# Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive6

## Humosexual

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 05:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• Self nom and For. Out of the closet, into the fire - one last one before I retire --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. We're here, we sneer, welcome to our site.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. That almost exactly describes me.--Emmzee 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fur because I feel bad for Procopius. --emc! 03:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Sweet pity helps me escape. :)--Procopius 20:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Rob will do a lot for a pizza, but he drew the line at being mentioned in this. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Fro cool. --Parodius 22:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Eggsaladtent-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 04:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Noteworthy article, but considering that the subject matter has longed been joked about to the point of not being funny at all, and the article itself contains no more than what has been around in popular culture, I must contest its credibility of being feature-worthy (but that doesn't make me a humophobe, does it?) -- The Colonel (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 07:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Thanks for pointing that out. I was unaware of my crime. Please put a link on my talk page to show me where this has been done before. I'd hate to be unoriginal. I will try and stuff something in that hasn't "been around in popular culture" for a while, like maybe Stephenson's Rocket or something. And another thing, how can an article be both 'noteworthy' and 'not funny at all'? You make no sense at all. Were you drunk perhaps? --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 15:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• I had to vote for as I'm a bit of a humo myself. Get saved! 21:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• FOUR. I like it. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great, Hardwick, but don't let this be your swan song! --The Rt. Hon. 12:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For it is great. Dumitru 12:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Nah. Just so-so for my sense of humour. --  Holla | CUN 03:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. What can I say? She made me laugh.-- 19:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Score: +20 if "Eat a bagel!" doesn't mean "for"

Featured I counted the votes very carefully and responsibly. Thanks for the support. —rc (t) 05:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For - Was a Poo Lit Surprise contest winner.--Mister Nosey 00:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Is this supposed to be funny? It reads like a Wikipedia article. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Lesson 1: It reads like a Wikipedia article because it's a parody. Brilliant, funny, subtle and smart writing and images. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 06:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I like how it pretends that Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings. The rest is good too.-- 06:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because it beat mine so it must be funny, which it is.— 10:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For as per Hardwick. ~ 10:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For wings...lol-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Hindleyite 12:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- monika 14:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For-- 19:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. The album descriptions are priceless.--Procopius 21:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Pure genius. --Hhamdy283 00:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Just wanted to say thanks for the nom, Mister Nosey, and for everyone who voted. I really didn't expect this article to do very well on VFH, but I'm glad to be wrong so far. —rc (t) 00:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Eat a bagel! -- 02:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I still ove the Abbey Road picture... but I don't think it could pull it's own weight on VFP, this is good enough... I suppose. 04:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 04:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Quite, quite brilliant. --Tezcat 09:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• I liek'. Dumitru 12:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because my culture requires me to vote for anything featuring the walrus of death. --User:Falcotron/sig 21:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For!!!!! i love the paul is dead clues!!! and i love this parody! a new extreme!! yay!! (and i wanted to use my totally awesome sig again) (be amazed, be very amazed) The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
• For, heehee. --User:Thetoastman/sig 11:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, grand stuff there lass -- sannse (talk) 22:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For I had a mighty inward struggle with whether to vote for myself. Hubris for the win! —rc (t) 04:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny, and who can go against the Beatles? --  Holla | CUN 04:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Rc is an indisputable genius, and this article is solid, but it feels somewhat incomplete. What's there is hilarious, but it just left me yearning for more. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment You're right. I concentrated on album "clues" but there's definitely more to the story than that. It's unprotected now (I guess all the PLS entries were left protected?) for people to expand. And thanks for the vote. :D —rc (t) 02:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

## Lost in Translation

Score: +22 misunderstand wort

Featuredrc (t) 06:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for. Like VCR manual, only uses other languages too. Very clever and funny.-- 18:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• For very clever, indeed. -- 18:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• For like, very mine, indeed. -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 20:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I am from lack of breath with laughed so much.-- 20:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Oy VEY!Me likr.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I get the joke, and its not funny to me. --  Holla | CUN 02:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• For because heh.— 08:06, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Starts off very well, but needs a little more Cowbell in the bridge. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against For and/or enters and ages- I got it joke, but just no funny anymore writing. Solly...It's better now, i guess.--Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 21:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against and/or and/or shed. Vaguely amusing, but not really worth it. The preceding unsigned comment was added by OpenFaceSurgery (talk • contribs)
• Weak Against but swayable. I like the idea but the ending needs to be revised. It starts off great but then succumbs to temptation. Weppy, the Wehpudicabok -- Hi there! (ticker tape) 05:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
It's part of the joke, to show that the writer is "giving up". -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
See below.
• For. I was payed to vote For.--ZniLe 07:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For clever jokes -- Xykon 08:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For I didn't see the movie, but it's funny anyway. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• for I'm working on a template which fors anything with Bat Fuck Insane in it. Get saved! 14:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, on the condition that by the time it comes to be featured, the Russian Reversal joke is obliterated. -- Hindleyite 15:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Mostly For Didn't see the movie, but riked what you did with the Engrish. Didn't raugh right out roud, but it tickred the insides of my brain. This sight courd use more writers who actuarry use their brains instead of staring at them in the jar on the pantry sherf. Good show, ord chap, good show. --Sharkbait1986 22:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against It needs more work done before it can even be considered for VFH. Expand the shorter sections, make them funnier and then I'll change my vote.--DrPoodle 23:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Revised for. Maybe seeing the movie would've helped me get it the first time...? Oh well, it's good, anyway. Also, DrPoodle needs it explained to him as well. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Wut gives? I like things that are lost. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Reply - I get the joke, I just don't think its that funny...--DrPoodle 09:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Fore. Because my hovercraft is full of eels. El Zoof 12:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Nah, see? Dumitru 12:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• For because Kakun forced me to. Or he'd kill my family.--Shandon 04:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 15:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• FOR - Its way funnier now. --DrPoodle 16:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• FOR - I Love Kakun! --PrincessCaitlaiPrincessCaitlai 17:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was on the fence before all the recent changes, but now it's just hilarious all the way through. And I love the sprite comics starring kanji. --User:Falcotron/sig 21:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

## Pixellated Face Disease

Score: +20 PFD sufferers

Featuredrc (t) 04:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For. As a long term sufferer, I must say that too many people are ready to kick us 'pixellos' around and shove us down manholes. Mere ridicule seems like a picnic by comparison, not that I get to go on many picnics, looking as I do. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes, life is tough for us PFD sufferers. 'Legoman' is not a nice nickname. -- Hindleyite 12:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• for...I wondered why my eyes were square.-- 13:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hi, I'm --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC) & I have PFD....
• For. ~ 15:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's time the world knew about this tragic condition. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. ( talk | contrib ) 16:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's funny 'cause it's true.--Shandon 16:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For.-- 17:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For -- My mother is a PFD survivor. This one's for her...I love you mom (wherever you are)! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• For I replaced one picture, don't ban me. -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Fuzzy for. --The Rt. Hon. 22:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I was hoping for some surprising jokes (and didn't get any), but it was funny enough just using the basic ones. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Yes Please. They used to call me pixhead, but maybe I misheard them on that one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 04:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 08:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Wit (tawk) 08:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very clever.--Procopius 13:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, because MC Frontalot rocks. --User:Falcotron/sig 18:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For While the second picture is not worth mentioning, I laughed when you mentioned "radio personalities", for now I truly understand what my friend meant when he said, "You have a face for radio" --01:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• Unsigned —rc (t) 04:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

