Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:Hit yourself on the head with a baseball bat seven or eight times

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


Why?:Hit yourself on the head with a baseball bat seven or eight times (history, logs)

Article: Why?:Hit yourself on the head with a baseball bat seven or eight times

Score: 13 voters with sore heads

Nominated by: MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 02:43, Apr 1
For: 18
  1. Nom+Cajek Apparently there are some of his articles which have not been featured yet. I have no idea why. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 02:43, Apr 1
  2. For Read it along time ago. I thought it would be featured by now... --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 04:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. --Docile hippopotamus 08:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. Symbol for vote For. Eccentric but funny. --Romartus 11:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. Cajek. You forget just how good he is sometimes. –—Hv (talk) 1/04 21:16
  6. The title on its own is enough. --Aljolson Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson 22:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  7. By the seventh vote, you've fulfilled your duty. You're in the hospital for a good long time, hopefully long enough to miss out on work for a few weeks. Oh, and those nurses! Sir SysRq (talk) 01:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  8. Yes I agree with DJ that the brought to you by X product isn't the greatest thing, it doesn't bug me as much. Still very good. Woody On Fire! Wood burningTalking Woody Stalking Woody 05:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  9. Aye, as per Woodburninator's comment. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:14, Apr 2
  10. Symbol for vote For. Never experienced Cajek in person, but his work speaks for itself. --Dame Sonjesig.pngCherry-blossom.gif 18:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  11. For I'm not an asshole --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 21:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  12. For. I don't love it as much as other people and this for is actually a little weak but yeah Djdorama 11:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  13. Cajek -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN14:36, 3 Apr
  14. For -RAHB 22:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  15. Symbol for vote For. I decided that hitting yourself 42 times will certainly let you meet Aunt June. ZhelielCow.jpg » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 08:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  16. For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  17. For. One thing. WTF is Spalding? Nameable 16:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
    This may help. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  18. For. Leomann 18:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5
  1. I'm an asshole the article is good but I don't like the brought to you by X product angle, it cheapens the idea too much. Making it seem like a proposal from a credited doctor would make the joke even funnier IMO. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 04:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  2. against. i love cajek's work, but i scarcely cajek'd when reading this one. i like the 'same images repeated' gimmick sometimes, but it didn't work for me here. i can't give this a for, and it's feel like a cop-out to abstain, so...yeah. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against. You'll note I reviewed the article a long time ago. I didn't like it too much, and my opinion has not changed. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 02:32, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. nah --Moneke 10:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. Against. I wandered through Cajek's stuff recently idly wondering if there was anything I could nom. I saw this and kept on going. It's not bad, but it's not great, and while I miss Cajek as much as anyone, I just can't vote for this - feels more like Cajek by numbers rather than his really good stuff - possibly because I think it came from one of his "write an article in one hour" competitions with someone like THE. This is turning into a lengthy comment now. tl;dr version: _NOTGOODCAJEK_ --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:05, Apr 4
    Cajek by numbers. I like it. Sir SysRq (talk) 19:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Comment. Dj irreverent is right imo Djdorama 11:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. Groovester makes a good point to in [[Talk:Why?:Hit yourself on the head with a baseball bat seven or eight times]] there isn't actually a reason to hit yourself aside from the Spalding product angle, which feels very contrived. I don't think Cajek ever intended for this to be featured either really, it isn't as nuanced as his other zaniness. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 13:16, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Cajek The whole thing is an advert for Spalding. You must hit yourself with a baseball bat so that you need to buy their products. See. Funny eh? MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 13:45, Apr 3
    kejaC Doesn't it say you need to buy the product to hit your head? It just feels too incomplete for a feature. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 14:03, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
    Oh, and those nurses! It's a clever marketing trick I believe. I'm convinced anyway. *Hits self with recently purchased Spalding product* The thing I hate most about Cajek is that he just makes his writing look so easy. Truth is he probably slaved for ages over this. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 14:10, Apr 3

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools
projects