Uncyclopedia:VFH/old

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:VFH(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Main Page: over ten days, +5)
m (HowTo:Get Banned: week old, +4)
Line 192: Line 192:
 
*'''For''', yes, yes, yes! --[[Image:HPSig.PNG]][[User:Hawthorn Peebles|HP]] <small>[[User_talk:Hawthorn Peebles|talk]]</small> 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For''', yes, yes, yes! --[[Image:HPSig.PNG]][[User:Hawthorn Peebles|HP]] <small>[[User_talk:Hawthorn Peebles|talk]]</small> 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
   
==[[HowTo:Get Banned]]==
+
{{S|+4}}
 
*'''For'''- Every newbie should read this. --[[User:Sparky2002b|Sparky2002b]] 01:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Against'''. Some suggestions cannot be done because the pages are protected. --[[User:Sbluen|Sbluen]] 03:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For''' ~ But only because it's mine, not because it should be featured. Every newbie ''should'' read it, though. :) ~ [[User:Todd Lyons|T]]. <small>([[User talk:Todd Lyons|talk]])</small> 05:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For'''. I nommed this the first time, and it's only gotten better since then.--{{User:Bradaphraser/sig}} 14:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''Also for'''. - {{User:Guest/sig}} 14:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*Just say '''NO''' to inside jokes. ~{{User:SimulacrumCaputosis/sig6}}21:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 
:''Comment'' ~ Fair enough, but please vote against ''all'' of the self-reference articles here, and don't single this one out. Or, you may be [[banned]]. :) (Kidding). ~ [[User:Todd Lyons|T]]. <small>([[User talk:Todd Lyons|talk]])</small> 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For''' I thought it was fairly funny-[[User:Sgore|Sgore]] 20:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*'''For''' I almost got banned last night ;-) --{{User:Severian/sig}} 12:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 
*I am still '''against'''.--[[User:Rataube|Rataube]] 20:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 
   
 
==[[Handgun]]==
 
==[[Handgun]]==

Revision as of 17:48, May 24, 2006

  • Sign below an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be ignored, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
    • You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.
    • When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
  • Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be SHOT.

Survivors will be given a DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.
Then we shoot them again.


Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

Allah: The Annotated Version

Score: +1
  • Nominate and For I really liked this one! MwM 09:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment, it was nominated recently and failed Modusoperandi 15:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. How did I miss that last vote? --Jordanus 15:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Still. ~ T. (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Zakk Wylde

Score: +3
  • NOM and FOR I haven't laughed quite so hard in a fortnight! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --OsirisX 09:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Me likey. Dumitru 15:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Sandy City, Utah

Score: +2
  • Nom + For. Self-nom. Skewers suburbs and Utah 'culture'. Almost too easy. Zaui 19:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • conditional for great premise and some funny images to back it up but needs something more - what? i don't know :( -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


Life (video game)

Score: +3
  • Nom and for --Cioclod 15:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This could be tweaked a little, but it's easy to see the work that's gone into it. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • half for comment keep with it and you will get my full for cuz it's a great idea so far! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes! - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hell yah! For I wrote it and it is my little baby. Dumitru 15:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

15th century

Score: -1
  • Ye Olde Nomination and a big For - because it's the funniest thing that could happen to me while referencing to 50 Cent. And because I have to wait one week for a self-nom. And because I like to see my name on pages and shit. Lookie: Dumitru 04:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. It just doesn't work. Nice idea, but...just doesn't work. *shrug* Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a kitten.Icons-flag-gb
  • eh, no sorry, just didn't strike me as funny :( -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Cap'n Crunch

Score: -2

Ernest Hemingway's Cookery Corner

Score: +6
  • Self nom. Just to see. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This article made me chuckle. Considering how rarely I actually open my mouth upon finding something funny, consider it an achievement. --Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a kitten.Icons-flag-gb 09:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This amused me, and, since I've never read Hemingway and therefore am sure I didn't get a lot of the jokes, that makes this a winner for me.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 05:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Squeeze some ketchup out in a line. Roll up the bread nice and tight. That’s it. Man creates food." Go go gadget literary humor! —rc (t) 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For You can't argue with this. Feel the quality in that cloth. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG FOR -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another quality product from the pen of Hardwick. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 15:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Trojan War

Score: +3.5
  • Nomination... An excellent article, very humorous, and plenty of pictures to make the reader continue reading. Contains no factual information whatsoever, besides the fact that Hector dies. And, yes, a self-nomination.
  • For. Very funny article. Love it. Llama Llover
  • For Llama? are you the same guy who nom'ed it? Good show. -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 09:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For can we have this one laminated? --HPSigHP talk 13:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Could have been more polished... - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Favours randomness over wit FreeMorpheme 19:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - for the same reason, too random. The basics of the Iliad are in place but it needs to be sharper. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Why not? Efitu (TW@) 21:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC) The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.150.7.40 (talk • contribs) May 23 2006
Vote by IP. --Splaka
  • For. This actually amused me.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against.--Rataube 20:46, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR! -- LinkTheGameFreak Bitch here 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - MwM 16:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Finland

Score: -1
  • Nomination and for. I cracked up most of the article, and I think this article needs some honoring. The Insane Velair Wight 05:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Das Boot 06:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment dude, this article is a little too long to be read. Just saying. --The Stig | Abt me Rant 12:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I've seen other countries done better --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:17, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The sad truth is that people only care about their own countries. Don't get too worked up about it; writing about the humourous foibles of our own humble nations is a fairly benign form of national vanity. Modusoperandi 14:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Tesco Value Ferrari

Score: +2
Comment. It doesn't exist, but yes, that's supposed to be the general gist of it. :-) --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 16:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Note: The article has now been adjusted to take a slightly different angle. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 19:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

White Slave Movement

Score: +8
  • Self Nom and for I really like this idea. Perhaps it could be expanded. Stephensface 02:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Great Concept Das Boot 06:49, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Concur and For an excellent piece of work. --epynephrin 14:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This amused me, I must confess.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Gotta keep those honkeys in their place! --Captain Finding Nemo 03:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. What he said.^^^ --The Stig | Abt me Rant 13:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Oh, yeah...Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Patriotism

Score: +7
  • Nom + For-Great collaboration on this rewrite--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ T. (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Haha I have a few of those awards. Severian 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Everybody loves Patriotism. Well, everyone but the Commies.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For King and Country! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment And here I didn't even know you people HAD a King...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Vague for --L 07:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For you gotta love those flags! --Plyr3005 00:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Decapitation Disease

Score: +7

Self-nom and for. --Emmzee 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

  • For. Fine, have your funny article featured. SEE IF I CARE!!!!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Aye, tis the awesome...-ness. Demonbob 22:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Future Rula 17:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For People have told me that's what they thought "Caputosis" meant. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon21:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For About time a good article showed up on VFH. Excellent. --ENeGMA 22:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • ick For --HPSigHP talk 13:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Obesity Fines

Score: +7
  • Self Nomination and For - Pointless Background Info you're probably not interested in: I got the idea for this article when I got pulled over by a morbidly obese cop for doing 122.9km/h. I got a $170 fine and 37 demerit points.....fags Enjoy. Das Boot 04:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this is something we desperatly need in our ever increasing fat society. --OsirisX 08:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For--- Jaques Pirat IS NOT FRENCH! TP, F@H 11:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For but I also took the liberty of adding a section on George W. Bush's Obesity Tax program. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. This article is too long, but I can't argue with the funny. It's got "it".--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Meh. I laughed at the picture at the top, though. --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~14:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Special:Log/delete

Score: +8
  • N+F: seeing that Main Page isn't going to make it... I think it's a hilarious example of comic relief, and I had much rejoincing when reading deletion... er, huffing summaries. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --OsirisX 08:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete!; the whole thing contains nothing but bad memories. --DW III CUNOUN 10:19, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I WILL go for this one, as the deletion log summaries are often some of the best quality work at the site. :p--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, your self-deprecating edit summaries when you have difficulty typing an error-free message (like to RC, re: the new Yahoo! design) are quite amusing as well. :) ~ T. (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Glad to contribute ;)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, just because I'm an ass right now. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, but Special:Log/block is funnier. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. I think list articles are a bit dry. --L 07:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, funny stuff. - Surreal Hamster 03:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, Relevance to the government bludging even more money out of the average Kiwi User:Guru 21:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC) (actually posted by 222.152.81.215)
    • Comment:- I think you voted for the wrong article - see above. Das Boot 04:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'd prefer the mainpage or VFH, but I'm glad that one of these gimmicks can be on the front page at least once, specially after so many failed nominations.--Rataube 16:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This page has new deletion log summaries every day. --Sbluen 17:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - I'd prefer to see real articles get featured. 219.89.25.56 05:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. One of the most frequently updated articles - hours of amusement can be had with this. Spang talk 08:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - - Real Articles Please!! Das Boot 04:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Change a lightbulb

Score: +11
  • Awesome - I know that I'm only supposed to nominate one article but this one is hella funny, too. --Sparky2002b 01:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the general populous was in need of an article like this. --OsirisX 08:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Doubleplusfor, made me laugh so hard I cried.--Emmzee 14:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Beautiful. Another winner.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Anarchy on a bun. Swordmaster 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh Hell YES! ---Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Dunno what I could have done without it! Demonbob 00:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! A quality article! --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~14:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For I was amused. --epynephrin 18:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because it's absolutely wonderful! Cheer BearC cheer*huggles* 21:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Funny. --ENeGMA 23:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, yes, yes, yes! --HPSigHP talk 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


Handgun

Score: +8
  • Nominate and For. A fine article. FreeMorpheme 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was, however, the author. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against as puns are the lowest form of humour Modusoperandi 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
so's your face - jack
I think that I've just been zinged. Colour me...apathetic... Modusoperandi 22:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. FEATURE! - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 20:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For its so basic, why hasn't it been done before? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For!. Spang talk 22:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I knew what the joke was going to be before I even opened the article. 'Hand Grenade' was funnier and done first. --ENeGMA 20:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good article Das Boot 05:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Just isn't hitting me with the "funnae".--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Good stuff.--Emmzee 22:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For i think the single barrel variety is more common... Stephensface 02:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Nifty. Reminds me of Air Guitar. --L 07:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 03:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Highly original, I like it! --Olipro Icons-flag-gb Anchor (Harass) 12:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ I like the single-action models myself. The moving thumb really lets people know that I've blown their head off for their stupid driving. ~ T. (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Banana Skin Joke

Score: +17
  • Nomination and For. A universally humorous gag. --Hindleyite Lowrate Talk 11:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Long, but well done (and well-researched).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --L 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because the apple skin joke just isn't as funny. --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Flabius-Danner 17:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because I need to vote for something and this article made me laugh.--Wizstaff2The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black MageWizstaff [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]Icons-flag-gbI am not a kitten.Icons-flag-gb 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. I like it, but I feel it needs a little finessing. FreeMorpheme 20:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Bugger! At the same time, I laughed, I litigated...--HPSigHP talk 00:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Indifferent eh.... Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Really really very very good. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 20:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - One of the classic scandals of all time. Great Setup. >> Sp1r1tofRad1o 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I wrote it so I promote it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hehe, bananas are always funny! For! Cheer BearC cheer*huggles* 21:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Old joke. Not funny anymore. But how is this article so hillarious? Stephensface 20:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - good stuff. --Nydas 09:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. (cues the small group of woodland creatures) ~ T. (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against funny, but not funny -- TKF 23:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. funny --Mushroom 11:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Rataube 21:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


Segregation

Score: +12
  • Nominate and For because PLS should dominate the clearly inferior non-PLS articles on the front page. (also it's a great article) --EvilZak 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Heh, this was going to be my next nomination but you beat me to it. —rc (t) 19:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For It's a good, funny idea, but it's a bit short. - Lenin & McCarthy 19:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Short but sweet, and PLS to beat Modusoperandi 19:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Oh, absolutely. I loved this one.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For- I wish it was longer, but it's still great!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for Its a great base, but it needs to explore what happens to the Pure white when something hot and red gets thrown in with them - the stain of miscoloration. FOR!Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Okay, seeing the support for this article, I must now expand it to win over those wary of its shortness. Strong Rad 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wow - very witty! --Jester 02:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great - very me. --Witt E, 21:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Spin 23:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Not yet. Needs more work. Good start though.--Anon32 00:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
    • For now that it's been improved.--Anon32 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Against since it's hasn't actually been improved.--Anon32 00:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. A good article, but I think a lot more could be written on this topic. Bloopy icon Bloopy 08:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for. A nice, meaty follow-up piece to Folding@home, but a little short. ~ T. (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Well written and clever in spots, but to me the overall concept is kind of cheesy. --So So 03:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. yé! - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

*For, funniest article i've read in a while. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Jack, I love you as much as the next guy, but only one for vote per article, please. :)--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong, yet supple for. Some damned fine rightin', fer them's want to reed a funy artikel. LMSO, silently of course. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 04:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sbluen 20:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Wolf

Score: +8
  • Just crying wolf! here for I am the boy who cried wolf! --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Ehhh... sure. But next time make the nomination a bit smoother, eh? --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 02:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I LOVE EVERYTHING NOW!--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 03:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Warren Zevon is awesome.--Severian 04:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Greatness of a kind that gives paws for thought. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 15:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Yes. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes 30 April 2006
  • Against. Fairy tale references in there too... Ugh. --So So 11:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hilarious. The picture of the coyote alone is worth a VFH vote. --ENeGMA 21:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It's just not really very funny to me.--Spin 22:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 08:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • ++For. well proper proper. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 16:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  • weak Against meh... it's OK, but not funny enought for VFH IMHO Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:15, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sbluen 20:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --KATIE!! 01:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Oscar Mayer

Score: +15


John Cage

Score: +16

Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Hogsig Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • 2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss. It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! --Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
  • 2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Amusing. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Couldn't you work in a Mortal Kombat Johnny Cage reference?--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 02:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Because I'm awkward. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because it zings with harmonious counterpoint.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against This article had a LOT of natural potential, which was completely quashed by stupid kitten huffing references that had no relevance to the complete insanity of this already bfi person --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Pantsu Getta! 2cents Here 2cents.PNG 15:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very good, affectionate, i didn't know who the fuck he was but it still made sense and ammused - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
  • FORE! Hilarious. I especially liked the part where the trumpets don't come in. --Sir Tripod2282 Icons-flag-us cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I only wish he could have written a symphony for 10 people banging their heads against a wall in unison...A great article for the front page -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - the list of songs made me chuckle. --Nydas 09:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For - brilliant --TKF 13:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Confusing --Mushroom 11:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Goa Tse

Score: +15
  • Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I cannot in good concience keep this against vote on this article as this is probably the best article on this page right now. Abstain.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Although I support Yeah - votes - this one is double. --Suresh simple Swami A. Suresh 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Indeed it is... —rc (t) 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For ancient chineese secret? I just wish that the title wasn't so offensive --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Pantsu Getta! 2cents Here 2cents.PNG 15:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Wholistic combination of the sacred and the profane --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice,Nice --Severian 19:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Rataube 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I don't know what a goatse is, I know it isn't very funny outside this site, and this article is funny enuogh that I don't need to know.--Witt E, 05:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. how long has this thing been on this list? Ant to Nintendorulez, calm it or i'll have the feature Euroipods again. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloopy icon Bloopy 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Lenin & McCarthy 06:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • NO ~PiratehattieCap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. C'mon folks, it's not what you think. By the time I reached the "Great Works" section, I was laughing my ass off. Get over the title and read it. :) ~ T. (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I admit I was scared at first but this is frickin' hilarious. --Hobelhouse 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Surprisingly refreshing material on an old joke. --TKF 22:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

Colossus of Barbie

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 01:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Archives

Awards, Decorations and Honours
Awards2 Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Admin Rank · Ninjastars
Ranks &
Honours
Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the moment
Potatochopper of the Month

Foolitzer Prize
Writer of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · RadicalX of the Year
RYA · User Space Affiliations · Past Winners


Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top Ten: 2005 · 2006 · 2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · Hall of Shame
Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year · Sandwich of the Month · FFS
Events citron Poo Lit Suprise · Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · The Article Whisperer
Happy Monkey Competition · Other competitions
Personal tools
projects