Score: +17.5 IP addresses blocked under WP:VAIN

Featuredrc (t) 05:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for. Pretty funny, and I think the author actually did all this stuff.--Procopius 13:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For! - User:Guest/sig 13:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For beyond reasonable doubt. It's true. And funny. It's funny and not just stupid. -- 15:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Yes. Go Gubby! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Hilarious. Very "in" (as in "in-joke") but most readers will understand. good job! -- mowgli 20:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Oh yeah! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Finally a 'HowTo' you can actually use....... --Some Fool 00:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Awesome! I wish I had thought of it. Wehpudicabok 00:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Anything that makes Wikipaedophile admins cry gets a for from me. --UtarEmpire 12:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Well, if I can vote for my own article I will, because I'm worth it. *grin* Gubby 16:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Good fieldwork. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. An aside: Gubby posted the same article on Uncyc, and I couldn't figure out if it was vanity or not until he posted the other one. My only concern is that this stuff will promote vanity on WP and here. But, to be honest, nobody cares since I can just ban them. ^_^ 20:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. John1728 21:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against: clever but too image-heavy. I don't think that would translate to the front page very well. Also, did you find your Rosa Blanco novel?— 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Bloke did 'is 'omework. And I laughed. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Whoever fucking wrote this deserves a medal. {Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Religious Wikism is getting to be a problem..thanks for exposing this ever pervasive trend-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Bravo. I loved that article.The Spith 08:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• YES. I love anything involving the vandalism of wikipedia. --  Holla | CUN 06:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. [1] --Han 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Hilarious, I know from personal experience on the Charles Edward Cheese article of Wikipedia. 1028 18:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against Step 6 is wrong. --HP talk 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against I get the strange feeling that somebody is maintaining a vanity page here, seeing as how the two other people to edit this article have had it reverted.User:Jsonitsac/sig21:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Unsigned, really. And no timestamp. --⇔ 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• ([[Talk:HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia#From VFH|Discussion continued...]])
• Against. Though somewhat amusing, it's a bit of a bad example, but also too image-heavy and thus unfit for the front page. --⇔ 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Really funny article. Deserves recognition. --Admiral06 04:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A page on How To: Waste Admins' Time is not comedy. Modusoperandi 04:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• comment. I just bet that you're an admin XD--Gubby 14:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. You heard it - this thing is butt ugly! -- The Colonel (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - I found it funny.--Mister Nosey 16:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against- Funny, but not feature worthy-- 17:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Howtos and UnNEws articles should not be featured. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: You just said that 'cause it rhymes. Go on - admit it. --Some Fool 03:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - I liked this one well enough. --Arzikl 01:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• ROFL, FOR!. GO, GUBBY! -- 12:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC) -ROFL SIGN YOUR VOTES! --  Holla | CUN 22:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Pricelessly funny yet extremely valuable.--TKF 05:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. 14:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• For That's good. It's very funny! The spoofing of the Sister Wendy Beckett article was probably the funniest thing I've ever read on this dump. --24.76.255.99 20:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• for but the thing that bothers me, is that I don't know why I think it's funny. Get saved! 21:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not funny. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

## Gazebo

Score: +18.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo: Be a Tramp

Score: 19 dumpsters raided

Featuredrc (t) 04:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Nom + For. One of the wittier HowTos out there.--User:Czar Yah/sig 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For LMAO. Yugoslavian F 03:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against Pretty funny, but not main page stuff. --Gunny 09:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Albeit biased, as the author. Just re-read it and think it's great, so there. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very clever, with funny text and amusing pictures. This vote cast in loving memory of HowTo: Criticize the Media's failed VFH nomination.--Procopius 16:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because it was funny, and i laughed at the bit about "you Scally." --Palsworth 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, rather useful. -- 01:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Down four stubbies in one go. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I shall give it a whopping 209 out of 210 for originality. - Stejinz 15:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For traveling on wind power through the night. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. What can I say? Schadenfreude strikes again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because that's exactly the right way to use a shopping cart.--Shandon 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I can't wait to get my Doctorate in Trampology --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, how did you guys find a picture of me? --HP talk 05:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against - could be so much better. --Nydas 18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Will vote for cash. -- 12:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A01:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Very witty. Evil Mark 12:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against Tramps are robots? The Bumfights thing has been done in real life, and Viz had a funnier page of job ads for tramps. Hate to be a prick. Sorry -- 12:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• For "Will code HTML for food".....priceless. No really, Hindleyite bribed me. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, now stop bitching about it on IRC. ;) -- 13:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• FOR At last, a serious article on tramping that doesn't just assume that we tramps are all nothing more than drunken dossers. As a member of the community of 'sunshine dribblers' as we prefer to call ourselves, I found the section on "useful phrases" particularly helpful in the fight against terrorism. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 16:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• PHOR. Hindleyite bribed me with pie. Also, is good HowTo. --SarinZero (blabber ) 18:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• for It works. Get saved! 12:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• for great article --Mr.Gear 20:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +20 Apples Eaten

Featuredrc (t) 04:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• N and F. Vote for this instead of the other one! --L 13:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For it's worth it just for the Chris Walken pic. Plus I dig choosing sides when VFH has a voting war between a page, and itself. Freaky. Modusoperandi 14:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I still don't get it. -- 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_Lost - it's famous among those who can read - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Too bad I can't, eh? Abstain, it's obviously well known. -- 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: John Milton wrote Paradise Lost. Then his wife died and he wrote Paradise Regained. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- 19:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --emc! 22:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because writing this got me to finally read Paradise Lost. -- Imrealized 00:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Fine, fine... I'll also abstain, because its a little confusing to me too. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] 02:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• For-Very clever.-- 20:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR Finally, something clever and funny. Dame  20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I actually learned about the real thing, making it funny now. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 07:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Although the original is pretty good, too.--Procopius 16:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For making us laugh instead of driving us blind...--Shandon 20:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, definately! --HP talk 16:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloody funny, not sure how I missed it earlier.--NotANinja 16:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Man, I love reading Milton trashing! "Winnie's corn cider, how my loot was spent!" --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• No idea how I'd missed this before....but FOR. -- 19:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. Consistently funny from beginning to end. Just skim over it and you'll definitely miss something. --So So 05:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• AGAINST. 'cos too many for's against it already. frankly "episodes" has funnier pictures. the main article is too long and tooo american, soap/tv oriented -- it's almost an "in-joke" for the rest of humanity (well, the rest-of-humanity understands gi joe, george bush, paris hilton and thank-jew-very-much much better). -- mowgli 20:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

::hmm, leave me a msg in my talk page if you're missing "featuring" by a vote. that was never my intention and i can still change (edit!) my vote. -- mowgli 20:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

FOR - was being frivolous earlier which i now regret. voting sections should be taken seriously. i never actually meant to vote against (nor abstain -- which means i neant to vote for, duh!) -- mowgli 06:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For man's first disobedience, and the fruit of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste brought death into the world, and all our woe, with the loss of Eden, till one greater man restore us, and regain the blissful seat, with earthly parody. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Hissss eat the apples already -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. We don't even have this in Oz yet. They'll probably put it on at 11.30pm Tuesdays in 2008, run a few episodes out of order, drop it while the Olympics are on and then forget to bring it back. -- 00:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Do you have to explain?--Savant13 14:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

## UnBooks:My First Necronomicon

Score: +21 souls consumed by the Elder God

Featuredrc (t) 04:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For, something of a self-nom since I did a fair chunk of it. InfiniteMonkey 08:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. The pictures really sell this one.--Procopius 12:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I added a link.-- 13:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, I made the orignal page but InfinteMonkey made it, in my opinion, so much more. --Ginchael 16:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, I wish it were longer, but it's great anyway.--NotANinja 16:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Otherwise Cthulhu will eat my soul ... sooner. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Be honest, Cthulhu helped draw those pics, right? They're excellent. Good writing, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 02:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Cthulhu Fortaghn!User:Tooltroll/sig 05:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• ƒø®. -L 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Especially considering that I already have Baby's First Mythos (the actual book.) Pray I never breed, people. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For...I agree about the pictures.--Shandon 19:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Cthulhu werde unsere Seele essen! -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Because its a clever twist to what I've been reading forever.198.179.0.1 12:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• För Almost as good as the Pudgic Bible...But I don't think enough children have heard the word of Cthulhu. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• I'm so for this that I'm taking a nite course in conversational Cthulhulian. Modusoperandi 04:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not funny, and I understand it about as much as why we're fighting a war in Iraq. --  Holla | CUN 05:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, good treatment of an otherwise overused genre.--Nydas 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• for the title alone, I case one vote. Get saved! 19:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very clever stuff. I doff my cap and drop my trousers -- 04:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Made me laugh. 74.119.26.14 18:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, because 20:1 isn't a good enough ratio for this book. --Falcotron 13:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• For cataleptically gnawing at the infested meat of my anguishes. FreeMorpheme 12:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I liked it.--Savant13 14:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

## Memento

Score: +21

Featuredrc (t) 05:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

• For and Nom. -- 18:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, though I feel biased for some reason. <checks tattoos> Ah... Modusoperandi 19:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Suprised me. --  Holla | CUN 19:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

(UTC) 2006 August 12, 20:00 Mordillo Hands off the virgin!Time till next rocket hits: - For *

• roF -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For I liked the movie. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Did I tell you the one about Sammy Jankis? I did? Multiple times? Oh. For. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 00:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• What the...? I mean, for, since I wrote the text. Credit goes to Modus for the second image and some anon for the re-ordering. --Nydas 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. That movie was cool. Rxfort 13:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• --TKF 13:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)For.
• For. Didn't see the movie but liked the article.--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• roF gnortS. I mean Strong For. --Falcotron 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love the tatt pic too. -- 11:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Wehpudicabok 19:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC) But it's funny once you do get it. Took me a while to get it since I hadn't seen the movie. Weak For
• For Good...--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For-Brevity is indeed the soul of wit-- 17:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For.My soul, art thou Brevity.--Wit (tawk) 16:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Funny only if you know the movie --Iambusyeating 16:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• For What the hell is wrong with this article? I have no idea, I just know that when I read it I get a squishy feeling inside. Maybe it's gas, maybe it's my appendix bursting. All I know is I like it. --Captain Finding Nemo 05:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, nice. --HP talk 20:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I remember saying at VFD ages ago that something a whole lot better could be done with this. I was so right. Spang 16:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

## Fisher Price: A Retrospective

Score: +22

Featured I decided to put the Fisher Price text itself on the front page and link to the Retrospective. Seems to make the most sense for people who aren't already "in the know." —rc (t) 05:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination And For Shizzle. Yes, I already know this has been "Quasi-featured", but this just might make me laugh more than any other article in the damned universe. PURE BRILLIANCE. --Sir Cornbread 04:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

• For. -- 05:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nuh-uh. No second chance for this bad boy. --L 07:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• No, no, no Some editor there even rejected my addition to it ( the only one with a connection to Fisher Price)-- Swami A. Suresh 08:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. What are you, fucking nuts? 24.145.222.85 14:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. So, so For it hurt my sides. TheMono 06:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's front page stuff. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Classic.-- 14:35, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Aganist. Do you think people out there really care about what happened to a damned website like Uncyc? Gimme a break! -- Colonel Swordman 15:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For It's impressive, that much written about Fisher Price. --ENeGMA 19:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 06:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   07:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For To fellate a coprophiliac... Mental note: Do NOT click any links! --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 23:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Excellent tone, superb funny... deserves to have the quasi dropped.-- Imrealized 01:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I had to think about this one, as I was part of the VFD discussion on the actual Fisher Price "article," but I think Volte's superb literary babble deserves highlighting. If nothing else, let this be featured to show fuckwits what will happen to their crass one-liners. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ T. (talk) 06:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Although it would be funnier if Fisher Price itself was featured. - User:Guest/sig 13:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Dirty words and sexual phrases do not equal great content. Dame  20:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Didn't like it then, don't like it now. --ninebucks 21:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against I found it dreadfully confusing. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 23:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 23:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Brilliant. For. ~ 16:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. gets my vote, sure it's offensive, but the analysis makes this article --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 23:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I love fisher-price.--Wit (tawk) 03:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is brilliant. - Sir Real Hamster {la} {talk} {contribs} 22:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Copyright issues. I don't think it's legal to post an entire book. But what the fuck do I know? --172.166.125.108 06:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment...Anyone have any idea what in the hell the guy above me is talking about?? He cant possibly think that this is a REAL BOOK, unless hes completely retarded. Also, his only contribution to the site was that vote...A little suspicious...  Holla | CUN--06:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• He bolded the F and O, so I guess he's voting for and is kidding. --User:Nintendorulez 18:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Well I guess that makes sense, I'll add it as a for until he says otherwise...  Holla | CUN --20:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Apparently I copy-edited this recently, so I have to vote for it.  c • > •  22:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oh hell yes! Brilliance at its core!--Emmzee 23:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• against Meh... it didn't tickle me at all. Maybe I should change my medications again. Get saved! 13:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The only problem I have is the name, which seems so unrelated. Arzikl 07:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For It's the analysis. 'Nuff said. -- Donut - no timestamp
• Against Hilarious, but too much of an in-joke for the front page. -- 18:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Plus, It's not the first time an inside joke has been featured.--User:Czar Yah/sig 01:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. What makes it great is that the author seems completely serious about the most ridiculous subject matter. Wehpudicabok 04:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't think this should really be considered an in-joke. I mean, you can just look up Fisher Price, can't you? That's what I did. Wehpudicabok 04:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

*For. Definitely: it's the analysis that sells it.

Oops, already voted ... --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 04:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 13:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I have to agree with Wehpudicabok. --Teh fish 10:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Meh, wasn't really all that funny. --Rabid Jaguar 04:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Forgainst. Lovely. --Splaka 07:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It may be about an injoke, but it explains it as well. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Nytrospawn 21:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral, I don't want this held against me in a court of law either way --HP talk 16:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, voting for my own article. --Sir Volte CUN 06:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Geez, I can think of 5 unfeatured/nominated articles that are way funnier than this one. --KUK nerd - no timestamp
• For. Bloody brilliant! -- 03:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Hey, why not front page "Fisher Price"? This article, though hilarious, is a lot funnier when you've read the original. And, on the original article, there's a little "see also" which leads you to the retrospective which no-one is going to miss.--Gubby 23:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, this fighting is <James Dean moment> tearing me apart! </James Dean moment>. Modusoperandi 00:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against It sucks and it's not worth featuring...no, it's a load of bull shite. Momochii Zabuza 01:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - I love satirical humour in any form or fashion.--Mister Nosey 04:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against--TKF 00:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Alright, fine, I'll put a for on this page, but to those who don't find it far funnier to put the 'Fisher Price' thing on the front page, well, I shakes my head --Some Fool 01:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• forsimple--129.96.142.18 02:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - I'll try again ..., and if this doesn't work, well then, "Fisher Price to you!" --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 01:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

## Battle of Gettysburg

Score: +25 Fallen Confederate Soldiers, Kind of Like my Heart, Brooke

Featuredrc (t) 04:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

• N+F Procopius is a funny guy. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A21:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For-ward, March! "Col. Chamberlain prevented disaster by re-establishing the Union line on Little Big Top, Brooke. I think there's a lesson there for both of us." I'm speechless. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 22:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. a page that brings history to life. Modusoperandi 22:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, yes, now I'm supposed to understand in-jokes about the American Civil War. Against. - User:Guest/sig 23:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: What are you talking about? There aren't any in-jokes in that article... In fact, the article tells real stuff about the the Battle of Gettysburg. --⇔ 13:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Searching our hearts for so long, all of us knowing — love is a battlefield. -- Imrealized did I just vote with Pat Benatar lyrics? I should be shot 02:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Self-vote For. Pay no attention.--Procopius 12:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for. Consistently amusing, well-written. InfiniteMonkey 18:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for- Very funny, nice to see an article about something real-- 20:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Boys get out those Conferedate dollars, There be yankee Strippers on the horizon!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• (singing) Sittin' by the roadside, on a summer's day, / Chattin' with my messmates to pass the time away, / Lyin' in the shadows underneath the trees; / Goodness how delicious, eatin' goober-peas! Oh, and AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 03:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another good one from Mr.Porpoise. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Yep. And this guy is easily NOTM. --  Holla | CUN 05:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Brooke' -- 09:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, I wanted to vote for this as a feature a while ago, but I didn't know how cos I'm a noob.--Ginchael 15:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, finally, history can apply to real life. --Thetoastman 15:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• FOR I can just hear Shelby Foote narrating...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 20:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Bravo. --⇔ 13:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, LMAO, everybody knows you don't invade until after you get to third base... --HP talk 02:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - A++++++++++ would lol again! Fantastic work --Hippopotassium
• For - I'll never look at the civil war the same way again. --Kevin Bell 13:15, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• For-score & seven thumbs up(!). --DW III 15:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Bloody Brilliant! -- 02:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For (and I'll leave it at that, because all the best jokes are already taken). --Falcotron 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

*For I think it's funny, and what i think is fact! --ZniLe 11:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)--ZniLe 11:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For, and I want to give this article the award for "best captions" but I don't think that exists... oh well. Wehpudicabok 00:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Yeah, alright, I'll give this a vote Yeah, alright, your vote's unsigned, so it doesnt count... --  Holla | CUN 01:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Consider it signed now Corn-boy. --Some Fool 02:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For: Incredible and coolific. It reminds me of my own experiences with love. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH17:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Awesome comedy!!!...though now that I've read it, I think some Carpetbaggers need to come in and clean up Procopius's co-dependent heart....you don't need to be a wartime tragedy..... --DawnLei 20:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

## Dark Ages

Featured ~ ⇔ 02:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +21

*For, really, really for I don't think many articles get quite as good and opinionated as that. Good shit.--Shadow the Blade 06:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Null and void; article is ALREADY FEATURED. H. 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• N+F. We need such vigorous bashing, especially when applied to a serious historical subject. - User:Guest/sig 14:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Huge, Huge For - hilarious. TheMono 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For; it seems a little familiar but it's still funny.— 06:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Self-vote For. Ignore this line and move onto the next.--Procopius 12:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. "Other eras were content to accept this as the will of God -- that a man would have to go through his day with a strong likelihood of being killed by an axe before sunset. Greek and Roman mythology is based on it." Priceless. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I came here all gonna nominate Battle of Gettysburg, but that was until I read about Thurmor, the black bandit of the woods. Shine On, You Crazy Diamond. --Palsworth 15:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• for, finally someone is saying what we're all thinking. Modusoperandi 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Everything there is good except the bashing. -- The Colonel (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• The bashing is the point! - User:Guest/sig 13:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Bashing=/=funny. If bashing is a form of humour, then why don't I find WWE amusing, despite those guys there bash each other with folding chairs all the time? -- The Colonel (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Bashing (can) = Funny. Viz the success and proliferation of Takeshi's Castle in all its wild permutations. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• I don't study history or arts or stuff so whatever the article is bashing makes no difference to me, and since everyone can call someone a "butthole", it is obvious to me that there is something lacking in this candidate - intelligence. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• It's the bashing being applied to a serious historical subject that makes it funny. - User:Guest/sig 17:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• The intense bitterness on a subject that doesn't warrant it at all makes it hilarious. TheMono 03:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I like it, but it could be expanded a bit. --emc! 19:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't find it especially bashy — it's just got a bit of a punch. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: Anything that bashes Petrach is boss. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH
• For I feel like I got an education and I'm really pissed that I didn't before reading this page...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Some Fool 07:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ 12:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  06:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fourteen hundred. Just like Martin Van Buren of IFHTBT.--Emmzee 14:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4 8 15 16 23 42 Uncyclopedian history at its finest. Swordmaster 17:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• For ...the shear beauty...two and a half thumbs up...pure excellence...Sony reminds me of Romans, I hate Sony. --HP talk 05:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I thought I already had voted for this. --  Holla | CUN 19:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For --Kavall 21:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Feature the dadburned article already. Swordmaster 17:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• I be for this and so does my pig be. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. The most intelligent rant I've seen in a long time. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 00:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Needs a Chrono Trigger reference. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 18:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• I had to look that one up. And now that I have, I realize it's not a bad idea. I would have made it TimeQuest, though.  :)--Procopius 19:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. But only if the B-test doesn't show illegally high levels of fact. It seems suspiciously erudite -- 00:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

## Smells Like Teen Spirit

Featured --⇔ 13:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +27.5
• Nom and for. One of the best things I've read on Uncyclopedia in ages. Seriously, this article is so good, I'm considering creating a bunch of sockpuppets just to vote on it here. Only kidding, please don't deop me. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Stonking great read! FOR -- 17:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I know this was worked on for some time.--Shandon 17:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Super-For Long live Kurt Cobain and Grunge! Wait... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A18:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Our little for has always been and always will until the end. (That's the best I could come up with.)— 19:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Forteen magazine. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Makes me feel stupid, and contagious. for. InfiniteMonkey 20:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For John1728 20:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• I miss the comfort in being sad.--Procopius 21:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• How did Imrealized manage to throw all that Nirvana stuff together? Totally stoned... I mean, totally for. -- The Colonel (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Why, just reading this is enough to send me to Nirvana for eternity. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 22:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For; absolutely genius. --em|c|! 01:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• This article's dumb, or maybe just crappy. Think it's just crappy... what? I wrote this? Oh, me! Then I'm all for it. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 02:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Top 10 articles of 2006 maybe? Bladetip 03:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• It starts with F and ends woth R. "Fucking a goatse practitioneR"? No, you pervert, its For! I am so in love with Kurt Cobain its not even funny anymore. I trapped his soul in my washing machine.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.130.180 (talk • contribs)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. While I usually pretend I've never worn flannel, this made me remember, and I needed the humiliation. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Link humor is the best. Wehpudicabok 17:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For- I was supposed to help him on this, but got busy in the stupid 'real world'-- 20:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Angst!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. What else should I be? Rxfort 15:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. This honestly gave me goosebumps because of how excellent it it is. --⇔ 18:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I have absolutely no idea what any of this is about, but I suppose the youngsters must have their fun. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm 55, and I found the genius in the article. --em|c|! 02:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was asked to work on this, but I didn't, because I suck. Sorry to all I dissappointed, you should've known better anyway. I did however do the en.wp article on the deodorant. 04:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• FOR, because its funny and Nirvana kicks ass. --  Holla | CUN 05:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not particularly anything against, but just not good enough for the front page. - User:Guest/sig 05:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Oh hush. FreeMorpheme 18:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Please note that this vote was UNCLEAR!!! --⇔ 13:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

## Snopes

Featured --⇔ 00:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: 23 urban legends smashed into little pieces by Barbara Mikkelson and Oscar Wilde
• Nomination and for. OK, so the MySpace article burned in hell. However, I promise that this is much funnier, it actually has some funny content which would probably function on its own. As an added bonus, it provides ammunition for a reskin, perhaps? --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 12:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: well done, although I wonder if it's as funny to people who aren't familiar with Snopes.— 14:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Claim: My For vote is totally unbiased. Status: False.--Procopius 14:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...but I thought Snopes played for the Boston Red Sox? --HP talk 16:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 19:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Collected on Uncyclopedia, 2006. --  Holla | CUN 21:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Funny, but I don't get the joke.--Emmzee 23:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I'm rather familiar with Snopes and I loved this article. --emc! 01:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I heard somewhere that you can vote more than once for Featured Articles, I don't know if that's true...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. --L 17:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Never heard of Snopes before, yet good anyway. FOR. ~ 17:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Hells yeah. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against-Interesting, but I didn't laugh once-- 16:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against While this is a great example of meta-humour, it just falls flat on being funny. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I disagree entirely with Dawg here... Not only is it not an example of meta-humour at all, but it's quite fluent and fun to read, as well as laugh-inducing. --⇔ 14:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I read stuff on Snopes a lot, and this actually is an amazing parody. Great work! User:Uncyclopedian/sig
• Si. I've seen snopes and this is a great parody of it.--Wit (tawk) 20:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love Snopes, love the parody. Spiraling 04:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. John1728 23:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. 00:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Jtaylor1 01:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Format Pwnage. Swordmaster 17:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Had my first run in with Snopes today — this is an excellent parody. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great stuff, even if it was written by electric monkeys in a secret mountain owned by the freemasons. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Really does look just like it. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Claim: This article should be featured. Status: For. --EvilZak 05:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• For I'm a big fan of the real site, and this layout and content parody is very appropriate. --Teddywithfangs 17:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:RIAA CEO discusses the analog hole

Featured --⇔ 02:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +26 Dollars per track
• N+F. "The basic problem that the RIAA has in protecting its property, is that after people have bought music, they can actually listen to it." Genius. - User:Guest/sig 01:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Pure genius. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A01:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Absolutely hilarious. --emc! 01:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Nah. Not a big fan of UnNews being featured.--Emmzee 02:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think the issue should be wheather or not its funny, not if its UnNews. -- 03:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 05:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm still waiting for digital 8-track. Modusoperandi 06:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For, and Emmzee needs to know that all pages should be featured if they are feature-worthy. ~ 11:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Why didn't this get nominated earlier?--Procopius 11:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. This poops over my article by a galactic proportion, seriously. -- The Colonel (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• FUCC, I mean, For. -- 13:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE! Truly a gut-buster. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Even though I'm writing lots of UnNews lately, I still dont think it should be featured. I probably wouldn't even vote for my own UnNews. I'm happy having UnNews featured on the UnNews page. --  Holla | CUN 20:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant. Wehpudicabok 20:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For need I say more? -- 03:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Sony blowing me. --HP talk 05:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Also, my vote should be multiplied by the number of following reasons that Sony should blow me...
1. virus-on-a-CD-trick
3. Sony makes CD-R media
4. Sony makes CD-RW media
5. Sony makes CD players
6. Sony makes CD players that play mp3's
7. Sony computer CD drives are manufactured under multiple company names (x10 at least)
8. Did I leave any thing out?
• Hey, that's my proprietary voting style! In the name of RIAA, I am going to shut down whatever websites you have and sue your pants off. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Until I see an UnRule that UnNews shouldn't be featured, I'll definitely vote for writing like this. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - smutty but clever --Nydas 18:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For John1728 23:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Beautiful. --Bladetip 04:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• For --Han 09:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Solid parody writing. InfiniteMonkey 10:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Support Funny, but un-fortunately true. 1028 19:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• For ANOTHER quality UnNews article...-- 00:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I miss Doug. 00:41, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• FUCC yeah! - Nonymous 19:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - Now don't you go singing in the shower boy! --Batmobile 00:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Omnipotent for. ~I'm really really sorry... :( --⇔ 07:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Erm, is there any point voting for this when it's gonna be featured next anyway? Oh to heck with it. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. The finest use of the word "grapejuice" I have seen in a long time. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• For ... I can't top that. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

## Voynich Manuscript

Featured --⇔ 06:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
• SN & F. Pimps away, Master Zim! -- 15:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• for cuz itz stoypid. Get saved! 15:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!!! zim voted for it..i mean come on...it has to be good.....good article!!! The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
• For and not because of Zim. --emc! 02:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only for the pictures, though the writing is really funny, too.-- 02:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like the picture captions. The article is shite, but i like the picture captions. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 02:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Its a little short, but makes up for it in content. --  Holla | CUN 03:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For featuring a cookery recipe. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, though it's much funnier after reading the Wikipedia thinger.— 12:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Ditto. But it made me laugh and I learned something new. And isn't that why we're here?--Procopius 12:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

*For Cool. --218.215.131.100 12:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• For above is me --Han 12:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Halfhearted for. I found this very funny, BUT only after I read it the first time, said "WTF" and actually did some quick research into what it actually is. Good, but it doesn't have the instant recognition and humour that deserves a full vote. --Nuknuk 14:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...and I will make a ref to this article for the rest of the month of July for each new article I make... --HP talk 15:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Mhaille is a god. -- 22:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For By pie, I will vote for this article. 19:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I found it to be thouroughly enlightening and humorous. It shall recieve a full vote. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH20:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Took me a bit to vote because I wanted to research first, laugh second. That actually wasn't necessary in this case because this article is really well-written and funny as hell. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 00:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. The Mhaille Hit Factory churns out another chart topper. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is not fair. Popular writers always get all the attention. -- The Colonel (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Solve The 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube

Featured Spang 05:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: 19 bottles of beer on the wall
• Nom and For. Simple and accessible - David Gerard 19:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Made me lol. --User:§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ|§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩÅ³]] 20:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I just dont like HowTo's that much.  Holla | CUN --20:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against I liked it and all, but 1.)I know it won't last long 2.) The Swedish rat Contest thing is funnier. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Someone needs to make a better picture for this article. I'll try one tommorow, but only if nobody makes one first. -- 00:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Done. -- 21:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No. --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For:
• Like DG said - "simple and accessible". If you think simplicity is stupid, then go laugh at my old Quantum Mechanics textbook.
• One crazy idea outrageously executed.
• One of the few fine works here by a n00b.
• Endorsed by Splaka the user hater (sort of).

-- The Colonel (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• For. Because the world needs to know it. --Wehpudicabok 04:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Feature it! --L 08:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love the picture(s). Witty. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Ya! Dame  13:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• ForxForxFor. No comment needed. -Nelson3x4x0
• For I was gonna nominate this. -- 00:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- GaraGara 00:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I laughed. Very nice layout as well.--TKF 00:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Shamelessly For. Wow! I thought the only way i'd get this to fail nomination is if i nominated it myself. --Dondonz 09:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For cause everyone needs one! Superlizard 10:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4x4x4 --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Awesome piece of work. --Nuknuk 10:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For great justice. Whoever wrote this gets the gold star. --UtarEmpire 15:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Han 12:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wholehearted for! Hilarious.--Emmzee 00:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, nobody at NASA believed me that it could be done...--HP talk 19:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against --JimmyB 04:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Whoa, this article was so funny that I already laughed like crazy just looking at the title! --KUK nerd 22:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! After I read the article, I went and solved one! This article changed my life. Thank you. Swordmaster 18:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Alas, I still can't figure it out.--Procopius 12:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Featured --⇔ 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
• Nom and For. There's something about the phrase "potato manipulation software" that really revs my engine. -- 04:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 04:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme For, Adobe deserves recognition for this great piece of software. -- 08:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

:For. --67.142.130.45 19:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• For. The above was mine....-- 19:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Potato-based humor doesn't get the kudos that it deserves Modusoperandi 20:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, but what about its puzzle potato creating properties?--Emmzee 21:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strongly For - Hilarious. Except of course that I am morally obliged to defend New Zealand! TheMono 00:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Massively biased FOR. -- 00:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because admins wrote it and they'll like me more if I vote for their articles. It's always good when admins like you, it really is.— 03:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Thats only half true. --
• For and I must say that i agree with Mr. Mooses above me. A reskin would be awesome. 09:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Equally biased as Mhaille, however. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 09:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against I'll be the first person to break the mold and vote against, and not just for the sake of non-comformity. I read the whole article against my ravenous will and I did not laugh. Once. Lame. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 04:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I haven't read the article, but the title makes me hungry. --Captain Finding Nemo 05:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against, I find it cute, and it might work for Encyclopedia Dramatica, but uhh, nice try. --emc! 03:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

For, changed my vote because I love this article! It's great! Wooohoo! :-] --emc! 21:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice article! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Futile against. I moaned and groaned. But computer nerd humor like this seems pretty much like a shoe-in for featuring... --So So 07:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The laugh is there, but not enough to hit the spot. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This one take the chip! HA! Chip! I made a potato joke! --officer designate Lugiatm 14:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Got any french fried potaters in that there chop? Mmm hmm. Reckon I'll have me the bigguns. Mmm hmm. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against but only because the Voynich manuscript is too far behind to be in the running --Some Fool 07:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. If nothing else, it displays the work that should go in to feature stories.--Procopius 14:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Although I would like to point out that I made up the phrase "Potato Chop", which I frequently shorten to just "potochop". Anyway, good work. -- 22:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Hilarious article! --DrPoodle 22:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Looks tasty. Rxfort 00:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• For - It's mockery of the greatest photo-editing technical marvel! I love it! --Demonlink2 22:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

## Rap

Featured --⇔ 07:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: reppin +22.5 fo shizzle
• Self Nom & For. I completely re-wrote this from crap. I spent LOTS of time on it, and I think it's ready to face the judges. Hope you like it! -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4 shizzle Considering I helped make the article what it is, I revoke all the "credit" Sir Cornbread and others deserve for rewriting this article, and take it for myself. --emc! 19:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Emmzee 20:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A nice scattering of funny throughout. Yea yeAH!! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• 4. -- 00:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fo' schizzle.--User:Czar Yah/sig 00:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Aiiii TheMono 01:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Mad props to the Freestyle Section.--Procopius 01:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. WOW! Thank u all! I thought this was easily my best article, but I didnt think it would do this well. Thanks for your votes! -- Sir Cornbread The Great  [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 03:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Gittin' down on all For's and shakin' it at the hudio, brother. ... Or something. Innit. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• For- 'A' for effort 'B-' for laughs-- 18:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• The shizzle, FOR rizzle, this artizzle is the shizzle! DiZ deems it worthy. DiZzletheGrizzle  ( Worshizzle me yo'!) (Prizzle me!) (Jizzle me!)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE-YO. This came a long way from VFD. An excellent rewrite, and worthy of attention. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• I have to vote For even though I think it could stand to lose the Bush picture. That's getting a little overdone. But overall it's definitely worth featuring. Wehpudicabok 02:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Dis article's tight, yo. I mean, for. --UtarEmpire 05:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• A splendid article, very well done indeed, my sincerest congratulations on such a fine achievement. --Nydas 19:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wonderful article --70.27.217.235 14:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, lol --JimmyB 04:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Why does snoop dog have an umbrella? For drizzle! Dshack 05:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against because I think that an article on rap could be a lot funnier than this, but I'd like to see that hilarious picture of the wiggers on a featured article so instead I'll just make this a comment. --So So 07:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• For all my homies Brilliant. --Nuknuk 14:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The kids listen to the rap music, which gives them the brain damage. With their hippin an a hoppin an a bippin an a boppin, they dont know what the jazz is all about! Great pictures, too.--TKF 17:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩÅ³ 00:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• For and damn, that's one scary-ass sig, isn't it?  c • > •  18:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

## Barns and Nobles

Featured --⇔ 08:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
• Self-nom and For. It's hard to go wrong when you start with a brilliant picture by RadX and go from there...-- 14:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. You had me at "sank my Serfdomship". -- Imrealized 19:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - David Gerard 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For living in the past*. -- 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
*Ian Anderson flute solo not available outside of UK. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I like the subject matter. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For The only thing I don't like is that it has nothing to do with Barnes & Nobles, except the play on the name - Arzikl 05:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Except for the fact that both the main book and the names of the expansions are plays on the names of popular places to buy D&D books, you're right (Barnes & Noble, Waldenbooks, Books-a-Million, & Borders... that's all we've got around here, anyway...).-- 13:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -L 12:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Clever.--Emmzee 20:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brad writes good articles.  Holla | CUN --06:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Sure. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• FORE! This had me laughing out loud. Great. The Unbeatable, Immortal Legend  [Discussion of I] [MUN!] In Soviet Russia, Tested Loses To YOU!! 01:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A great article. Puns ahoy! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant!--Rabidwombat27 04:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For the image. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 01:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 13:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another article I cracked up at while not working. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• For...funny --HP talk 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

• Forgot to add the squiggly thingies. ForInfiniteMonkey 04:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• For bastard! I thought my d20 days were behind me... Modusoperandi 16:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

## The Swedish Orienteering And Firing A Rat From A Cannon Championships

Featured --⇔ 06:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18.5
• Nom and For. I laughed like a drain. A freshly Drano'd one - David Gerard 18:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Up next, Vole vaulting. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Jesus, this guy is good (That is a very strong for). -- Imrealized 21:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• För I thought it was going to turn out to be one of those articles only people from the designated country would understand, but I found it funny. Personally, though, I prefer gerbil-tossing, but is gööd, yah?!? --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Fucking amazing. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• This is flipping crazy! I like it. For --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  13:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Awesome! --DeathByPie 13:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Funny & original. Almost good enough to abstain on --142.68.236.133 22:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - The image itself was enough.--Shandon 01:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The name alone wins this, but an entire article on this? Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 12:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - I very idea that an article with this name was created made me laugh. Just weird enough, and brilliant. --Nuknuk 13:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong meatball. --So So 05:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Mushroom 06:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! Hilarious.--Emmzee 17:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• A 21 rat cannon salute in honour of this - One of my favourite articles on here, and that was before the drugs scandal got added. --Billsheppard 11:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Articles like this are what make Uncyclopedia great. Wehpudicabok 18:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

## Universal Remote Control Everything 3000

Featured --⇔ 07:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18
• Nom and for. It does exactly what it says on the tin. Well almost exactly. Sort of. Except it doesn't come in a tin. I actually have no idea why I even mentioned that. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. The image also needs a VFP. Could do with the subarticles being merged, though I know the author disagrees - David Gerard 13:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Says it all, really. ~ 15:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I was afraid it would be like Click, but I was pleasantly surprised. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 15:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Wow. Just wow. -- Imrealized 17:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I want one! — 17:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  17:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I like the concept (and the fridge pic), but the remote isn't nearly complicated enough to make my life easier. It needs buttons for everything, cryptic symbols on those buttons, cryptic symbols where there aren't, and a power cord. Modusoperandi 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nobody told you about the vibration feature? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Having read and reread the page, my stance has softened somewhat. When the button-orific U.R.C.E. 4000 I'll vote for it. In the mean time, Abstain Modusoperandi 01:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• F-f-f-for. Great.  Holla | CUN --19:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, the perfect gift. -- 03:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! give me one! MwM 19:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very useful. I also like the pictures. They should be featured. --Sbluen 22:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• For the fridge picture alone. The rest is just gravy. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• ForYou gotta love the pictures.--User:Czar Yah/sig 02:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against because the fridge picture is a freakin' megabyte and I'm on dial-up. Plus I don't really find the article to be funny.— 09:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Procopius 14:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Amazing. I want one.--Emmzee 14:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! This one is really funny...-- 21:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 21:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fore! I've got my URCE3000, have you? --Lokine 14:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. A lot of my time went into this. Time I should have been spending watching TV. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 15:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against If there was a joke in that article, I must've missed it. --emc! 20:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Get Banned

