Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive2

Previously Featured

The Night After Christmas

Featured --—rc (t) 05:31, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I like this one better than Rudolph. Agree? Vote Don't agree? Fix it. We's just wants something Christmassy and satirical on the front page near Christmas, preciousss... -- T. (talk) 16:50, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• I LOVE this one. Todd = grand master of Christmas. --KATIE!! 23:57, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For -- This is a Christmas no-brainer. --Algorithm (talk) 00:22, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Great job! For. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 00:38, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For Woo hoo! --203.214.138.61 04:38, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Whoot! This is awesome! Love it! --T.W. North 17:43, 23 Dec 2005 (EST)
• 1/2 vote yet, and that's only because the one thing missing is a picture - David Gerard 11:17, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC) Full vote for - David Gerard 08:25, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: Picture added! Much thanks to Strong RadX. -- T. (talk) 20:56, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For Hysterical! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:03, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• for A Christmas freakin Miracle! --Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 04:33, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• FORE The Christmas spirit lives on... Chrismukhah's too. Jlove1982 05:34, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For this better be featured by december 26 or im gonna be so pissed. --207.69.137.40 17:43, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• BIG HAIRY ARSED FOR -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 19:38, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Invalidated I suspect at least half of these votes are from Todd Lyons' sockpuppets. Come on Todd, show some class. --—rc (t) 04:11, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• And I would've gotten away with it too, if it hadn't a'been for you meddling kids. -- T. (talk) 11:19, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

North Korea

Featured --—rc (t) 07:26, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I like it --Kennyisinvisible 03:36, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I enjoyed it.  :) Rei 20:59, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• --David Gerard 19:14, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• An amazingly clever article - possibly the funniest thing I've seen on Uncyclopedia yet. Zkion 21:13, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Very good! --Caiman 17:24, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• This isn't so much different than actual NK press. -2+6 Swordmaster 18:01, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For - --Johnny C. Raven 06:10, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• FOR! --Chronarion 08:22, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• This article definitely deserves to be featured. --KATIE!! 04:48, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 12:52, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• for lol i love how unbelievably horrble the pictures are. --Tompkins 02:13, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)

John Seigenthaler Sr.

Dawg says "feature," I say "for how long?" --—rc (t) 04:31, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For - Hillarious! 85.100.153.35 16:33, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Funny article, would make a good featured article in light of recent events. --Diafel 06:50, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Okay. != Mandaliet 07:44, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Needs more coherence - no vote yet - David Gerard 10:49, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC) Perhaps I should reread the article first. For this version - David Gerard 11:01, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For! As part of a perverted publicity stunt we should try and get Mr. Seigenthaler to go on TV and say we libeled him.--Jsonitsac 23:54, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For - I totally agree! If he thinks en.wp is bad, he hasn't seen anything yet. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 07:07, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For, but not until someone e-mails it to him for a response. --Spooner 00:42, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For --Isra1337 01:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• I am for rampant slander. --KATIE!! 04:54, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For I liked this article when it was written (by me of course) but people have made many improvements, it is good now. Ashibaka 06:45, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comment: Hey rcmurphy, would you please FEATURE THIS ARTICLE ALREADY? Thanks. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:21, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• For Now that I finally looked up who this guy is. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 12:14, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For, For, For!. I haven't looked at the article in thirty seconds and I'm still cracking up as I type. Rei 23:42, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Noooo! I just spent all morning clearing out dozens of seigenthaler-related complaints sent to the Wikimedia Board address. I'm sure I'll find it funny eventually, but right now it just makes me cry. :) Angela 06:58, 22 Dec 2005 (UTC)

New "voice chat" feature proposed for mobile phones

Featured --—rc (t) 04:29, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I R t3h l33t. l33t l33t l33t!! *does l33t dance* - David Gerard 08:30, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• 

  

  Nokia "UltraVox" voice-chat prototype.
  For There are some really excellent articles in UnNews, though it doesn't get the love and recognition it often deserves. Between the sarcasm, truth, and technical commentary in this article, I was rolling on the floor laughing. I also like how it makes certain things that are really archaic sound very modern and hip. Awesome. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 07:19, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • If UnNews stuff is VFHable, I have a few things I'll be nominating! - David Gerard 10:49, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • It's getting fucking creamed on Kuro5hin, though (login required). Bah and phooey! - David Gerard 23:50, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Yes! --71.126.167.121 10:47, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Yeah, my own work but I like it enough to consider it featureworthy. (I could have more Uncyclopedia features than Wikipedia features!) - David Gerard 10:49, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For - Very well-written. --some other user 13:43, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Awesome. - Guest 17:18, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• LOL --Nerd42 18:32, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Nice --Paulgb 21:21, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• yay! I mean For! --The Hedgehog 22:47, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. --Isra1337 02:14, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• *4_[send] An utterly ridiculous idea (voice chat? eek! that'd quickly become even more annoying than 'phones with cameras!) but amusing and original. --Carlb 21:17, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For I'm not popular enough to be different. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:24, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• its a prty dum idea its like sayn 'lol' out loud lol bt 4 newayz --KATIE!! 04:19, 19 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Definately for, my friend told it to me and i believed it at first, it took about 2 seconds for me to stop and think lol--Greenirvana 01:01, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

