# Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

(Difference between revisions)

• Sign below an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
• Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
• Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button () above the edit box.
• You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
• When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
• Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
• Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE.

Violators of this policy will be SHOT.
Survivors will be GIVEN A DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.
Then we shoot them again.
Any funny business and we shoot you a third time.
If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and test my patience.
I love you.
(in fine print above, if you read it aloud, your dog will also be shot)

# Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

## Voynich Manuscript

Score: +1
• SN & F. Pimps away, Master Zim! -- 15:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## The Enigmatic Mr. Grumpikins

Score: +1
• Nom and For. I can't believe this wasn't featured before. --Rabid Jaguar 08:17, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## Humosexual

Score: +2
• Self nom. Out of the closet, into the fire - one last one before I retire --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. We're here, we sneer, welcome to our site.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. That almost exactly describes me.--Emmzee 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +1

## Igor

Score: -1
• N+F Igor gets nommed out of his skull --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry Hardwick, too short, not funny enough to overcompensate. --  Holla | CUN 08:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment No need to apologise - I'm not the writer - just the nominator. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Amusing, but the third person goes a little too far. It's also too short.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## The Everybody Loves Raymond Controversy

Score: -4
• Nomination and For Why did nobody think of this before? I lost my right to vote because another user had his hand up my arse. --Maewfannwr 17:37, 28 July 2006 (EST)
• Nothing suspicious at all about the author and the nominator... Especially nothing suspicious about the fact they attend the same university... And definitaly nothing suspicious about how the author magically stopped editing once the article was nominated... Nope, nothing suspicious at all. --⇔ 07:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• No Way. I originally NRV'd this. And I agree w/ MoneySign... CONSPIRACY! --  Holla | CUN 08:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against.Sorry.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Laaaaaaaame. Despite the talk page, the article sucks, and should be banned from the Internet.

## Sausage Butty Batter Nugget

Score: +4
• Nomination and cholesterol-rich For. Heck, you can't argue with Russell Crowe. I know I don't fancy a phone in my mush. Anyway, I'm sure they sell these at my local chippy. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Napoleon Boneparte died alone and childless on the windswept island of St. Helena after a harpsichord fell through the ceiling and hit him on the head. I'm a sucker for rich imagery.--Procopius 11:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. dung has not just fallen out of cows, it has also fallen out of fashion. Pure genious, well done that man!--McBumlo 19:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. This is my kind of random. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## Snakes on a Plane

Score: 0 snakes on a plane
• Nom and For It's got mother***ing snakes on a mother***ing plane! Let's face it: this movie WILL redefine the film industry and the world. Let's feature it so we can say we liked it before it was cool. Plus, it's got Samuel L. Jackson.-- DiZon aPlane!  (Snakes!) (On!) (A Plane!)
• Weakest for ever DiZ forced me to. User:Uncyclopedian/sig
• For. But the introductory paragraph could use some work.--Procopius 00:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I mean For. Ummm... Abstain for now. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP(+13)!~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 00:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!!! Wait until the sequel.... Anidn on a Plane! --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:34, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I just can't resist casting a nay vote on what is largely a display of lists and quotes. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Not really the same style as most featured articles, but it's genuinely funny. I like it. Wehpudicabok 18:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I likeded it. --emc! 18:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry but after re-reading, it has too many quotes and lists. Not much quality writing. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP(+15)!~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 19:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Rewrite Its good, but not that good. Too many quotes/lists. --Nytrospawn 21:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment A rewrite vote on VFH? So... doe sthat change the score at all? 4 + rewrite? 4 - rewrite? 00:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against on a plane.— 11:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Snakes on an Against. -- 09:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. This place should be about starting vacuous bandwagons, not jumping onto them. -- Tezcat 11:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, too listy/quotey, and a one-note meme to boot. There are, in fact, snakes on a plane, apparently. Modusoperandi 18:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against JimmyB 04:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Somehow, a FOR. Has just exceeded the funniness of Euroipods. --Timmytiptoe my talk 10:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:After 30 years of marriage, a London man discovers that his wife is actually a rare Yucca plant

Score: +1
• N+F. Simply briliant AND I can't just about see a thing like that happening to me...-- 16:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, happened to a friend of a friend of a friend of a friend of mine. -- 01:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• NO. Not because it's UnNews. Because it's unNews and it's short and sucky. Has potential, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 03:57, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I agree with DiZ - FAR too short, but I typically don't like UnNews much anyway, I've voted for UnNews twice ever. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 04:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• comment Gentlemen, this is the average length of UnNews articles, so I don't think length should be factor under this category. As for the sucky bit, I can't help...:) --Mordillo Hands off the virgin!Time till next rocket hits:

I wouldn't exactly call Euroipods lengthy... FOR! --The Rt. Hon. 01:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. ANyone ever try reading a four page news article... sucks. 08:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 12:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, even though I'd usually say "Never Feature UnNews" this one is funny, and has potential. -- 14:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, coming from a member of the "Feature UnNews, Dammit!" coalition. This just wasn't funny. — 21:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Considering I wrote it, I was surprised to see it nominated. --emc! 22:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry, emc, but this thing is just not big and funny enough to catch my eyes. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I did laugh, so I feel bad voting against but it really is too short, even for an UnNews, to feature IMO. Sorry. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Question If I find out that my wife is a rare plant, do I get to vote again? -- 20:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Answer I hear it's quite common. Yes. --emc! 20:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Although I find this one funny, it's not quite feature quality. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For lmao --JimmyB 04:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## Dark Ages

Score: +9
• N+F. We need such vigorous bashing, especially when applied to a serious historical subject. - User:Guest/sig 14:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Huge, Huge For - hilarious. TheMono 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For; it seems a little familiar but it's still funny.— 06:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Self-vote For. Ignore this line and move onto the next.--Procopius 12:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. "Other eras were content to accept this as the will of God -- that a man would have to go through his day with a strong likelihood of being killed by an axe before sunset. Greek and Roman mythology is based on it." Priceless. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I came here all gonna nominate Battle of Gettysburg, but that was until I read about Thurmor, the black bandit of the woods. Shine On, You Crazy Diamond. --Palsworth 15:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• for, finally someone is saying what we're all thinking. Modusoperandi 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Everything there is good except the bashing. -- The Colonel (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• The bashing is the point! - User:Guest/sig 13:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Bashing=/=funny. If bashing is a form of humour, then why don't I find WWE amusing, despite those guys there bash each other with folding chairs all the time? -- The Colonel (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Bashing (can) = Funny. Viz the success and proliferation of Takeshi's Castle in all its wild permutations. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• I don't study history or arts or stuff so whatever the article is bashing makes no difference to me, and since everyone can call someone a "butthole", it is obvious to me that there is something lacking in this candidate - intelligence. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• It's the bashing being applied to a serious historical subject that makes it funny. - User:Guest/sig 17:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• The intense bitterness on a subject that doesn't warrant it at all makes it hilarious. TheMono 03:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I like it, but it could be expanded a bit. --emc! 19:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't find it especially bashy — its just got a bit of a punch. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: Anything that bashes Petrach is boss. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH

## HowTo: Be a Tramp

Score: 11 doorways slept in
• Nom + For. One of the wittier HowTos out there.--User:Czar Yah/sig 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For LMAO. Yugoslavian F 03:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against Pretty funny, but not main page stuff. --Gunny 09:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Albeit biased, as the author. Just re-read it and think it's great, so there. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very clever, with funny text and amusing pictures. This vote cast in loving memory of HowTo: Criticize the Media's failed VFH nomination.--Procopius 16:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because it was funny, and i laughed at the bit about "you Scally." --Palsworth 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, rather useful. -- 01:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Down four stubbies in one go. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I shall give it a whopping 209 out of 210 for originality. - Stejinz 15:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For traveling on wind power through the night. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. What can I say? Schadenfreude strikes again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because that's exactly the right way to use a shopping cart.--Shandon 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I can't wait to get my Doctorate in Trampology --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## Rap

