Uncyclopedia:VFH/United Nations Charter

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

United Nations Charter (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: United Nations Charter	Score: 20 boring charters
Nominated by:	Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
For: 21	Self-nom & For.. Took a while to write, but I think its good. [: --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC) For.--Æ 21:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC) For. I suppose this is why world government is a joke. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 04:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC) For. I reviewed this and didn't like it. After a few revisions, however, this has become totally fuckin' awesome.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 26 / 04:45) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:47, Dec. 29, 2007 For. I flicked through this quickly recently and dismissed it. I am so glad I read it again, properly. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For...I too scanned, failed to see the funny, but upon return engagement I was amused. This article is probably much of what an uncyclopedia article, parodying wikipedia, was originally envisioned as.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For --THE 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Ratified--Scott 01:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Lame     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   06:45, 5 January 2008 (UTC)   For It looks so damn boring, yet everyone's voting for. Must be good. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 18:31, Jan. 5, 2008 For, I like the two pictures. The article doesn't attempt to do any overkill, but it has two of the funniest pictures I've seen lately.--Zisook 14:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC) For, quoting Shandon: "This article is probably much of what an uncyclopedia article, parodying wikipedia, was originally envisioned as." ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 22:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC) For. If only for the last line (or if not) --monika 02:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Weak For Its a good article. The only problem is that you can't really find the jokes by scaning it and you cold easally dsimiss it as a lame fact article, but not this one. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC) For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:25, Jan. 15, 2008 For. Very boring first off but it had great subtle humour. Congrats--DJ Irreverent 07:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC) What a bore -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC) For I love this article, rofl =) Javascap 18:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	AgainstMasterd 19:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.