Score: 2 unfree consumers

Nom & for A funny look at the dilemma of modern developed society. --Hrodulf 14:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. For Not really laugh out loud funny, but very entertaining and clever The Oblong Lobster 20:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 3 kindly old gentleman callers

1. I found the prospect of nominating this article, too elating to resist. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I've got a significant case of the chills -RAHB 05:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Self for I'm flattered, having an article all about me nominated - not that I'm really like that, of course - well, except maybe for a couple minor fetishes. Teensy weensy ones, no worries. Sir Roger 06:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 3 sporting imperialists

1. Nom + For. Found this one way back in the archives. Brilliantly overlooked stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
2. A pun this bad cannot go unreleased. --L 03:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Any article containing a novelty Scrimshaw engraving of a man's penis gets my vote! A work of genius. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 11:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 3 pets escaped souls

1. Nom + For I remember when this was on last time. I liked it. The end.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong for as per Ljlego. And promise no drama this time, Shandon! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Fore!!! Darn it, a dog ate my ball! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

No against votes

Score: 4 bitter secretions

1. Nom + For Very funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I love the Looney Toons style capture. -RAHB 00:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For It's not ultimately funny, but pretty good nonetheless. Social Studiously 11:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For. Since reading this, I have Olipro secured and in my basement. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For I love cherry pie. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For - Your place or mine? --AAA! (AAAA) 23:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
7. 4 Sure, why not? Kinda short, but still pretty funny. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For, Five, Six, Seven. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Weak for. --L 03:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Not ready for the front page--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
2. I can overlook the ick factor, but it's odd, ugly and incomplete as well. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Ew, no.--vyvyan 02:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against Making sex predators funny would take a lot more than this. --Andreasegde 15:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Against Funny in parts, but not the finest article. Oh yes, and it's ikky. RabbiTechno 17:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Touché, Tom Mayfair. Touché. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 corny excrement jokes

1. Nom + For. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig this article's mouth needs a soap-rinsing. --THINKER 23:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For'D! -RAHB 00:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For - Nice images. Social Studiously 11:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For...not bad, not bad.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
6. F☭R, 05:37, 27 June 2007
7. For - At least this is better than I maed a yuky doody. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Very clever. I don't understand how it can be considered nasty. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For. Quite good, but does need cleaning up a bit. Some bits aren't funny (like about the elements), but generally I like. --Gazco --- hurray for me!!! 18:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC) 19:45 29 June 2007 (GMT)

1. No. It's nasty and not funny. Do you all honestly think it should be on the front page? --vyvyan 02:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 8 hits in the fucking balls

1. Nom/For Gonna give this one the second chance it deserves -RAHB 22:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig, even though I apparently didn't work on this article whatsoever, according to some people.. ;) --THINKER 23:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Self For Oh Thinker, you're so wacky. You obviously haven't looked at my bibliography page, which clearly states that you did work on this article. I just wrote it. GUYS! THINKER DID STUFF ON THIS ARTICLE! Happy now? :)-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
4. F☭R, 05:38, 27 June 2007
5. Excellent parody of that twat fine young lad known as Dane Cook. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
6. 4 Because Dane Cook is annoying. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For another good example of self-referential humour referencing itself. -- 54x  F@H (XXXX!) 00:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
8. BAMF! I'm actually a fan of cook, but I dig this meta-article. It's begging for a finely done audio, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For There's not a single joke in the entire article. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against - Well, I would have voted yes, but it doesn't make too much sense... or is my sense of humour just bad? Social Studiously 11:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

   Well, uh, it's Dane Cook's style. If you don't get that, I can understand. Perhaps watch some of his standup and reconsider.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

• Happy'd. And see, theres even a template already made so you wont have to share the credit. :) --THINKER 23:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Splendid. And rejoice, know that your edits here showed me what it was to be funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
• You know, TKF's suggestion of an audio file makes me tingle. I think I'll take a crack at it tomorrow. -RAHB 06:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 4 handcuffed predators

1. Nom & For I'm being quite the vote whore lately, but I enjoyed this far too much -RAHB 00:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Yay, self for! You guys make me so happy, what with your nominating my pages and all. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Nice work Led Balloon. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
4. F☭R, Hehehe 05:41, 27 June 2007
5. For. And this little pig ate ham. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For irony-sake. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For- I reviewed this on Pee Review and It Made Me Laugh, Great Concept! --Sir Manforman 17:21, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against As presented it's libel. Hansen will not be happy, but his laywer will. --Andreasegde 15:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

   Dude, are you serious? It's not libel, and even if it is then he's free to change it. Everything submitted here is protected under parody, and I highly doubt that Hansen's lawyers will even know about this. Not a valid reason to vote against at all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

   I didn't know I needed a valid reason to vote. --Andreasegde 14:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

2. Strong Against. No offense, LedBalloon, but I found your last VFH'd UnNews infinitely more enjoyable. I completely fail to see the humor in this article. It sounds exactly like real articles, and those depress me. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:51, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Too obvious and not very funny at all. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 18:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Well Led, it's quite an honor isn't it. Almost too much to handle. Fortunately, this world has graced us with several opportunities of returning the favor.

Not saying you should read, and likewise vote on, this piece of course. Heavens no I would never pull your leg like that. -RAHB 03:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I'd appreciate it if you return the favor, as well. I know, I'm a shameless whore. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I'd appreciate it if you returned the favor myself.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Guys, guys, if I could, I'd return all of your favors. I will soon, probably. Unfortunately, I'm still a bit sore from returning Whelp's favor. (/me walks away, with a disturbing limp)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 21 Horny Bums

1. Nomandfor - a delightful little piece, sat in a sandbox for a month and now finally free to make its way in the world. Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. lawl Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Hooray! Mhaille and Codeine learned how to write again! :D -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. If I didn't vote for my own article, I might as well go shag a tramp. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 07:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For! \o/. Finntastic 10:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For You know why... --Roger The Bum Full sig!
   <a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a>
   CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 11:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. Y'know, I think we are all so fascinated by tramps that we secretly want to be one. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For - FEATURE!!! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 12:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Anything to stop Codeine's non-stop IRC whoring. Oh, and 'cos it's a great article too :) RabbiTechno 13:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For a steaming pile of literary treasure -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For, it maded me lol. -- TheOminousMan 16:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Nicely done guys, and the article is good too -- sannse (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For Beautiful The Oblong Lobster 19:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
15. DIG I knew I would be voting for this one before clicking the damn link; glad I did though, because its funny too! :) --THINKER 23:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For. -- Mitch 07:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
18. F☭R, 04:53, 27 June 2007
19. For, but only if this image is on the front page, not the one at the top of the article, for the love of god. --General Insineratehymn 18:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Conditional for. Only if the top pic is on the frontpage. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For and I agree with MO -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
22. For--Dr. Fenwick 00:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
23. For the love of God, who cares which image we use?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
24. For the picture being on the front page! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
25. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against Because it didn't have any against votes.--24.176.12.20 02:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

So... motion to get this scrapped for obvious reasons? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Motion seconded. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Conditional against. Please, please, please, please, PLEASE don't put the top picture on the front page. Please. Otherwise, you kids can do what you want.--<<>> 13:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

   But it's the only one that'll fit.. the others wouldn't be comprehensible at the reduced size of the FA template. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

2. Against --AAA! (AAAA) 23:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
3. 'gainst -RAHB 01:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against. Good pictures, though... --vyvyan 02:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

What's with the objections to Image:Greekhobo.jpg? Are you people really so repressed that 5000 year old Greek homosexuality offends your sensibilities? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

The short answer is "yes."--<<>> 20:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

/me looks uncomfortable. That doesn't explain your erection. Or why you left the webcam plugged in. Or the nudity. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't it? You don't know Brad very well do you? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

...and why are you sitting on his lap? Are those $20 bills in your thong? Why do I keep lending you my clothing? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

/me vomits. Sorry, that acid reflux again.....I'll just go ahead and clean that up.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you think you guys could keep your fantasies off VFH's comment areas and back on your blogs where they belong, maybe?--<<>> 15:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Clearly the answer is "No". Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 1 Crying Pokemon Fanboys

1. Nom and For'd - I found this article very funny. --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 22:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For - Great article. I've always been waiting for a Pokemon character to die. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Some funny stuff in that one. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For' Thanks guys. This is my crowning article, and my first funny one! Please read comments, if you're having trouble deciding.. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Strong For!! - Made me laugh till sundown. Actually, the sun was already down, but the images (especially the ones with 'the rolemodel' and the animation) were absolutely hilarious! I don't really know why some are against, but... what the heck! Social Studiously 11:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
6. F☭R, 05:43, 27 June 2007

1. Against Sorry but I really don't get it. The Oblong Lobster 19:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against. Doesn't quite seem FA calibre. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 21:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Sry. maybe 5-7 years ago when one could use the Pokemon craze as an excuse for liking Pokemon.. --THINKER 23:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Weak Against The idea is good, and I must admit I crack up every time I see the headline on UnNews. Just not feature quality though. -RAHB 01:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Against pedophilia, rape, and anime in the same article. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Against What a pile of shit An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays Consult the Oracle 20:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

• When I joined Uncyclopedia, I wanted to make Pokemon better. As I have rambled on many a talk page, it was filled with gay jokes, which I fixed. This was supposed to be my first article, but then I realised that by making this article, I could highlight the changes the pokemon pages have endured. This article was 3 months in the making. Please enjoy the new revamped Pkemon section, and behave yourselves. (I revert like a bitch.) Thanks for your votes. I love you all! Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

All of the funny images and animations were uploaded by one user, and placed on my talk page. Theres some funny shit he gave me. Before, all I had were a collection of the OH NOS! Some were good (Ash raping Pikachu, Brock spanking Ash) Now I have these ones! I'll use most of them in the following up article, Ash's Funeral... Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 14:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I would suggest not niching yourself into one category. Very soon people are going to start getting sick of all the Pokemon crap. It's just not that popular anymore. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I would say that after this, stop writing Pokemon articles for good. Otherwise, you'll end up like Kwakerjak, who niched himself into Presidential Elections. No one's heard from him since.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I didn't think that that was why Kwakerjak left. Heck, we all knew he was a great writer, he could've done so much more! He was really close to NotM, too. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm done after the funeral, that I'll write tomorrow. Thanks for warning me. Pokemon has become to intertwined with my identity. Maybe I should remove it from I sig. Well, gotta go. I have an urge to find Kwakerjak...Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 01:19, 28 June (UTC)

I must admit, simply "Serq Fet The Poet" has a nice ring to it -RAHB 05:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, uh, Poets tend to make names with certain intentional sounds (I hope he buys that. Haha.) I'm sorry. The funeral will probably suck. Maybe. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 14:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

As much ungood as it was, it was a vital part of rounding out the pokemon menace at uncylopedia, and therefore a necessary addition to the site. (I hope he buys that. Haha.) -RAHB 18:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

I bought that. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 19:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

And why wouldn't you? It's the truth after all -RAHB 22:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 2 Super-bromadrosis

1. Nom and For An inspired piece of misinformation. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 19:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
3. fo' a little strange, but hilarious all the same. --THE 20:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For Though the source article is gruesome. Sir Roger 00:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Upon taking a closer look, and realizing what the source was, I've decided to change my vote -RAHB 22:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
6. 4 Because I knew the story from the news, and found the page hilarious. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
7. sDig Because my life is shit right now and a feature might help cheer me up. --THINKER 21:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
8. F☭R, 05:45, 27 June 2007

1. Against. I don't really care to know about Superman's personal life. Nor, upon reading about it, do I find it funny.--vyvyan 20:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Meh Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Not funny --Hrodulf 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Meh -RAHB 05:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Weak Against--Dr. Fenwick 19:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Not funny.--I can't see the humour. Or is it just me? Social Studiously 12:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Not that funny.--Nightmare975 18:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 18 head bashing induced highs

1. sNom and For Giving it another go -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For'd - I liked it when you made it. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For although I find that stapling your nose shut can give you a much better high. --THE 20:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Strong For Improved since my Pee Review, and it was good then.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
5. I should try that some time. (translation: For) --General Insineratehymn 22:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
6. I tried it - it was so incredible I'm voting for Sir Roger 00:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Man, I'm still out of it, dude. Like, wow. RabbiTechno 13:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For, because Leo threatened to put me into "a permanent high" -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)C)
9. For. Very nice. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Dig between this and my iTrip it really isn't surprising that I don't get any work accomplished.. --THINKER 23:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For As with the iTrip, I still prefer tradition over convenience, but still a good one. -RAHB 01:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
12. F☭R, 05:46, 27 June 2007
13. For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For, A gentleman and a scholar. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For this one has it at the title. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For. -- Mitch 05:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For the delectable silliness that is this article. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For Mindnumbingly brilliant. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 0 philosophical ideas that fucking rock

1. Requested for nomination by none other than Rcmurphy. --General Insineratehymn 21:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I am smarter for having read this article. —rc (t) 23:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Strong for -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Weak for'd -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 17:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For One of the greatest articles to ever fucking rock. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For - WHOA! Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
7. F☭R, 05:48, 27 June 2007
8. Weka for. Can't believe I'm saying it, but it really is good satire. I've known people like that, who think they're smart but act like idiots. They bug me. Anyway, too short but still For, and I know it probably won't make it at this point but I'm doing my part. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:45, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Weka Against I think this is one of those articles that needs a lot of substance and jokes not the opposite, the point is gotten across yes, but not enough chuckles in between. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr. Fenwick (talk • contribs)
2. Nahhh--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Sartre is smarter than me. This, however, is not. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against I'd agree with Dr. Fenwick, but I don't know wtf "Weka" is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Good idea, weak weka execution. --So So 00:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Crotch No -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Against - What? --AAA! (AAAA) 23:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Aganist per Dr. Fenwick Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14 axes apologetically put through your head

1. Nom and For Quite witty I do say -RAHB 14:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For - I simply must for this article. To any other pages here I haven't, you just gotta know, it's not personal, it's just business... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For --Winstanley1 20:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For Such wonderful dark humour. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For At first I thought this was going to be so typical but it really got so good at the end.--Dr. Fenwick 21:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For hilarious --THE 22:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Dig Its cool by me; all my friends call me Trotsky with this stylish icepick in my skull! ;) --THINKER 22:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For Sir Roger 18:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For. -- Mitch 09:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Yup.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Sure. Another great one from Winstanley -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
13. F☭R, 05:49, 27 June 2007
14. For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 10:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 14 Gear Sticks Shoved into Overdrive

1. For I still think I'm funny. Your mileage may vary, depending on the number of passengers in your Vulva. --El Zoof 07:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig I say: Funny! --THINKER 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Too funny. Sir Roger 07:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For. -- Mitch 16:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Sadly enough, I've never driven a Vulva, but I've heard that it's a great ride. The Humbled Master 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For I've always liked this article. --THE 17:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Strong For Because I'd love one of these...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For I'd like to take one for a spin myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For If only for the picture of a Vulva in the swimming pool. --Andreasegde 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For --Gaberou 20:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. ForI've never even heard of a Vulva until now lol.--Dr. Fenwick 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. I've driven one for years, steering can be a bit sticky, but they have a nice little engine under the bonnet. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 11:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For My husband works on my Vulva frequently Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
15. ForLOL nice Inuendo Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC
16. For Don alun 20:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For I'm always up for good Vulvaaaaa Lasss Vegas! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
18. lol --Pcgamermofo 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
19. Drive stick with the kung fu grip, let the banana split and let it go right to your thighs. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
20. For' Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 17:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
21. F☭R, 05:50, 27 June 2007
22. For - I laughed. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. That sounds like a delightful car, I don't see why everyone's laughing.--vyvyan 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. --L 05:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against. There's not a lot there, and what's there isn't making me want to get one. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak Against -Whats here is good stuff, but thers not enough of it. --WesternLotus 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Weak Against: A tad short. Needs some more UMPF! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 07:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Against - Just not enough clever parts. Sounds like something from a seventh grade hallway. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Against - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 10:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Abstain Could be great, and has good stuff already, but simply can't for it. -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 19.5 Grannie Terrorists

1. Nom and For'd. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 00:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. sDig thanks Sonic!! :) --THINKER 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Yeah, I really liked this one.--<<>> 04:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For - we must take a stand against these cheek-pinching sweater-knitting maniacs! --El Zoof 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --THE 11:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For. NOT GRANDMA! NOOOOOO!!!--Mr.Vib 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Laa Ilia Il'allah wha'Muhammad rasul Allah! ~ 15:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. -- Mitch 16:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Allahu Uhallalah! The Humbled Master 16:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. Wait, do you mean dead Grandma or "I got 20 years left and I'm gonna use 'em" Grandma? Ж Kalir _{nobody knows my gender} 17:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Gaberou 20:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
13. I had long suspected it. Thank goodness Uncyclopedia shines the light of truth on us! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Honestly, how can you deny sweet little old granny a shot at the front page? -RAHB 08:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
16. YEAH! This article is AWESOME! Slash-dev-slash-random 01:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
17. Definately For --ORION 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For just because of the title! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
19. F☭R, 05:53, 27 June 2007
20. For Probably the funniest UnNews article I've ever read. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For Well I guess Granny is Gitmo bound... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
22. For —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.202.63.214 (talk • contribs)

1. Against, An okay story, just a bit hackneyed. --Brit-guit 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
2. NO--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  00:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14.5 feral kittens

1. Nom and for Prettiestpretty's best article.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For...this is, indeed, funny--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For Sir Roger 06:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Peace, dude This article is far out. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Dig Because I see her at every show I go to. This state is full of em. --THINKER 21:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Of course I am compelled to vote For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
8. like it --THE 11:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. -- Mitch 16:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For--Gaberou 20:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Weak For. Text is great, but could use another picture or two. See comment that I'm about to leave on the talk page. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Full For with new pic. Thanks, PP!  :) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For--Dr. Fenwick 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
14. I actually know plenty of people like this, if only they knew...For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 11:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Don alun 21:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Definitely For'd -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 14:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
17. F☭R, 05:57, 27 June 2007
18. Fore!  c • > • cunwapquc? 00:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against Thought the lead was funny and the ending but there was a desert of not laughing in the middle. --Andreasegde 14:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Weak Against -RAHB 01:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against --AAA! (AAAA) 23:57, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 16 ....later

1. SN + F Braydie said I should. It got a 46 in the Pee (by Braydie) and, well, I like it..Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Rfo Yay, 1st vote! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
3. like it --THE 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
4. I would say For, but I just can't be bothered. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Fur, yaw me like. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For I would have voted for this earlier, but I'm a procrastinator myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
7. Yeah. —Braydie 22:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
8. '"," -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
9. I'll vote for this tomorrow. Next Tuesday, at the latest. --El Zoof 02:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Because I meant to do it late.r Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
11. For Can't think of anything witty, sorry. --Hrodulf 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Cute. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
14. Redeemed. :) I like it.--Mr.Vib 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. for love this article from the day i saw it. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN22:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Short, but sweet. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For. -- Mitch 03:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
18. Eh, i'll vote later. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
19. fo- I vot- so sa- Sli- ~ Tal- * S- * JA- * GALLE- * Cu-
20. F☭R, 06:02, 27 June 2007

1. Against Could be a great article, but needs a lot more (or less, depending on your level of procrastination) --Andreasegde 14:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Not enough there to be featured, content or length-wise. --So So 05:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
3. I agree, there seems to be a few parts missing. Add more to the article and I might reconsider. --Eiyuu Kou 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

   Nothing is missing. The parts that are cut off are supposed to be cut off. I didn't forget anything.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

4. Against Nothing special -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abs Yaknow how people have those things they just don't find hilarious (like pedophilia or religious humor)? Procrastination is mine; just never thought it was all that funny a topic. Its a good little piece, but the subject just doesn't make me chucklez. --THINKER 21:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I see.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry buddy. I'd buy you an ice cream cone but someone might misinterpret it, and I'm not going back to the clink, man.. :( --THINKER 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Eh, the Mr. Softee truck already passed anyway. Perhaps another day.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain - It has its good points, but I wasn't laughing through most of it, so I'll abstain for this one. -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 16:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 19 silly dogs

1. Self Nom & For. She's the sweetest crazy person you'll ever meet!--Mr.Vib 00:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig poor uncle Morty... --THINKER 01:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For.--vyvyan 03:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For That silly lady was out of her mind, but this article was hella fine!Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Don alun 22:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For User:Supermoose
9. For Disturbing... The Humbled Master 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. -- Mitch 15:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Ja Though what's possibly even more bizarre is apparently a friend of mine has relatives who've named their dogs Lenin and Stalin...seriously. I don't think they'd get along with Goering very well. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

    At least they didn't name one Molotov. Burnt dog flesh...not good.--Mr.Vib 21:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

13. For. Not enough pages reference Sir Oswald Mosley, I think. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

    Probably because South America has gone out of style...and I'll give a cookie to the first person to guess the song reference.--Mr.Vib 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

14. Best article of the month. --L 05:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For. Oh god, for. The most funniest thing I've come across all day. Hanyouman 19:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For oooh. nasty. --Phantom Grammar 11:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For I pictured myself in my grandmother's house with her as the main character, making this all the more funny. -RAHB 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
18. F☭R, 06:03, 27 June 2007
19. + --General Insineratehymn 01:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 18.5 severely crazed teddy bears