---

• FOR with no ambiguity. Very few things I read can make me giggle just thinking of them. --k3vin 21:47, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For Ths rtcl rks! F u no wt i mn. gt 2b my fvrt. --corelog 15:46, 03 JAN 2005 (UTC)
  • Folks, this won already and has already been featured, which is why it is at the bottom under the previous features heading. Your votes can do nothing for/against it now. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 17:38, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

George Bailey

Featured --—rc (t) 04:15, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• -toots own horn- --Silius 19:25, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Well written. A+! Rei 21:32, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For. Inventive. -- T. (talk) 00:18, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Didn't click till I got to the end. Good one - David Gerard 13:59, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For I didn't get the joke until the last paragraph either (which is part of why I'm voting for it) --Putz 10:03, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Aye very good article Staxeon 06:38, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For - it would be hypocritical of me not to vote for this. --Johnny C. Raven 15:39, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For - made me laugh out loud, great twist at the end --Doctors Mob 08:28, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Poland

Featured --—rc (t) 06:06, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• --—rc (t) 17:37, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC) With all the Polish activity lately I decided to finally read the Poland article. The Education section in particular is great.
• I reluctantly accept this glamourous, highly paid position. -- ERTW MUN 04:49, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• great really great
• We want more wudzia!! :)) This article should be on the frontpage PERMANENTLY :)

Just a note here: if you want your vote to be taken seriously and counted you need to sign your votes by typing ~~~~ after your post and you should be logged into an account that actually contributes material -- ERTW MUN 15:25, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• This article is the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Being an Engineering Physics student, I especially appreciated the section on Poland's relations to other countries.
• I vote for YES. This should be on front page as long as possible... :) MaDeR 06:34, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Great! Should be on the front page. --Silius 03:24, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Great article, especially the maths bit with the flags --Joachim22 07:50, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• 90% hilarious. Rei 00:52, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Poland * But Were Afraid to Ask
• For ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 22:09, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• for too Sj 01:06, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Poop Cuisine

Featured --—rc (t) 06:55, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• --Jeremy-Black 03:00, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC) Frodo eats poop? That must be what that elvish stuff was that fatty stole from him in the last movie!!!
• --Splaka 23:04, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC) Bad taste that tastes bad!
• --Marlton Green 13:16, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC) I'm definitely a fan of POOP CUISINE.
• 218.215.130.253 09:43, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• NoneTooSmart 13:21, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC) In favor of.
• --Carlos the Mean
• Grow up. Against.. Rei 00:53, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Eat shit and die I mean, highlight. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 18:04, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• FOR! the more shit, the better. Myronic da Chronic MUN NScx (h0lla) @00:52, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• How can you NOT vote for this? Hilarious stuff. User:Leofan7
• User:Bitchfucker: I nominate this. Actually, It's already been nominated, but I agree with the nomination. Isn't it funny how things turn out like this?

IPod yocto

Featured Though I don't know what "very swish" means. --—rc (t) 06:47, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• -- David Gerard 23:29, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Agreed --Savethemooses 00:07, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• The sad thing is, they'd sell. Vote for. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 14:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I love anything that extrapolates on the truth cleverly, and this is great. For. -- T. (talk) 22:15, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. Because Savethemooses is a nice guy, really. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:19, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Ragtime covers by William Shatner? I'm in. --Keitei 08:53, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For --Willy on wheels! 20:35, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Aye great article --Staxeon 06:45, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Agreed very swish --dig412 2050, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Red Shirts

Featured Yes, I counted the votes: 12 Fors, 3 Againsts and a "harshes the funny." No whining, please. --—rc (t) 07:07, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• From KP, Uncyclopedia's answer to Jonathan Swift. --Cap'n Ben CUN 11:12, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Rossangeles - I'll buy this one for a dollar. Feature this thing, and do it with all haste!
• Four thumbs up! --Nitro 16:44, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Against. To strong of a liberal bias. Seriously, I know this is uncyclopedia, but people could tone it down a bit. --neoEva88 22:43, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• So *that's* how it works! Five thumbs up (sticks out tongue at Nitro). Rei 00:58, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• It is vanity, but I will vote for my own article. My vote should more than cancel out neoEva’s vote since:

1. I am twice as old as neoEva.
2. I am 78% more charming than neoEva.
3. I have additional special powers granted to me by various degree-granting institutions.
4. I have the special ability to bend the wills of drug dealers and criminals.

You may ask, “Does KP kid?” And KP says, “sometimes.” Alas, I kid not about that last point listed above. ::--KP CUN 19:30, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Very, very clever. -Mandaliet 06:08, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. Sure there's some left lean, but Democrats get whacked on other pages, and why not? Both sides are fair game. -- T. (talk) 19:27, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

(Left/right debate moved to the DUMP. This space is for votes only -- T. (talk) 09:49, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC))

• -- David Gerard 20:53, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I'm liberal meself, but I think the lefty agenda kind of harshes the funny. I'm in favor of leaving what we have on there, but maybe adding some other things--world politics, maybe. Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 12:42, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I think it might be funny to some (as is proven here), but is this honestly feature worthy? On this, I dont beleive so. A feature worthy article generally is funny all around, and not only to a certain group of people. I think there are better articles out there that will appeal to more people, so I have to go against this one. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 20:00, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. Some things are hilarious whatever the politics. --Wyattj 11:56, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Weak for agreed, some funny things, though some things that apparently are too close to reality it gets mistaken as a political message. Might need some less reality in there! --Dalar 20:17, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Bad --Nerd42 19:37, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For Despite the fact that this is highly liberal leaning, I exercise my democratic right to vote. Before anyone looks at me funny, my vote only counts once. --Chronarion 06:08, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For --Wob 14:07, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Attack of the 500 foot Jesus

FEATURED --—rc (t) 04:48, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• -- David Gerard 01:54, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• chess! --Willy on wheels! 02:00, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. It's an excellent article, plus I helped a bit. The image to go with it is great too. It's not a matter of if, but when it will be featured. --neoEva88 03:53, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Needs a good one-over for grammar and editing, but after that I vote for this entry. --Isra1337 02:38, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)/23:52, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Don't use underscores in your links, dammit. It looks ugly. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:42, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Forbes. Jesus is on a rampage! --Strong RadX 20:00, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• FOR. This is funny as hell. --Hobelhouse 18:24, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For, for, for! Fucking hilarious. --Ianweller 15:05, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• FOR - I went in and proofed it just now, so most of the speling and grammer misteaks shoold gone bye-bye OK. (Feel free to revert any other changes I made if you don't think they're all that funny.) - --Johnny C. Raven 15:08, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For - I WANT to see this on the front page. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 16:26, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• against pictures are admittedly funny, the article kinda sucks though --Nerd42 02:56, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Emoticonics

:D --—rc (t) 04:55, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I vote for this because I made it. It is about the glorious and splendid study of emoticons.

I done added a few emoticonical forumlae. --Detective Arno Dick 03:57, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Good one. Great pic! - David Gerard 12:06, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• --—rc (t) 03:04, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC) Rather good. I'd love to see some of the other emoticonic formulas explained.
• ++Mandaliet 19:35, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC); I approve with mild enthusiasm, although the backwards.jpg image is way too long.

Well, the backwards.jpg image fit my screen pefectly. Problem will be making it fit different screens. I propose we shrink the image and make it align left. --neoEva88 23:18, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• For. The title alone got a laugh out of me, the article was great too. --neoEva88 20:31, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. Awesome. I laughed a lot. :) -- Galatea 21:06, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• =|;{> --ENeGMA 21:14, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. 218.215.132.68 07:26, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Aye excellent article Staxeon 06:22, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

German grammar

Der featured --—rc (t) 00:19, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I laughed out loud at this article at work and lost my job. Damn you, Uncyclopedia! - David Gerard 16:03, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• It's a pleasure to be nominated. Also, I'm voting for my own article. I'm such a rebel. - Mandaliet 10:22, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• As an ESL teacher in Germany, I, too, vote for this article, because it makes more sense than it has any right to. Mirandate
• Rather rough and crude, but funny enough to get a vote. Rei 21:35, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Add my vote, this shit is good! feTzu 18:3., 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• This is so very unfortunately true. And funny. --Carlos the Mean 07:52, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• A winner is you! Vot'd --Llamapalooza87 07:37, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For --Isra1337 10:41, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Für --Spintherism 06:06, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For -- fickst du im Monikas Arsch? --Myronic 07:35, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Euroipods

Featured! --—rc (t) 04:55, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• ++++ Very good, would buy from again. --—rc (t) 00:42, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• 1/7th of a vote. What the heck --Splaka 06:29, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Against. It's like a fraction of a stub. A stub of a stub of a stub. --Nintendorulez 20:46, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• 1/118th of a vote. --Savethemooses 20:53, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• 3/5 of a vote! --Paulgb's slave 20:56, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Nope, but kudos for the most spelling mistakes in the smallest word count. Impressive. -- T. (talk) 00:12, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• No, and it appears to be true despite the Oscar Wilde quote, so actually I think deletion would be more appropriate (yes, I know I'm heartless!)--Sweet Indigo 16:13, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• 1⁹² votes. Is this a sociological experiment to see what kind of articles actually get elected for highlight? I'm of course alluding to Rcmurphy's "don't worry, it serves a purpose comment." ;) Hooloovoo 17:26, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Erm, against... wtf? --Caiman 22:14, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Um...no Butthead stub as a feature? Staxeon 06:33, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Against. Dream on, it's not even an article. Why has it been left up to be voted on for so long? -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)

I put it on QVFD. It got speedily deleted. Then it got speedily restored. I can't be bothered to waste my mental energies working out why it's there.--Sweet Indigo 19:19, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Prefer this version. I might be biased. 62.252.32.12 23:27, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• For Amazing. --—rc (t) 05:19, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• 15 votes against' - David Gerard 14:07, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Against - This person may have come from a website where it is ok to be unfunny. But this just doesn't cut it on Uncyclopedia Jeydehn 07:04, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• 10 PRINT "Strong object" : GOTO 10 Article contains only three statements, and two of those are factual. Also, User:Rcmurphy claims the article serves a purpose, when UP articles clearly should serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever. 62.252.32.12 02:18, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Barrel Clowns

Featured --—rc (t) 06:40, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• --65.27.9.195 12:16, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC) I think that this is very original. I'll never look at traffic barrels the same way again.
• --Tyrante 11:48, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• --Original and funny and coherent. Good one. - David Gerard 14:28, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• --Am I vain enough to vote on my own article? I am! OddLockset
• --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 22:25, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• Definitely original and funny. Good one. --Silius 05:52, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• This article is the lolz0rz --Peder 23:50, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• -- Good! --Adorno 20:10, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For --Overlordzoloft 03:57, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Afghanistan

Featured --—rc (t) 04:10, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• It was rewritten from its former, depressing self through a collaborative effort, and one that has most certainly paid off. This is worthy of a feature. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 20:05, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Good one! - David Gerard 14:56, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Stand up and shout - yah i agree --Zombiebaron 20:16, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Definately. Kikimora 00:48, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• An outstanding result. Very For -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:41, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• I approve. Runiteshark 04:32, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Fore! Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 12:54, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Aye Staxeon 06:22, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Change the currency from heroine to opium, and I'm in! --Stewie 03:23, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

J.D. Salinger

Featured --—rc (t) 05:11, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Anyone who's suffered through Catcher In The Rye will appreciate this - David Gerard 21:39, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Much agreed. I'd give it a bold For, but bolding text makes it harder to read. I hate that. -- Lee 16:27, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Oh wow. Seamless. --Katie loves you! 01:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Hats off! Now if somebody took the time to spruce up Lord of the Flies the resultant flashback would really fuck me up. --Commander Jameson 19:21, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Done! Also, I support this article. Illiterate bum that I am, I have never read Catcher in the Rye and yet this article still amuses me. --Isra1337 13:14, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• For. I probably read this article. I might have also read Catcher in the Rye. I think we should feature it or something. --Strong RadX 03:33, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For, and I loved Cather in the Rye. --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 14:21, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Extreme thespian vote Wow, I forgot that I hadn't even voted for this yet... awesome. I'm pretty sure that's a record for most votes before my vote on one of my VFHed articles. --Savethemooses 14:58, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• For. --~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 04:12, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Fecal E.Coli

Featured --—rc (t) 04:35, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

With some truly great artwork from RadicalX. -- T. (talk) 22:57, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Factual, but not tedious; this one deserves a vote. --Keitei 05:26, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

An extended poo joke that's actually funny - David Gerard 13:58, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Brilliant. --neoEva88 01:21, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Vote from me, great --Caiman 03:56, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yes A poo joke good to the last drop --Wiki Tiki God 08:06, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Hehe...someone said "poo". VOTE -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

#2!...er 4! Here's poo in your eye! --Strong RadX 02:18, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 12:24, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keira Knightley In A White Corset And Kate Beckinsale In A Black One

Featured (Kate Winslet is hotter) --—rc (t) 05:38, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I desperately want to see this film. Snowspinner 00:08, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I second this nomination for my own article. (It was getting to eight hours without nomination. I have a reputation to maintain!) The picture really really is t3h suxx0r. I beg anyone to do a better one. I was particularly frustrated that the only good corset pics I could find of Keira were in black - David Gerard 00:16, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Cheers to RadicalX for a much-improved picture. Though I still wanna do things to it ... (so to speak) - David Gerard

BTW, if/when this is featured, the blurb should use the Spy vs Spy pic - David Gerard 20:47, 21 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Support as a member in good standing (and fantastic boots) of the David Gerard fan club. Mindspillage 19:12, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Chronarion 07:00, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Splaka 06:48, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC) (DG owes me)

HLAGH HLAGH HLAGH HLAGH HLAGH - David Gerard 15:48, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 20:08, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 22:15, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

When is this coming out? And if it isn't, why not? I vote for. --Isra1337 07:18, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--I vote that it should be released on high-def multi-angle DVD as well :p Hooloovoo 14:39, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Niggers

Featured --Imperial Wizard (JUST KIDDING) —rc (t) 08:51, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The satire here is exceedingly sharp. But I think the point is made sufficiently in the intro paras - David Gerard 11:44, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)

If you don't vote for this, you're racist. --EvilZak 01:54, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

And indulge in bigotry - David Gerard 13:10, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I am not racist--DeafByBeheading--68.121.209.160 06:26, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--kafkaesque 21:43, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Great parody! A+! Rei 20:49, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

forgainst --Kennyisinvisible (tlak) 22:41, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

It's the best sort of satire - the sort you feel really uncomfortable laughing at. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 14:43, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nice new pic added of their cheerleader squad. Also, unlike every other use on Uncyclopedia, I've finally found the perfect application for the Kanye West quote - David Gerard 21:48, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I added a Niggers logo which has already been branded "sucktacular" by one enthusiastic fan ;-) It's based on the "Rufus" pic below. If someone can do better, please do. Something reminiscent of the Washington Redskins logo? - David Gerard 07:42, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I've now put one on that's directly lifted from the Cleveland Indians logo, which I'd never seen before and couldn't believe how offensively racist it was ... I think it bludgeons home the point of the article nicely. Note text on Image:Birmingham niggers logo 3.png which asserts the legal basis for using it ... when this gets front-paged, the Cleveland Indians are gonna be pissed. But, eh, fuck 'em. Just waiting to hear from RadicalX about a good version of the text logo - David Gerard 16:22, 10 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The revision is in. Aaaaah...much better! Great image, DG! --Strong RadX 02:23, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Cool, I was afraid I was gonna get drummed out of the Un...vote for my own article...--slack 23:36, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

This is a joke I have been making for years. I am an American Indian and don't think i will live to see the day a team actualy gets named the Niggers, yet I have to put up with the Redskins every year... Midsummer, 1134, 7 Nov 2005

Fo-shizzle, m'nizzle! --Strong RadX 02:23, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Against I didn't really find much to laugh about, and I'm not even black!

For Niggertime! :-) Aaarrrggh 02:42, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Wingzerotype 22:04, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For. But please Lord, don't let this be on the front page next time we get slashdotted. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:52, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For: That's some high quality poor taste funny. --Sir gwax (talk) 08:30, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia Brown

Featured --—rc (t) 06:12, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I laughed out loud just at the title and continued at the article - David Gerard 12:04, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Chronarion 02:44, 14 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Funny. - Silius 19:03, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I liked it --Nerd42 01:00, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I am full of laughter. ----++++@@@@****Mandaliet 21:05, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

For. Except that the article is going to need an image. --neoEva88 23:13, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Utterly hilarious concept  ;) It's always great when you can get the person laughing before the article even starts  ;) Rei 17:25, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

4: (Image slut I) --Splaka 05:06, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nice, I like it! ----Rauni-- 13:44, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Since recent improvements have vastly improved it, I also vote for it! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 12:16, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For!!! - it just HAS to be..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

The Most Quotable Smackdown of All Time

Featured Again dipping into the "been on VFH way too long" barrel. --—rc (t) 05:19, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• --Spooner 13:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• --Cowation 04:31, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)(You can vote for yourself, can't you? I mean, I wasn't even the first person to nominate the article.)
• --Cap'n Ben CUN 00:58, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC) Rockin'!
• comment: Now longer and notably better, with a wonderful picture from our pal, Radicalx--Cowation 02:41, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 10:59, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC) Now this is what fantastic smells like.
• -- Showin' mighty love to the 'wation (but only if he votes for mine!)--slack 17:50, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
• Vote. Because any entry with "You can vote for yourself, right?" has been here way too long, and really deserves to finally be featured. Plus, it's a crazy funny article too. --Katie loves you! 23:42, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Gibberish

Featured I got sick of seeing it up there so I decided to move it down here. --—rc (t) 05:38, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Jacen Aratan 18:04, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sweet--slack 15:48, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

--RadicalX 16:02, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--David Gerard 14:30, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Completely coherent, with a logical plot, not based on crudeness, and yet with enough insanity and tweaking of history (plus diabolical puns) to lead the reader to question your medication levels. Well done! Rei 21:40, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Awesome. --neoEva88 22:44, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Air

FEATURED --—rc (t) 04:47, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Joachim22 13:58, 9/18/05 (UTC)

--David Gerard 14:22, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--MonkeyGem 08:55, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

A clever parody on the aether theory. Support. - Guest 14:51, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Supported - Amusing. --Trevie 01:23, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-For - Great job! Rei 03:27, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 14:15, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-For --Mosquitopsu 15:27, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-Fur I chuckled so hard, I was gasping for...nothing. --Strong RadX 02:15, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Philip Glass

Featured --—rc (t) 05:03, 9 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Mindspillage 10:51, 9 May 2005 (EDT)

--David Gerard 17:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) David Gerard David Gerard David Gerard David Gerard 17:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) 17:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) 17:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC) 17:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

--The Hedgehog 01:04, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

--Chronarion 04:55, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--EEBaum 08:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Those who aren't Philip glass fans may not get this... but as for myself, I laughed out loud at work  ;) Thanks a lot  :P Rei 00:40, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Very funny...and very truthful

Why haven't I voted for this yet? It's very funny, even though I don't know much about Philip Glass. Mandaliet 05:50, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I laughed so much I did it again and again--Bigrich 07:38, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

British film industry

Featured --—rc (t) 17:56, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 02:27, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Anything with the word "norks" in is worth a vote --Tinned Stoat 10:18, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Gets my vote --pmcelroy 14:32 4th Oct 2005 (GMT)

And mine --193.144.191.128 09:16, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

j0 - David Gerard 13:30, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Anything British is funny to me --Detective Arno Dick 04:49, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

The picture is the icing on the cake. It must be done! --193.146.74.97 16:54, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Not sure; it's a little too close to the truth to count as satire. Ah, what the Hell, I vote yay. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 14:26, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh, but I like those guy ritchie movies. gets my vote though --Isra1337 10:34, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Founding Fathers

Featured, thanks to the images no doubt --Rangley 17:27, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

-- David Gerard 15:15, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

If those pictures aren't already featured images, they should be. --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 15:25, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Hilarious. For. Rei 04:22, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

In a desperate attempt to get my first featured article in like eight months... --—rc (t) 06:56, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Very funny and clever. Deserves a nomination, especially with those pictures. --Silius 05:43, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Excellent. The top image would look great along with the article on the main page too. --Mosquitopsu 03:54, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

fofofofofor --Paulgb 02:30, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Oh my goodness, yes. --Keitei 07:33, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Sheer genius! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN 14:31, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)

For Just feature this already, otherwise it'll sit here forever! ^_^ --Splaka 06:22, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Much Ado About Yokels

Featured --—rc (t) 17:19, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

--Hyad 01:07, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

--David Gerard 11:12, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Three eeps up. --Marcos Malo 07:43, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Nytrospawn 20:18, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Yay for nepotism! --Lee 04:40, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--tightly plottedNeca 07:13, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Well done!  :) Rei 20:36, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Alternate Universes I Seriously Hope Do Not Actually Exist

Featured --—rc (t) 18:12, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

for This is well written and can grow from there i think it is a great base, putting it on main page will make more people write on it and make it even better Illogicalbeats 23:13, 28 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I made loud guffawing noises with my mouth - David Gerard 22:06, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Wow... this came a pretty big surprise. I'd say it needs a lot more material added before it's ready for the front page, but who wouldn't love seeing their article featured? --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 22:16, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I seriously hope Universe Where This Article Doesn't Get Featured doesn't actually exist. --EvilZak 19:21, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Wait, is that for or against? --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 20:37, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)

the universe where i actualy vote for something now exists. for. --Neko 13:07, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Good. Very Good. For. --Joachim22 06:18, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I didn't get a chuckle until "Everybody Speaks French Except You Alternate Universe: Imaginez un Univers où il existe des gens qui ne parlent pas français, ça serait terrifiant non ? Feel how alienating that was? Imagine that happening all the time.". That was good enough to get my vote  :) Rei 03:31, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Morse code

..-. . .- - ..- .-. . -.. --—rc (t) 18:36, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

After Reading it I had to nominate it--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 14:23, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Splaka 20:07, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC) Good stuff

--81.179.239.124 19:05, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC) beautiful

--Viking 12:07, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Gorovich 12:44, 16 Oct 2005 (CST)

Very funny article. I love it. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 12:05, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Well, Uncyclopedia Vandals was my first choice, but since that seems to have no chance now, and Dawg himself has voted for this, this is a good second choice. -- Naughtyned 21:30, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

.- --. .- .. -. ... - --Paulgb Talk 14:26, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Styrofoam

...Highlighted --—rc (t) 17:48, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Quite blast. I about fell out of my chair. --KP CUN 02:43, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Agree. --Splaka Bur. SG CM © 02:48, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Hilarious. --The Unwikified 20:38, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Sheesh, this one made me snarf my styrofoam cup of coffee all over my keyboard. --I am Wonder Woman and you .... are NOT! 16:47, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-- David Gerard 20:31, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, okay. Mandaliet 04:38, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Vote I always wondered about the different styrofoams I see around me, now I know the truth. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:33, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

The GI Joe-Transformers War

Featured --—rc (t) 18:08, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--RadicalX 16:02, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Nytrospawn 18:03, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

-- Inventive, funny and well written Hessef 03:11, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--222.152.158.53 09:31, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Ben CUN 11:55, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-- Good one, particularly with the bottom pic - David Gerard 22:14, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Roger The Bum 15:31, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Peer

Fizeatured --—rc (t) 17:00, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Abc 06:48, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I thank you for your kindness in nominating my article :)--Insertwackynamehere CUN 14:17, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--152.163.101.9 21:19, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--70.110.191.82 16:30, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Viking 12:17, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--User:RobinHood 15:19, 06 Oct 2005 (CET)

Guest 07:52, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Splaka 03:15, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

This article digs right through the fascade of one of the most shadowy figures on the internet. I wholeheartedly vote For this article. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 12:19, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--User:Random18 18:42, 23 Oct 2005 (BST)

AAAAAAAAA!

AAAAAA AA --—rc (t) 17:07, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

By order of Chron and myself--Sir Flammable KUN 08:36, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA --—rc (t) 17:33, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--David Gerard 13:07, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA! --Detective Arno Dick 00:26, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Extreme lesiban support! after all the work we put in defending it today. --Splaka 02:17, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I always thought this one was funny, but not headline material. After today, I have the same sentiment as Splaka - EXTREME SUPPORT. Now we need to push it through and get it on the home page IMMEDIATELY. -- » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 02:21, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

If this were a school assignment, it'd get an AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!+. support --EvilZak 02:54, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Now I know what to exclaim when my face falls off! Thanks, Uncyclopedia! 213.42.2.11 07:04, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Bar Mitzvah

Featured --—rc (t) 16:30, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--AnalAlien 15:31, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) I think it's funny! So sue me, Bar Mitzvah boy! If you agree with me, cast your lot in with the Jewish people right here.

--Rcmurphy 17:45, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC) I voted for this the other day but I think I deleted my vote by accident...

We can vote more than once, right? I mean for different articles. --Marcos Malo 07:02, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

JEW POWER!!! --OneTopJob6 02:44, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Oy, this article's funny -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:05, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

For, I want to see a featured article on the main page, during its VFD. Yay! --Splaka 10:08, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Newmath

Newfeatured --—rc (t) 17:52, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Doubleplusgood --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 14:19, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Tripleplusgood newthink. Especially plussatisfied with the Iraq funspeak. - Guest 12:36, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Doublelaugh plusenjoyable. Votenow for Featuredarticleplusplus.--47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 01:37, 18 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Unhappy but true. --Unissakävelijä 09:58, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Feature it. Not feature is ungood crimethink.--Poofers 05:33, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I'll pony up a vote for my own article just for the sake of my own narcissism. --KP CUN 15:05, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Very clever --Detective Arno Dick 05:17, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Crimes inspired by video games

Now showing --—rc (t) 19:49, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

• Very new, but already very funny. Can only get better.

--DarthBhourd 16:17, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• You heard the man. Mindspillage 14:24, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Gets points just for the concept - David Gerard 14:28, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Some awesome stuff! 138.16.21.56 18:23, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Thumbs up - Streetslight 06:36, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• For. --Monthenor 16:24, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Friggin'. Hilarious. --Hobelhouse
• Against, for now at least. I think it's a brilliant idea. IMO, the article needs more pictures and should be written more in the form of List of weapons that don't exist, but should. The chronological-year presentation format seems pretty week. ~ Jared ~ 02:21, 10 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• For. Bucking frilliant. --Just Tenn. You were expecting Sophia? 00:14, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)
• To be honest, I this makes me ROFL, for! Jack Cain 01:49, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Zombies

Featured, this one's an oldie --—rc (t) 23:34, 13 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Chronarion 20:23, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

Holy crap, I remember when you wrote this, I nearly peed my pants at work.
--PantsMacKenzie 20:20, 28 May 2005 (EDT)

--Abc 18:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I endorse this article wholehearted. I endorse anything Zombie related. Zombies will always have a special place in my heart.
--Jeremy-Black 02:47, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--David Gerard 05:50, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yes, Yes, Yes - Fantatastic, my god, so fucking hilarious, how can i not vote for it? --Zombiebaron 21:47, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Redundancy

Featured --—rc (t) 23:18, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC) —rc (t) 23:18, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC) Highlighted

Wow, why does this section stay empty? I love self-referential humor. - Guest 12:59, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I like as well.--47Monkey MUN HMRFRA s7fc | Talk 13:15, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--RadicalX 03:23, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

This is really really really really funny. Ok, that didn't work very well. - Carlos the Mean 02:47, 25 Aug 2005 (GMT)

--Cap'n Ben CUN 11:12, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Kennyisinvisible 20:08, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)--Kennyisinvisible 20:08, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

A vote for redundancy is a vote for redundancy. Thumbs up General Specific 12:55, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I find the humour of this article quite funny. --Detective Arno Dick 02:26, 11 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Bloodbath

Featured --—rc (t) 02:24, 10 Oct 2005 (UTC)

As the originator of the Bloodbath article (though the current article is more of Elvis’ baby), I would encourage those looking at Bloodbath to examine some bloodbath-related links. There is a pretty extensive series of bloodbath articles on Uncyclopedia. Now, enough with my shameless self promotion. --KP CUN 05:57, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--EvilZak 07:35, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

--Elvis 09:38, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

--KP 23:07, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Tso1d 16:30, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Ben CUN 22:31, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--LOLMOLE 04:55, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:05, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Orange Construction Barrels

Featured --—rc (t) 15:57, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It made me cry a little... Then I went out and stole a pylon. --64.236.208.25 22:54, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--KP CUN 07:25, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC) Nice little article.

--Abc 06:48, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--DWIII 00:24, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC) CUN

I rewrote this, I hope nobody minds. The general structure is still there, I just fleshed it out and added some pics. Also, this is a vote for. --Monthenor 03:13, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Great re-write! Thanks for the help, and for the votes, and since it's not solely my work anymore, I'm voting for.--Nitro 03:02, 20 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Definitely. Mindspillage 14:27, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Beautiful...in the same spirit as my Gazebo article. I'm all for it! --RadicalX 01:38, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Dake-Bonoism

Featured finally --—rc (t) 16:29, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Abbot Vesuvius 17:27 27 April 2005 (EDT)

--Jeremy-Black 03:33, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

--Steve Johnsenson 06:41, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

--Cribbage 14:24, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Eric Leavitt 19:00, 03 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Beefrius 19:34, 03 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Marlton Green 13:17, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC) Good Stuff. Check out the Jack Chick info when you have a chance.

Missing milk

This one's been waiting too long --—rc (t) 19:51, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

--Elvis 17:12, 11 May 2005 (EDT)

--Rcmurphy 00:39, 12 May 2005 (EDT)

--SlowlyRusting 19:51, 12 May 2005 (GMT)

Another one that made me snarf my coffee. The concept of having pictures of missing British milk bottles on American milk cartons was just too much to pass on! --I am Wonder Woman and you .... are NOT! 21:45, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I can vote for this can't I? Delete the vote if its not allowed. --Mellomeh 22:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--David Gerard 19:18, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Schnarf --Freebasser 13:07, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ipod_Nano_200gb_Instructions

Now showing --—rc (t) 17:06, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Chron wrote an article for the first time in 3 months. --Chronarion 03:06, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 17:50, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--stillwaters/Talk 23:23, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--138.16.21.56 18:12, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--PantsMacKenzie 23:38, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Agree - Quite funny - --Trevie 03:58, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

A goodie. --KP CUN 18:55, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-- David Gerard 19:16, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--RadicalX 19:03, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Certificate of Hitlertude

Featured --—rc (t) 17:04, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Spooner 00:31, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--EvilZak 18:45, 3 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Bob the Mediocre 16:18, 29 Aug 2005 (EST)

--AmyNelson 15:47, 1 Sep 2005 (BST)

--Layp 19:14, 18 Sep 2005 (WEST)

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:07, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-- David Gerard 11:50, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

--Chronarion 18:17, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--MonkeyGem 00:43, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Trevie 01:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Vaelys 01:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

X Window System

Featured 23 September. I love you people. FOUR DAYS from creation to front page.

• --Chronarion 05:37, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• The most brilliant piece of writing since ... well, ever — Olathe 06:06, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• --Splaka 06:04, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC) heh
• God I love you people. Can I vote for my own article? If so, EXTREME LESBIAN SUBCRBIE!! - David Gerard 19:04, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

  BTW, Adam Jackson (ajax) and Daniel Stone from X.Org Server liked it too. So there. Oh, and cheers to my LiveJournal beta testers. - David Gerard 19:08, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• I have absolutely no idea how to do this. - 68.205.250.236 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)
• Ye gods, this is funny. And too true. And more fun to look at than XScreensaver: support. Mindspillage 14:20, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I heartily endorse this event or product! - 193.211.0.185 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser) 15:48, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Definite! - Guest 16:22, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I say: hilarious. --George guy 17:44, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Quantum Economics

--Nytrospawn 20:36, 13 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Abc 06:48, 23 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Yeppit yep yep --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 16:20, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I get to vote for my own article. Yippee! --KP CUN 06:42, 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Ben CUN 11:58, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The concept of an accelerated bozon emitting morons to create a field of ignorance did it for me. Now I've snarfed my coffee all over my keyboard again! :( --I am Wonder Woman and you .... are NOT! 18:36, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I endorse this product and/or service -- ERTW MUN 15:29, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Dude, Where's My Time Machine?

Fizeatured --—rc (t) 02:29, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Nytrospawn 19:51, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Huzzah! 22:20, 20 Aug 2005 (PST) Duuude

-Hyad 05:45, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC) All this needs is a funny pic.

--Splaka <;small>Bur. SG CM ©</small> 12:01, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC) Ask forth and ye shall receive... (also this is a vote)

Wow. My wish was granted, see here. Do I only have two more left? Nuts. BTW, I added the pic the Movie page. 4 original Photoshopped/GIMPed/GIMPshopped/somehow-edited pics on one page. Can't beat that? (Well you probably can, but that's still pretty good.) -Hyad 08:56, 30 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Ben CUN 22:33, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--DrAwesome 22:34, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC) I'll vote for my own article whether it counts or not!

Nihilism

Featured --—rc (t) 03:47, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it's my own article, but it seems such perfect front-page material. --Spintherism 20:43, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I don't know how it'll look on the front page, but that sounds like someone else's problem to me. I vote for it! --Cap'n Ben 14:10, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Good show --Hooloovoo 17:36, 25 Jul 2005 (UTC)

--Sunsneezer 04:32, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC) That's deep.

Wasn't this already front paged on Insternational Page Blank Day?--Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 10:15, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Well, I certainly don't remember reading it... --Famine 13:36, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Of course not. You don't exist, you can't remember. --Sophia 22:10, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

It was featured, but only for the one day. I thought it deserved a regular three-day run like the other articles so I left it here. --Rcmurphy KUN 14:46, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Sunny 22:03, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC) this is first class "uncyclopedia"

--Spooner 00:12, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC) Just feature the damn thing already.

--Poofers 4:17, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC) Funny and requires no thought. Sounds content-free to me!

Wikipedia

The time has come --Rcmurphy KUN 23:35, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Chewy --Commander Jameson 21:17, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)
• Sure --General Specific 03:53, 31 Jul 2005 (UTC)
• Definitely. - Guest 15:38, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• About time --Sophia 01:55, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Without a doubt. -- The Unwikified 20:31, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Long overdue. -- Codeine OUN Bur. 20:12, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Wiki Wiki Wiki. -- Leekolas

World War I (video game)

Featurmotized--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:48, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

6 votes, too! The most for any of my featured articles! --Savethemooses 20:18, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Fan-bloody-tastic --Freebasser 18:24, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• --Sir Elvis KUN | Petition 19:31, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Amusing. Can't help but think it's a rip-off of this, which I found more amusing.
• Brilliant. And yes, it's inspired by that WWII thing. Also, fuck off. --Savethemooses 21:28, 27 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• --Cap'n Ben CUN 12:02, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I'd like to vote for this, but I'm loathe to inflate Savethemooses' ego any more. Oh, screw it. Yes -- Codeine 12:08, 1 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Random humor

Fizneatured --Rcmurphy KUN 16:37, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

--Cap'n Ben 10:36, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC) This article is better than watching Charles in Charge at NORAD whilst eating sardines.
--DWIII 00:24, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC) Absolutely hilarious(!).
--Abc 19:52, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)
--EvilZak 07:35, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)
--Marcos_Malo S7fc BOotS | Talk 18:27, 19 Aug 2005 (UTC) We'll need a new Feature soon, and this should be it.
--User:Xiao Li 19:46, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)

List of weapons that don't exist, but should

Featured --Rcmurphy KUN 23:01, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Wonder how this one got under the radar for so long. . . --LeeHarveyKennedy 21:41, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Awesome. Dare I say super awesome? Yes, I dare.--DrAwesome 23:15, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Add sword-chucks and it gets my vote. --Nitro 08:30, 15 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Yes, yes, yes -- Codeine 11:04, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Support And I'll work on those swordchucks.--Spintherism 19:02, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--EvilZak 03:36, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

--Nice 24.98.21.59 18:27, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

yes! --Mooky 11:27, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)