This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH.
nom Saw this on pee review and loved it. I believe it was also in PLS. Kelpan 17:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
for That is hilarious! Subtle and yet, frightening. --Smrt-guy 18:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
For One of my very favorite articles from the Poo Lit. I thought for sure it would thrash the hell out of my article, but it didn't. And that's something of a shame. SirENeGMA(talk)GUNWotMPLS 19:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Self-for. A lot of work went into this article. I got through three pairs of binoculars for a start. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 21:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For I don't know if this was nominated before, if it was why did it not feature? anyone who's ever worked for a retail monster can relate - jack mort |cunt| talk - 22:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For If it's not Walmart, it's Walgreens. --Hanyouman 05:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For, and let it be known that this will probably be the last conventionally featured article without that freaky voting table. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
HITLER SAYS YES!, Hitler! 22:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Hahaha- I clicked the article thinking it was some tired communist joke, I was pleasantly surprised.Witt,ofUNionEntertain me* 04:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I unknowingly helped over IRC with the World of Warcraft part, although i said he was a level 70. --Sir OCdtJedraventCUNUmPVFHPLSACSWH 19:44, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I love the pictures in this article, especially the melon fuherer Weasel3689 03:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
emc's work in wikifying and improving this article must not be ignored. However, because it is a Hitler article, it MUST be protected or at least semi-protected upon being featured so that gobshites can't fiddle with it.--§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 03:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Great darts. I never knew Adie H was such an adorable person. The pictures are fantastic too. Billsheppard 11:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR Absolutely brilliant. It is so easy to stuff articles like this up. But this was genuinely funny. A classic! Nice pics too. Marto 85 15:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR "I can't believe it's not Hitler" got me from the start. BRILLIANT!!!Lord Gneo 19:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
As much as I love Hitler (and hey, who doesn't?), this page needs an editor. Most of what's there is pretty good, but the sheer volume overwhelms. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 02:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
against. I agree that it needs to be edited down, a lot of it is unfunny randomness. InfiniteMonkey 03:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
For the record, the "acid" mentioned that he was supposedly on was actually mustard gas that he was really exposed to during WWI. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 03:56, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
ya if all the amphetamines dont count Weasel3689 01:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR ONLY $0.99Weasel3689 08:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 21:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
After agonizing week after week in English class, waiting for everyone in the class to understand what a thesis was and how one was made, where I had already grasped this fairly simple concept in the grade previous. As a side note, more recently everyone had forgotten what a thesis was in class. But I'm rambling. This is good. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 03:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
For. Should be distributed to all schools, everywhere, as it couldn't possibly lower the standard of edumacation. --El Zoof 04:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
You have to admit, you don't see a Taco Bell ad coming when you read that title. Really nice. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 02:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Ironically, the African giraffes only weakness is other African giraffes. This has led the African government to start hundreds of African giraffe breeding programs. These mostly end in the death of entire civilisations because everybody knows African giraffes will run you the fuck down.
Nominating this article - great examples of Newspeak that got me laughing for some time, but - more importantly - confused over how to actually speak a language for a good hour or so. Appears to have been Pee Reviewed positively in the Discussion area. 212.219.142.161 13:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Methink unwikiarticle doubleplusgood bbaproved. In english, I think that article was fantastic and Big Brother agrees.The foam cup 02:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Great... I mean, doubleplusgood.InfiniteMonkey 17:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Against Unreadable crap. --Agh 04:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments
comment-incomprehensibility is the entire *point* of Newspeak. That's like complaining that the article on dyslexia has words where the letters are in the wrong order. InfiniteMonkey 04:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
self nom and for - Received a good review and has been underworks for quite some time. Now that it is basically 'done', I think it's time to put it up for VFH.
For Tip: if you want to get featured consider bribing your nearest admin with tasty weaselpudge or possibly just ASPLODE!!! all the other competition Weasel3689 05:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Not a Star Trek fan, but I am a fan of this article. -- HindleyiteConverse 20:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For This article is hilarious. -- Mustkillroy
For: Okay, so this has been nommed before and people have used the Grue meme as a reason to vote against the article in the past, but I don't feel that should have any influence on voting what-so-ever this time. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 22:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I am self nomming an article I wrote. It's been on Pee Review for a week and had favorable self-feedback, also by me. What can I say? It's a sad and beautiful world. Yes. I can say that. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Brilliant. I love it. However, the tracklisting isn't that great and could do with a bit of trimming (except for the track I'm about to add). --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 20:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I like it --GAMESPOT=666 22:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Nom + For Quality of the purest and most classical kind. {{RabbiTechno 19:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)}}
For- A lot of hard work was put into this article. And funny.--Sir ClaudiusCUNVFH (carpe diem) 21:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
For. How about an illustration of a tachyon, though? Or maybe one of those weird squiggle-line diagrams of the sort produced by particle colliders? InfiniteMonkey 22:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
for. the oppening paragraph isn't great, i was gonna vote against, but after the table of contents it was suddenly really good - jack mort |cunt| talk - 23:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
For. I read it and thought that it had a lot of funny words and pictures. It was a very interesting read. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 19:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Against Limited appeal to the casual observer --Kelpan 19:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment How else are they going to learn the facts about the origin of our species? Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 02:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment Is this how you do this? Well alright then. Limited appeal to a casual observer? Half the tales told on this site (maybe more) have limited appeal to someone, somplace for some reason. So there. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:26, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Nom and For A grand old Fundlebuggy. It even got transwikied. --Alksub - VFHCMWARV {talk} 21:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
for. superb. where is hardwick anyway - jack mort |cunt| talk - 23:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering that myself. One can of Fanta too many. Woke up in a desert. Isn't that always the way? --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 04:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
FEATURE THE FURRRY THING! This furry article is one of the funniest pieces of shirt I have ever read! I WANT THESE MOTHERFURRY SNAKES OFF OF THIS MOTHERFURRY PLANE!!!Weasel3689 07:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR I AM ABOVE THE LAW! --Kenvalyi 15:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Against This hurts to do, indeed I've been avoiding VFH because of it, but it turns out that there's a page by HF that does nothing for me. It's merely okay. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go drown myself in a bottle.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For justice. --Hanyouman 07:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For - I found it pretty amusing myself... :3 --Hanyouman 16:40, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I had so much fun with these books when I was a kid. I've even got the one that I wrote about Ancient Rome.....For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 16:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For - That's pretty good, feature this article! --Shadowlost 18:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Self-nom and for. Got a mention on PLS, I'm fairly pleased with it. It also got 81 at pee review but that hardly counts since it was me who scored it - jack mort |cunt| talk - 00:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
For. An unexpected twist on a story that made me cry a little as a kid (but in a manly, masculine way). --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 22:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
For. I was thinking about how this'd go up for VFH soonish just yesterday. --ContestantCUN--VFHNotMBuzzCtrbs 01:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Strong for. Interestingly, the Charlotte's Web article has got a decent (but separate) gag. For the moment, the two will merely reference each other despite the seeming contradictions. — Lenoxus 02:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
For Mae West would've contracted and died of AIDS had she lived past 1980. Sorry I didn't light your fire mhaille. --AmericanBastard 01:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For, although I am disappointed to see so many red links in a Procopius article. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 16:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Against - I don't see, why this article has to live from altered photos. I urge any real Mao-fan, who wants to see actual Mao pics to vote against this article. 144.211.95.12 15:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
For Featured Article is a great institution, but I'm not ready for an institution yet. But this article is. Well done! --Kenvalyi 04:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
For - quite edumacationalising. Pretty pictures, too. --El Zoof 11:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
For. - I like this article WEEEEEEEEEEVan Halenite