Score: reppin +18.5 fo shizzle
• Self Nom & For. I completely re-wrote this from crap. I spent LOTS of time on it, and I think it's ready to face the judges. Hope you like it! -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4 shizzle Considering I helped make the article what it is, I revoke all the "credit" Sir Cornbread and others deserve for rewriting this article, and take it for myself. --emc! 19:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Emmzee 20:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A nice scattering of funny throughout. Yea yeAH!! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4. -- 00:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fo' schizzle.--User:Czar Yah/sig 00:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Aiiii TheMono 01:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Mad props to the Freestyle Section.--Procopius 01:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. WOW! Thank u all! I thought this was easily my best article, but I didnt think it would do this well. Thanks for your votes! -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 03:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Gittin' down on all For's and shakin' it at the hudio, brother. ... Or something. Innit. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For- 'A' for effort 'B-' for laughs-- 18:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• The shizzle, FOR rizzle, this artizzle is the shizzle! DiZ deems it worthy. DiZzletheGrizzle  ( Worshizzle me yo'!) (Prizzle me!) (Jizzle me!)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE-YO. This came a long way from VFD. An excellent rewrite, and worthy of attention. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• I have to vote For even though I think it could stand to lose the Bush picture. That's getting a little overdone. But overall it's definitely worth featuring. Wehpudicabok 02:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Dis article's tight, yo. I mean, for. --UtarEmpire 05:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• A splendid article, very well done indeed, my sincerest congratulations on such a fine achievement. --Nydas 19:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wonderful article --70.27.217.235 14:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, lol --JimmyB 04:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Why does snoop dog have an umbrella? For drizzle! Dshack 05:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against because I think that an article on rap could be a lot funnier than this, but I'd like to see that hilarious picture of the wiggers on a featured article so instead I'll just make this a comment. --So So 07:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +14
• Nom and For. There's something about the phrase "potato manipulation software" that really revs my engine. -- 04:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 04:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme For, Adobe deserves recognition for this great piece of software. -- 08:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

:For. --67.142.130.45 19:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• For. The above was mine....-- 19:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Potato-based humor doesn't get the kudos that it deserves Modusoperandi 20:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, but what about its puzzle potato creating properties?--Emmzee 21:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strongly For - Hilarious. Except of course that I am morally obliged to defend New Zealand! TheMono 00:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Massively biased FOR. -- 00:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because admins wrote it and they'll like me more if I vote for their articles. It's always good when admins like you, it really is.— 03:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Thats only half true. --
• For and I must say that i agree with Mr. Mooses above me. A reskin would be awesome. 09:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Equally biased as Mhaille, however. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 09:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against I'll be the first person to break the mold and vote against, and not just for the sake of non-comformity. I read the whole article against my ravenous will and I did not laugh. Once. Lame. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 04:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I haven't read the article, but the title makes me hungry. --Captain Finding Nemo 05:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against, I find it cute, and it might work for Encyclopedia Dramatica, but uhh, nice try. --emc! 03:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

For, changed my vote because I love this article! It's great! Wooohoo! :-] --emc! 21:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice article! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Futile against. I moaned and groaned. But computer nerd humor like this seems pretty much like a shoe-in for featuring... --So So 07:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The laugh is there, but not enough to hit the spot. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This one take the chip! HA! Chip! I made a potato joke! --officer designate Lugiatm 14:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Got any french fried potaters in that there chop? Mmm hmm. Reckon I'll have me the bigguns. Mmm hmm. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

## Pentium 4

Score: +8
• Self Nomination - I have worked on it for some days and it's time for it now to face the final test. (I'll try and respond to every comment/vote posted here - just like this guy)-- The Colonel (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 13:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Thanks for the vote first of all, but it would be even nicer if you make a comment or two on the article. See my talk page. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• What the hell is wrong with u ppl? Saw this when it was under development and liked it then. For. -- 15:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Thanks for that, Uncle Mhaille! :) -- The Colonel (talk) 15:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - I liked it. It's not very often that an article up for nomination mentions a recently featured article (Idiocrates). Plus it was funny. --emc! 20:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• I'm glad that you like it! :) -- The Colonel (talk) 05:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Took me a while to decide, because it was kinda confusing the first time I read it, but after re-reading, its funny and the images are good. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 05:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• It's good that you re-read it, and thanks for your support! -- The Colonel (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I'm one of the poor bastards that bought a Pentium Pro and I'm still holding a grudge. Modusoperandi 00:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Then I hope you are not still mad at the fact that Pentium Pro is weak in 16-bit processing. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, you know why... -- 00:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Cleverly done. This is why I own a Compaq. Wait a minute . . .--Procopius 12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• I have a desktop with an AMD chip running at 1.8GHz, and a laptop with an Intel P4-M chip running at 1.7GHz. Notwithstanding the fact that there is only a difference of 100MHz, the desktop runs almost 3 times as fast as the laptop. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is a sympathy vote for a nice try. Seriously, WTF is this (see [1])? Go to Hades? That's some funny shit there Swordman. So is this article. I've no sympathy at all, actually. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Thanks for your "antipathy" vote. :) -- The Colonel (talk) 13:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:Diogenes_searches_world_for_honest_mechanic

Score: +9
• Nom and for. Well written and funny. InfiniteMonkey 01:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nor should UnNews articles. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 01:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is a perfectly brilliant cynical slab of comedy mothballs. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Unless it is terrific, UnNews shouldnt be featured. It needs its own VFH kinda thing, though. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 01:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For It is terrific. I mean, I agree, but this is fucking great. Diogenes makes anything better. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Voting For my own work, so take this with a grain of salt. Thanks for the nod, Infinite Monkey.--Procopius 02:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Yep. Now, back in the tub I go. -- Imrealized 02:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Greek philosopher + UnNews = win — 05:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. NFU -- Never. Feature. UnNews. -- 13:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! And Mycroft agrees. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hilarious.-- 13:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Ford. Recall notices are Job #2. --Carlb 23:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I think this would work better repackaged as an UnBook.-- 03:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not a big fan of featuring UnNews either. --emc! 00:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I liked it when I read it in the UnNews before seeing it here. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For one good idea cheerfully executed. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. I don't think saying that it's UnNews justifies voting against this article, and it's possibly the best one so far. Wehpudicabok 05:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## Martin Van Buren

Score: +8
• Nom and for. I laughed pretty hard at this. Yes, I'm a history dork.--Procopius 14:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. InfiniteMonkey 17:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Too American-centric. For - David Gerard 18:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For; I shouldn't like it but I do.— 19:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. XD -- 20:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against- I think it was funny, and I'm probably nitpicking, but most of reads like it could be about anyone, little of it has anything to do with Martin Van Buren.-- 20:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Well, it does mention the Independent Treasury Act. You can't go into your local independent treasury without seeing a statue of Martin Van Buren.--Procopius 17:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Random and hilarious. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 21:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's true, it could be written about anyone, but I think that's what makes it so funny--that an insulting article like this is written about an obscure president, of all people. Wehpudicabok 03:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Enthusiastically for. This reminded me of IFHTBT. - Nonymous 03:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! I voted for this last time, and I'll be damned if I don't do it again.--Emmzee 21:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A rare example of something being both stupid AND funny? --So So 02:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against This isn't even close to being clever, its just a silly rant. Dame  20:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for fdssafkf --emc! 03:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. All f- and s- words and no humour. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +10 Apples Eaten
• N and F. Vote for this instead of the other one! --L 13:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For it's worth it just for the Chris Walken pic. Plus I dig choosing sides when VFH has a voting war between a page, and itself. Freaky. Modusoperandi 14:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I still don't get it. -- 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_Lost - it's famous among those who can read - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Too bad I can't, eh? Abstain, it's obviously well known. -- 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: John Milton wrote Paradise Lost. Then his wife died and he wrote Paradise Regained. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- 19:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --emc! 22:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because writing this got me to finally read Paradise Lost. -- Imrealized 00:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Fine, fine... I'll also abstain, because its a little confusing to me too. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] 02:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For-Very clever.-- 20:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR Finally, something clever and funny. Dame  20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I actually learned about the real thing, making it funny now. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 07:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Although the original is pretty good, too.--Procopius 16:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For making us laugh instead of driving us blind...--Shandon 20:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Solve The 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube

Score: 16 bottles of beer on the wall
• Nom and For. Simple and accessible - David Gerard 19:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Made me lol. --User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ|§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩÅ³]] 20:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I just dont like HowTo's that much.  Holla | CUN --20:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against I liked it and all, but 1.)I know it won't last long 2.) The Swedish rat Contest thing is funnier. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Someone needs to make a better picture for this article. I'll try one tommorow, but only if nobody makes one first. -- 00:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Done. -- 21:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No. --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For:
• Like DG said - "simple and accessible". If you think simplicity is stupid, then go laugh at my old Quantum Mechanics textbook.
• One crazy idea outrageously executed.
• One of the few fine works here by a n00b.
• Endorsed by Splaka the user hater (sort of).

-- The Colonel (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• For. Because the world needs to know it. --Wehpudicabok 04:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Feature it! --L 08:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love the picture(s). Witty. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Ya! Dame  13:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• ForxForxFor. No comment needed. -Nelson3x4x0
• For I was gonna nominate this. -- 00:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- GaraGara 00:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I laughed. Very nice layout as well.--TKF 00:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Shamelessly For. Wow! I thought the only way i'd get this to fail nomination is if i nominated it myself. --Dondonz 09:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For cause everyone needs one! Superlizard 10:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4x4x4 --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Awesome piece of work. --Nuknuk 10:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For great justice. Whoever wrote this gets the gold star. --UtarEmpire 15:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Han 12:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wholehearted for! Hilarious.--Emmzee 00:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, nobody at NASA believed me that it could be done...--HP talk 19:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against --JimmyB 04:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## Fries with that

Score: +8(thousand) fries
• Nom and For. Hits every note - David Gerard 19:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.  Holla | CUN --21:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For with that. Super-sized comedy. -- Imrealized 21:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Supersize my vote FOR this article. Dame  00:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For This is some good shit. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Mmm, nah. ---L 08:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I'a say'a yes.

## Gazebo

Score: +12.5
• Nomination and For.--63.135.2.27 17:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very random, but funny.  Holla | CUN --06:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, oddly clever. Dame  12:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. The "Emperor" looks like me mum. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Is good, yah?!? --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Excellent article, especially the Stages of Development. -- Imrealized 18:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, but shouldn't the Taj Mahal be the ultimate form of Gazebo? Okay it's a crypt, but still, it's sheer gazebo-ness is world renowned. Modusoperandi 04:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 19:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - This is a great article.--Wit (tawk) 23:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Still a great article. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For It reminds me of that old D&D urban myth about the guy sneak attacking a gazebo. -- 19:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Don't build a gazebo out of styrofoam. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Good good good. --PseudoChron 21:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Amazed I haven't voted for this yet. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Emmzee 17:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

## Vincent Van Gogh's Things To Do on a Rainy Afternoon

Score: +9 damaged ears
• Nomination and For. Am I going crazy with the noms? Perhaps, but we're due for a funny art feature, and this one fits the bill. Excellent offering from a relative newcomer. -- Imrealized 08:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against 2 of those articles in the space of one month is too much... maybe later... ~ 08:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Agree that it awfully close to the Cookery Corner, but its well done and deserving. Dame  13:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wha? It has neither cookery nor corners: still, I'm For it. Modusoperandi 15:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...Wow, it was the first article I wrote...if you like, don't forget to vote me n00b of the month--Shandon 17:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 17:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - :-D - David Gerard 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Shades of Hemingway's Cookery Corner, but... even less funny. --Hobelhouse 04:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Loved the bit with the stabbing. --User:Nintendorulez 16:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too similar indeed.  Holla | CUN --20:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Culture, people, culture. It's not just for throat scrapings, you know. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Not the funniest Uncyclopedia article there ever was, but for some inexplicable reason it simply feels like it deserves to be a featured article. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩÅ³ 23:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm no art buff, but I found this pretty funny. — 06:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I laughed--TKF 18:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Forgasm. But shouldn't this be an Unbook?--Emmzee 17:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment:Urrgh...please don't say that; UnBooks don't do well here. But thanks for the vote!--Shandon 19:17, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

## Euripides

Score: +10
• Self-nomination - Just for Déjà vu sake... plus it now has a Talk Page. -- Imrealized 18:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Though this is a tardy crediting it is worth noting that Some user contributed the true genius to the talk page (replacing all the dates with the proper Attic calendar dates and the superior second half). That may slip unnoticed if one were not to check the history, so I'm telling it here. -- Imrealized 20:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• I can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm a sucker for lampooned Greek drama, and this had me hyperventilating. Aristophanes pwns indeed! ("Lost his oilcan!") STRON-GEST AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• No. This scares me.  Holla | CUN --19:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Boo. -- Imrealized 19:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. All injokes are going to Hell. -- Colonel Swordman 20:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Here I thought it was a Greek joke. Guess I oughtta brush up on my mythology. [1] -- Imrealized 20:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment on the above comment by Imrealized - Υποκριτής -- Colonel Swordman 21:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Tired joke gets new lease of life. For -- 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• I voted "for" for this before--TKF 21:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• for, but only if talk:euroipods is featured. otherwise, it would confuse any young nooblets who haven't lurked here as long as i have. --Testicles 00:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! Great parody. Weird, because I hated Euroipods.--Emmzee 01:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For evreything you could possibly want in an article: clever humor, intellectual references, and euroipods. The Talk page only adds to the glory that is.-- 01:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, amazing how the obvious injoke was made into a funny intelligent article ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For a) money b) referring your friends to read Homer --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, same as last time. -- 03:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, not significantly improved since the last nom. It appears to have barely changed at all...needs both more & better Modusoperandi 05:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Hey, it's a parody of Euroipods! Having read both, I'm changing my vote. I may be slow, but my dead eyes more than make up for it. Modusoperandi 21:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. 06:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Most definite for ever. - User:Guest/sig 11:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Too reliant on an injoke, and all of the actual Greek references suffer from it. --Jamtrousers 17:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. EURIPIDES!!! --User:Anidnmeno/sig 23:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Malista ge!! Phor. -unsigned vote Unsigned vote and unsigned crossing out. --⇔ 13:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. In-jokes sucks! --⇔ 13:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The perfect combination of high culture, low culture and injoke - David Gerard 16:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against anything related to Euroipods except Talk:Euroipods and Euroipods Crusade. Crazyswordsman 00:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• 'Wheel Of Fortune! Alright, that was lame. But the article's not. Brilliant. --Joachim22 10:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 13:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 15:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

## Barns and Nobles

Score: +18
• Self-nom and For. It's hard to go wrong when you start with a brilliant picture by RadX and go from there...-- 14:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. You had me at "sank my Serfdomship". -- Imrealized 19:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For living in the past*. -- 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
*Ian Anderson flute solo not available outside of UK. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I like the subject matter. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For The only thing I don't like is that it has nothing to do with Barnes & Nobles, except the play on the name - Arzikl 05:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Except for the fact that both the main book and the names of the expansions are plays on the names of popular places to buy D&D books, you're right (Barnes & Noble, Waldenbooks, Books-a-Million, & Borders... that's all we've got around here, anyway...).-- 13:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -L 12:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Clever.--Emmzee 20:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brad writes good articles.  Holla | CUN --06:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Sure. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• FORE! This had me laughing out loud. Great. The Unbeatable, Immortal Legend  [Discussion of I] [MUN!] In Soviet Russia, Tested Loses To YOU!! 01:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A great article. Puns ahoy! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant!--Rabidwombat27 04:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For the image. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 01:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 13:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another article I cracked up at while not working. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...funny --HP talk 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.

## Fisher Price: A Retrospective

Score: +16.5

Nomination And For Shizzle. Yes, I already know this has been "Quasi-featured", but this just might make me laugh more than any other article in the damned universe. PURE BRILLIANCE. --Sir Cornbread 04:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• For. -- 05:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nuh-uh. No second chance for this bad boy. --L 07:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• No, no, no Some editor there even rejected my addition to it ( the only one with a connection to Fisher Price)-- Swami A. Suresh 08:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. What are you, fucking nuts? 24.145.222.85 14:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. So, so For it hurt my sides. TheMono 06:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's front page stuff. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Classic.-- 14:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Aganist. Do you think people out there really care about what happened to a damned website like Uncyc? Gimme a break! -- Colonel Swordman 15:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For It's impressive, that much written about Fisher Price. --ENeGMA 19:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 06:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   07:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For To fellate a coprophiliac... Mental note: Do NOT click any links! --Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 23:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Excellent tone, superb funny... deserves to have the quasi dropped.-- Imrealized 01:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I had to think about this one, as I was part of the VFD discussion on the actual Fisher Price "article," but I think Volte's superb literary babble deserves highlighting. If nothing else, let this be featured to show fuckwits what will happen to their crass one-liners. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ T. (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Although it would be funnier if Fisher Price itself was featured. - User:Guest/sig 13:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Dirty words and sexual phrases do not equal great content. Dame  20:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Didn't like it then, don't like it now. --ninebucks 21:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against I found it dreadfully confusing. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 23:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 23:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Brilliant. For. ~ 16:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. gets my vote, sure it's offensive, but the analysis makes this article --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 23:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I love fisher-price.--Wit (tawk) 03:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is brilliant. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 22:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Copyright issues. I don't think it's legal to post an entire book. But what the fuck do I know? --172.166.125.108 06:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment...Anyone have any idea what in the hell the guy above me is talking about?? He cant possibly think that this is a REAL BOOK, unless hes completely retarded. Also, his only contribution to the site was that vote...A little suspicious...  Holla | CUN--06:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• He bolded the F and O, so I guess he's voting for and is kidding. --User:Nintendorulez 18:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Well I guess that makes sense, I'll add it as a for until he says otherwise...  Holla | CUN --20:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Apparently I copy-edited this recently, so I have to vote for it.  c • > •  22:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oh hell yes! Brilliance at its core!--Emmzee 23:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• against Meh... it didn't tickle me at all. Maybe I should change my medications again. Get saved! 13:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The only problem I have is the name, which seems so unrelated. Arzikl 07:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For It's the analysis. 'Nuff said. -- Donut
• Against Hilarious, but too much of an in-joke for the front page. -- 18:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Plus, It's not the first time an inside joke has been featured.--User:Czar Yah/sig 01:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. What makes it great is that the author seems completely serious about the most ridiculous subject matter. Wehpudicabok 04:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't think this should really be considered an in-joke. I mean, you can just look up Fisher Price, can't you? That's what I did. Wehpudicabok 04:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

*For. Definitely: it's the analysis that sells it.

Oops, already voted ... --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 04:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 13:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I have to agree with Wehpudicabok. --Teh fish 10:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Meh, wasn't really all that funny. --Rabid Jaguar 04:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Forgainst. Lovely. --Splaka 07:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It may be about an injoke, but it explains it as well. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Nytrospawn 21:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

# Previously Featured

## The Swedish Orienteering And Firing A Rat From A Cannon Championships

Featured --⇔ 06:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18.5
• Nom and For. I laughed like a drain. A freshly Drano'd one - David Gerard 18:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Up next, Vole vaulting. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Jesus, this guy is good (That is a very strong for). -- Imrealized 21:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• För I thought it was going to turn out to be one of those articles only people from the designated country would understand, but I found it funny. Personally, though, I prefer gerbil-tossing, but is gööd, yah?!? --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Fucking amazing. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• This is flipping crazy! I like it. For --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  13:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Awesome! --DeathByPie 13:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Funny & original. Almost good enough to abstain on --142.68.236.133 22:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - The image itself was enough.--Shandon 01:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The name alone wins this, but an entire article on this? Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 12:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - I very idea that an article with this name was created made me laugh. Just weird enough, and brilliant. --Nuknuk 13:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong meatball. --So So 05:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Mushroom 06:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! Hilarious.--Emmzee 17:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• A 21 rat cannon salute in honour of this - One of my favourite articles on here, and that was before the drugs scandal got added. --Billsheppard 11:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Articles like this are what make Uncyclopedia great. Wehpudicabok 18:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

## Universal Remote Control Everything 3000

Featured --⇔ 07:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18
• Nom and for. It does exactly what it says on the tin. Well almost exactly. Sort of. Except it doesn't come in a tin. I actually have no idea why I even mentioned that. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The image also needs a VFP. Could do with the subarticles being merged, though I know the author disagrees - David Gerard 13:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Says it all, really. ~ 15:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I was afraid it would be like Click, but I was pleasantly surprised. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 15:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wow. Just wow. -- Imrealized 17:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I want one! — 17:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  17:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I like the concept (and the fridge pic), but the remote isn't nearly complicated enough to make my life easier. It needs buttons for everything, cryptic symbols on those buttons, cryptic symbols where there aren't, and a power cord. Modusoperandi 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nobody told you about the vibration feature? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Having read and reread the page, my stance has softened somewhat. When the button-orific U.R.C.E. 4000 I'll vote for it. In the mean time, Abstain Modusoperandi 01:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• F-f-f-for. Great.  Holla | CUN --19:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, the perfect gift. -- 03:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! give me one! MwM 19:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very useful. I also like the pictures. They should be featured. --Sbluen 22:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For the fridge picture alone. The rest is just gravy. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• ForYou gotta love the pictures.--User:Czar Yah/sig 02:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against because the fridge picture is a freakin' megabyte and I'm on dial-up. Plus I don't really find the article to be funny.— 09:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 14:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Amazing. I want one.--Emmzee 14:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! This one is really funny...-- 21:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 21:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! I've got my URCE3000, have you? --Lokine 14:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A lot of my time went into this. Time I should have been spending watching TV. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 15:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against If there was a joke in that article, I must've missed it. --emc! 20:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Get Banned

Featured - ⇔ 06:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
• For Hah. I have to admit that I'm guilty of a few of those things...-- BirdEgal202 17:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: LOL. This is teh funnay. - unsigned vote
• For. Hasn't this been nominated recently? - User:Guest/sig 04:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Yes, as a matter of fact it was. Modusoperandi 04:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For the record, this has been nommed by a different user each time. Third trip down the aisle, always always left standing at the altar. ~ T. (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For ; I have my reasons, such as I am anti-Skub --ccdimeanc | cantabria 11:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. it's not really.... good. or an article - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 14:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For good idea, seriously - unsigned vote
• For. This article has been improved with pictures. --Sbluen 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, fine. The pictures help a lot. --Hobelhouse 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just seems like a lot of bitching about annoying uncyclopedia users.--InfiniteMonkey 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For LOL phrom ph00blet - Unsigned
• Against  c • > •  04:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not funny. --Emmzee (flame me here)
• For. New and improved. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• I have added "Not vote FOR this article on VFH" into the list. Those listed above may want to reconsider their vote..... -- 18:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I was not coerced into this vote. — 17:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Rataube 09:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Just say No to inside jokes. ~15:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For haha, every website needs a how to get banned manual! --Snerlin 21:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I must be a moron... I think it's funny. Get saved! 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only for the opening.-- 21:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny, and sadly true. It's much improved with the pictures. The extended introduction is quite good, though not markedly better than the short, snappy original one.--Winston 02:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For...but wasn't this taken directly from the howto--be a good wikipedian?? --HP talk 03:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I got banned for #15 in Expert Users....-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Insineratehymn 15:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I've only got to intermediate level. :( --The Rt. Hon. 16:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. meh...not every how:to needs to be nominated, but this is alright.--Witt E, 05:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 03:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• $\int_{-\pi/4}^{\pi/4}2\sqrt{2}(\cos{x}-\sin{x})\, dx$ -- 05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Say For to funny pics. OMFG STFU N00b! Demonbob 22:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Aganist - Unpocalypse is here!! -- Colonel Swordman 14:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Needs "Add a B to AAAAAAAAA!" back in there. Crazyswordsman 23:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Bleh--TKF 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - How to get banned? Was somebody having trouble with that? Here? Now that's funny.--Immy 19:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now the admins track the people who do what it says to make their job easier.--Cray Z. 07:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against...Doesnt even really count as an article, just OK anyway...--Sir Cornbread 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --The Stig | Abt me | Rant 06:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Half the stuff on there is a direct reference to something Flameviper has done. 24.145.222.85 16:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC) vote by sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Flameviper, both banned (ironic).
• For I wish I had had this when I first got here! --Chimzar 22:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• for this is funy unsigned vote
• No because it's a list inside of a HowTo. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 04:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, but needs vote rigging. ~ 15:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Donut 02:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 20:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It gave me ideas. --Testicles 02:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• This is worse than an internet rant. Not front page material. --Rabid Jaguar 00:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Spot on. (vo_o)b--Batmobile 22:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Too accurate. -- 18:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 04:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

# Archives

I vote for Bionicle.Pie 18:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 Awards, Decorations and Honours Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars Ranks &Honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment Potatochopper of the Month Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · Hall of Shame Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions