Uncyclopedia:VFH/Wikipedia Main Page

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Wikipedia Main Page (history, logs)

Article: Wikipedia Main Page

Score: 2.5 babies NOT cooked

Nominated by:
For: 9.5
  1. Okay, well I thought I'd Self Nom because 1. I'm a whore 2. It's got fairly good responses on VFH and I think I've made quite a lot of improvements, so I want to see how it goes down here and 3. *sigh* See 1 - [17:25 19 January 2009] YYettie
    Oh and I guess, technically I should also have said: Self For. - [19:36 22 January 2009] YYettie
  2. For even though the author is a girl. --Mnbvcxz 17:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. What does being a girl have to do with writing articles? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. For. good article. --Docile hippopotamus 03:38, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. All heil! All heil! All heil! All heil! All heil! All heil! Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:29, Jan 20
  6. For Nice. ---Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. For. That is all. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:02, Jan 21
  8. For.  :D I love it!!! McMajik - stealing yer face 'till the cows come home. 18:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. :: Well, first of all, Mickey, we as Uncyclopedians DO, in fact, Hate Wikipedia, with all of our entire hearts. My only criticism is that the Uncyclopedia mainpage is ALREADY, IN-ITSELF, a spoof on the Wikipedia mainpage, so it is basically a second "Uncyclopedia" webpage spoof. HOwever, it is a GOOD spoof nonetheless, which is why it should be featured over the other TOTAL SHIT that has been featured lately. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.111.202.179 (talk • contribs)
    Hey guys look, it's an IP that speaks for the actual community. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
    I don't hate Wikipedia. And just who are you supposed to be? --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 05:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
  10. For. Like my opinion matters. VT 23:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 7
  1. Against. I don't like the idea of putting such an anti-Wikipedia article on the front page, thus encouraging the notion that Uncyclopedia as a community hates Wikipedia. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
    Wait, so Uncyclopedia is censoring its content now, in case it gives us a bad image? Are you really honestly suggesting that we shouldn't judge pages on VFH by their quality but by what they'll make other people think of us? Well, then we better stop featuring all but our very nicest articles. - [19:35 22 January 2009] YYettie
    Because we all know that nobody would take that as a joke. Its not like we are a parody of wikipedia or something.
    I have voted against articles on the basis of "what will a casual reader think" before, but I don't think supposed "wikipedia hate" would turn off most readers. I'm not saying that you should vote "for" on this; I'm just saying you might want to consider your reason. If you did against it on meh-ful-ness too, just say "meh". --Mnbvcxz 17:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
    Our IP friend illustrates my point beautifully. Also, to me it uses the proverbial sledgehammer to crack a nut. I like the list of policy sections, but accusing them of being Nazis out to kill uncyclopedia is going a tad far. It comes across more as an expression of a personal grievance than as a witty satire. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  22:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
    Actually I did not mean it to be my personal attack on wikipedia. I personally actually love wikipedia and find myself defending it a lot. It writes so many essays for me. But, I see where you're coming from. - [13:24 25 January 2009] YYettie
  2. Against. Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 20:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. I can't even read some of it. Some of the images are out of place....or something. Is it just me (and my poor choice of words)? --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 05:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
    I think I fixed the image you're talking about. The one with Hitler, right? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
    Mmm...someone had uploaded a random picture over the Hitler one, I've reverted that now. - [13:47 25 January 2009] YYettie
  4. Against Actually sort of the reason that IP gave for saying for, it's kinda of what we already have. And like Micky said it feels a bit attacky. Add to this teh fact that it was written by you: Sorry dude but no. ~Orian57~ Icons-flag-gb ~Talk~ Gay sign 00:57 25 January 2009
  5. Against. IronLung 07:09, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Against. So, an Uncyclopedia non-editing reader (and apparently a number of them do exist!) goes to the front page, clicks the FA, and gets... another front page? I don't know. I would take something fucking hilarious to sell me on that idea, and this page is merely good. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. So Wikipedia is a fascist dictatorship. Meh --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 04:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Its an in-joke. Yettie was been intentionally confusing people about her gender since she came back to the wiki about a week ago. --Mnbvcxz 18:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    I knew that already, but I find the fact that she's a girl somewhat irrelevant in this context. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    Its called a "stupid joke". --Mnbvcxz 18:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    Mmm...sexism is cool! - [18:59 19 January 2009] YYettie
    I'm not being sexist, I'm making fun of sexist people by parodying them. If you weren't a girl, you would have noticed that :) --Mnbvcxz 19:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    Well...duh! Of course I noticed, I was sort of going along with it. When I said "sexism is cool" I said in a way like I meant it, but actually I didn't, it was a parody. Sheesh! - [19:28 19 January 2009] YYettie
    That statement really was sexist, and I don't think we should feature articles by girls. I just said that other stuff so you wouldn't get offended and cry. --Mnbvcxz 19:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    Mmm...crying girls are sexy! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
    Unless the girl in question happens to have a weight of equal to or greater than an elephant. I'm so shallow. - [16:42 20 January 2009] YYettie
    Well, most girls are shallow. --Mnbvcxz 19:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  • How could you bring up in-jokes? Memes, whatever...wannabe memes, whatever... - [18:20 19 January 2009] YYettie

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools
projects