NOM + FOR me and Shabidoo did some cleanup on an article we liked and discussed it. After some grammar and extending, Let's hit it rich.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYorkClick here to talk 22:39, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
I don't think this is ready. Good potential, but needs more clean-up, a clear concept/purpose and a few LOLs. --ShabiDOO 17:54, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comment. There are some good ideas but the writing style throws me off, especially the opening paragraph. Just my opinion though. Carry on. Prätt Körp (talk) 04:34, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm neg healthTKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 10:04, January 1, 2013 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.