1. Self-nom + For Sir Roger 23:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Dig I liked it so much I was upset I didn't get to review it. :) --THINKER 02:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For This is such an awesome idea. Pulled it off too. -Epical Zamora
4. Strong For! This is the epitome of the perfect Uncyclopedia article. Can you say "top article of June?" — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
6. For Worthy of the front page --WesternLotus 15:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Tackles mental ilness in grislys with immense sensitivety. The Oblong Lobster 18:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For - I'm so impressed by this article I want to buy Bipolar Bear merchandise.--Dr. Fenwick 02:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
10. For. Terrific! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For. -- Mitch 04:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Strong For--Gaberou 01:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
14. I never want to hear another polar pun again as long as I live, no matter how subtle. That being said, For. You can just hear some National Geographic narrator softly talking about these poor, magnificent, messed-up creatures.--Mr.Vib 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For --THE 15:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For The bits about Nunavut and the toonie really drove it home for me. Save the bipolar bears! -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For Don alun 21:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For'd Yay to BiPolar Bears! --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 15:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For --193.77.238.223 23:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
20. For - Really clever. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For - Very well written, clever. A+++ would read again --nimper 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
22. F☭R, 06:05, 27 June 2007

1. Somehow this just doesn't work at all for me. --So So 06:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
2. against I just didn't laugh -RAHB 01:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against - Neither did I. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17.5 shameful tears

1. Nom + for A quasi-featured and a runner up in the last PLS competition. It was robbed last time it was nominated; I thought it deserved another chance. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Sweet merciful tiddlywinks, YES! --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 19:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For, it's the Mr. Grumpikins of its generation. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
4. F☭R 08:50, 07 June 2007
5. For If you don't for this, I think we should end our relationship before anyone gets hurt. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Dig fun read --THINKER 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For, although I can see how it missed out before, as it takes a little while to get going. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For I can see that damn smudge. That jerk kid...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
9. Again For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 16:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For Mr. Beluncle shamed me into voting for this article. But, aside from that, it's very well written, and gets better and better toward the end. Great work. -- Big Brother (a.k.a. #1_ALF_FAN) Miniluv•Minitrue 17:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For - It could also be an UnBook, from the way I read it. Just a thought. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
12. For. -- Mitch 18:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. love. I doubt most people find this hysterical though, its just enjoyable, until that last part. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For --THE 21:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For - This is actually more disturbing than hilarious, but... IT'S SO WELL WRITTEN. I can't help myself. 206.248.135.200 23:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Holy Mind! That's a good piece -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
17. Weak for It's good until that horrible anti-climax. The Humbled Master 00:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For. I'm not sure why... completely damn insane rubbish. More! --El Zoof 12:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Severian: A number of users (including myself) brought that up last time. Unless somebody objects soon, I'll move it to UnBooks myself. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
• DOOOOO it. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)

• Done. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Ooo! Now make it an UnTune! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Darn it, Modus, I'm a doctor, not a songwriter. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 17 shares in Nicole Kidman

1. SNF Thought I'd give this another chance as last time I nominated it before it was ready. --Winstanley1 09:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Super FOR! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For --THE 19:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For I like this more than plastic. The Oblong Lobster 20:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
6. F☭R 08:51, 07 June 2007
7. For Beautiful, freewheeling in its cynicism. --Phantom Grammar 21:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
8. Dig its back, and still funny --THINKER 23:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For--Dr. Fenwick 03:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For Sure, why not. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For. -- Mitch 18:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For As promised.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For. I was fixing it up for CPS (didn't see that you had already done that, Mitch!) and laughed all the way through. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
15. Have watched this grow, and loved it from the beginning. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 11:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For Good stuff -RAHB 01:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Needs cleaning up nice ideas, but the writing's a bit iffy and the text has too many punctuation and grammar mistakes. I've cleaned up the first few paragraphs but hey, I have work to do. I'll change this to a For if the text gets tidied up. Phantom Grammar 12:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• I've sorted out the typos now. Most of them spring from the fact that this was originally written as a magazine feature in the first person, then re-wrtitten into an encyclopedic format. I handn't noticed that it messed up the grammar in some places.--Winstanley1 13:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks - vote duly switched to for

Conditional For Submit to Ceridwyn's Proofreading Service and have someone take care of it and I'll vote for.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

• I've added it to the proofreading service. --Winstanley1 11:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• It's been fixed twice now. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Score: 14.5 soiled pairs of pants

