Uncyclopedia:VFH/creepy

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Creepy (history, logs)

Article: Creepy

Score: 11 voters that would like to know you very well

Nominated by: Dlo2012 20:39, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
For: 14
  1. Freakin awesome, i never saw this article before The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dlo2012 (talk • contribs)
  2. For. It's not a self-nom, Shroomula, check the history. And I like it. It does strike me as similar to others we have featured, but I chuckled, which is the main criteria. --UU - natter UU Manhole 09:46, Oct 15
  3. For. Just the kind of warped humor I love coming across on here.--Tempogain 3:18, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. I really enjoyed this article. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:01, Oct 15
  5. For. This actually did creep me out... Just a bit. --Skullduggery 17:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote For. JudgeZarbi Icons-flag-gb TALK 18:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. For Wasn't this on VFH sometime before? Like a long time ago. So long, I can't even find any records of it. Ah yeah, those were the days... -RAHB 19:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
  8. For. Cuntywunty 21:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
    For. Cuntywunty 23:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC) - Only one vote per person, Cunty. --UU - natter UU Manhole 14:36, Oct 20
  9. weakish for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
  10. For. Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 15:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
  11. For. Perhaps not the best formatting ever, but nevertheless inspired. If Olipro had written it, I'd be terrified. RabbiTechno 15:33, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
  12. For. funny Extremelyestlybored 22:36, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
  13. Weak For OrangeAipom 10:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
  14. I am pretty sure that this is the 14th vote. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 22:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3
  1. Against. Is this your first article? It seems like it, (You didn't say you were Self Nom. or sign it) not bad for a first one, just needs work if you want it to be featured.--Shroomulah 21:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against, on the basis that I didn't find anything here that my friends have not come up with about a thousand times already. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 21:43, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. I think I voted against this one last time too. Don't really go for the adjective pages written in the style of that adjective... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 13:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. Without the kitten huffing bit I'd vote for, I think. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 18:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects