Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive6

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Humosexual

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 05:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Self nom and For. Out of the closet, into the fire - one last one before I retire --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. We're here, we sneer, welcome to our site.--Procopius 14:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That almost exactly describes me.--Emmzee 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fur because I feel bad for Procopius. --emc! 03:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Sweet pity helps me escape. :)--Procopius 20:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - Rob will do a lot for a pizza, but he drew the line at being mentioned in this. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Fro cool. --Parodius 22:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Eggsaladtent-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 04:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Noteworthy article, but considering that the subject matter has longed been joked about to the point of not being funny at all, and the article itself contains no more than what has been around in popular culture, I must contest its credibility of being feature-worthy (but that doesn't make me a humophobe, does it?) -- The Colonel (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 07:37, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - Thanks for pointing that out. I was unaware of my crime. Please put a link on my talk page to show me where this has been done before. I'd hate to be unoriginal. I will try and stuff something in that hasn't "been around in popular culture" for a while, like maybe Stephenson's Rocket or something. And another thing, how can an article be both 'noteworthy' and 'not funny at all'? You make no sense at all. Were you drunk perhaps? --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 15:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I had to vote for as I'm a bit of a humo myself. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 21:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • FOUR. I like it. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great, Hardwick, but don't let this be your swan song! --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 12:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For it is great. Dumitru 12:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah. Just so-so for my sense of humour. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. What can I say? She made me laugh.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 19:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

"Paul is dead" hoax

Score: +20 if "Eat a bagel!" doesn't mean "for"

Featured I counted the votes very carefully and responsibly. Thanks for the support. —rc (t) 05:22, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom and For - Was a Poo Lit Surprise contest winner.--Mister Nosey 00:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Is this supposed to be funny? It reads like a Wikipedia article. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Lesson 1: It reads like a Wikipedia article because it's a parody. Brilliant, funny, subtle and smart writing and images. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 06:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like how it pretends that Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings. The rest is good too.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it beat mine so it must be funny, which it is.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:36, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For as per Hardwick. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For wings...lol-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Hindleyite 12:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- monika 14:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For--SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle 19:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The album descriptions are priceless.--Procopius 21:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Pure genius. --Hhamdy283 00:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Just wanted to say thanks for the nom, Mister Nosey, and for everyone who voted. I really didn't expect this article to do very well on VFH, but I'm glad to be wrong so far. —rc (t) 00:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Eat a bagel! -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I still ove the Abbey Road picture... but I don't think it could pull it's own weight on VFP, this is good enough... I suppose. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 04:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Quite, quite brilliant. --Tezcat 09:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I liek'. Dumitru 12:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because my culture requires me to vote for anything featuring the walrus of death. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 21:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For!!!!! i love the paul is dead clues!!! and i love this parody! a new extreme!! yay!! (and i wanted to use my totally awesome sig again) (be amazed, be very amazed) The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
  • For, heehee. -- cdr. thetoastman Toastmansig.png tlk ctr cun f@h 11:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, grand stuff there lass -- sannse@Wikia (talk) 22:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For I had a mighty inward struggle with whether to vote for myself. Hubris for the win! —rc (t) 04:36, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funny, and who can go against the Beatles? -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 04:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak for Rc is an indisputable genius, and this article is solid, but it feels somewhat incomplete. What's there is hilarious, but it just left me yearning for more. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment You're right. I concentrated on album "clues" but there's definitely more to the story than that. It's unprotected now (I guess all the PLS entries were left protected?) for people to expand. And thanks for the vote. :D —rc (t) 02:02, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Lost in Translation

Score: +22 misunderstand wort

Featuredrc (t) 06:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

It's part of the joke, to show that the writer is "giving up". --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
See below.
  • For. I was payed to vote For.--ZniLe 07:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For clever jokes -- Xykon 08:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I didn't see the movie, but it's funny anyway. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for I'm working on a template which fors anything with Bat Fuck Insane in it. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 14:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, on the condition that by the time it comes to be featured, the Russian Reversal joke is obliterated. -- Hindleyite 15:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Mostly For Didn't see the movie, but riked what you did with the Engrish. Didn't raugh right out roud, but it tickred the insides of my brain. This sight courd use more writers who actuarry use their brains instead of staring at them in the jar on the pantry sherf. Good show, ord chap, good show. --Sharkbait1986 22:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It needs more work done before it can even be considered for VFH. Expand the shorter sections, make them funnier and then I'll change my vote.--DrPoodle 23:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Revised for. Maybe seeing the movie would've helped me get it the first time...? Oh well, it's good, anyway. Also, DrPoodle needs it explained to him as well. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Wut gives? I like things that are lost. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Reply - I get the joke, I just don't think its that funny...--DrPoodle 09:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Fore. Because my hovercraft is full of eels. El Zoof 12:30, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah, see? Dumitru 12:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For because Kakun forced me to. Or he'd kill my family.--Shandon 04:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 15:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR - Its way funnier now. --DrPoodle 16:54, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR - I Love Kakun! --PrincessCaitlaiPrincessCaitlai 17:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I was on the fence before all the recent changes, but now it's just hilarious all the way through. And I love the sprite comics starring kanji. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 21:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Pixellated Face Disease

Score: +20 PFD sufferers

Featuredrc (t) 04:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom and For. As a long term sufferer, I must say that too many people are ready to kick us 'pixellos' around and shove us down manholes. Mere ridicule seems like a picnic by comparison, not that I get to go on many picnics, looking as I do. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Yes, life is tough for us PFD sufferers. 'Legoman' is not a nice nickname. -- Hindleyite 12:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for...I wondered why my eyes were square.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hi, I'm --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 13:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC) & I have PFD....
  • For. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's time the world knew about this tragic condition. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 16:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's funny 'cause it's true.--Shandon 16:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 17:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- My mother is a PFD survivor. This one's for her...I love you mom (wherever you are)! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I replaced one picture, don't ban me. --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 21:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuzzy for. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 22:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. I was hoping for some surprising jokes (and didn't get any), but it was funny enough just using the basic ones. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:38, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes Please. They used to call me pixhead, but maybe I misheard them on that one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 04:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Wit (tawk) 08:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very clever.--Procopius 13:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 14:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because MC Frontalot rocks. -- Falcotron16.png !!! ??? 18:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For While the second picture is not worth mentioning, I laughed when you mentioned "radio personalities", for now I truly understand what my friend meant when he said, "You have a face for radio" --01:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Unsigned —rc (t) 04:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

Score: +17.5 IP addresses blocked under WP:VAIN

Featuredrc (t) 05:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom and for. Pretty funny, and I think the author actually did all this stuff.--Procopius 13:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For! - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For beyond reasonable doubt. It's true. And funny. It's funny and not just stupid. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 15:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes. Go Gubby! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Hilarious. Very "in" (as in "in-joke") but most readers will understand. good job! -- mowgli 20:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh yeah! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Finally a 'HowTo' you can actually use....... --Some Fool 00:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Awesome! I wish I had thought of it. Wehpudicabok 00:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Anything that makes Wikipaedophile admins cry gets a for from me. --UtarEmpire 12:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, if I can vote for my own article I will, because I'm worth it. *grin* Gubby 16:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Good fieldwork. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. An aside: Gubby posted the same article on Uncyc, and I couldn't figure out if it was vanity or not until he posted the other one. My only concern is that this stuff will promote vanity on WP and here. But, to be honest, nobody cares since I can just ban them. ^_^ Major insignia Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 20:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. John1728 21:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against: clever but too image-heavy. I don't think that would translate to the front page very well. Also, did you find your Rosa Blanco novel?—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 21:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Bloke did 'is 'omework. And I laughed. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Whoever fucking wrote this deserves a medal. {Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Religious Wikism is getting to be a problem..thanks for exposing this ever pervasive trend-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
    • For Bravo. I loved that article.The Spith 08:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • YES. I love anything involving the vandalism of wikipedia. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 06:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. [1] --Han 09:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hilarious, I know from personal experience on the Charles Edward Cheese article of Wikipedia. 1028 18:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Step 6 is wrong. --HPSigHP talk 02:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I get the strange feeling that somebody is maintaining a vanity page here, seeing as how the two other people to edit this article have had it reverted.--Jsonitsacsig jsonitsac talk to me crimes against humanity21:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Unsigned, really. And no timestamp. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
    • ([[Talk:HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia#From VFH|Discussion continued...]])
  • Against. Though somewhat amusing, it's a bit of a bad example, but also too image-heavy and thus unfit for the front page. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 19:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Really funny article. Deserves recognition. --Admiral06 04:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. A page on How To: Waste Admins' Time is not comedy. Modusoperandi 04:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • comment. I just bet that you're an admin XD--Gubby 14:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. You heard it - this thing is butt ugly! -- The Colonel (talk) 04:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I found it funny.--Mister Nosey 16:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against- Funny, but not feature worthy--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Howtos and UnNEws articles should not be featured. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 03:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: You just said that 'cause it rhymes. Go on - admit it. --Some Fool 03:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I liked this one well enough. --Arzikl 01:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • ROFL, FOR!. GO, GUBBY! -- 12:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC) -ROFL SIGN YOUR VOTES! -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 22:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Pricelessly funny yet extremely valuable.--TKF 05:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 14:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For That's good. It's very funny! The spoofing of the Sister Wendy Beckett article was probably the funniest thing I've ever read on this dump. --24.76.255.99 20:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for but the thing that bothers me, is that I don't know why I think it's funny. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 21:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Not funny. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] Icons-flag-us MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 02:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


Gazebo

Score: +18.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


HowTo: Be a Tramp

Score: 19 dumpsters raided

Featuredrc (t) 04:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom + For. One of the wittier HowTos out there.--The One and Only Czar Yah 01:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For LMAO. Yugoslavian F 03:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against Pretty funny, but not main page stuff. --Gunny 09:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Albeit biased, as the author. Just re-read it and think it's great, so there. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very clever, with funny text and amusing pictures. This vote cast in loving memory of HowTo: Criticize the Media's failed VFH nomination.--Procopius 16:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because it was funny, and i laughed at the bit about "you Scally." --Palsworth 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, rather useful. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Down four stubbies in one go. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I shall give it a whopping 209 out of 210 for originality. - Stejinz 15:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For traveling on wind power through the night. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. What can I say? Schadenfreude strikes again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because that's exactly the right way to use a shopping cart.--Shandon 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I can't wait to get my Doctorate in Trampology --WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 21:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, how did you guys find a picture of me? --HPSigHP talk 05:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against - could be so much better. --Nydas 18:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Will vote for cash. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 12:25, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A01:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Very witty. Evil Mark 12:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Tramps are robots? The Bumfights thing has been done in real life, and Viz had a funnier page of job ads for tramps. Hate to be a prick. Sorry -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 12:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Will code HTML for food".....priceless. No really, Hindleyite bribed me. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, now stop bitching about it on IRC. ;) --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:29, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR At last, a serious article on tramping that doesn't just assume that we tramps are all nothing more than drunken dossers. As a member of the community of 'sunshine dribblers' as we prefer to call ourselves, I found the section on "useful phrases" particularly helpful in the fight against terrorism. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 16:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • PHOR. Hindleyite bribed me with pie. Also, is good HowTo. --Sign2SarinZero (blabber )Sign2 18:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for It works. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for great article --Mr.Gear 20:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Paradise Lost

Score: +20 Apples Eaten

Featuredrc (t) 04:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

  • N and F. Vote for this instead of the other one! --L 13:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For it's worth it just for the Chris Walken pic. Plus I dig choosing sides when VFH has a voting war between a page, and itself. Freaky. Modusoperandi 14:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, I still don't get it. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/F@H 15:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_Lost - it's famous among those who can read - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Too bad I can't, eh? Abstain, it's obviously well known. --POJoe!IrelandTALKCONTRIBSF@H 22:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 17:22, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For: John Milton wrote Paradise Lost. Then his wife died and he wrote Paradise Regained. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 19:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --emc! 22:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because writing this got me to finally read Paradise Lost. -- Imrealized 00:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Fine, fine... I'll also abstain, because its a little confusing to me too. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] 02:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Very clever.--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (speak up) 20:51, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR Finally, something clever and funny. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Because I actually learned about the real thing, making it funny now. -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 07:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Although the original is pretty good, too.--Procopius 16:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For making us laugh instead of driving us blind...--Shandon 20:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, definately! --HPSigHP talk 16:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloody funny, not sure how I missed it earlier.--NotANinja 16:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • STRONG AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Man, I love reading Milton trashing! "Winnie's corn cider, how my loot was spent!" --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • No idea how I'd missed this before....but FOR. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 19:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong for. Consistently funny from beginning to end. Just skim over it and you'll definitely miss something. --So So 05:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AGAINST. 'cos too many for's against it already. frankly "episodes" has funnier pictures. the main article is too long and tooo american, soap/tv oriented -- it's almost an "in-joke" for the rest of humanity (well, the rest-of-humanity understands gi joe, george bush, paris hilton and thank-jew-very-much much better). -- mowgli 20:19, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

::hmm, leave me a msg in my talk page if you're missing "featuring" by a vote. that was never my intention and i can still change (edit!) my vote. -- mowgli 20:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

FOR - was being frivolous earlier which i now regret. voting sections should be taken seriously. i never actually meant to vote against (nor abstain -- which means i neant to vote for, duh!) -- mowgli 06:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For man's first disobedience, and the fruit of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste brought death into the world, and all our woe, with the loss of Eden, till one greater man restore us, and regain the blissful seat, with earthly parody. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hissss eat the apples already -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. We don't even have this in Oz yet. They'll probably put it on at 11.30pm Tuesdays in 2008, run a few episodes out of order, drop it while the Olympics are on and then forget to bring it back. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 00:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Do you have to explain?--Savant13 14:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


UnBooks:My First Necronomicon

Score: +21 souls consumed by the Elder God

Featuredrc (t) 04:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom and For, something of a self-nom since I did a fair chunk of it. InfiniteMonkey 08:32, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The pictures really sell this one.--Procopius 12:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I added a link.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I made the orignal page but InfinteMonkey made it, in my opinion, so much more. --Ginchael 16:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, I wish it were longer, but it's great anyway.--NotANinja 16:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Otherwise Cthulhu will eat my soul ... sooner. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Be honest, Cthulhu helped draw those pics, right? They're excellent. Good writing, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 02:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Cthulhu Fortaghn!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN  Eh?  Oh!  UnTunes! CannabagreenI Card-spades-up my cat! 05:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • ƒø®. -L 12:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Especially considering that I already have Baby's First Mythos (the actual book.) Pray I never breed, people. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For...I agree about the pictures.--Shandon 19:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Cthulhu werde unsere Seele essen! -- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because its a clever twist to what I've been reading forever.198.179.0.1 12:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • För Almost as good as the Pudgic Bible...But I don't think enough children have heard the word of Cthulhu. --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm so for this that I'm taking a nite course in conversational Cthulhulian. Modusoperandi 04:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Not funny, and I understand it about as much as why we're fighting a war in Iraq. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 05:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, good treatment of an otherwise overused genre.--Nydas 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
  • for the title alone, I case one vote. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 19:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very clever stuff. I doff my cap and drop my trousers -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 04:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Made me laugh. 74.119.26.14 18:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because 20:1 isn't a good enough ratio for this book. --Falcotron 13:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For cataleptically gnawing at the infested meat of my anguishes. FreeMorpheme 12:07, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I liked it.--Savant13 14:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


Memento

Score: +21

Featuredrc (t) 05:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

  • For and Nom. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, though I feel biased for some reason. <checks tattoos> Ah... Modusoperandi 19:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Suprised me. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

(UTC) 2006 August 12, 20:00 Mordillo IsraeliconHands off the virgin!Time till next rocket hits:Countdown - For *

  • roF --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I liked the movie. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Did I tell you the one about Sammy Jankis? I did? Multiple times? Oh. For. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 00:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • What the...? I mean, for, since I wrote the text. Credit goes to Modus for the second image and some anon for the re-ordering. --Nydas 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. That movie was cool. Rxfort 13:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • --TKF 13:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)For.
  • For. Didn't see the movie but liked the article.--Procopius 22:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • roF gnortS. I mean Strong For. --Falcotron 10:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love the tatt pic too. -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 11:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Wehpudicabok 19:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC) But it's funny once you do get it. Took me a while to get it since I hadn't seen the movie. Weak For
  • For Good...--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For-Brevity is indeed the soul of wit--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For.My soul, art thou Brevity.--Wit (tawk) 16:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For Funny only if you know the movie --Iambusyeating 16:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For What the hell is wrong with this article? I have no idea, I just know that when I read it I get a squishy feeling inside. Maybe it's gas, maybe it's my appendix bursting. All I know is I like it. --Captain Finding Nemo 05:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, nice. --HPSigHP talk KUN Icons-flag-pi 20:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I remember saying at VFD ages ago that something a whole lot better could be done with this. I was so right. Spang talk 16:17, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Fisher Price: A Retrospective

Score: +22

Featured I decided to put the Fisher Price text itself on the front page and link to the Retrospective. Seems to make the most sense for people who aren't already "in the know." —rc (t) 05:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination And For Shizzle. Yes, I already know this has been "Quasi-featured", but this just might make me laugh more than any other article in the damned universe. PURE BRILLIANCE. --Sir Cornbread 04:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment...Anyone have any idea what in the hell the guy above me is talking about?? He cant possibly think that this is a REAL BOOK, unless hes completely retarded. Also, his only contribution to the site was that vote...A little suspicious... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN--06:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • He bolded the F and O, so I guess he's voting for and is kidding. --User:Nintendorulez 18:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Well I guess that makes sense, I'll add it as a for until he says otherwise... Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --20:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Apparently I copy-edited this recently, so I have to vote for it.  c • > • cunwapquc? 22:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh hell yes! Brilliance at its core!--Emmzee 23:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • against Meh... it didn't tickle me at all. Maybe I should change my medications again. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 13:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The only problem I have is the name, which seems so unrelated. Arzikl 07:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

*For. Definitely: it's the analysis that sells it.

Oops, already voted ... --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 04:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 13:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I have to agree with Wehpudicabok. --Teh fish 10:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Meh, wasn't really all that funny. --Rabid Jaguar 04:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Forgainst. Lovely. --Splaka 07:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It may be about an injoke, but it explains it as well. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against--Nytrospawn 21:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral, I don't want this held against me in a court of law either way --HPSigHP talk 16:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, voting for my own article. --Sir Volte CUN Talk (+S NS CM Bur. VFP VFH F@H) 06:44, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Geez, I can think of 5 unfeatured/nominated articles that are way funnier than this one. --KUK nerd - no timestamp
  • FOR please. get this on the front page already.--Bladetip 22:55, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Bloody brilliant! --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) SpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-gb 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacerSpacerSpacerIcons-flag-usSpacerSpacerSpacer 03:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Hey, why not front page "Fisher Price"? This article, though hilarious, is a lot funnier when you've read the original. And, on the original article, there's a little "see also" which leads you to the retrospective which no-one is going to miss.--Gubby 23:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, this fighting is <James Dean moment> tearing me apart! </James Dean moment>. Modusoperandi 00:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against It sucks and it's not worth featuring...no, it's a load of bull shite. Momochii Zabuza 01:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I love satirical humour in any form or fashion.--Mister Nosey 04:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against--TKF 00:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Alright, fine, I'll put a for on this page, but to those who don't find it far funnier to put the 'Fisher Price' thing on the front page, well, I shakes my head --Some Fool 01:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • forsimple--129.96.142.18 02:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I'll try again ..., and if this doesn't work, well then, "Fisher Price to you!" --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 01:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


