)(Contribs)} 16:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Mmmmm, nah. --L 04:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
2. AgainstWasn't very funny. --Freik 16:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 9 Clear! Clear! We're losing him nurse Helga!

1. SN+f. Did that some time ago, and got a good review (which I forgot to thank Jocke Pirat for, as well as for the pics. Now vote, or de doctor shall pay you a visit! ~ 16:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For. Herr Doktor has paid a visit and approves. -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Kelpan 16:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For. -- Mitch 23:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Rogpyvbc 05:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For, but next time, use Ceridwyn's proofread-o-matic service before bringing the page here. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Word.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, in place of MO's second vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For--Dr. Fenwick 20:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• /me puts down bottle, moves vote to correct place... Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the plug MO :) I actually did start proofreading this as I read it for VFH, but I got side-tracked! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:46, 18 May 2007

Score: 11 Cro-Magnon poets

1. For. Quasi that made me laugh. --He's a radical rat! ^{(Talk page!/Contribs)}
2. Onka-Bonka! -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 16:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
3. Article good for brain. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
4. Still for, although most of it is over my head. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:14, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. It's hilarious, I laughed out loud at "Ug no able record CSI: Miami," but it's a little too short... but funny enough to compensate. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 03:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
6. --L 10:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Self-for. --Emmzee 00:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig but Ug digress --THINKER 20:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Fug, even though I voted Agug last time -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Featured article good. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
12. Abstinence Lifted Good luck.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Lovely article, but I think MO's article did the caveman thing better. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 14 May 2007

• Abstain because I think that two caveman themed articles so near each other is uncool. Really good though. Will renom at an unspecified date.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment... So? We had two communist articles in a row, and all that happened was that it got added to Worst 100 Reflections on 2007. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Hey, it's just my rationale for abstinence. Not attempting to convince anyone one way or the other. And plus, why knowingly get added to something with worst in the title.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Just vote already. Gol-dang kids with your highfalootin' words like "rationale" and "or". Pah! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Peh, you curmudgeonly old fogies with your incomprehension of words such as or. I like the article, but my will remains firm. You know what else is firm? Ironing boards.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright, my will is less firm than I originally made it out to be. Sue me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 12.5 Ancient Chinese Secrets

1. Self Nom + For because I like this article of mine. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig ..and to think it was on VFD not to long ago.. Great overhaul! --THINKER 04:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For It's better to vote for now than for later, in bed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For I've been watching this article since way before the vfd, it's completely different now and I think it's finally pretty good.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Splendid.--Dr. Fenwick 19:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For. Revenge vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For. -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 16:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, since the damn pic has been fixed --Sir Shandon 15:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
9. a-FOR-ism. The pic is fantastic. Oh, and the writing's good too. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 22:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For, a charming article. A LOL, indeed. --63.24.61.167 22:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For. --Emmzee 13:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For --User:Pwner Ganondorf 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
14. Confucious say:This article will be featured. Lucky letters are:S, T, F, U. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines

1. Against...if that image is fixed I might change my vote.--Sir Shandon 17:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Note: I fixed the odd edges of the fortune cookie  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

The image is strangely assembled from four parts, however, when you press refresh theres a new fortune! its the only good part of the old article. cept maybe "how to be hysterical." Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 22:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Not funny. --So So 06:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

• I'm gonna think on my vote for a while. I've been pretty ruthless tonight thus far, and the turn around in this article from its stint on VFD (which can't have been much more than a week ago) is enormous, but sadly it still fails to hit that secret spot for me. The funny spot, not the other one...pervert! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:30, 13 May 2007

• Thinker...Ummm VFD? So was this up for deletion lolz?--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  09:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not this version of it no. Extensive work has been done to it since it was on VFD. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:32, 14 May 2007

• Aw is it like that? Didn't do too bad, and the comparison is pretty steep.. The cookie is cool? Who can say...
  But, Leatherbound hasn't answered my call for Ups or downs, so whatev... :) --THINKER 09:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Good luck Leatherboundbooks. It's pretty darn near impossible to get Ceridwyn's vote, apparently.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Not at all. I've voted for plenty of good quality articles. Just the recent batch don't quite hit the mark for me. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:17, 13 May 2007

• Well, considering I put it up for VFD because it was under the wrong name and was a completely different and terrible article, think of them as seperate entities. (Do it for the random fortune fortune cookie, if only the random fortune fortune cookie) Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 13:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 Land-locked ports

1. Self-nom and for. Good pee review, my first attempt at being featured. Rogpyvbc 22:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Quality article. Good work on the tense change. --Kelpan 22:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Quality - This deserves featuring. Matt lobster 23:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig absolutely --THINKER 05:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Beautiful satire of a subject all too often made into crap.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For, because it eases my conscience over all those hours spent logging and then burning stuff just for the hell of it. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  18:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For I like the irony. Ethereal 04:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Funny stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 04:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For - It's gneomI 12:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
13. Genius. --Emmzee 13:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For - [Insert vote whore here] --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 01:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
15. for in school today, some idiots use the day after tomorrow as a reference for their presentation on global warming. what the fuck? the experience makes this all too funny in the saddest of ways. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 02:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For. But gets a bit weak near the end. goshzillacorrespondence 19:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Sorry, its a decent article, but not feature worthy imo. Just didn't hit that spot... ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:19, 13 May 2007
2. Against Very well written, but it lacks anything really humorous. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

• Dantoller has voted against this because I nominated an article of his for deletion. I don't think his vote should count.Rogpyvbc 18:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Seeing as he essentially admitted as much in his reasoning, I agree. But that's not my place. Ask an admin.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    • I also agree, I am like an angry child...

dantoller

• Thanks for changing your vote, Dantoller. But I don't think I can accept a for vote for the wrong reasons either, so I've removed your vote altogether. Rogpyvbc 17:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • How very honorable of you. I would never have done such a thing. That's why I'm going to hell and you're not.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 hackneyed big concept pictures

1. Nom & For Read and tell me you don't want to see "Oops, I did it Again" --Asahatter (annoy) 20:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For the Hollywood rendition of Hamlet. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
3. For Back of the net! Matt lobster 22:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:49, 09 May 2007
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig it more company in LA :) --THINKER 02:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
7. For Karma-AH 08:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
8. For Obviously, I think my article is brilliant beyond human comprehension. YouFang 15:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For because I want to vote for this movie, but the voices in my head are telling me not to.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
10. For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
11. For --Nydas 11:00, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 01:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 23:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For After a brief scrubbing-over. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
15. Emmzee slowly removes his pants, and votes for.--Emmzee 13:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For. How did I not read this until now? Articles as long as this don't often keep the laughs coming as frequently as this. Excellent effort. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For. It's a good article, well written. The formatting of one section bugged me, but I "fixed" it. --El Zoof 06:23, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
18. For --Phantom Grammar 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 24 ninja space pirates

Featured —rc (t) 06:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

1. Nom+for, journalism par excellence! --Unedible 14:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
2. Cuz this is what it's like when worlds COLLIIIIIIDE! Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 15:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
3. And yet I still have no idea what it's like when doves cry.--<<>> 18:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
4. For, because it's a good article, and also because I give voting preference to UnNews. Mostly the first one, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
5. For Finally, a non-topical UnNews. And it's not unfunny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
6. For We must crush the dreams of young children wherever and whenever they may arise. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:06, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
7. Ha ha, sweet despair. --So So 23:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
8. Strong For. This is awesome! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 00:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
9. For Genius! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
10. Dig very nice, well written. --THINKER 01:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
11. Very Nice!  Weasel 3689 03:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
12. For Karma-AH 10:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
13. For...wow. This has been a terrible wakeup call. I must cast my dreams of being a ninja space pirate aside.--Sir Shandon 11:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
14. For And I thought there was quite a market for ninja space pirates...Megamanfanx7 14:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
15. For --Uncle J 15:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
16. For We are DOOMED! maybe... CopperCore^{(Talk)(Contribs)} 16:16, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
17. For Rogpyvbc 19:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
18. For I think yes The Oblong Lobster 19:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
19. For. I wanna be an astronaut. And a cowboy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
20. For. I wanted to be a magician wizard genius. Alas no more. --Phantom Grammar 21:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
21. For. You mean... I can't... get a job as a... *snif* WAAAAA! AAAAAAAAA! (Great work, whoever wrote this.) Swordmaster 21:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
22. lfor wow. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 21:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
23. Lfor Awesome!! --SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
24. For, because it creates happiness in my brain. That Guy Huffed Me's sig does not, however. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 00:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

    I fixed. It had an umlaut. True story. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

No against votes