Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Read A Book

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Why?:Read a Book (history, logs)

Article: Why?:Read a Book

Score: 17 Folks a readin'

Nominated by:
For: 17
  1. Self Nom and For Two pee reviews later, Ape feels the time is right to nominate his article for featurehood. Narrating his own actions like a mental patient he begins to type "Self Nom and For Two pee reviews later, Ape feels the time is right..." -- booming Ape (absolve) (Riot Porn) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  2. For --THE 23:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  3. Yes - Bassguy 10:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  4. For, but it could use a solid conclusion. ЖGBDsig.PNG WHEEEEE! 22:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  5. For --J.R. "Bob" Dobbs 01:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  6. Weak for. Pretty good, although I agree with Kalir about the ending - it feels a little... flat. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
  7. For. I hope this article produces a new group of amateur literary critics. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 12:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
  8. F☭R, SpacerSpacerPremierTomMayfairChe RedPhone Unsoc Hammer and sickle
  9. strong for. this article is awesome.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  10. Weak For --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  11. FOR Robertodole 18:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
  12. Dig though it could be constructed a little better, and be even funnier. If it doesn't make it to FA, I will THINKER this. --THINKER 04:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  13. Symbol for vote Reading is good. --General Insineratehymn 15:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  14. 4our-Sorry I voted against. Too paranoid about my own VFH at the time.--Blueflatcapsig Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  15. Four MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 06:23, Dec 28
  16. For --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us (TalkContribsCUN) 09:54, Dec. 29, 2007
  17. FOR --Ianlopez1115 19:16, December 29, 2007 (PHT) 11:16, December 16, 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0

No against votes


Well, it's an awesome topic, but it was a bit weak in the jokes and organization departments for me to give it a go for a for.--Blueflatcapsig Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 02:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools