Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:You should get a new couch

Score: 10 people who love decomposing furniture

1. Nom and For. There's not much on VFH at the moment, so I'd thought I'd nom this. It was featured on the Why? namespace anyway.-- (CUN) 03:58, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
2. For. I admit I am not a huge fan of first person narrative but this does work in my view. A feature I hope. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:06, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
3. For although it'd work better if the picture actually depicted an ugly couch. That one's nice. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100918 - 21:16 (UTC)
4. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:13, 18 September 2010
5. For. Because what's VFH without voting for your own article? Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:33 Tuesday, September 21, 2010
6. For. Because I read this article quite a while ago, and it still cracks me up. Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 04:49, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
7. For. We're done auto-against voting all first person and gag articles these days, right? Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 14:39, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
8. For. almost missed this... Funnybony  08:05, Sep 23 08:05, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
9. For Like it --I'mthedaddy 23:50, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
10. For. (But don't tell my couch, it thinks it's going on "vacation.")  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Sep 2010 ~ 02:59 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain. You need to find one more picture. 137.159.95.30 05:51, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Done. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:16, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
• I'm abstaining. A decent read but there's nothing hugely funny in there, in my opinion. --Black Flamingo 12:38, September 22, 2010 (UTC)