Featured - ⇔ 06:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
• For Hah. I have to admit that I'm guilty of a few of those things...-- BirdEgal202 17:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• For: LOL. This is teh funnay. - unsigned vote
• For. Hasn't this been nominated recently? - User:Guest/sig 04:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Yes, as a matter of fact it was. Modusoperandi 04:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For the record, this has been nommed by a different user each time. Third trip down the aisle, always always left standing at the altar. ~ T. (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For ; I have my reasons, such as I am anti-Skub --ccdimeanc | cantabria 11:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. it's not really.... good. or an article - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 14:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• For good idea, seriously - unsigned vote
• For. This article has been improved with pictures. --Sbluen 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, fine. The pictures help a lot. --Hobelhouse 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just seems like a lot of bitching about annoying uncyclopedia users.--InfiniteMonkey 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For LOL phrom ph00blet - Unsigned
• Against  c • > •  04:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Not funny. --Emmzee (flame me here)
• For. New and improved. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• I have added "Not vote FOR this article on VFH" into the list. Those listed above may want to reconsider their vote..... -- 18:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I was not coerced into this vote. — 17:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Rataube 09:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Just say No to inside jokes. ~15:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For haha, every website needs a how to get banned manual! --Snerlin 21:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I must be a moron... I think it's funny. Get saved! 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, if only for the opening.-- 21:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny, and sadly true. It's much improved with the pictures. The extended introduction is quite good, though not markedly better than the short, snappy original one.--Winston 02:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For...but wasn't this taken directly from the howto--be a good wikipedian?? --HP talk 03:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I got banned for #15 in Expert Users....-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Insineratehymn 15:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I've only got to intermediate level. :( --The Rt. Hon. 16:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. meh...not every how:to needs to be nominated, but this is alright.--Witt E, 05:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 03:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• $\int_{-\pi/4}^{\pi/4}2\sqrt{2}(\cos{x}-\sin{x})\, dx$ -- 05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Say For to funny pics. OMFG STFU N00b! Demonbob 22:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Aganist - Unpocalypse is here!! -- Colonel Swordman 14:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Needs "Add a B to AAAAAAAAA!" back in there. Crazyswordsman 23:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Bleh--TKF 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - How to get banned? Was somebody having trouble with that? Here? Now that's funny.--Immy 19:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now the admins track the people who do what it says to make their job easier.--Cray Z. 07:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against...Doesnt even really count as an article, just OK anyway...--Sir Cornbread 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --The Stig | Abt me | Rant 06:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Half the stuff on there is a direct reference to something Flameviper has done. 24.145.222.85 16:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC) vote by sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Flameviper, both banned (ironic).
• For I wish I had had this when I first got here! --Chimzar 22:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• for this is funy unsigned vote
• No because it's a list inside of a HowTo. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 04:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, but needs vote rigging. ~ 15:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Donut 02:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 20:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It gave me ideas. --Testicles 02:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• This is worse than an internet rant. Not front page material. --Rabid Jaguar 00:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Spot on. (vo_o)b--Batmobile 22:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Too accurate. -- 18:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 04:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

## New Age Psychology

Score: +18.5

Featured -⇔ 08:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• 4 self-nominations in a row. Just jumping on the bandwagon, plus I'm proud of this article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For "What can I do to get out of this puddle!?" and other such goodness. -- Imrealized 19:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Love the circle map. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Made me laugh.  Holla | CUN --19:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Winnah! - David Gerard 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For helping me get in touch with my inner energies --Nydas 21:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Faux Native American Beaded Necklaces -- 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For "Homosexuals stealing our women." Wehpudicabok 00:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Nintendorulez 01:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article just got better the farther down the page I got. Good work.-- 02:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For-absolutely great--24.24.150.168 06:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Best article I've ever read on Uncyc! Then again, it's probably the only one I've ever read fully so... ~ 07:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, meh... - User:Guest/sig 11:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -L 12:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• VERY For Remember, the only people who are really helped by self-help books are the authors of the self-help books themselves. Dame  13:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• F-o-r --Flabius-Danner 20:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For with the stipulation that you also write an article on New Age Physiology --Mindsunwound: (NS) Torture Water Man Babies 23:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• for HAH! Get saved! 17:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For you idiot, now buy my books.--Wit (tawk) 03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +22, eh?

Featuredrc (t) 04:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nom+For because I forgot to nom it on Canada day... Modusoperandi 19:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - lovely! - David Gerard 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Eh? (I suppose that's a for) ~ 07:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 11:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Its funny.  Holla | CUN --20:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fort McMurray. --Carlb 05:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For snowy skies,for yellow mounds of canola. VolatileChemical's talk 07:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-EH-TIVE-EH. Our country reeks of trees, et al. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, because here in Canada, GTA means something completely diffrent. -- 14:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. fantabulosis. my favourite page. --Ieatbreadpeople 17:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. O Canada! Our home and native land! And so on and so on. --User:Toonmon/sig 17:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Provisional For. This For is recinded if it is subject to GST-- 18:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For a semi-long article that keeps up the funny. -- Imrealized 00:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, eh? --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 00:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For the true north strong and free. Beauty, eh? ~ T. (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For but leaning towards abstain--LOLMOLE 02:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - Modusoperandi & Co. have really done a lot of nice work on this over these last few months.  c • > •  03:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. eh?--Wit (tawk) 23:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, Eh. Okay, so the artist's impression of where Canada might be was funny, but for the most part, it really isn't that incredible. tested 00:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Eh! (Aye) --Major4 03:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I vote like a big boy, eh? --Sivius 02:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Amazing For! Funny, and true. At least to my part of Canada.--Emmzee 20:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• .49th of a vote for--TKF 01:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

## Command Line

Score: +22.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

• for --master5o1 13:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nom and For 'tis very funny, though a bit hard to read. I very much enjoyed how my picture was worked into this article. -- 20:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
If you can think of ways to make it less unreadable they would be most welcomed - David Gerard 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
The main problem is the font size. Although code'd text is always that small. -- 19:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
There's kludges involving font tags and so forth. I'll try some experiments - David Gerard 22:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I just tried <font size=+1> - any better? - David Gerard 00:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes. -- 12:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Too confusing.  Holla | CUN --21:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Even though I only possess a vague idea of what this is refering to (I am still quite computer-inept), I find it extremely funny, which says a hell of a lot. -- Imrealized 21:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - New intro is good, my vagueness rescinded. Thanks. -- Imrealized 06:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For....it would be my first feature. -- 22:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For even though it's still very much in progress - David Gerard 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Even though its awfully command-line-centric ;-) Good job, and its originalish. Dame  00:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 00:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 03:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Had me at "Bootstrapping the RAM." --L 09:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Pro. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. RTFM! (unsignedin UnJetamo)
• Un-properly-signed —rc (t) 03:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Great idea well executed. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I vote this worthy.

Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 12:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• Brilliance. One of the best articles on Uncyc I've seen. FOR. - User:Guest/sig 12:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Reminds me of the time I installed Linux and forgot to install X. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bwahahah. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 13:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! The Dalek liked it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• for Very, very amusing and different. Get saved! 16:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's readable to me; I suppose the question is how you fit it in the Feature Box on the front page.--Procopius 21:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Hence the new intro, which I hope doesn't overexplain the joke so much as set it up properly. That said, it'll probably set back the cause of the Linux geek with a live CD back three years ... - David Gerard 22:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like it. --Sbluen 22:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. How delightful. --63.135.2.27 23:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I like it. --Arzikl 07:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against - been there, done that -- The Colonel (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Reminds me of when I tried to install Linux, and had forgotten the password I hadn't given it yet.-- 14:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. That was beautiful. --DeathByPie 13:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For "Articles that look like the things they're about" at it's best. --Rabid Jaguar 21:01, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Yep-- 14:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Terrible!--Emmzee 21:00, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• My God YES --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• For.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   00:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Forit--Wit (tawk) 01:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

## Jingo

Score: +23

Featured 03:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Self Nom and For in the pursuit of my own interests. And don't give me any of that "I'm a foreigner and I don't understand crap". -- 08:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- VodkaTabako 08:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! Had me at "the entire bay was filled with pigs." --L 09:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For King and Country! - David Gerard 10:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Sweet Nice article. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For British Humour taking over Uncyc! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Jingo in its many forms, but especially in the form of clever satire. -- Imrealized 11:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. By Jingo, this article wants to imperialize me! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Very for Dame  13:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very nice. Much better than when it was shown to me in its larval form, and it was pretty funny then, too.-- 13:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Funny, but the whole 'fallen soldiers' caskets as jingo blocks' idea just said no to me. Sorry. Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 13:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• for I like it! Get saved! 14:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Says it all, really. ~ 15:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I just can't vote for an article that uses caskets of dead soldiers as its hook. Modusoperandi 15:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not looking to change your vote, however you're not looking at the main focus of that specific image, which is more to do with the way governments play with their soldiers lives for their own political and often financial gain. --
I get it, I just can't vote for it. Aw, heck...Abstain Modusoperandi 15:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Screw it, I had an epiphany while on the can: it's good, and the image drives home the message...for. Keep it up. Modusoperandi 06:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• The Dalek sez AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Jingooo! --KATIE!! 16:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Indeed.  Holla | CUN --16:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For--Shandon 17:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Although may I suggest something about Jingo Fett. I love that guy. -- 19:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Damn you Mhaille, are you ever gonna peak? You're making the rest of us look bad. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Ignorant westerners... wait! 00:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. — 02:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant For The article itself is brilliant, but I have my reservations against the 'Flag_coffin' image. Those are dead daughters and sons of grieving parents. They where killed because of what their fellow countrymen beleived right, and that fact should not be mocked. Just as you should not mock a Palestinian self-bomber. They have in common that they probably died for reasons that they themselves did not choose or even understood fully. That is the true tragedy, and I think it should not be mocked. diMario 23:15, 14 July 2006
• For. I'm a foreigner and I don't understand crap -- VFP Eincyc (talk) 22:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

## Z

Score: Brought to you by the number 23

Featuredrc (t) 06:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. I laughed, I cried, I pissed on President Clinton. 21:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Zed's dead, baby! - David Gerard 22:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• I guess. If you insist. (STRONG FOR) -- 02:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I don't like the conclusion, but the rest of the article is good enough to get a vote. —rc (t) 03:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• I count one, count it, ONE, vote for. Ah! Ah! Ah! --Hobelhouse 04:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• 'For. -L 04:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For with one tweak. Dame  14:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fo- oh wait, stm did this? He's got enough features already, doesn't he?  :)-- 14:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --User:Nintendorulez 16:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Holy Fucking For Good work. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For sure, I remember Zed's cousin. Perhaps next, the "Onetwothreefourfive, sixseveneightnineten eleven twelve!" song? Modusoperandi 20:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. That's just.... wow.--Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 23:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free|F@H|MUN
• Against. I just don't want this on the front page. Also, I don't get it, and before you ask if I get anything, the answer is yes. - User:Guest/sig 07:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! To think, this went from QVFD, to VFD, to VFH, to VD our hearts. Z rockz, even if Zima zucks. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against It's well-written and all, but I don't think the content itself makes good VFH material. I don't like the idea of an article about a letter being featured. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For It's a decent story. I'd love to see a picture of Z knifing someone though. --Yesihavecookies 20:15, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fur Meh... i haven't voted in like a month or so... --Mindsunwound: (NS) Torture Water Man Babies 23:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -  c • > •  04:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Four That's our letter of the day, kids! --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩÅ³ 05:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I barely understand it, and its still pretty damn funny.  Holla | CUN --05:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Zomeone zaid on VFD that an article about a letter was doomed to fail (I'm paraphrazing). Zis zhows what a skilled writer is capable of... exzellenze. -- Imrealized 21:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• weak For. Sure it's good, but not that good.--Wit (tawk) 23:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Heck yeah, for!!! Wow. That was one of the most original and yet obvious ideas I've seen in a while. U GIT GOLD STARS! tested 00:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• For -- 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• NO, X. XYLOPHONE IS MY WORD. MINE. NOT YOURS. Heheh, For. --Rabid Jaguar 03:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Today's show was brought to you by the letter Z and the number for. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

## Grue

Score: Ye Olde One-Score and TWO and 1/2

Featuredrc (t) 05:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For How this failed to be featured before I do not know. Vote, run away scream then die, for the grue is around here somewhere...OH MY- 09:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I like the Best and Worst Case Scenario grid.--Procopius 13:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it links to one of my pages, and we need to feature another "Uncyclopedia" Uncyclopedia article, you know?--Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 14:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For it was nombefore, but that was a much worse article. The newer version is much better. ~ 14:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For! This hasn't been nominated yet? -- 15:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!!!!! If Zork is featured, why isn't Grue featured?--Timmytiptoe my talk 17:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For absolutely. Mrthejazz 18:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR! It's a Grue, for heaven's sake! Tar7arus 19:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nod -- 20:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Huge for. In my opinion one of the sites best, plus I've done a lot of it.  Holla | CUN --23:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Four. Brilliance, and it served as fodder for many a Text adventure.--Emmzee 01:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's hilarious unless you don't know what a grue is, and if that's the case, then it's your own fault for not checking our less intelligent counterpart Wikipedia. --Testicles 02:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This has gotten much better since I last voted against it.-- 02:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against:
• Ugly layout
• Too many quotes
• Random humour, anyone?
• I never played Zork. Plus, text adventure games suck.
• No, your mom doesn't like them either.
• In Soviet Russia, Eurg eats YOU!!
• The article features a lame use of the word "olde".
• The League of Ninja-priates doesn't want this to be featured.
• In conclusion, this is just one, big, yucky article.
-- Colonel Swordman 04:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• For because Col. Swordsman voted against it. And watch it with the bullet-point madness. --User:Nintendorulez 13:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For this article and that little Grue beating his arms in ye olde aire. Against aggressive bullet points in VFH. -- Imrealized 04:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fuhor. Without a doubt. --Wit (tawk) 05:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR My Picture is one of the several hundred! -- 15:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Very messy, random, and... well... messy. Needs some more work. --Jordanus 19:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against, too many links. -- 03:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• *** You have died *** (i.e affirmative). --L 08:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  12:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For People who disagree will be messily devoured by a grue.--Ganall 13:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Yes.--TKF 21:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Random (I did laugh, but it's not front page material). - User:Guest/sig 11:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Let's see, needs formatting cleanup, a thorough de-listification, and even then it wouldn't be very good. Against again for emphasis. —rc (t) 15:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I don't care how bad the article is. It's funny. Grues in general are funny. Isn't that the only thing that matters here? Plus, it's one of our injokes, much like Oscar Wilde, AAAAAAAAA!, Euroipods, and Kitten Huffing. Crazyswordsman 04:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Grues in general are funny? Yeah, right... -- Colonel Swordman, the enemy of nerds and low quality injokes 21:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment then again, that was added by a vabnal. So that shouldn't always be trusted. Anyways, funny is a matter of opinion, so don't complain. ~ 16:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For I laughed hard. Grue crossing - you will die -- 82.117.223.65 23:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment- "It's hilarious unless you don't know what a grue is..." Not true, Testicles. I didnt know what a grue was until I read the Wikipedia article after reading this article. And it was and is still frickin hilarious.  Holla | CUN --06:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• for. why hasn't it been featured yet? --Ieatbreadpeople 17:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)