For. This article defies all the laws of physics. It's a list. It involves famous names. But the perfect amount of rediculousness involved is what makes it so good. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 17:19 Sep 02, 2007
For Though a certain list is funnier and has more pictures(so you whiny bastards can shut it...). I like it. --Dexter111344 19:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Against. It's not a bad list, but it's a list. Make one that's the Top 6 worst things to put in an IV, or somesuch, flesh each out, add pictures, sing in the rain, etc, and I'll consider a different vote. 100 things is 94 too many, no matter how good they are (unless each is the funniest thing ever, but that's unpossible as there can be only one funniest thing ever. I kept it in my glove box, but someone stole it. Bastard.). SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Against - I wrote something like this recently. Looking at this, I realise why I kept my list in that article down to 5 things. Like all Worst 100 lists, this just drags on too long, and the entries from about 95-1 don't really feel like they are adding anything new or funny. SirCs1987UOTM.t.c 05:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Against. Some good, some not so. Doesn't really hold the attention in the way a shorter, punchier article would. And Modus, you shouldn't have left the car door open. Or so someone told me. Ahem. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 14:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Against - for the large amount of text, there isn't nearly enough pictures--SirManforman 14:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Against I have no problem with lists. I think lists are funny. This list isn't funny. -RAHB 03:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm +1 (Low Health 8%)SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 00:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.