# Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive5

## Speech to text software

Score: + Nine teen and a have

Featuredrc (t) 03:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! By far one of the funniest, goofiest things I've seen in months! Kudos to Hindley for employing the subject of the article to create the article, and generating a wonderful skewering in so doing! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ 16:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- 17:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I wood like two vote fore because eye am the Arthur. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Reefer Desk - Use it | Converse 19:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Ah, I remember the good old days of making text-to-speech programs say dirty words. Good times. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, a great artacle everyone will be love. -- 00:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. A good arctic hole. --Sbluen 00:21, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. But the music me. 01:45, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Eff Oh Arrr --{{SUBST:User:Donut/Sig}} 02:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Billy ant period I mean.-- 02:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Für. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• NEGATIVE. Its alright, but not feature-worthy. For, upon further review full stop --  Holla | CUN 07:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For a crack in art ickle.--Nydas 19:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Seems like it's just one tiresome joke stretched out to its breaking point. Didn't get me laughing, anyways. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Four Dame  22:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yes. Eye lychee. -- Imrealized 08:02, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strange Floor.--Wit (tawk) 03:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Self reference is teh roxzorz. 06:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Huge For - I love a good self reference. TheMono 03:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Major FOR , This guy is a pie on ear of the self refs. - Vosnul 17:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fore!, reminds me of Newton adventures. --Eponymous Coward | talk | "contributions" | ban 08:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against.--Joe!TALK|CONTRIBS|F@H 14:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Fourperiod it reminds me of how frustrated eye was when eye got tex too speech soft wear period--Testicles 02:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against I agree with Diz -- this thing is just one mediocre gag stretched to the breaking point. --Jordanus 03:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - I agree that it's stretched to the breaking point, but it's better than mediocre, gag-wise... Anyway, it has a certain charm.  c • > •  22:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Four. Self-reference at it's best. --Rabid Jaguar 05:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Thetoastman 06:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• for taking Bill Gates down a peg. Oh, and for cleaning my socks. Thanks. Get saved! 15:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• No--TKF 21:53, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Four hill air i us art ickle--24.24.150.168 14:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

## Africa

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 02:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• For. Awesome stuff. --User:Themarcuscreature
• Against - The conclusion was the best laugh I had. I have to be honest, it's a little too true to be funny, and in a lot of people's eyes, that's what Africa actually is. TheMono 05:15, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• 4. -L 09:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. While not entirely my style, shows a spark of creativity that's quite unique. --File:Ichthus.svg Jayrod «Speek MUN WH» 17:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for It's pretty funny article, though not a barn-burner, but as was mentioned earlier, it's almost too true. --ENeGMA 20:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For It's extremely funny, but, again, almost too true, much like a majority of my Wikipedia sporks. Howerver, the maps rock hardcore!Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH
• Strong for. Definitely. So let's all help turn Africa's frown upside-down. --So So 03:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it's both funny (mostly) AND true (not so much), just like the Uncylopedia article on where ever it is that I am from. Modusoperandi 04:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Very For - I love humourous maps, and that article has them in abundance. --ninebucks 20:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Collosal For There hasn't been an article to make me laugh like that since....who cares? It's funny. Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 23:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 11:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• OK. Good, in-depth conclusion. ~ 16:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For.— 01:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• For This is amazing. Yes, yes, yes. --I hate red links!

The end.--File:Ichthus.svg Jayrod «Speek MUN WH» 23:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Fourteenth vote FOR. Front page quality.  Holla | CUN --04:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Love that pro/cons table. --User:Nintendorulez 12:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. It's got its humor, but something about the formatting/presentation just strikes me as unpolished. I think that it will make a good featured article with some finishing, but the as it stands, it's kind of rough. For starters, take out the red links. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• AIDS-ridden For!--TKF 23:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• One self-serving For, coming right up. You want fries with that? --Jordanus 03:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Didn't do it for me. I'll just go stand off to the side now. -- Imrealized 08:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Super AIDS-ridden For! --Sbluen 20:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good one - David Gerard 08:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I agree with TheMono --Han 07:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. Hilarious and true at the same time. --Rabid Jaguar 00:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

## Gay Pride

Score: +27! Simply faaaabulous!

Featuredrc (t) 02:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. It's here, it's queer and it's damn funny. -- Imrealized 04:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against. Sorry, but it didn't make me laugh. --Sbluen 04:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Sexual references = big no-no. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For my own article. I even made the bouncywikilogo pink especially. And anyone who doesn't vote 'for' this is a homophobe and neonazi - David Gerard 07:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, Sannse created Image:OscarPride.jpg for it, so if you don't vote 'For' then the Wikia Cabal will get you! - David Gerard 14:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Because I actually added to the content. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 13:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Certainly made me giggle. Rebecca 14:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For respecting its diversity... closets are for clothes, sweetie. --Carlb 14:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. We must be proud of our big no nos! Morwen 16:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• I like to go swimmin' with bow-legged wimmin and swim between their knees.... 19:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because David made me. -- sannse (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Yeah, ok. Works for me, print it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:20, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Fags are our friends. 18:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Forish. The Main Page has a serious lack of Faggotry. This should remedy that. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Oh god yes!--Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 20:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article will show the world that Uncyclopedia is fair to all, no matter what their race, creed, colour or sexual orientation (as long as they're young, white, middle-class gay men). --Shamus
• For. I'm cool with gays. Not with the liking dudes part, but with the not liking girls part. All the more for me! I'm kidding...............kind of. My chance-o-meter just dropped points, didn't it? Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 21:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• On behalf of my brother, I vote FOR Dame  22:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Extreem lesbian For.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• FORGASAM -- 01:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, the last bit is hilarious. -- 02:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. I went in wanting to hate this article. I really did. Unfortunately, I was laughing too hard to.-- 03:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Poorly organized and full of tired stereotypes. And I may not be a homophobe, but I'm definitely a furryphobe. *shudder.* --Jordanus 03:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. If only it was a month earlier.. gay pride month? --Bongo 05:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Most gay people hate pride parades. Something should be added about the Bear Pride bits of the pride parades. --Spencer (yiff) Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 05:40, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Bear pit added - David Gerard 07:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For - though I have to say that it really would be vastly improved by removing (or at least moving down) the cartoon furry thingy.  c • > •  06:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I must stop putting the cartoon furry on everything - David Gerard 07:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Just so the Wikia Cabal doesn't get me. --Sbluen 09:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, If only for the very last line --Jamtrousers 09:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. -- 10:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For even though it makes no difference. Just like everything else I do.— 11:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, from a blatant homophobe. (No Ghey Pride reskin, thanks!)-- Colonel Swordman 14:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• BIG GAY FOR! Uuh...you did not just read that...--Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. 19:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

## Super Smash Bros: Xtreme Beach Volleyball

Score: 19% damage

Featuredrc (t) 05:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For. Awesome mixing of SSBM and DoA:XBV. Hilarious, and brilliantly written. --nuknuk 04:40, 16 June 2006 (Aus EST)
• For --Pcgamermofo 07:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Absolutely hilarious. --ENeGMA 13:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Made ME laugh, anyway...-- 14:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Blush and For. Thanks, guys. I just did some major edits before I realized this got nominated. --Monika 18:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Could do with some jokes about pics of nude codes. --User:Nintendorulez 18:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
I prefer nude coeds.(those computer nerds...)-- Swami A. Suresh 22:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I liked how the link between Kid Icarus and Metroid was slyly referenced. -L 09:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, combines a great game and a crap game into a tasty melange that, somehow, makes me feel both creepy and weird simultaneously. Modusoperandi 17:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --emc! 04:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is really funny stuff.--Wit (tawk) 18:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Severe hawtness. I wish it was really a video game, damn! 24.145.222.85 20:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Make up for that whole page move thing. Heh, sorry 'bout that. 06:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• hee hee, thanks and no problem. I was so confused when it was happening, though. Especially since I thought I had changed the name already but I'd really decided to lump it in with the rest of the rewrite. --monika 06:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• FOR Zelda has a nice ass. Reminds me of this girl I met in Ipanema --24.57.52.178 04:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry to ruin the PERFECT, but is this really funny enough to feature? ..Would have left it alone, but something tells me the DoA article I started will get ransacked by anonymous IP's if this goes up... --So So 13:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• comment If you're worried about your article, I (or you, it is a wiki) can take out the link. --monika 17:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• There's a link? ..Oh, but it looks like you took it out already. I was half-kidding, but oh well. Thanks. --So So 06:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

## Ernest Hemingway's Cookery Corner

Score: +18

Featured I counted three articles with +18. This one got the nod because I liked it best it's the oldest. —rc (t) 05:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Self nom. Just to see. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This article made me chuckle. Considering how rarely I actually open my mouth upon finding something funny, consider it an achievement. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody. 09:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This amused me, and, since I've never read Hemingway and therefore am sure I didn't get a lot of the jokes, that makes this a winner for me.-- 05:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For "Squeeze some ketchup out in a line. Roll up the bread nice and tight. That’s it. Man creates food." Go go gadget literary humor! —rc (t) 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For You can't argue with this. Feel the quality in that cloth. FreeMorpheme 21:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG FOR -- 22:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Another quality product from the pen of Hardwick. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 15:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For It made me hunger for wasp. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Food is good. Dame  23:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against it's okay, but it's no [Bouncy Castle]. Plus self noms annoy me Modusoperandi 00:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Charming article and now Modusoperandi's vote is neutralized. Its like two votes in one. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against- Funny at times, but needs much more work before it can be accepted as a featured article. There are only about 3 recipes on there- hardly enough to call it a full article. The Llama Llover
• For. OMGTF ROFLROFL WWJD! yeah well good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:21, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.--InfiniteMonkey 23:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Like the noble clown, it charges into the circus ring, only to die on the matador's sword, because it's quite a nasty circus. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 10:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For It's so Hemingway-ish. I'd love to see that featured! Awesome work Sir :) --Zig 14:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - sorry, I have tried to love, but someone needs to kill this bull..... -- 17:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For This made my comatose aunt laugh. Get saved! 19:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. If Celebrity Roast or Cannibalism can't make it to the front page, then this one definitely should. It's one after my own heart.  :) ~ T. (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - I looked at funny as though I were seeing it for the first time. --Imrealized 22:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. I quite like it, but it's a bit too repetitious for me to love completely. You can do better, Hardwick. ^_^--Winston 02:10, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Now to go read some Hemingway. --Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 01:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Mushroom 10:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  04:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Indeed.  Holla | CUN 04:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For because I love this type of article--TKF 18:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For ~ 16:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

## UnBooks:See Dick

Featuredrc (t) 04:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For: Read it. You'll like it. --File:Ichthus.svg Jayrod «Speek MUN WH» 00:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Agreeable For. I read it. I loved it. -- Imrealized IMme 00:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For: Stylistcally consistent. this would have been an easy one to fuck up. nice beat, can dance to it... I give it an 8Matt Kurz 00:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - Oh no! Dick has hurt Harry! Hilarious. TheMono 05:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For "He is not a crook. Crook, crook, crook."... that shouldn't be so funny, but it is --Jamtrousers 09:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For and thanks for the Nomination ;-) Dame  12:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Read it, didn't like it, but I'm willing to accept that this could just be because of my politics.-- 13:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! This got me giggling. Pret-Pret strikes again! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• For.InfiniteMonkey 03:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For This is well-executed, and extremely classy. Though politically itchy, It's a for, since we don't care about being FAIR AND BLALALANCED (TM, lol)--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 03:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. An original UnBooks article... Wait, no, nevermind. Whatever... still for. 06:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - funny and clever.--Nydas 08:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --emc! 04:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  04:51, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• *reads title alone* For --User:Nintendorulez 21:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Quality stuff.--SN W | T 19:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 'Tis funneh for 'tis true. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• See me vote for See Dick. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 23:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Forshizzle.  Holla | CUN 00:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny and topical. --Mr.Vib 14:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Simple but effective. For -- 16:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• For See DiZ vote. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

## Neolithic Age

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 05:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for. It's written by Mhaille and it's not stuffed full with innuendo. Need I say more?-- 14:13, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• I'm tempted to vote against this to restore the equalibrium of the universe, but what the hell...for -- 20:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Hello equilibrium. --Imrealized 22:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Clever, thoughtful, clean. :) ~ T. (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very uncyclopedic. Tee hee hee, "Weapons Of Mass Poundings." --L 11:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Proto-Indo-European harbringers of death? Rock on. --KATIE!! 12:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• Yeah I gotta fill my voting quota for today...-- Swami A. Suresh 12:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, --HP talk 03:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Formidable. --The Rt. Hon. 15:31, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For This article gave me a right rogering. Get saved! 19:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Just didn't really grab me.--Emmzee 20:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Woo.(BTW that means for) And do I have to give a reason? I'm too tired. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody. 12:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, because Mhaille is a god I know you all already knew that. Go back about you're buissness.-- 13:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. As an anthropology geek, I simply must vote so. ~13:40, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Totally splendid beginning but trails off near the end. --Hobelhouse 02:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. really really well written. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Apologetic For. I wish Mhaille would write something rubbish so I could vote against him just once. Not yet, though. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain --LOLMOLE 22:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Extra marks for mentions to Romanian Circus and Proto-Ugg. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Reefer Desk - Use it | Converse 13:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Best article thats close to being featured. --Sir Cornbread 01:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Mushroom 10:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. And I actually read it Mhaille, I didn't just give you a whored vote; so funny, it almost made me do a little wee. --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 13:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Don't delete my votes, this means YOU --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 14:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Kajagoogoo hypothesis? Almost nonsensical, but still funny--InsertKittenHuffingJoke 07:23, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Because I'm too shy shy, hush hush, etc etc. Oh, and I giggled. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

## Rogue Punchlines

Score: +20

JESUS CHRIST IT'S FEATURED GET IN THE CARrc (t) 02:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

• JESUS CHRIST IT'S A LION GET IN THE YOUR MOM ON WHEELS! --KATIE!! 19:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Fooooooorrrrrr, as the actress said to the bishop. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• The Aristocrats, I mean FOR. -- -- 22:27, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain --LOLMOLE 22:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• And so he says to me, he says, it was the Butler! --ENeGMA 00:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• For my own stuff, per regulations.-- 01:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --L 02:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• I'm For. and so's your face. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• I vote for this... in bed. -- Nørwegian Kanaaääaäaalääaaaäaaää Attack! 14:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Good idea, Brain, but where are we going to get that many for votes at this time of night? —Pinky 01:14, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. My image :D -- Skiddles

(talk)

• For. Nothing like some randomness. Swordmaster 16:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• JESUS CHRIST, FOR!!!--TKF 00:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Han 04:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. WTB? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against, more out-of-context one-liners are the last thing Uncyclopedia needs.--Jonadab 20:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Forty-two. --User:Nintendorulez 20:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. people should add to thie list - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. It's an OK article but in my opinion (1) not laugh-out-loud funny (2) Uncyclopedia has enough of this kind of humor without featuring it. InfiniteMonkey 03:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny. So the patient says, "I don't know how those beads got up there!" Didn't add to count because I'm confused about some of these votes. Get saved! 16:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against Well it is a public subject, but it smells of inside joke. And I put them slightly higher than vanity.-- Swami A. Suresh 11:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• For ...and so is your mom. --emc! 06:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Needs more punch, or more lines, or a lot more of something. --So So 05:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Gotta agree with So So, Infinite Monkey. ~ T. (talk) 11:50, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for because that's what he said. --Rabid Jaguar 20:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• JESUS CHRIST ITS A FOR-VOTE, ADD IT TO THE PILE!The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody.
• For. Allegedly. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Reefer Desk - Use it | Converse 13:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Assuming I didn't already vote on this... too lazy to look. 07:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. Amusing, but... feels a lot like just some lists. Then again, not much else it could be. -zachol 05:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I enjoyed this very much..... and then I found five bucks! -Nuknuk 23:16, 22 June 2006 (Aus EST)
• For. I can't think of anything witty to say... because I'm too busy with YOUR MUM/MOM!... <cough> --Joachim22 08:36, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• I vote For, "but how would that be different from any other day?"--DiZ 18:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• OH YES -- 00:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

## Calvin and Hobbes

Score: +20.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For Mixes philosophy and the greatest comic strip of all time into a delectable feast. —rc (t) 01:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• concur For. this is a wonderful rewrite that reality-distorts most effectively. Morwen 01:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC), who does have a Computer Science degree, but didn't realise it had any philosophy or history in it
• For. Yeah, this is the good stuff.-- 02:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Absolutely. Well done.--Donut 02:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. sorry, but because its funny to people with uni degrees doesnt give it an automatic pass.--hotdog02:32, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I don't even have a unicycle degree. --EvilZak 04:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For... and this is totally unbiased. *shifty eyes* --Nakedman 15:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. It had me at "featuring philosophers John Calvin and Thomas Hobbes as themselves" --Monika 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• A great article.-- Swami A. Suresh 18:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I am so damn tired of those decals on trucks, damaging the reputation of this once sterling philosophical show. --Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 01:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  01:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Hell. YES.--68.94.39.182 04:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm digging it Modusoperandi 06:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Automatic Pass. Absolutely excellent. --Imrealized 18:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh my god, that made me laugh the second I realized where the joke was going, and then more as I actully read it. I'd like some more fake comic strips, but it's already awesome.Arzikl 08:19, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nifty! --L 09:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For; the 4-panel strip sent me rofLing(!). --DW III 19:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For So high-brow that even I don't know what I'm talking about anymore. --ENeGMA 22:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I'm a Calvin and Hobbes fan and the pictures on the article are hilarious. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~01:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. The pics are a bit too ugly. -- Colonel Swordman 02:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Pure blend double malt witty. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against There's something called avoiding clichés on Uncyclopedia, one of them being: "This person...did something...a period of time...after his death. Just stupid, not funny." That basically sums up my vote on this. --emc! 04:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Me likes -- 11:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against because I suck. Also, I think the jokes are too obvious, though the images amuse me.— 10:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Not really a parody. I suspect that those who voted 'For' mainly like the comic strip, as I do, but this is supposed to be a parody about the comic strip, and it isn't a good one. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.86.119.172 (talk • contribs)
• For. It's not a parody of the strip; it's a parody of an encyclopedia article about the strip, and an homogenous mixture of truth and fiction, addressing some of the same points that a real article about the strip would have to address, but in a different way. --Jonadab 13:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For the pics alone. Clever, good-hearted stuff. --Nydas 20:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Totally awesome. It's not that hard to get. -zachol 05:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• I think all the reasons have been exhausted. For.  >Major Sir Hinoa|Talk|KUN   05:31, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For, for an exhausted reason.--TKF 18:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Man, this is some good crap. Philosophical genius.
• Unsigned —rc (t) 03:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

## John Cage

Score: +15

Featured Okay, Spang? OKAY? —rc (t) 06:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• 2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss. It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...-- 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! -- Get saved! 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l KUN VFH FP (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
• 2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amusing. — 00:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Couldn't you work in a Mortal Kombat Johnny Cage reference?--SLACK...ah ah...he'll save everyone of us! 02:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Because I'm awkward. ~ 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because it zings with harmonious counterpoint.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against This article had a LOT of natural potential, which was completely quashed by stupid kitten huffing references that had no relevance to the complete insanity of this already bfi person --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Crotch Drops There 15:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Very good, affectionate, i didn't know who the fuck he was but it still made sense and ammused - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• FORE! Hilarious. I especially liked the part where the trumpets don't come in. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I only wish he could have written a symphony for 10 people banging their heads against a wall in unison...A great article for the front page -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - the list of songs made me chuckle. --Nydas 09:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - brilliant --TKF 13:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Confusing --Mushroom 11:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I simply don't get the joke. Sorry! -- Colonel Swordman 12:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It kept me entertained to the end. As such I feel we should burn something. Why are you looking at me like that? User:Yuri von-juan/sig 08:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For A little obscure, but anyone who knows who John Cage is will absoutely piss themselves Jammygit
• Weak Against. It's ok..--Emmzee 02:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Silence is cool, but that's about it. Demonbob 13:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. That he's not extraordinarily well known is a strike against, but the kitten huffing references finished it for me.--Winston 02:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• The Against. John Cage? Didn't get a single "joke".--Witt E, 04:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Let's get this 4eatured already! FreeMorpheme 18:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. They featured Patriotism at 13, and this has reached 16 and 15 (and was currently at fourteen when Patriotism was featured at 13 >.<) multiple times without getting featured. Well, now it's at 15 again, so feature! NOW!--TKF 19:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment By my count it was at 12 (21 Fors - 9 Againsts = 12 total) when Patriotism was featured at 13. Now Cage is at 14 (23-9), but another article is at 17. Believe me, I'd be glad to see it featured and off VFH finally. Maybe next go-round... —rc (t) 03:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Meh, Comment and Suggestion. people should accurately change the score at the top when they vote. It confuses people >.<--TKF 02:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Reasonably good tone, good parody of subject matter, good formatting.--Jonadab 20:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For— .... ........ ..... --Lenoxus 22:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Would someone just put this thing on the front page already? It's funny and it's been voted on since March. Just feature it already! --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~02:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. To repeat what others have said above: I'd love it if this were featured sometime! :) See VFH discussion for some COMPLAINING about this. Spang 04:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