1. Nom + For Very funny work courtesy of DiZ.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For I said it was funny when it was in the piss, and I say it's funny now (and the captions are better!)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For - A sheer work of genius, if I do say so myself. 'Cough-cough' --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 04:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Weak for. --L 06:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
6. FOR. Thought it was hilarious. --Polyamorousx 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Gave me a whole new philosophy. I used to consider it a mild annoyance, but I'll value every crap from now on. Sir Roger 19:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For funny. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
9. For Push! Push! Kip the Dip 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
10. XD Brilliant! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For I like the Hello Kitty picture --24.215.168.140 16:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
14. F☭R 09:14, 07 June 2007
15. For. -- Mitch 12:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For a brown stain. --Ekashp 01:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For 172.143.185.85 17:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
18. For 86.152.82.149 17:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
20. Poop --THE 23:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
21. For--Sir Manforman 23:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Against scatological just-okay-edness. Sry. --THINKER 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Against as per the Thinker -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Against Constipation is no laughing matter. I had constipation once, and I had great discomfort for the next three days. --General Insineratehymn 22:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
4. Against - OK, not FA material IMO. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
5. Against - ew. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

ROTFLOL at the last sentence of the article. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Same w/ me, but I think it's really that the article sets up for the joke through the entire thing to make it funny. Standing alone, it's alright, but after the article, brilliant!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

True dat. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

Score: 21 red-faced up-to-the-minute Chicago Tribune editors

Featured —rc (t) 06:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

1. If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
3. Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
4. For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11
8. For just like before. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
10. For. Once again, Uncyclopedia teaches me about American history. I didn't even know there was ever a President Dewey before this! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
11. For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
12. Give 'em Hell, Mister President-HST...yeah, he'd vote Fortoo--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 17:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
13. For Kwakerjak! YAARRRRR! (And my Strom Thurmond photoshop).--Procopius 13:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
14. FOR! Kwakerjak was so great. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Poor Kwakerjak... The Humbled Master 00:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
16. For Finally got around to reading this one. I was not disappointed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For. Dew-EY! Dew-EY! Dew-EY! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
18. Dewey for president!!! --Vanaelin 16:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
19. For Hehe, jokes about politics. -RAHB 01:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
20. F☭R, 06:06, 27 June 2007
21. [For vote] --General Insineratehymn 23:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

Score: 24 fucking jokes

Featured —rc (t) 06:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Nom + For I reviewed it, and laughed like hell, cuz this article is that swell. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
2. For Sir Roger 22:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
3. For The writer of this magnificent article deserves some sort of award -RAHB 02:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
4. --L 05:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
5. For some fucking funny kind of joke--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 05:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
6. Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 05:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
7. For Because this article makes me laugh very much --Masterd 07:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
8. For. -- Mitch 10:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
9. For. This is a pretty sweet article. I spruced it up a bit and hopefully it gets there. :D Mightywayne 13:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
10. IS THIS SOME KIND of FUCKING ARTICLE? ~ 16:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
11. Hellz Ya! - IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING TALENT? -- --_{Mgr. Sir} Sonic80^☭ 17:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
12. For--vyvyan 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
13. Nice.--Mr.Vib 13:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
14. For--Dr. Fenwick 19:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
15. For Read it, dug it. And no, that 4 is not some kind of a fucking joke at all! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
16. Dig though this vote is, in fact, a fucking joke, so I don't know if it really counts.. --THINKER 23:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
17. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
18. F☭R, 05:47, 27 June 2007
19. For IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING VOTE?!?! Kip the Dip
20. For - What Kip said. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
21. This is fucking brilliant. Seriously. Though I wonder why the author didn't save it for the PLS? It could've won, I bet. Certainly done well, anyway. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
22. For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
23. Smokin' -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
24. Yerp// Sgt.Montez, SIR! 19:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

No against votes

• Interestingly enough, this nomination inspired my band to create a song of the same name in practice today. It does my heart good to see the word "fucking" used so many times in such a jovial musical arrangement. -RAHB 08:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

I look forward to hearing that. :) -- Hindleyite Converse 11:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

I'd put it on untunes if it wasn't a serious piece of music. Maybe myspace...-RAHB 21:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Kip, I think you need to take a look at your sig. The numbers always reset after it. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Looking back on it I kick myself for not saving it for the PLS. Unfortunately, I had no idea the PLS existed until they put that fancy little template on the main page. -RAHB 07:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)