Nom+For. Since we're nomming stuff in people's userspaces now... Which is actually not a bad thing at all, as it brings these hidden pearls into the bright daylight. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM00:23, 28 May 2012
I see what you're doing there. You're getting Black flamingo to polish and mainspace a page he hasn't worked on in two years. Pretty sneaky, Sockpuppet of an unregistered user, pretty sneaky. I trust this will be featurable when polished a bit more by BF, so For.Aleister 1:40 28-5-'12
For. Brilliant. Lots of unexpceted laugh inducing moments...and of course...the vote is conditional that BF does the final touches and moves it to mainspace. --ShabiDOO 10:53, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 3
Against. Something about namespace blah blah something racist blah blah damn jews. -OptyCSucks! CUN06:09, 28 May
Modesty is an artists poison. This article only needs the slightest of touch ups and it will be awsome. I loled several times and enjoyed the tone of the article throughout. --ShabiDOO 17:35, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
Against. Nah - maybe like not try and feature userspace stuff as well. Sycamore(Talk) 11:14, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Pretty funny, but I think it should be moved to the UnScripts namespace because it's formatted as such. --SirCuteMewtwoOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0)] 01:14, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. Userspace, guy doesn't want it here, yadda.1234~ 18:02, 29 May 2012 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 18:02, May 29, 2012 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:23, 28 May 2012
Nom+For. Since we're nomming stuff in people's userspaces now... Which is actually not a bad thing at all, as it brings these hidden pearls into the bright daylight. 
Pretty funny, but I think it should be moved to the UnScripts namespace because it's formatted as such. --
18:02, 29 May 2012 