## UnNews:National Gay Marriage Threat Level Raised to "Flamboyant"

Score: +18.5

Featuredrc (t) 04:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For. Very Onion-esque, except it's been a long time since I've seen something this creative in The Onion.InfiniteMonkey 02:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great article. 02:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. — 02:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice concept. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against for US presumption. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• $\int_{-\pi/4}^{\pi/4}2\sqrt{2}(\cos{x}-\sin{x})\, dx$ -- 05:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against Its not as cool as me. - User:Dave grohl/ 09:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for simply because the color threat level isn't a logical progression. Besides, where is the taupe level? Greige (grey-beige) level? Dame  12:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For We must get the word out and stop these devients. --ENeGMA 14:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. 21:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• For; absolutively hilarious. --DW III 06:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Faabulous, dahling. for. --Carlb 11:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - Wow, thanks for so much support for my article and for all the great additions to it everyone made; the full color-coded scale and descriptions were my favorite. --Composure1 16:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. The title is great, but the article is AMAZING. Of course, this is what I'm coming to expect from UnNews. </pimp UnNews>-- 04:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Flamboyant For. -- 08:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• What's with the letter F, anyway?' --L 13:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Oh rather... We need something a bit more kinky. --The Rt. Hon. 14:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain --LOLMOLE 22:51, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: What is the point of abstaining from something you don't have to vote in anyway? I'm just wondering. --Hobelhouse 16:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• LOLMOLE has abstained, like, all over. I have no idea why. --Lenoxus 22:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For- good for some giggles. Signed, See -> 67.17.21.29 10:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Neh. Funny, but there are other articles I'd like to see featured over this one.--TKF 18:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• OOh, for, sexi boy - ok, maybe that was a little too far :P --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 12:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gay Marriage on a Plane is probably the best "Snakes" reference in history. --Lenoxus 22:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. What else is there to say? One of the best articles of the year. --nuknuk 4:45, 16 June 2006 (Aus EST)
• Beautiful --Donut 15:52, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For So funny that tears poured out of my urethra... wait, maybe those werent tears... --Sir Cornbread 03:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

## Idiocrates

Score: +22

Featuredrc (t) 04:11, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

• N+F Bloody Funny..... -- 12:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Completely impartial and objective for. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Unequivocal for. ~ T. (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. because it's very good, not because he has any member of my family captive :| call the police! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for - provided that excessive bolding of the subject is removed. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 12:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Done. Thanks for pointing that out, it wasn't very pretty. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Excellent article. Just excellent. --ENeGMA 13:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - I laugh, therefore this is. --Immy IMme 18:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Much, MUCH better than Humor Theory, my take on a similar subject. Like, so much better, that I have no idea why I put that non-funny link there in the first place...-- 19:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Idiocratic aphorisms --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For — it worked wonders for my toothache. Don't ask how. --Lenoxus 22:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Made me chuckle, but the captions did the trick.--Emmzee 00:04, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• 2+2 --KATIE!! 00:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's stupid, but cleverly stupid instead of stupidly stupid. Apologies if my "Idiocratic Method" screws up the article.
• Unsigned —rc (t) 04:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• 4. --emc! 04:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --EvilZak 04:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For The Spith 11:33, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• I think therefore I vote For - LordHilly 07:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Forgasam Oh my god this article was amazing. -- 12:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Converse 12:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Cogito ergo seagullum. Get saved! 15:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• "For if we accept this as true, all else follows." --Donut 15:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• I don't think, therefore I am not. --User:Nintendorulez 20:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

## Blame somebody else

Score: +14

Featuredrc (t) 03:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for. This wasn't my idea, really...-- 15:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny. 19:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• He made me do it. --KATIE!! 20:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Sure he did, Keitei. You're innocent. But is that a for or an against? -- Swami A. Suresh 20:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. This is funny in parts, but not all the way. Ok I suppose.--123Fat123 23:42, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for too --Sixx 13:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC) It's not as great as segregation
• For -- 01:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• For -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain --LOLMOLE 22:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• FOR--Usewho'sname? 00:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. I love this article. In fact, I made some additions. I hope it gets to the front page. --The Llama Llover
• For. Its good.--Wit (tawk) 19:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for.--Rataube 11:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• I have to vote for this article, so that guy over there doesn't shoot my cat. Dame  13:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Gah, I felt like nomming this but meh. For!--TKF 18:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. —That guy, over there! 19:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 20:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

## Patriotism

Score: +13

Featured The voting was very close this go-round. If I missed any votes on other nominations...don't bother telling me. —rc (t) 02:35, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom + For-Great collaboration on this rewrite--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 20:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Haha I have a few of those awards. Severian 02:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Everybody loves Patriotism. Well, everyone but the Commies.-- 04:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For King and Country! -- 18:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment And here I didn't even know you people HAD a King...-- 15:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Vague for --L 07:30, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For you gotta love those flags! --Plyr3005 00:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Yeah, I know - the chicks are hot, but I really had a hard time deciphering the content. Sorry! -- Colonel Swordman 14:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. you seem to be mocking the midlessness and hypocracy of patriotism, also there are women in swimwear. I didn't read the rest, i'm not even literate. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• No - the first pic seems to be two naked chicks wrapped in US flags. *Breww...*
• The pics are way, way, way too big and I really had a hard time keeping my focus on the left, where the actual article was located. :)
• The article contains too many history references.
• Even the history references themselves are too vague for average Joes like me to understand.
• The portrayal of patriotism as a disease hardly reconciles with the HOT HOT pictures on the right-hand side.
• Nice try, but I'd rather see something else featured on the front page.
-- Colonel Swordman 13:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Same reason as Jack, but also funny. --Emmzee, Destroyer of Goats (yell at me)
• For. So... err... Is this on the merit of the article, or the quality of the chicks in dress? --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 18:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because there's no other explanation for patriotism... --epynephrin 16:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I found several missing commas. --Sbluen 23:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. haha, a disease! Excellent! --Snerlin 04:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For LMSO! Get saved! 18:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Smart and funny.--Winston 02:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Very entertaining. --Insineratehymn 15:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I never thought I liked the Canadian flag so much! --HP talk 00:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I could hardly read it... but I still laughed. The color text bugs me, but adds to the theme anyways. What I did read was great, and I love the pictures.
• Unsigned —rc (t) 02:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against treating objects like women. --Immy 19:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

## Segregation

Score: +15.5

Featuredrc (t) 02:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate and For because PLS should dominate the clearly inferior non-PLS articles on the front page. (also it's a great article) --EvilZak 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Heh, this was going to be my next nomination but you beat me to it. —rc (t) 19:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For It's a good, funny idea, but it's a bit short. - Lenin & McCarthy 19:22, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Short but sweet, and PLS to beat Modusoperandi 19:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh, absolutely. I loved this one.-- 19:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For- I wish it was longer, but it's still great!--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for Its a great base, but it needs to explore what happens to the Pure white when something hot and red gets thrown in with them - the stain of miscoloration. FOR!Dame  00:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Okay, seeing the support for this article, I must now expand it to win over those wary of its shortness. Strong Rad 15:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Wow - very witty! --Jester 02:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Great - very me. --Witt E, 21:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 23:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Not yet. Needs more work. Good start though.--Anon32 00:39, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For now that it's been improved.--Anon32 00:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against since it's hasn't actually been improved.--Anon32 00:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. A good article, but I think a lot more could be written on this topic. Bloopy 08:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. A nice, meaty follow-up piece to Folding@home, but a little short. ~ T. (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Well written and clever in spots, but to me the overall concept is kind of cheesy. --So So 03:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. yé! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

*For, funniest article i've read in a while. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Jack, I love you as much as the next guy, but only one for vote per article, please. :)-- 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• Strong, yet supple for. Some damned fine rightin', fer them's want to reed a funy artikel. LMSO, silently of course. Get saved! 04:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Sbluen 20:40, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Orgasam --ZB 01:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Forgasm is more like it --TKF 21:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nyea Great article, but it's a bit short. --Snerlin 04:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - 'tis a bit short, but the funny more than makes up for it. --Imrealized 22:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Solid article. Plus, I want to make sure that idiotic "How to:Get Banned" isn't featured.InfiniteMonkey 07:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

## Decapitation Disease

Score: +17.5

Featuredrc (t) 03:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nom and for. --Emmzee 14:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Fine, have your funny article featured. SEE IF I CARE!!!!-- 14:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Aye, tis the awesome...-ness. Demonbob 22:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Future Rula 17:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For People have told me that's what they thought "Caputosis" meant. ~21:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For About time a good article showed up on VFH. Excellent. --ENeGMA 22:57, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• ick For --HP talk 13:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Raven_1959 | Bleep 14:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Yes good *nod* - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 18:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Flabius-Danner 20:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. The worst part of the disease is the instant separation of the head from the neck. --Sbluen 21:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --stephensface 23:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• This idea is stupid. Brilliantly stupid. Strong For.--InfiniteMonkey 23:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Han 09:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gruesome but good --n00b no.433 Qua? ~ T. (talk) 10:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Snerlin 04:34, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Very funny. This comes from a person who think's Bat Fuck Insane is hilarious, so you might not want to take it as a compliment ;) Get saved! 18:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gruesome but guud. (rising in the n00b ranks). 67.17.21.29 12:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Get a user account, then vote. Stupid IPs.--Emmzee 18:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC) IPs can vote, if you try to invalidate their votes again, I'll ban you. 06:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Nicely done, sir. --Kalir, Novice Burninator (offer instruction) 18:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For Hilarious. Kles 19:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Score: +26

Featuredrc (t) 03:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nom and for - I know that the format is funny, but what about the rest of the article? --Nydas 07:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment — Uh, yeah... where is the rest? Seems like more people below are just as confused as me, and, um, you. Wait — didn't you write it, Nyadas? Are you stoned or something? (Not that I don't find the writing excellent. It just feels incomplete — maybe it needs a stub tag?) --Lenoxus 05:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Comment - I've removed the chapters that seemed to be causing trouble for people. --Nydas 06:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
What I meant was, "what about the rest?" sounds like a confusion about the article iftself ("so where is the rest of my incomplete article?"), which would make no sense. But I think I get you now. I think.=--Lenoxus 17:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

(Bleat) 09:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Innovative format, although I expected the content to be a bit more encyclopedic. -- Colonel Swordman 12:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
That is a problem that I just fixed. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~15:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
I strongly disagree with the use of chapter pages. They noticably detract from the adventure gamebook feel of the article. Will change back unless someone strongly objects.--Nydas 17:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --84.81.137.132 16:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. That's fantastic that is. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For This is all right. FreeMorpheme 22:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ 11:29, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Turns Game:Game into a pile of croutons. --L 11:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I found fewer mistakes in this game than in Game:Game. --Sbluen 13:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I remember those, i hated it when i lost. -- 15:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, where's the rest of it? Modusoperandi 15:00, 1 June 2006 (UTC)For much better now Modusoperandi 04:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Perhaps you should try clicking a few links? Oh, and *For--TKF 19:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• changes vote to for - At the time I initially voted, there was just a solitary red link. --User:Nintendorulez 11:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. If you can't find the next page, you aren't trying hard enough. Nice job, Nydas. Swordmaster 19:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nay. It's a good idea, but it could use more pages.. --Snerlin 02:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Very, very FORDame  20:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - just like I remember..... -- 21:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For a trip through the Wayback Machine. --Imrealized 22:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• For its ggggreat. --24.17.40.11 05:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. I love this.-- 05:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For....ahhhhhh, I spent hours on this page.....--HP talk 03:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For the funny.--Witt E, 07:54, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For hahah -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For --Insineratehymn 15:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Indeed. There is wit and satire in there too. --The Rt. Hon. 15:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For I hate games, all games, but, I like this article. Funny. Get saved! 19:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. "Congatulations, you have just out-witted a seven year-old girl." 00:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. It could have a few more options and be bigger, but it's still great as it is. Arzikl 04:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against.Stupid.--Emmzee, 5 June 2006 (UTC) I replaced the IP because that was me at school and I forgot to log on. -Emmzee (flame me)
• Comment. Kill the Emmzee...kill it.^^^^(edited)--Witt E, 02:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Potential to be one of the best. Kles 15:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Amzing although he should have developed the sonicc 2 bit more. :) User:Jrolee Now (UTC)
• Weak Against. A good play on an adventure book (I always cheat!), I don't see featured material here though... Demonbob 01:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

## Oscar Mayer

Score: +18

Featuredrc (t) 03:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and For more inuendo. -- 13:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• For (and thank you for nominating it). ~ T. (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Splendid. --Hobelhouse 18:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For this fine addition to the local meat market. --Carlb 00:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For all its meat-by-product wholesomeness(!). --DWIII OUN CUN 01:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Reminds me of sexual inuendo. No, not the article, I mean the thingy.-- 03:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For who would've ever thought mechanically separated chicken and assorted beef would be so sexy. --Severian 04:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. That first quote is a great prelude to an awesome article.--Witt E, 05:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 08:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. Dame  14:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Almost as good as Bouncy Castle. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Funny. --So So 10:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Is this a record for most unanimous votes so far? --User:Nintendorulez 19:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against No.-- 21:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gibberish but also good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Laughed my love handles off! Get saved! 15:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Yes, I am a scheme breaking asshole. -- 02:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but I do wish it would have unlocked the mysteries of olive loaf for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For the Weiner Man -- 18:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against, for the reason that it's toooooooooo American. -- Colonel Swordman 12:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - how can it be too American? The author is Canadian...... --
• For For For! Hilariously suggestive. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~16:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I like it. --epynephrin 16:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Hellafor.--Lenoxus 05:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against - It's just one big phallus innuendo. --Imrealized 22:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
• And that's a bad thing? Big fat for--TKF 15:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - A well-done one, at that.--Winston 02:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

## Embracing Mediocrity

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 03:06, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination & For. I laughed, I nominated, I voted. A tad bitter in spots, but delightfully so. I need to think of some entries to add to the jobs/secret powers section. ^_^--Winston 02:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. -L 11:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. And quite rightly so! --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 11:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I might as well accept it -- 12:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Something to aspire to. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Another award for Todd! -- 15:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I laughed. I cried. I pretended it wasn't how my sad existence has actually turned out--LordHilly 16:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Actually, it's not very good, but I've long since given up on seeing anything better.--InfiniteMonkey 17:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Superb. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. You can tell from the title it's going to be good. FreeMorpheme 20:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• 2+2=For I read the article to see what the big deal was. And I must say, I am impressed, my colleagues, I am impressed... --DiZ 16:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Muchas gracias, for mi amigos. ~ T. (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Yes! Funny and true to life. --Emmzee (flame me here)
• For. Tremendous job, indeed, Mr. Todd Lyons. ~15:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. The rc quote wins. --User:Nintendorulez 18:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. Loved that book pic, and the rest is great, too. Now I can live with myself, in my parents' garage, rent free. Swordmaster 19:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• I am For this article. It is truly a work that should be placed in the hallowed halls of literary prestige. Something like that --epynephrin 19:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• For! I could definitely see this on the front page. --Snerlin 20:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against the idea of people voting negatively for this wonderfully funny article. FOR!--Witt E, 02:10, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

## Handgun

Featured. ~ T. (talk) 04:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Score: +18
• Nominate and For. A fine article. FreeMorpheme 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I was, however, the author. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 18:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against as puns are the lowest form of humour Modusoperandi 20:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I think that I've just been zinged. Colour me...apathetic... Modusoperandi 22:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. FEATURE! - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For its so basic, why hasn't it been done before? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 21:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For!. Spang 22:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I knew what the joke was going to be before I even opened the article. 'Hand Grenade' was funnier and done first. --ENeGMA 20:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Good article Das Boot 05:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

*Against. Just isn't hitting me with the "funnae".-- 14:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Weak for. Still too much like hand grenade, but the last sentence of the "characteristics" section won me over.-- 13:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good stuff.--Emmzee 22:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For i think the single barrel variety is more common... Stephensface 02:44, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Nifty. Reminds me of Air Guitar. --L 07:24, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 03:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Highly original, I like it! --Olipro Anchor (Harass) 12:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ I like the single-action models myself. The moving thumb really lets people know that I've blown their head off for their stupid driving. ~ T. (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm surprised I hadn't noticed this before, as I frequent VFH every day I can. User:Yuri von-Juan/sig 09:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. That's what people are supposed to vote for. -- Colonel Swordman 12:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Handy. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Awesome. Arzikl 00:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Jack Handy would have been proud...--HP talk 00:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Finally, a use for imaginary bullets. --Sbluen 15:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Bang bang! You're dead! KeYYeK 03:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

## Goa Tse

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 06:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?-- 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...-- 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• I cannot in good concience keep this against vote on this article as this is probably the best article on this page right now. Abstain.-- 04:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: It actually is relatively safe for work, you probably just don't have the time to "read" the "articles" you are "voting against" and recognize the clever "puns" that lie within. And it doesn't matter if it's Safe for work or not, all that matters is if it's funny, and this article is pretty damn funny (OH MY GOSH I SAID DAMN THIS DISCUSSION PAGE IS NO LONGER SAFE FOR WORK!!!) --TKF 21:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I don't know if it is damn funny, but for a certainty it is damn low. "Rabbit digs the burrow"? Is this sort of smut really that amusing? How about a list of terms referring to woman's period? Is Uncyclopedia really about how witty people can get with genitalia and buttock and stuff? Pfft... I don't know what people think here, but VFH is really sending a message out there - a plain negative one. -- Colonel Swordman 14:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.— 23:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 01:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. -- 01:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For - I'm too lazy to click on the article link and want to read it on the front page. Guinness2702 02:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It could use some more content. -- – Mahroww a.k.a.  08:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. So disgusting, so wrong. But I couldn't care less. 17:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Biased but For -- 17:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Enhanced by Mhaille - me too steps out of the closet. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For with a smirking grin. --KATIE!! 13:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• For want pie now --Willy on wheels! 12:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• For the quotes alone are hilarious :) --Huffers 03:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Too deep for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• For YES! good. an original take on goatse that won't make you gag. --JackMort 12:45, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
• For. A Goatse on every computer in every school by 2007. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against - In what appears to be a sadly predictable trend for me. Even though the subject manner is handled cleverly, it's still one big anal sex joke at the end of the day. — 2nd Lt. Sir David, the Weasel of Wild KUN VFH FP Fire! 17:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak NEG-A-TIVE. I like this. I really do. It's smart, and I laughed. But I have to agree that the front page is starting to get too predictable in its display of crassness. I'm all for smutting it up, but too much of a good thing, and all that... maybe later. Yeah, definitely later. And no, not like that, you filthy bastards. I'm a trashcan. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No Goatse!!!--Anon32 22:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• OH my fucking god, that is so disturbing! FOR! -- 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• For. Subtle and funny: I like it. -- Get saved! 13:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Jump on the bandwagon. --The Rt. Hon. 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. This would require an NSFWArticle for it to be featured, and it would mean some workplaces could block Uncyclopedia from their servers. --Sir Velair Wight 04:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• For Very well written. Ethereal 08:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I didn't want to like the page, but the quotes won me over. -Conniption 17:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• I haven't voted on this yet? What the hell? For. — 04:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. It's goatse. Period. Full stop. Whatever. ~ 15:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong for I don't believe that this hasn't been featured -- Norwegian Kanaaääaäaalääaaaäaaää Attack! 10:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Although I support Yeah - votes - this one is double. -- Swami A. Suresh 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Indeed it is... —rc (t) 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For ancient chineese secret? I just wish that the title wasn't so offensive --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Crotch Drops There 15:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Wholistic combination of the sacred and the profane --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 05:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• For Nice,Nice --Severian 19:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 21:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. I don't know what a goatse is, I know it isn't very funny outside this site, and this article is funny enuogh that I don't need to know.--Witt E, 05:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. how long has this thing been on this list? Ant to Nintendorulez, calm it or i'll have the feature Euroipods again. --Anidn Needs Ignorant Dumbasses to Not Meaninglessly Exile him from InterNet MeetingrOoms MUN FC4 .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 03:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against  c • > •  04:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Lenin & McCarthy 06:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• NO ~ 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. C'mon folks, it's not what you think. By the time I reached the "Great Works" section,I was laughing my ass off. Get over the title and read it. :) ~ T. (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I admit I was scared at first but this is frickin' hilarious. --Hobelhouse 17:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Surprisingly refreshing material on an old joke. --TKF 22:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Why haven't I voted for it yet? I dunno. Feature it already! Spang 06:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. (gag and vomit) Not that sick geek joke again... --Colonel Swordman 10:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Just to get it off the page already! —rc (t) 06:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Change a lightbulb

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 04:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Awesome - I know that I'm only supposed to nominate one article but this one is hella funny, too. --Sparky2002b 01:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, the general populous was in need of an article like this. --OsirisX 08:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Doubleplusfor, made me laugh so hard I cried.--Emmzee 14:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Beautiful. Another winner.-- 14:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Anarchy on a bun. Swordmaster 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Oh Hell YES! ---Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Dunno what I could have done without it! Demonbob 00:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout! A quality article! --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~14:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I was amused. --epynephrin 18:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because it's absolutely wonderful! 21:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny. --ENeGMA 23:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, yes, yes, yes! --HP talk 14:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Of course, that's how you change a lightbulb! I've been doing it wrong for years!--Witt E, 02:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Fucking good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• I was seriously tempted to add an against just so that it doesn't get all fors, but after reading it I realize it is a work of art. For. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody.
• For. Why don't we have a howto namespace anyway?--Anon32 01:04, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

## Banana Skin Joke

Score: +18

Featuredrc (t) 03:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. A universally humorous gag. --Hindleyite Talk 11:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Long, but well done (and well-researched).-- 18:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --L 03:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because the apple skin joke just isn't as funny. --Captain Finding Nemo 04:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Flabius-Danner 17:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I need to vote for something and this article made me laugh.--The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody. 09:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 10:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For. I like it, but I feel it needs a little finessing. FreeMorpheme 20:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Don't mention it! In particular, I laughed, I wrote...--HP talk 00:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Indifferent eh.... Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR. Really really very very good. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - One of the classic scandals of all time. Great Setup. >> Sp1r1tofRad1o 21:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I wrote it so I promote it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 22:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Hehe, bananas are always funny! For! 21:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Old joke. Not funny anymore. But how is this article so hillarious? Stephensface 20:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - good stuff. --Nydas 09:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. (cues the small group of woodland creatures) ~ T. (talk) 09:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against funny, but not funny -- TKF 23:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. funny --Mushroom 11:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• For.--Rataube 21:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I actually saw someone slip on a banana peel.--Witt E, 02:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nice-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

## Colossus of Barbie

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 01:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For. Great article. 21:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I agree.-- 23:24, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, as the resident Egyptian Deity, this article pleases me. --OsirisX 00:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and thanks ;-) Dame  00:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Coolie, Colossus of Ken doesn't even compare. --Severian 02:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. Good idea, but it's a mess. For - Lenin & McCarthy 06:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Absolutely Wonderful--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 13:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I didn't really think it was very funny. Amusing concept, but meh. --ENeGMA 21:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Very funny. Someone put a lot of good work into this. --Jester 00:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For but is it anatomically correct? --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Crotch Drops There 20:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 09:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. You can't go wrong with 2000 Kens.--Hardwick Fundlebuggy 16:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For We need to highlight a feminist piece. Get saved! 03:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  04:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ T. (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Imrealized 17:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• I do --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 21:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against because of the image. (I voted against it on VFP, and I will do it again.) - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 04:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Yes, the first of the seven uncyc wonders of the world. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against Cause the idea of a giant barbie scares me. --ZB 16:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Darling love, vote on the merits of the article, not your fear of a twenty-foot Vulva on a Barbie giantess. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because it could have a twenty-foot vulva if it really existed. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Aye, it deserves to be featured. ~12:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

## On a stick

Score: +18

Featured. --KATIE!! 08:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination and For, a profound philosophy. --OsirisX 07:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, and I appreciate the nomination.  :) ~ T. (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• On behalf of all the pole twirlers who can't be here, I vote FOR Dame  14:39, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For my pole could stand a good twirl. --Severian 23:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Concept, content, perspective; Everything is grade A. --So So 03:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Concept, content, perspective; Everything looks better on a stick. ----Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:30, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Great stuff--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 14:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Good concept, decent writing, very funny. --ENeGMA 21:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. This is indeed funny.-- 04:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Good. Sort of the thing I've always thought about but never realized the humor of. Arzikl 06:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Bloopy 07:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For on a stick. — 23:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. provided you add section 'the moon on a stick'. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - a cross between real crap and fond memories --HP talk 18:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. I liked the "ice cream sliding off a stick" line. --L 06:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Funny, sometimes droll, somewhat disgusting. Excellent front page material. Get saved! 23:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For and its not just because Todd wrote it, either. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it's downright hilarious. --Rabid Jaguar 19:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

## Uncyclopedia is the worst

Score: +20

Featuredrc (t) 02:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment ~ What about people that hate us even though they've copied our site? :) ~ T. (talk) 04:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
I love those!-- 14:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Uncyclopedia in a coconut. --OsirisX 06:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against - Sorry, not funny. Das Boot 06:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Said Yuri von Juan in a mighty resounding, God-like voice, having read this article yesterday and said on the talk page that it should be VFH-ed, but didn't do it himself. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody. 08:27 9 May 2006
• For. Junky junky junk, but quality junky junk. Plus I was an author of this. --Hindleyite Talk 10:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For yep, thats us -- 12:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• FOR FOR FOR! Perfect. ~ 16:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Nothing quite like self-depreciatory humor. Swordmaster 17:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Lenin & McCarthy 20:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hatehatehat. — 23:46, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Simply mahvolous. --Moogle.EXE 23:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Fory fory for! --EvilZak 00:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. dangerous, dribbling and probably Communist. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For— 06:40, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Four! Funny, and just random enough to be a classic. Unsigned vote. ~ T. (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Ya, ya ich liebe der bierworst!! --HP talk 18:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against ~ 20:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --User:Nintendorulez 22:47, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• HATE HATE HAT -- 22:54, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• That sounds like an against, yet your sig suggests for. Which is it? --User:Nintendorulez 15:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• You're an idiot. It's a For. -- 16:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I hate kittens. Jayrod 06:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because I believe it may hold the key to curing cancer. --Captain Finding Nemo 03:32, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, because Uncyclopedia is junky junk junk! --Cctoide 13:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. I suggested its creation, but is it really funny for those who didn't read the original forum post?--Rataube 20:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• Noooooo! (runs away screaming)--Winston 11:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Lordhed 17:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC) Not really that funny after the first sentence.
• For Uncyclopoedia is about making fun of everything, including Uncyclopedia. And this is one of the funnier ones. --Porsche 07:43, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For Hilarious.--Emmzee 14:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Cause some people take this kind of thing seriously...all the better for the rest of us -- Sp1r1tofRad1o 02:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• fOR The pinnacle of literary exfcelence. --Sbluen 06:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

## HowTo:Avoid speeding tickets/fines

Score: +19

Featuredrc (t) 02:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nom and For. Can a HowTo be featured? --Hindleyite Talk 11:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Kind of long, but it has some good jokes. Excellent pictures. --ENeGMA 14:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Old joke, and a little long, but it made me laugh.-- 18:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Jocke Pirat 21:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! --L 03:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --ZB 16:42, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Flabius-Danner 17:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Laugh joke, and a long little, but it made me old. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 20:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 03:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it is fricken hilarious in an exteremely random way. --The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a antibody. 11:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Bloopy 10:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I wish I had known about your techniques last year. --70.160.123.211 21:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For And that article contains too many facts! --Jester 23:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For --HP talk 23:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For THIS ARTICLE KICKS MUCHO BUTTO Japanese Lenin 05:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• grudgingly FOR but what about just showing the officer your tits? Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 19:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hysterical. Swordmaster 19:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Usually i don't read really long articles cos i don't have the attention span but i finished this and it made me laugh, and was pleasingly english, so kudos. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 20:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-One of my favorite hobbies--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 21:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

## Yahoo!

Score: +18

Featured!, and Reskinned-- 04:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Self-nomination and for because I'm feeling too good lately, and I need my ego to be taken down a notch.-- 04:58, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, great! It's a hell of a lot better than what was there before. Shouldn't Yahoo redirect to Yahoo!? Bloopy 07:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I think it does. There's no redirection notice (I guess Brad's formatting preempted it) but if you click Yahoo and check the history, it displays the history for Yahoo! with the exclamation. —rc (t) 15:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Spang made the redirect some time after my comment. =) Bloopy 01:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, Clever, subtle satire of Brobdingnagian proportions. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 08:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. No ego depreciation for you. Spang 11:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Self reference is getting rather old. Sorry. Not this thyme, friend.--Anon32 12:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because that's just fucking funny. --ENeGMA 14:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Hmmm... --The Rt. Hon. 15:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Agaisnt It needs some work. I think this'll be my next project --PiOfFive 19:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
*Comment You have my blessing. I think it could use some pictures of 6 of the 7 deadly sins across the top, myself, but it's pretty good as-is. (Since Lust is pretty well-represented in the article as it is now, and there are 6 icons across the top of Yahoo!, it'd be perfect!) Man, I need to learn how to gimp...-- 20:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Zombie gave me EXACTLY what I wanted. Thank you, Zombie.-- 01:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Your welcome for both that and the For vote old chum. -- 00:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• for i havent figured out what the difference betwwen that and yahoo.com is yet--Alia kenobi 03:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• $\sum_{k=0}^1 \left(2k+1\right)$ 05:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I'll bite, and it bit back and it was good stuff.--Severian 23:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Cause I helped make it. -- 00:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For because it links Cancer porn - David Gerard 08:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Because it is so much better than the original! --Mordillo 20:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For even though it links to Cancer porn.  :) ~ T. (talk) 04:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - superb Das Boot 06:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For that guy who always votes against my stuff..... -- 13:15, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - I enjoy epileptic siezures now and again --HP talk 18:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, although it'll be tough to put it on the front page... meh, that's RC's problem, not mine.— 03:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Gulliver's Travels references = my vote. --L 06:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Vive la differance, eh? Get saved! 20:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• For, but how are we going to put this on the main page? Oh, and I'm not surprised at where the Wrath link leads. At all. — 13:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
• For! I laugh.--Witt E, 01:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• For!!!! Wooooo! It's funny - and offensive! The two best things about Uncyclopedia - except for the randomness. Gazco 17th May 20:04 (UTC)

## Biggles

Score: +17

Featuredrc (t) 02:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• For learning me what it means to seagull.--{{User:Suresh/sig}} 10:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Ve have vays ov making you vote for. --Hindleyite Talk 10:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against it seems unfinished. I'm going to change my vote to: For Dame  12:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Who needs finished articles when you can have Biggles?? --KATIE!! 13:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

*Against. Hmm... maybe it's just too British for me...-- 15:06, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak for. Americans will have to click on the wikipedia link to have any idea what this is about. It IS funny.-- 15:21, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Even without the Wikipedia link it's pretty easy to find humor, For. 15:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For My american idocy likes enjoyed this, and my German skills loved that you correctly formatted "Fliegender Zirkus"--Severian 17:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Jolly well For, old bean, what? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Had absolutely no idea what it was about and I still found it funny. Well written. --ENeGMA 19:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Well written extended riff on an old Monty Python joke. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat)& 06:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Like if bob monkhouse and kenneth williams bummed. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 17:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Harry, England and St George! -- 23:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
• Blackmail. This is a very good article. I give it my full support. Now can you destroy those photos? --officer designate Lugiatm 13:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Alphax 13:55, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

*For. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 16:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

- jack mort | cunt | talk - has quit (Excess Flood) Um... yeah.-- 17:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

• For. Hilarious, but the innuendo would be double-hilarious (with extra cherries!) if the article didn't explicitly describe Ginger as Biggles's lover in the first paragraph. --Wyattj 15:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

*For. This is great, Unsigned-- 20:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

## Citizen Kong

Score: +16

Featuredrc (t) 01:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for - I did in fact laugh out loud - David Gerard 15:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Dame  15:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For-Delightful--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 16:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Swordmaster 17:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• I Like It A Lot Jennay --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Crotch Drops There 19:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• This article is so good that the very pixels in this post are "FOR" shaped. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes -20:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Very impressive. --ENeGMA 21:50, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Clever. Bloopy 22:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Spin 23:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Amusing, and it won't scare off new readers. Get saved! 14:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• Remember folks, a vote For Kong is a vote for freedom. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 16:34, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For Lenin & McCarthy 18:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
• For  c • > •  04:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. Brilliant.-- 04:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. If I had a shred of photoshop ability to back it up, I'd love to tackle ideas as brilliant as this. This is the good stuff. Long, yes, but as Hardwick reminded me, so is the movie. ~ T. (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Imrealized 17:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I find his antics laughable. --Severian 22:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. I didn't think it was funny... too much. 00:40, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• For I had to find Citizen Kane on Wikipedia for it be funnier, but it's great at mixing wierd ideas. Arzikl 06:22, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

*For Freakin SweetUnsigned vote-- 16:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

## Insert title here

Score: +16.5

Featuredrc (t) 04:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

• [Insert for and self-nomination explanation here] [Insert complaint about how people don't presume nominations to be for here] - [Insert user name here] [Insert date here] 10:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• [Insert three letter word here] [Insert note that For is a three letter word here] [Insert signature here] [Insert 11:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC) here]
• [Insert vote] [Insert witty self reference about including witty self reference in my for vote here] - [Insert username here] [Insert date here]
• [Insert vote here] [Insert some cruddy reason for voting here [Insert User Sig, Time and Date Here (Hindleyite 14:31, 21 April 2006 (UTC))]
• [Insert a SHUT THE FUCK UP Against vote here] --PiOfFive 15:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 15:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I'm out of fors. ~ 16:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• [Insert clever variation on "for" here] [insert oblique jab at everyone who voted against here] — 18:25, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. God, I hate Brad. He just ruined that great running gag.-- 19:55, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. This brings self-reference to a whole new level of exactly where it was before. --Hardwick Fundlebuggy 20:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• This comment was funnier than the entire article. (Against) --Hubert Cumberdale 22:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• $\sum_{k=0}^1 \left(2k+1\right)$ 00:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. --OsirisX 02:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Witt E, 03:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. If Redundancy was featured there's no reason why this shouldnt be too. --sqsz, 12:16, 22 April 2006 (+8 GMT)
• Against. If Redundancy was featured there's no reason why this should be too. --Imrealized 21:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• For If we've featurred nihilism, then obviously we could not have Redundancy featured. Obviously. Twit! --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice 08:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak for. Probably the best anti-cliche article, and a lovely self-reference. It's too injoke though...--Rataube 20:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against this is... boring, and played out.... --Mindsunwound: (F@H) Crotch Drops There 14:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Fortress --Andrusi 16:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• [insert affirmative vote here] - [insert voter here][insert voter's talk page here] - [insert date(24April2006) here]
• For. 21:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Only marginally witty and not really that funny. I vote for articles not ideas. --ENeGMA 21:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• For --Spin 04:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• For. Now who wants to write a page based on this template, hmm? - Conniption 17:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against too cynical of uncyclopedia itself. --Flourentina 19:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against[insert insult here] unsigned vote
• For One of the most clever things here. --Johnfn 01:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• somewhat For - it's good. --epynephrin 18:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• [Insert support vote here]. -- Miserable Failure 04:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• Against. No work put into the article. Bilky Asko Talk Here 18:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
• for. actually got sore laughing. Matt Kurz 05:36, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• For! --So So 11:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• for a time, I was amused. Then, I finished the article, and I got bored, so I voted. -- Get saved! 15:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against I don't like articles like this...and it's similar to an old message board joke that never struck my fancy anyway. —rc (t) 15:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I regret that prolonged exposure to AAAAAAAAA has affected my enjoyment of formatting jokes. I'm left wanting content.--Winston 16:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. In fact, I think we should even to an "[Insert Here]" skin for the main page on the day it's featured, like [Insert logo here] [Insert Featured Article Here] [Insert Link Here]. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~ 16:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• For - Lenin & McCarthy 06:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• For. It's funny because it's true. --Zyrac 14:48, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• [Insert for vote with praise for the article here]--Sbluen 23:36, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• No' -- 00:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)