No timestamp, but diff —Braydie 22:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Wow....and I was just about to vote for this....FORE! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps if the little boy had a bit of quiet time before being rush back for judgement here, he might be able to examine why he didn't make it last time against. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 22:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Originally Nomed and Strong For -- Awesome article but you could have waited a bit longer to put in back on VFH, why did you take it off in the first place instead of vote for it? --Uncle J 14:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Around Christmas, we had maybe a half-dozen articles that were removed, renommed, and then featured. I don't know why everyone's making such a huge deal about it right now. I didn't vote for the first time, because there was crap in it before. Now that crap is gone.--<<>> 22:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For It made my eyes well up.. in a very manly way. --Kenvalyi 16:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For Wow, it's here once again. Anyway, before voting Against please note that some crap has been taken out of this article since last time...-- 10:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
For, again --GAMESPOT=666 22:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For Hes crying like a bitch Weasel3689 18:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment I Just checkd this page again and IT IS STILL NOT FEATURED! Look at the above timestamp and my below one!! I voted for the previousl featured version and the current nomination. FEATURE IT!!!! Weasel3689 18:30, 03 March 2007 (UTC)
Sadly, Against. The title is brilliant but the text, even with the changes, isn't keeping up.--SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Am changing of vote to For. Story is filled me with joy. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 03:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Nom, and a vote for. Really well written news article that is funny without having to mention kittens or grues etc.--Benny Goodman 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I tried to buy a Wii. After failing to locate one at any local store, I was reduced to wandering the streets yelling "Wii!". Send bail money. Fast. Bubba's got this look in his eye. --SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against It's funny, but a lot more could be done with it besides the "breaking pots" angle. Throw in some chicken abuse, lawn defacement, etc. and I'll gladly remove my Against. —rc(t) 19:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong For- I can't believe no one has thought of this already lol --Uncle J 20:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
That was unintentional... I hadn't read that article. Though it is interesting that I happened to write it within a close vicinity of time after. I never intend to plagiarize, I'm not a Carlos Mencia. I attempt avoid that at all costs, and I actually did a bit of searching on here for any UnNews related to Link/Zelda to make sure it wasn't too similar to anything. I happened to miss the fact that the RPG article, which has conceptual similarities, could have any resemblance. - AhhDiddums 21:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Basicly the same as RC's comment, Do more then just breaking pots and I'll vote for it. Other then that very good.User:Iceman187 19:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment: Could someone make an informative notice or box for those of us not "in the know" regarding (if I properly recall the name) Zaldo the Elf? Kinda like the "Overly British/American" tags. I would do it but I don't really think I'm even knowledgable enough to know what to say — maybe some feature of the Hynian universe is begging to be incorporated into such a sign.— Lenoxus 05:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Self-Nom and For. This may struggle to get featured, due to its Britishness, but I really want to give it a go. In a nutshell, David Cameron is our leader of the opposition and has been often criticised for focusing on style over substance, most notably with his video blog: WebCameron. --15Mickey20(talk to Mickey) 22:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I have no idea what it's talking about, but I liked it. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK] 23:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. The Britishness isn't a problem at all. It seems like the same political bullshit thrown around in any democracy. Pretty good.--Procopius 01:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Ya I get what he is trying to say and I understand the struggle of labor vs. conservative in England but its too political and not enough funnyness (my patented word) Weasel3689 18:00 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For Britishness (or Britishocity) is no problem here, it's a very good satire on politicians trying to be hip in general. Very good article. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 05:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. It's good. --Zarbag 10:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
This is my first time voting Tory. I feel dirty. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Not that I'm a thatcherite or anything... not that I'm saying you can't *think* I'm a thatcherite, you can if you want - it's ok by me --OliproAnchorKUN (Harass) 12:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For I don't vote much, so this deserved it, prepare for launch.... (yes it's back, albeit in a shorter form) ...3...2...1...
For I was laughing by the end of the first paragraph. It may be focused on a UK politician, but it's also a satire on a variety of political types. Phantom Grammar 14:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Don't know who he is, don't need to know. Beautiful concept. --So So 13:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Against, sorry, I didn't find it that funny. He doesn't come off as sufficiently out of touch. How about using outdated youth terms like 'bodacious' or 'mad for it'?--Nydas 14:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
I want to agree and at the same time I think that's been done to death. I just don't know... -- Lenoxus 15:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
For This is the kind of warmth the government needs, you know? To connect, really connect with the people. -- Lenoxus 15:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
For Clever satire, marvelously not saying anything across the whole article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added byThe Rover (talk • contribs) diff
For Private eye level satire Retrofuture42 15:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)