Against. Nominator was banned (not even by me!) for this spree of junk nominations, illegal voting, and ban evasion. This nomination should be taken down. Spıke¬ 10:24 14-Apr-13
I like your keeness and enthusiasm but this article has already been featured you know. Sir ScottPatUnSCUNVFH (talk) 06:56, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
Comment. Wikipedia admins' insane obsession with global warming and birdchoppers -eg some editors spending thousands of hours adding propaganda to any even slightly related article- deserves a mention. Lantash (talk) 08:17, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
How about Wikipedia's extensive scholarship on "Homophobia," which is at heart nothing more than the debate technique of accusing gay-marriage opponents of fearing that they themselves are gay. For Wikipedia's biases, read Argumentum ad Wikipediam. Spıke¬ 10:24 14-Apr-13
The nomination was not successful. 1 for, 1 against, no additional votes after a week -- Simsilikesims(♀UN)Talk here. This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 22:30, April 22, 2013 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.