Battle of Gettysburg

Score: +25 Fallen Confederate Soldiers, Kind of Like my Heart, Brooke

Featuredrc (t) 04:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

  • N+F Procopius is a funny guy. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A21:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For-ward, March! "Col. Chamberlain prevented disaster by re-establishing the Union line on Little Big Top, Brooke. I think there's a lesson there for both of us." I'm speechless. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 22:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. a page that brings history to life. Modusoperandi 22:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, yes, now I'm supposed to understand in-jokes about the American Civil War. Against. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 23:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment: What are you talking about? There aren't any in-jokes in that article... In fact, the article tells real stuff about the the Battle of Gettysburg. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 13:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

*For I think it's funny, and what i think is fact! --ZniLe 11:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)--ZniLe 11:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong For, and I want to give this article the award for "best captions" but I don't think that exists... oh well. Wehpudicabok 00:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Yeah, alright, I'll give this a vote Yeah, alright, your vote's unsigned, so it doesnt count... -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 01:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Consider it signed now Corn-boy. --Some Fool 02:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For: Incredible and coolific. It reminds me of my own experiences with love. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH17:47, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Awesome comedy!!!...though now that I've read it, I think some Carpetbaggers need to come in and clean up Procopius's co-dependent heart....you don't need to be a wartime tragedy..... --DawnLei 20:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Dark Ages

Featured ~ ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 02:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +21

*For, really, really for I don't think many articles get quite as good and opinionated as that. Good shit.--Shadow the Blade 06:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Null and void; article is ALREADY FEATURED. H. 06:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • N+F. We need such vigorous bashing, especially when applied to a serious historical subject. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 14:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Huge, Huge For - hilarious. TheMono 04:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For; it seems a little familiar but it's still funny.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 06:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-vote For. Ignore this line and move onto the next.--Procopius 12:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. "Other eras were content to accept this as the will of God -- that a man would have to go through his day with a strong likelihood of being killed by an axe before sunset. Greek and Roman mythology is based on it." Priceless. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I came here all gonna nominate Battle of Gettysburg, but that was until I read about Thurmor, the black bandit of the woods. Shine On, You Crazy Diamond. --Palsworth 15:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for, finally someone is saying what we're all thinking. Modusoperandi 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak against. Everything there is good except the bashing. -- The Colonel (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • The bashing is the point! - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 13:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Bashing=/=funny. If bashing is a form of humour, then why don't I find WWE amusing, despite those guys there bash each other with folding chairs all the time? -- The Colonel (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Bashing (can) = Funny. Viz the success and proliferation of Takeshi's Castle in all its wild permutations. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
          • I don't study history or arts or stuff so whatever the article is bashing makes no difference to me, and since everyone can call someone a "butthole", it is obvious to me that there is something lacking in this candidate - intelligence. -- The Colonel (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
    • It's the bashing being applied to a serious historical subject that makes it funny. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
      • The intense bitterness on a subject that doesn't warrant it at all makes it hilarious. TheMono 03:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like it, but it could be expanded a bit. --emc! 19:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I didn't find it especially bashy — it's just got a bit of a punch. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For: Anything that bashes Petrach is boss. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH
  • For I feel like I got an education and I'm really pissed that I didn't before reading this page...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 03:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Some Fool 07:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 12:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For  c • > • cunwapquc? 06:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fourteen hundred. Just like Martin Van Buren of IFHTBT.--Emmzee 14:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 4 8 15 16 23 42 Uncyclopedian history at its finest. Swordmaster 17:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For ...the shear beauty...two and a half thumbs up...pure excellence...Sony reminds me of Romans, I hate Sony. --HPSigHP talk 05:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I thought I already had voted for this. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 19:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Kavall 21:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Feature the dadburned article already. Swordmaster 17:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I be for this and so does my pig be. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The most intelligent rant I've seen in a long time. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 00:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Front page please--Bladetip 02:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Needs a Chrono Trigger reference. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 18:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
    • I had to look that one up. And now that I have, I realize it's not a bad idea. I would have made it TimeQuest, though.  :)--Procopius 19:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. But only if the B-test doesn't show illegally high levels of fact. It seems suspiciously erudite -- Sir Armando Perentie Icons-flag-au KUN FP 00:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Smells Like Teen Spirit

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 13:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +27.5
  • Nom and for. One of the best things I've read on Uncyclopedia in ages. Seriously, this article is so good, I'm considering creating a bunch of sockpuppets just to vote on it here. Only kidding, please don't deop me. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Stonking great read! FOR -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 17:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I know this was worked on for some time.--Shandon 17:39, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Super-For Long live Kurt Cobain and Grunge! Wait... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A18:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Our little for has always been and always will until the end. (That's the best I could come up with.)—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Forteen magazine. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:00, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Makes me feel stupid, and contagious. for. InfiniteMonkey 20:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For John1728 20:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I miss the comfort in being sad.--Procopius 21:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • How did Imrealized manage to throw all that Nirvana stuff together? Totally stoned... I mean, totally for. -- The Colonel (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Why, just reading this is enough to send me to Nirvana for eternity. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 22:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For; absolutely genius. --em|c|! Icons-flag-us 01:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This article's dumb, or maybe just crappy. Think it's just crappy... what? I wrote this? Oh, me! Then I'm all for it. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 02:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Top 10 articles of 2006 maybe? Bladetip 03:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It starts with F and ends woth R. "Fucking a goatse practitioneR"? No, you pervert, its For! I am so in love with Kurt Cobain its not even funny anymore. I trapped his soul in my washing machine.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.25.130.180 (talk • contribs)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. While I usually pretend I've never worn flannel, this made me remember, and I needed the humiliation. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Link humor is the best. Wehpudicabok 17:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For- I was supposed to help him on this, but got busy in the stupid 'real world'--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 20:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Angst!-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 01:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. What else should I be? Rxfort 15:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This honestly gave me goosebumps because of how excellent it it is. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 18:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I have absolutely no idea what any of this is about, but I suppose the youngsters must have their fun. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm 55, and I found the genius in the article. --em|c|! Icons-flag-us 02:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Please note that this vote was UNCLEAR!!! --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 13:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


Snopes

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 00:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: 23 urban legends smashed into little pieces by Barbara Mikkelson and Oscar Wilde
  • Nomination and for. OK, so the MySpace article burned in hell. However, I promise that this is much funnier, it actually has some funny content which would probably function on its own. As an added bonus, it provides ammunition for a reskin, perhaps? --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 12:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For: well done, although I wonder if it's as funny to people who aren't familiar with Snopes.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Claim: My For vote is totally unbiased. Status: False.--Procopius 14:55, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For...but I thought Snopes played for the Boston Red Sox? --HPSigHP talk 16:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 19:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Collected on Uncyclopedia, 2006. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 21:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Funny, but I don't get the joke.--Emmzee 23:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I'm rather familiar with Snopes and I loved this article. --emc! 01:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I heard somewhere that you can vote more than once for Featured Articles, I don't know if that's true...--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 06:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This article is awesome.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --L 17:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Never heard of Snopes before, yet good anyway. FOR. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Hells yeah. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against-Interesting, but I didn't laugh once--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 16:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against While this is a great example of meta-humour, it just falls flat on being funny. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 14:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I disagree entirely with Dawg here... Not only is it not an example of meta-humour at all, but it's quite fluent and fun to read, as well as laugh-inducing. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 14:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I read stuff on Snopes a lot, and this actually is an amazing parody. Great work! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • Si. I've seen snopes and this is a great parody of it.--Wit (tawk) 20:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love Snopes, love the parody. Spiraling 04:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. John1728 23:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Jtaylor1Small Egg 01:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Format Pwnage. Swordmaster 17:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Had my first run in with Snopes today — this is an excellent parody. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Great stuff, even if it was written by electric monkeys in a secret mountain owned by the freemasons. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 17:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Really does look just like it. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 18:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Claim: This article should be featured. Status: For. --EvilZak 05:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For I'm a big fan of the real site, and this layout and content parody is very appropriate. --Teddywithfangs 17:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:RIAA CEO discusses the analog hole

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 02:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +26 Dollars per track
  • N+F. "The basic problem that the RIAA has in protecting its property, is that after people have bought music, they can actually listen to it." Genius. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 01:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For Pure genius. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A01:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Absolutely hilarious. --emc! 01:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Nah. Not a big fan of UnNews being featured.--Emmzee 02:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think the issue should be wheather or not its funny, not if its UnNews. --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Voynich Manuscript

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
  • SN & F. Pimps away, Master Zim! -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 15:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for cuz itz stoypid. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 15:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR!!!! zim voted for it..i mean come on...it has to be good.....good article!!! The HRH MuCal. Tayor Lz4MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
  • For and not because of Zim. --emc! 02:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, if only for the pictures, though the writing is really funny, too.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I like the picture captions. The article is shite, but i like the picture captions. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 02:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Its a little short, but makes up for it in content. -- Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN 03:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For featuring a cookery recipe. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, though it's much funnier after reading the Wikipedia thinger.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ditto. But it made me laugh and I learned something new. And isn't that why we're here?--Procopius 12:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

*For Cool. --218.215.131.100 12:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

  • For above is me --Han 12:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Halfhearted for. I found this very funny, BUT only after I read it the first time, said "WTF" and actually did some quick research into what it actually is. Good, but it doesn't have the instant recognition and humour that deserves a full vote. --Nuknuk 14:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For...and I will make a ref to this article for the rest of the month of July for each new article I make... --HPSigHP talk 15:50, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Mhaille is a god. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For By pie, I will vote for this article. The Invading Genius Yuri the Vaguely Octagonal [WORSHUP ME] [MUN] [YvJP] 19:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I found it to be thouroughly enlightening and humorous. It shall recieve a full vote. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) Icons-flag-ie-Icons-flag-us KUN SEXY WH20:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Took me a bit to vote because I wanted to research first, laugh second. That actually wasn't necessary in this case because this article is really well-written and funny as hell. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 00:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The Mhaille Hit Factory churns out another chart topper. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:37, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This is not fair. Popular writers always get all the attention. -- The Colonel (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Solve The 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube

Featured Spang talk 05:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: 19 bottles of beer on the wall
Done. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. No. --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 01:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For:
    • Like DG said - "simple and accessible". If you think simplicity is stupid, then go laugh at my old Quantum Mechanics textbook.
    • One crazy idea outrageously executed.
    • One of the few fine works here by a n00b.
    • Endorsed by Splaka the user hater (sort of).

-- The Colonel (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

  • For. Because the world needs to know it. --Wehpudicabok 04:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Feature it! --L 08:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Love the picture(s). Witty. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Ya! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • ForxForxFor. No comment needed. -Nelson3x4x0
  • For I was gonna nominate this. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 00:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- GaraGara 00:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I laughed. Very nice layout as well.--TKF 00:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Shamelessly For. Wow! I thought the only way i'd get this to fail nomination is if i nominated it myself. --Dondonz 09:11, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For cause everyone needs one! Superlizard 10:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 4x4x4 --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 17:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Awesome piece of work. --Nuknuk 10:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For great justice. Whoever wrote this gets the gold star. --UtarEmpire 15:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Han 12:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wholehearted for! Hilarious.--Emmzee 00:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, nobody at NASA believed me that it could be done...--HPSigHP talk 19:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against --JimmyB 04:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Whoa, this article was so funny that I already laughed like crazy just looking at the title! --KUK nerd 22:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! After I read the article, I went and solved one! This article changed my life. Thank you. Swordmaster 18:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Alas, I still can't figure it out.--Procopius 12:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Adobe Potatochop

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19

:For. --67.142.130.45 19:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against, I find it cute, and it might work for Encyclopedia Dramatica, but uhh, nice try. --emc! 03:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

For, changed my vote because I love this article! It's great! Wooohoo! :-] --emc! 21:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Nice article! Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 20:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Futile against. I moaned and groaned. But computer nerd humor like this seems pretty much like a shoe-in for featuring... --So So 07:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. The laugh is there, but not enough to hit the spot. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This one take the chip! HA! Chip! I made a potato joke! --officer designate Club symbol Lugiatm Club symbol MUN NS CM ZM WH 14:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Got any french fried potaters in that there chop? Mmm hmm. Reckon I'll have me the bigguns. Mmm hmm. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 20:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against but only because the Voynich manuscript is too far behind to be in the running --Some Fool 07:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. If nothing else, it displays the work that should go in to feature stories.--Procopius 14:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Although I would like to point out that I made up the phrase "Potato Chop", which I frequently shorten to just "potochop". Anyway, good work. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:46, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Hilarious article! --DrPoodle 22:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, airbrushed to read For - This article rules. --Superbo 01:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Looks tasty. Rxfort 00:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For - It's mockery of the greatest photo-editing technical marvel! I love it! --Demonlink2 22:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Rap

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 07:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: reppin +22.5 fo shizzle
  • Self Nom & For. I completely re-wrote this from crap. I spent LOTS of time on it, and I think it's ready to face the judges. Hope you like it! -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 19:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 4 shizzle Considering I helped make the article what it is, I revoke all the "credit" Sir Cornbread and others deserve for rewriting this article, and take it for myself. --emc! 19:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Emmzee 20:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A nice scattering of funny throughout. Yea yeAH!! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 22:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • 4. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fo' schizzle.--The One and Only Czar Yah 00:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Aiiii TheMono 01:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Mad props to the Freestyle Section.--Procopius 01:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. WOW! Thank u all! I thought this was easily my best article, but I didnt think it would do this well. Thanks for your votes! -- Sir Cornbread The Great Icons-flag-us [SHOUT] [MUN] ~RAP~ [GET IT FEATURED!] 03:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Gittin' down on all For's and shakin' it at the hudio, brother. ... Or something. Innit. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For- 'A' for effort 'B-' for laughs--Spqr Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 18:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The shizzle, FOR rizzle, this artizzle is the shizzle! DiZ deems it worthy. DiZzletheGrizzle Cuba flag large ( Worshizzle me yo'!) (Prizzle me!) (Jizzle me!)
  • For...this article had a lot of contributors.--Shandon 04:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE-YO. This came a long way from VFD. An excellent rewrite, and worthy of attention. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I have to vote For even though I think it could stand to lose the Bush picture. That's getting a little overdone. But overall it's definitely worth featuring. Wehpudicabok 02:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Dis article's tight, yo. I mean, for. --UtarEmpire 05:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • A splendid article, very well done indeed, my sincerest congratulations on such a fine achievement. --Nydas 19:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wonderful article --70.27.217.235 14:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, lol --JimmyB 04:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Why does snoop dog have an umbrella? For drizzle! Dshack 05:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against because I think that an article on rap could be a lot funnier than this, but I'd like to see that hilarious picture of the wiggers on a featured article so instead I'll just make this a comment. --So So 07:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For all my homies Brilliant. --Nuknuk 14:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The kids listen to the rap music, which gives them the brain damage. With their hippin an a hoppin an a bippin an a boppin, they dont know what the jazz is all about! Great pictures, too.--TKF 17:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩųTalk%C2%A7.gifMini%C2%A7.gif 00:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For and damn, that's one scary-ass sig, isn't it?  c • > • cunwapquc? 18:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Barns and Nobles

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 08:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
  • Self-nom and For. It's hard to go wrong when you start with a brilliant picture by RadX and go from there...--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 14:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. You had me at "sank my Serfdomship". -- Imrealized 19:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - David Gerard 21:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For living in the past*. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
*Ian Anderson flute solo not available outside of UK. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like the subject matter. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For The only thing I don't like is that it has nothing to do with Barnes & Nobles, except the play on the name - Arzikl 05:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Except for the fact that both the main book and the names of the expansions are plays on the names of popular places to buy D&D books, you're right (Barnes & Noble, Waldenbooks, Books-a-Million, & Borders... that's all we've got around here, anyway...).--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -L 12:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Clever.--Emmzee 20:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brad writes good articles. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --06:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Sure. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FORE! This had me laughing out loud. Great. The Unbeatable, Immortal Legend Icons-flag-us [Discussion of I] [MUN!] In Soviet Russia, Tested Loses To YOU!! Wiki-political.png 01:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A great article. Puns ahoy! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Brilliant!--Rabidwombat27 04:03, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For the image. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ Icons-flag-az 01:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 13:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Another article I cracked up at while not working. Crazyswordsman 03:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For...funny --HPSigHP talk 19:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

*For. Not signed. ::sigh:: Please sign, as I want your votes.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 15:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

    • Forgot to add the squiggly thingies. ForInfiniteMonkey 04:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For bastard! I thought my d20 days were behind me... Modusoperandi 16:15, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The Swedish Orienteering And Firing A Rat From A Cannon Championships

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18.5
  • Nom and For. I laughed like a drain. A freshly Drano'd one - David Gerard 18:47, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Up next, Vole vaulting. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Just because someone actually made this article is enough. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Jesus, this guy is good (That is a very strong for). -- Imrealized 21:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • För I thought it was going to turn out to be one of those articles only people from the designated country would understand, but I found it funny. Personally, though, I prefer gerbil-tossing, but is gööd, yah?!? --Señor DiZtheGreat Cuba flag large CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Fucking amazing. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is flipping crazy! I like it. For --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Awesome! --DeathByPie 13:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Funny & original. Almost good enough to abstain on --142.68.236.133 22:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - The image itself was enough.--Shandon 01:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The name alone wins this, but an entire article on this? Awesome. --User:Nintendorulez 12:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - I very idea that an article with this name was created made me laugh. Just weird enough, and brilliant. --Nuknuk 13:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong meatball. --So So 05:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. --Mushroom 06:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fore! Hilarious.--Emmzee 17:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • A 21 rat cannon salute in honour of this - One of my favourite articles on here, and that was before the drugs scandal got added. --Billsheppard 11:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Articles like this are what make Uncyclopedia great. Wehpudicabok 18:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Universal Remote Control Everything 3000

Featured --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 07:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18
  • Nom and for. It does exactly what it says on the tin. Well almost exactly. Sort of. Except it doesn't come in a tin. I actually have no idea why I even mentioned that. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. The image also needs a VFP. Could do with the subarticles being merged, though I know the author disagrees - David Gerard 13:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Says it all, really. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. I was afraid it would be like Click, but I was pleasantly surprised. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Sir Silent Penguin Penguin foot "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 15:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Wow. Just wow. -- Imrealized 17:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I want one! —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 17:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, I like the concept (and the fridge pic), but the remote isn't nearly complicated enough to make my life easier. It needs buttons for everything, cryptic symbols on those buttons, cryptic symbols where there aren't, and a power cord. Modusoperandi 17:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Nobody told you about the vibration feature? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Having read and reread the page, my stance has softened somewhat. When the button-orific U.R.C.E. 4000 I'll vote for it. In the mean time, Abstain Modusoperandi 01:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • F-f-f-for. Great. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --19:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, the perfect gift. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! give me one! MwM 19:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very useful. I also like the pictures. They should be featured. --Sbluen 22:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For the fridge picture alone. The rest is just gravy. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • ForYou gotta love the pictures.--The One and Only Czar Yah 02:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against because the fridge picture is a freakin' megabyte and I'm on dial-up. Plus I don't really find the article to be funny.—Sir Mandaliet CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 09:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.--Procopius 14:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Amazing. I want one.--Emmzee 14:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! This one is really funny...--Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 21:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fore! I've got my URCE3000, have you? --Lokine 14:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. A lot of my time went into this. Time I should have been spending watching TV. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 15:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against If there was a joke in that article, I must've missed it. --emc! 20:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Get Banned

Featured - ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 06:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Score: +19
  • For Hah. I have to admit that I'm guilty of a few of those things...--CASTIR8H BirdEgal202 17:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For: LOL. This is teh funnay. - unsigned vote
  • For. Hasn't this been nominated recently? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:13, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Yes, as a matter of fact it was. Modusoperandi 04:47, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For the record, this has been nommed by a different user each time. Third trip down the aisle, always always left standing at the altar. ~ T. (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For ; I have my reasons, such as I am anti-Skub --ccdimeanc | cantabria 11:10, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. it's not really.... good. or an article - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon - - 14:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For good idea, seriously - unsigned vote
  • For <3 this article. --User:Nintendorulez 01:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This article has been improved with pictures. --Sbluen 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh, fine. The pictures help a lot. --Hobelhouse 23:55, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Just seems like a lot of bitching about annoying uncyclopedia users.--InfiniteMonkey 01:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For LOL phrom ph00blet - Unsigned
  • Against  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Not funny. --Emmzee (flame me here)
  • For. New and improved. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • I have added "Not vote FOR this article on VFH" into the list. Those listed above may want to reconsider their vote..... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 18:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • For, and I was not coerced into this vote. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. --Rataube 09:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Just say No to inside jokes. ~AxeiconCaputosistheHorribleAxeicon15:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For haha, every website needs a how to get banned manual! --Snerlin 21:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For I must be a moron... I think it's funny. Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 19:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For, if only for the opening.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 21:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Funny, and sadly true. It's much improved with the pictures. The extended introduction is quite good, though not markedly better than the short, snappy original one.--Winston 02:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For...but wasn't this taken directly from the howto--be a good wikipedian?? --HPSigHP talk 03:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For I got banned for #15 in Expert Users....-- Sir Severian Severian1 CUN (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut 11:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Insineratehymn 15:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For I've only got to intermediate level. :( --The Rt. Hon. BarryC Icons-flag-gb MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. meh...not every how:to needs to be nominated, but this is alright.--Witt E, 05:01, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • 
\int_{-\pi/4}^{\pi/4}2\sqrt{2}(\cos{x}-\sin{x})\, dx
--IconSir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 05:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Say For to funny pics. OMFG STFU N00b! Demonbob 22:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Aganist - Unpocalypse is here!! -- Colonel Swordman 14:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak For. Needs "Add a B to AAAAAAAAA!" back in there. Crazyswordsman 23:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Bleh--TKF 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against - How to get banned? Was somebody having trouble with that? Here? Now that's funny.--Immy 19:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Now the admins track the people who do what it says to make their job easier.--Cray Z. 07:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against...Doesnt even really count as an article, just OK anyway...--Sir Cornbread 22:30, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For --The Stig | Abt me | Rant 06:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Half the stuff on there is a direct reference to something Flameviper has done. 24.145.222.85 16:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC) vote by sockpuppet/meatpuppet of Flameviper, both banned (ironic).
  • For I wish I had had this when I first got here! --Chimzar 22:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • for this is funy unsigned vote
  • No because it's a list inside of a HowTo. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 04:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For, but needs vote rigging. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For Donut 02:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It gave me ideas. --Testicles 02:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • This is worse than an internet rant. Not front page material. --Rabid Jaguar 00:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Spot on. (vo_o)b--Batmobile 22:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Too accurate. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 18:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

New Age Psychology

Score: +18.5

Featured -⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 08:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

  • 4 self-nominations in a row. Just jumping on the bandwagon, plus I'm proud of this article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For "What can I do to get out of this puddle!?" and other such goodness. -- Imrealized 19:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Love the circle map. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Made me laugh. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --19:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Winnah! - David Gerard 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For helping me get in touch with my inner energies --Nydas 21:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Faux Native American Beaded Necklaces -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 21:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For "Homosexuals stealing our women." Wehpudicabok 00:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --User:Nintendorulez 01:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This article just got better the farther down the page I got. Good work.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For-absolutely great--24.24.150.168 06:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Best article I've ever read on Uncyc! Then again, it's probably the only one I've ever read fully so... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, meh... - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. -L 12:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • VERY For Remember, the only people who are really helped by self-help books are the authors of the self-help books themselves. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • F-o-r --Flabius-Danner 20:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For with the stipulation that you also write an article on New Age Physiology --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Suppository Sickness PeanutButterJellyTime Dog Fart Trombone 2cents.PNG 23:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for HAH! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 17:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For you idiot, now buy my books.--Wit (tawk) 03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Canada

Score: +22, eh?

Featuredrc (t) 04:21, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom+For because I forgot to nom it on Canada day... Modusoperandi 19:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - lovely! - David Gerard 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Eh? (I suppose that's a for) ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For --Sir Silent Penguin Penguin foot "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 11:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Its funny. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --20:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fort McMurray. --Carlb 05:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For snowy skies,for yellow mounds of canola. VolatileChemical's talk 07:00, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-EH-TIVE-EH. Our country reeks of trees, et al. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because here in Canada, GTA means something completely diffrent. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:11, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. fantabulosis. my favourite page. --Ieatbreadpeople 17:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. O Canada! Our home and native land! And so on and so on. --ToonmonMUN(Stop and Chat) 17:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Provisional For. This For is recinded if it is subject to GST--JAX-arrgh!!! Prevaricate at me 18:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For a semi-long article that keeps up the funny. -- Imrealized 00:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, eh? --Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 00:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For the true north strong and free. Beauty, eh? ~ T. (talk) 01:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For but leaning towards abstain--LOLMOLE 02:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For - Modusoperandi & Co. have really done a lot of nice work on this over these last few months.  c • > • cunwapquc? 03:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For -I'm Canadian, and this article is still funny. Excellent work, everyone. Mr. Predictable 21:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. eh?--Wit (tawk) 23:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, Eh. Okay, so the artist's impression of where Canada might be was funny, but for the most part, it really isn't that incredible. tested 00:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Eh! (Aye) --Major4 Major insignia 03:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I vote like a big boy, eh? --Sivius 02:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Amazing For! Funny, and true. At least to my part of Canada.--Emmzee 20:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • .49th of a vote for--TKF 01:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


Command Line

Score: +22.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

  • for --master5o1 13:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nom and For 'tis very funny, though a bit hard to read. I very much enjoyed how my picture was worked into this article. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
    If you can think of ways to make it less unreadable they would be most welcomed - David Gerard 22:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
    The main problem is the font size. Although code'd text is always that small. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
    There's kludges involving font tags and so forth. I'll try some experiments - David Gerard 22:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
    I just tried <font size=+1> - any better? - David Gerard 00:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Yes. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 12:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Too confusing. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --21:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Even though I only possess a vague idea of what this is refering to (I am still quite computer-inept), I find it extremely funny, which says a hell of a lot. -- Imrealized 21:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment - New intro is good, my vagueness rescinded. Thanks. -- Imrealized 06:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 12:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Jingo

Score: +23

FeaturedSir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|MDA|+S 03:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Self Nom and For in the pursuit of my own interests. And don't give me any of that "I'm a foreigner and I don't understand crap". -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 08:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For -- VodkaTabako 08:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! Had me at "the entire bay was filled with pigs." --L 09:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For King and Country! - David Gerard 10:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Sweet Nice article. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 11:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For British Humour taking over Uncyc! --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Jingo in its many forms, but especially in the form of clever satire. -- Imrealized 11:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. ~ T. (talk) 12:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. By Jingo, this article wants to imperialize me! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Very for Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Very nice. Much better than when it was shown to me in its larval form, and it was pretty funny then, too.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Against. Funny, but the whole 'fallen soldiers' caskets as jingo blocks' idea just said no to me. Sorry. Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 13:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for I like it! Zimbuddha Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 14:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR. Says it all, really. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, I just can't vote for an article that uses caskets of dead soldiers as its hook. Modusoperandi 15:02, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not looking to change your vote, however you're not looking at the main focus of that specific image, which is more to do with the way governments play with their soldiers lives for their own political and often financial gain. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me)
I get it, I just can't vote for it. Aw, heck...Abstain Modusoperandi 15:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Screw it, I had an epiphany while on the can: it's good, and the image drives home the message...for. Keep it up. Modusoperandi 06:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The Dalek sez AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:12, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Jingooo! --KATIE!! 16:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Indeed. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --16:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For--Shandon 17:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Although may I suggest something about Jingo Fett. I love that guy. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Damn you Mhaille, are you ever gonna peak? You're making the rest of us look bad. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Ignorant westerners... wait! Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For.Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 02:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Reluctant For The article itself is brilliant, but I have my reservations against the 'Flag_coffin' image. Those are dead daughters and sons of grieving parents. They where killed because of what their fellow countrymen beleived right, and that fact should not be mocked. Just as you should not mock a Palestinian self-bomber. They have in common that they probably died for reasons that they themselves did not choose or even understood fully. That is the true tragedy, and I think it should not be mocked. diMario 23:15, 14 July 2006
  • For. I'm a foreigner and I don't understand crap --Kakun_Sig.JPG VFP Eincyc (talk) 22:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Z

Score: Brought to you by the number 23

Featuredrc (t) 06:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Grue

Score: Ye Olde One-Score and TWO and 1/2

Featuredrc (t) 05:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Nom and For How this failed to be featured before I do not know. Vote, run away scream then die, for the grue is around here somewhere...OH MY- Invader Yuri [WORSHUP ME] [MUN] [YvJP] 09:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I like the Best and Worst Case Scenario grid.--Procopius 13:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For, because it links to one of my pages, and we need to feature another "Uncyclopedia" Uncyclopedia article, you know?--Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 14:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For it was nombefore, but that was a much worse article. The newer version is much better. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For! This hasn't been nominated yet? --Icons-flag-us SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 15:12, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR!!!!! If Zork is featured, why isn't Grue featured?--Timmytiptoe my talk 17:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For absolutely. Mrthejazz 18:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR! It's a Grue, for heaven's sake! Tar7arus 19:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nod --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Huge for. In my opinion one of the sites best, plus I've done a lot of it. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --23:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For This article is just hilarious. Especially the "how to kill a grue" part. --Wehpudicabok 01:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Four. Brilliance, and it served as fodder for many a Text adventure.--Emmzee 01:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. It's hilarious unless you don't know what a grue is, and if that's the case, then it's your own fault for not checking our less intelligent counterpart Wikipedia. --Testicles 02:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. This has gotten much better since I last voted against it.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 02:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against:
  • Ugly layout
  • Too many quotes
  • Random humour, anyone?
  • I never played Zork. Plus, text adventure games suck.
  • No, your mom doesn't like them either.
  • In Soviet Russia, Eurg eats YOU!!
  • The article features a lame use of the word "olde".
  • The League of Ninja-priates doesn't want this to be featured.
  • In conclusion, this is just one, big, yucky article.
-- Colonel Swordman 04:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For because Col. Swordsman voted against it. And watch it with the bullet-point madness. --User:Nintendorulez 13:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For this article and that little Grue beating his arms in ye olde aire. Against aggressive bullet points in VFH. -- Imrealized 04:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Fuhor. Without a doubt. --Wit (tawk) 05:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR My Picture is one of the several hundred! --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 15:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Very messy, random, and... well... messy. Needs some more work. --Jordanus 19:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, too many links. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • *** You have died *** (i.e affirmative). --L 08:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For People who disagree will be messily devoured by a grue.--Ganall 13:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes.--TKF 21:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Random (I did laugh, but it's not front page material). - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against Let's see, needs formatting cleanup, a thorough de-listification, and even then it wouldn't be very good. Against again for emphasis. —rc (t) 15:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I don't care how bad the article is. It's funny. Grues in general are funny. Isn't that the only thing that matters here? Plus, it's one of our injokes, much like Oscar Wilde, AAAAAAAAA!, Euroipods, and Kitten Huffing. Crazyswordsman 04:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. Grues in general are funny? Yeah, right... -- Colonel Swordman, the enemy of nerds and low quality injokes 21:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment then again, that was added by a vabnal. So that shouldn't always be trusted. Anyways, funny is a matter of opinion, so don't complain. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For I laughed hard. Grue crossing - you will die -- 82.117.223.65 23:15, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment- "It's hilarious unless you don't know what a grue is..." Not true, Testicles. I didnt know what a grue was until I read the Wikipedia article after reading this article. And it was and is still frickin hilarious. Sir C Icons-flag-us Holla | CUN --06:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • for. why hasn't it been featured yet? --Ieatbreadpeople 17:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects