Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:So Serious?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Why?:So Serious? (history, logs)

Article: Why?:So Serious?

Score: 0 reasons to be cheerful

Nominated by: UU - natter UU Manhole
For: 7
  1. Nom & for. Blah blah VFH low. Blah blah Led and TKF. Blah blah disturbingly funny article. Blah blah my glass is empty, I need more drink. --UU - natter UU Manhole 21:23, Oct 29
  2. Partial self for, the partial of course describing the nature of the self, rather than that of the for, which would be silly, as partial fors are widely considered rather ungainly. Also, thanks very much for the reviewnom, UU. :D - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:44, Oct 29
  3. Weak for Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:55, Oct 29
  4. Salf-For. Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  5. Yes it's good. IronLung 06:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  6. For. 07:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. For. wwhy not 12:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  8. For. Hasn't this been nominated already? Well, it's as good as it was then, if that indeed happened. BlueYonder GalaxyIcon - CONTACT
Against: 7
  1. Nah I'll jump the other way and say that it tried too hard and made me wince more than laugh. I dunno, abusive narrators in articles have never done it for me. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 06:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against per Irreverent. Abusive husband and stepfather, huh. Hmm. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. Nahhh, kinda formulaic. I liked the cancer ice cream joke, though. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Not quite there PaddyAtkinson 02:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  5. Against. Weird. Witt, Union leader of Union member UNion Entertain me* 02:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  6. Against. It felt extremely contrived, which made it boring for me User:Fag/sig5 13:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  7. Against. Not quite ready Simon Brown (Talk) 20:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. - I was going to review this, I stopped however as I was fairly mixed about it, on one hand like UU I liked it on another it did not move me.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools