Uncyclopedia:VFH/You should talk about ponies - A letter to Bill Richardson (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

You should talk about ponies - A letter to Bill Richardson (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: You should talk about ponies - A letter to Bill Richardson	Score: 12.5 ponies
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 23:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 15.5	Nom+For. I like, I nominate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Self-For Um... Per the fact I wrote it... Is that a good reason? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC) strong for I really liked it SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 10:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC) For. --Necropaxx, Super-teen Extraordinaire For. Is nice. Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC) For. Per the two freakazoid references associated with this article.--JackOfSpades (talk) 21:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Yes! Ponies rule! T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC) For I always thought this needed to be featured. I'm still not sure if this is the right time (a while past the election), but dammit, I like it. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Giddyup -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:10, 14 Apr For. IronLung 21:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC) for. as per last time. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 21:48, 14 April 2009 (UTC) For. Heh. -- Meta 500 02:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Strong For. Despite being a little dated. —Sir Guildensternenstein 17:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 00:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC) For. Per it's awesomeness 75.172.75.126 03:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Djdorama 00:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Looks a bit short and under developed. Is that it ? --Romartus 13:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Short? It's a letter. Also, a lot of our featured articles are relatively short. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC) against. i'm not a fan of the tone, mostly. could be great if it was more deadpan. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Romartus, I'm not interested in why you voted against, however, I am interested in this edit. How did you manage to accidentally do that? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.