From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Uncyclopedia (history, logs)

Article: Uncyclopedia

Score: 6 self-referential votes for a self-referential article

Nominated by: Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 11
  1. Nom+For. Sycamore did a major rewrite on this one, and I love what he's done with it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. For--DRStrangesig5 Sherman Fingertalk  23:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. For. Wow, a lot better than the last time I looked at it. User:Jedibob5/sig 01:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. For --Mnbvcxz 01:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. For - so long as featuring Uncyclopedia on Uncyclopedia won't break the Internet, like Googling Google does. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb kvetch Icon rabbi Contribs Foxicon FOXES 11:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. Symbol for vote self forSir Sycamore (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. For I'm digging what he did to it. Colin Explode fireALL YOUR BASEExplode fireHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Finally this article stopped sucking. And it only took, what, four years? Sir SysRq (talk) 23:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. For. It's us in a nutshell. A large, virtual nutshell. --UU - natter UU Manhole 13:09, Jan 7
  10. For -- An inspiring job. See my review. BlueYonder GalaxyIcon - CONTACT
  11. For. Silver-uk 01:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 5
  1. Against. Still needs more work on continuity and some shaving off of memes. --Christmas present 15Mickey20 Christmas-tree (Ho ho ho to Mickey)  20:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  2. Against. Chock-full of in-jokes that would be funny to almost no one not voting on this very page. Plus, featuring an article on ourselves makes us all look, in my opinion, like a bunch of douchebags. This one has to be top-notch quality just because it does - not for VFH. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 21:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Against - I have to agree with Hype here. It's a lot better than the old version, but it lingers way too much on things like forum in-fighting and memes that, if the article was on another site other than Uncyc, would probably be shot down for vanity. It's a fairly good article, just doesn't work for VFH IMO. –—Hv (talk) 11/01 18:32
  4. Against Nice work, but this is not ready yet. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 22:37, Jan 12
  5. Per Hype. It's got to be revolutionary if we're going to feature it. -RAHB 07:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
  1. Abstain -- i dunno. I'm just not feeling it. Oh well. Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:19, Jan 5
  • Comment - Mickey, I'll take a look at the flow and see what I can do - although I have not seen anything myself. With regards to memes etc - this article is the exception on that rule, I could not really imagine an article about ourselves without some in-jokes and self parody - although I have cut out the very bad ones like Cap Obvious, the ones there I think work pretty well. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools