Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnTweets:Mr McElroyLand!

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnTweets:Mr McElroyLand! (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnTweets:Mr McElroyLand!	Score: 12 tweets
Nominated by:	~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 07:47 12 May 2009
For: 14	SN&F Ok I think this is ready for a shot at the big time. I've got lots of positive feedback from users and a review that says its probably VFHable, so yeah. Also if there's anyone who can help it look more like an actual twitter page that would be so awsome! :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 07:47 12 May 2009 Fory For For --CrabPope 12:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. I would like to see a formatting guru get their hands on this and make it look more like the real thing. But on the other hand, I like this, and so I vote for. --UU - natter 12:25, May 12 For And I look forward to contributing some UnTweets myself to broaden your new namespace.    Tagstit    talk    contribs    awards   13:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. Good one. If you'll try to set "Twitter of the month award" I shall kill you dead, ~ 14:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Very For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. per everyone (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC) I'm sure that title has nothing to do with me, George Morgan. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC) For. Honestly, UnTweets? I love it... - [09:42 13 May 2009] PlebYettie For. Perhaps Mordillo is on to something... hmmm... Twitter of the Month... --Dame 09:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Stalking George Morgan and Alex McElroy. Thanks for the valuable information. Mahm00shA IS WATCHING YOU Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 09:53, 13 May '09 Bless. Lol —The la Zhel 12:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC) For. You see, it's even more funny because, in 30 years, this will be SysRq's actual life. Oh, except then instead of cars it will be hovercrafts. And we'll all have computers in our brains and not even use phones anymore! -RAHB 16:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 2	Weak nah Sure there's some good stuff there but the depressed, lonely, adult male character just feels overdone (and a bit cliche). I'd be for it if the ending was better, particularly where it rolls from I am bleeding to death. These may be my last words... gotta make them good. to Oh, he mugged me, and then insulted my "worthless" phone and "terrible" dress sense. :/ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Sorry. I was confused. And I don't like Twitter. It's okay, but I'm not a fan. Whore cHeDDaR 01:56,14May,2009 01:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC) the same goes to you cheddy; its okay but im not a fan means Abstain. Abstain is basicly for the meh, i dont care type of opinion. You may not be a fan but im pretty sure many people would understand the value of this parody of twitter. It deserves the main page... And i say again, im not a fan means Abstain. Against means it sucks and doesnt deserve to be featured. Tl;dr Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 05:36, 14 May '09 Against could be better if you took pee review advice. --Docile hippopotamus 03:24, 14 May 2009 (UTC) he doesnt have to put all the possible concepts in one article. Im sure here will be a future untweet about the secret service guy or something. But this one is perfect, moyt. Voting Against. means that the article is bad which it isnt. Please, consider abstaining instead. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 04:03, 14 May '09
Comments	Abstain. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:17, May 12 Abstain. per above. Mnb'z 17:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC) Per what exactly? He said abstain, you said abstain per above. So you abstain per abstain? ~ 09:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Hmm... this is fishy.... —The la Zhel 12:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC) Maybe he meant "above" in a slightly more random sense. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC) abstain. decent, but i can't commit myself to a 'for'. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC) abstain. --Docile hippopotamus 05:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.