This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH.
Self nominating and for. With all due to modesty, maybe my best job up to now. Thanks RcMurphy for changing the rules, it got a very positive review. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 21:17, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
for- It is really a pretty damn good and short biography. Or it could just be me. I have been expirencing sympathy hot flashes of late for my pregnant wife. Happy Weasel 15:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
For Speed lynching and werewolves, who could want more! --EA Ruin Everything 16:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For, but it's really early in the morning and I can't think of a witty comment. Something will come to me, I'm sure. Eventually. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
For...I like it--Sir Shandon 15:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Uncyclopedia: funny and educational. Between this and Martin Van Buren, I've learnt more about 19th Century American history on this site than anywhere else. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 21:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
For Brilliant pictures... --Sibley 13:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
.Nom and for. It worths all of the time it took Mordillo to complete. A crazy piece of rolling-on-the-ground-style humor. Mel Brooks shall be proud. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 21:26, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
For. But I'd recommend Mordillo to take the stereotse part out. It seems Modus made you a great pic and you had to make it fit into the article. It doesn't really fit, it sorts of break the previous flow.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 07:16, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Obligatory self For. Based on a true and tragical story ~ 08:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Sorry I'm late. Anybody want to buy a stereo, cheap? --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Four I have to sayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yes! Matt lobster 22:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For Get the F*ck away from my car radio!--Dr. Fenwick 03:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0
No against votes
Comments
Actually, that image is responsible for 30% of my such enthusiatic nomination. Maybe Mord can improve a little in finding a context to the "vengeance", but I think whatever he would have written, it's still rofl just for the pic itself. For greater justice, think I'm putting it on VFP. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 11:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Mordillo, do whatever is best for the page. I just made that pic because I'm quite mad. Mad! --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:59, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Macho as hell but, I believe, true to the facts. I don't like self-nominations but I want to give this a try. -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 02:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
For, although I can't figure out why you'd wanna run away...the round need love too. If anything, they need it more. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 12:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
For Well okay, I didn't wanna seem like a cheater voting for my own adopter but hey, it is a well inspired article LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 01:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For.Just because my fat friends think they're sexy.--DAME::FoxyBabe::TALK 04:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Modus, I'm taking note of your comment. Just in case it's 4 a.m. and I need a decoy friend to save me from a compromising situation. Yeah, you're a great friend indeed!
Also, ladies, I know, this is awfully scoundrelish. But sometimes we men need to talk like a man, just to remember the ol' good times... Okay, okay, I'm already there! No, no, no, that pan I'm not washing... I am, I am! -- herrdoktorneedsAbeam[scream!] 13:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Nom. and For Absolutely brilliant... if you're British, you HAVE to read this... if you're not British then you probably won't get it, so bugger off... hats off to Sannse! --Prof. OliproKUN(W)AnchorOpBur. (Harass) 00:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
FOR This is kinda funny. Happy Weasel 04:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Against Because only George Washington deserves to be elected unanimously... *shot for making an overly American comment* --Dexter111344 00:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments
/me pulls up gun. "Got him" —Braydie 00:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
For. Alright, alright... I've been trying to put together a Stephen Hawking-themed page lately, but this is funnier than mine was. I bow to you, sir.--<<>> 12:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
My grampa used to tell me this: "Barry" (he called me Barry for some reason) "Only two things in life are certain; For and Steven Hawking ran over my cat." --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
For - this is an excellent example of good, funny randomness. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 13:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Random without being stupid. It makes me laugh, but it doesn't make me embarrassed to say so. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't like the formatting, but still Dig --THINKER 05:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
For, although could have sworn that Todd Lyons wrote this. Regardless, this is great quality article that satirizes Fox News in a way that hasn't been overdone. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 04:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
For, the pics are mint and the writing is quality even if it's funnier if you've read Nobody cares. -- HindleyiteConverse 19:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I care about this article enough to vote for. --Emmzee 13:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Just to balance things up, this one is a for. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
For Yes please. --GeneralInsineratehymn 22:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1
Naah. -L 04:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Comments
You guys don't want me back, do you? I should think that would be the height of recklessness. Anyway, thanks! (I always thought this was one of my better efforts, actually.) c • > •cunwapquc? 19:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
You know when you search for something and stumble across something else? This is like that. But with zombies. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 13:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
For Nice, very nice.--Gaberou 21:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Dig I once loved a cold-blooded she-zombie.. Not that far back though, I'm not an old person.. --THINKER 21:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong for before I even read the article. The name of the article is just priceless. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Rawr says the author (you have no idea how well-researched this article is...)--Sir Shandon 22:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
"Good ol' rock. Nothin' beats that." First to locate the exact Simpsons episode with that quote gets a cookie. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak against, which is a fancy way of saying indecisiveness personified. But I have to say that, since it's not stellar, it's a no. Sorry.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 00:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Against. What's there is okay, but there's not enough meat on those bones. Also, there aren't enough bones. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Against- It's almost there, but kinda drab. Realdeal 55 04:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Squiggle - It's from the episode where Bart and Lisa write Itchy and Scratchy scripts and get Grandpa to front for them. Now where's my cookie? --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 07:00, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
For! Surprised this one slipped through the cracks after the last PLS --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Self nom & for So long as everyone's going nuts with the nominations, here's one of mine that did pretty well on pee review. --Cap'n Sir BenGUNWotMVFHVFP 03:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I thought about nomming and against-ing, but then I remembered that was stupid.--<<>> 21:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Must...show...love...for...one's...own...article...--Sir Shandon 21:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For, damnit. Now Shandon has two pages on VFH. His head must be <emoticon of /me holding hands really far apart> big. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 21:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For'That poor horse.--Dr. Fenwick 22:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
DoubleplusgoodWeasel3689 22:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Nom + For - I saw this article a little while ago, and it was quasi-featured. I thought it was good and deserved a second chance (or is this a third chance? Or maybe fourth?) Anyway, it's a nice article
DoublePlusGoodWeasel3689 20:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Many people before me have tried to write a funny Byzantine Empire article, but all have failed... until now. Some time ago, I found this article in a miserable condition, and I took it upon myself to rewrite this article. Some time later, I had completely rewritten the article. I submitted it to Pee Review, left it for a week, and now I nominate it on VFH. In summary, For. --GeneralInsineratehymn 03:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
My doctor has me on Byzantine. He says it keeps the voices away. The voices disagree. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 20:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Self-nom + For. This has been on Pee Review for a few days and got two very nice reviews, so I'm going to take a whack at nominating it --TKF 19:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
For. On that note, good to see you here again, TKF. —HinoaKUN(talk) 19:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
For. -- Because it was the first thing I've seen that made me laugh since visiting for the first time in months.Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
For. -- Awesome article. Almost thought uncyclopedia was running out of funny articles until I found this (it's all I do for an hour an a half during second perion in school =P).Megamanfanx7 15:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
For -- It's funny. What else needs to be said? --Ljlego 21:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
self nom and for Well, it got a good review, so I thought I'd stick it on here. —Braydie 15:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Agree, especially since I made the good review. I think it's an excellent news article. The addition of the handcuffed person at the end is gold. - Enzo Aquarius 00:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes. We've featured a lot of UnNews recently, but UnNewses like this keep them from burning out. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 22:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Of course, the likeliness of a Google employee's job to suck is much higher than that of an Apple employee, but I won't hold that against the article.StopTalkingToMyself
For. Was just about to make an against comment about how I didn't get it either. Then I did, and it's funnier because of it.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
I won't say it's not funny, per se. I will say it's not Feature quality. 205.162.208.33 03:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
MACS AND APPLE WILL SOON RULE THE WORLD, SO STOP TRYING TO FIGHT IT WITH ALL THESE STUPID ARTICLES!!!
Unsigned. Plus, OTT? —Braydie 07:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Against If the above is true and Macs and Apple really soon rule the world then I don't think I can vote for this article. I'm too scared. Matt lobster 09:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Was disappointed that the article had so little to do with the title, and was just filled in with random first-person commentary. --So So 00:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Self-nom and for Holy crap. I totally forgot about ever writing this when all of a sudden it appeared in my watchlist. I read it and kinda liked it. So... yeah. Might as well nom it.--» Sir SavethemoosesGrandCommandingOfficer ... holla atcha boy» 02:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
This is a good article.--Nydas 17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Boy, this reminds me of the boredom of studying similar subjects in Geography. In a good way. --Phantom Grammar 18:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Brilliant, although I may make the place names more Welshy, if that's okay. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 18:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
For Be nice to see us boyos on the front page. Support Slate Labour (with some extra spit to add unique Welsh feel)! --Don alun 21:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. I Guess we already have a Top 3 Contender for April here. -- 21:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Mega Dig. Just reading the title causes me lengthy fits of laughter. --THINKER 07:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak fðr. Very close to against'ing solely because of the lack of an accent Aigu in Sauté (yeah, I'm a stickler like that) --T.K.F. 22:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
For a nicely executed lampoon of the news outlet that is also Satan's betrothed (how dare they fire Imus), I salute you as a bona fide real man of genius.--SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk)20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Self-nom and for. I've been working on this one for a while, and I think it's ready for a spin on the ol' VFH. Remember gents, your wallet moth is you!--Nydas 09:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
For - Great Article --Uncle J 18:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
For - Hillarious. --Blah Blah Blah 19:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Most Excellent. Great satire without over reaching. Why didn't we think it first? Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 20:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
For. What the hell, but I'd still see one of the other articles further down featured first. Creation to feature in 2 days is too much for me >_> --T.K.F. 21:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
For O Cancer! We hardly knew ye! Weasel3689 21:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I really like this article. I definitely laughed, very good one. However, for me, it falls directly in the middle/gray etherzone: its funny, enjoyable, concise and well-written, but it just isn't the mountain-on-high caliber required for my Dig. I give it a strong Half-Dig (or 'D' , and the dot from 'i' ) --THINKER 05:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I restored the "For" count to an even number, as opposed to 3.5, because it doesn't make any sense to me. Please let me know if I was incorrect about that. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk)I am the dirt under your rollers 14:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Well I'd see it somewhere else (either here on another article or one of the other voting pages) so I thought I'd give it a halfer, since it's right at the point between For and Against for me. Its cool if the count should stay whole numbers though; I'll just subtract .01 and round my personal score sheet down. :) --THINKER 15:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Abstain until the other two UnNews articles up for vote are featured. First things first, fellas.--T.K.F. 19:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
For Yep definately. It's great because it's completely unguided - I think most of the letters are from different people and they do manage to work together to provide a cross section snapshot of uncyclopedia. Aaadddaaammm 09:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Sir: Thank you for article, Strongly worded letter. Please be assurred that I am voting FOR said article, and will not be stopped from doing so, even at the risk of your threats. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 17:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For Not bad at all --GAMESPOT=666 01:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
For againsting purpose. It sounds insulting that's all. Not very funny at all. Doesn't mean that it's not funny. It's funny but not that funny. Feureau 23:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Against - It's devoid of a picture. I'm sure that someone could justify one picture in this article somehow. -- Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 17:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I read the entire thing, and I have no idea what any of it means. Could someone please explain it to me? I'm tempted to vote against but I feel I can't do so without understanding what the heck is going on. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 21:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
It's freeform, man. Aaadddaaammm 09:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I nominated this a while ago, and it missed being front page by a hair's breadth. Therefore, I nom again. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 22:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
For May it lumber, slowly and with purpose, towards the happy land known as "Featured", as might a brontasaurus, whilst trying to catch a bus in central London, succeed in said aim, though it is undeniable that such a creature is seldom seen in the metropolis, though, on this fine spring morning, some might mistake a Brontosaurus for Mr. Catchpole, the manager of a local bank. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
SN+F. A...unique...Howto with audio that is also...unique. I've lost my mind. Nope, there it is. My bad. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Women have mastered the kind exterior with a cold, heartless interior. Sure they may all seem like motherly, caring types, but don't you dare get that bitch angry. Or do dare and don't come whining to us when suddenly all your friends and family are under the impression that you're a furrypedophile.
There are for the most part three kinds of female jokes: men-hating ones, self-deprecating ones, and pregnancy/motherhood/babies/children/whatever-related ones. This article has mostly the first at the beginning, a section or two of the second, and none of the third. Therefore, it seems unfinished to me. Oh, also menstruation jokes but those are just weird to the uninitiated. As for bitterness, that's just part of the joke. But whatevs. Obligated for as main contributor. --KATIE!! 17:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
For, this is like that song "Suffragette City"...about women...and "Wham Bam Thank You Ma'am". -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
For. I saw a woman once. Naked. Then she screamed and shut the blinds. *sigh*. Chicks are always over-reacting like that. Frankly, it was so distracting that I forgot to masturbate. This is off the record, right? --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 08:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
For Is funny. Matt lobster 09:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
I think I voted for this before, I made some witty comment about how women can't write goodly. Oh wait, no I was scared of what would happen to me. —Braydie 17:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
yes, yes, yes. the question i have here is, why the hell would people want to look at a rock in a desert? now excuse me while I go back to working on helping book the trip to see Uluru --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)