NOM+ULTRA DIG The smash hit that took IRC by storm. I'll fly in the face of my normal moralistic stance on FA's under the circumstances. --THINKER 03:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
FOR VERY NICE! Masterd 03:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
For, so long as <insert name here> is not thinkerer, and it gets a decent intro paragraph. EugeneKaywuzhere(whinethank)03:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC) (who is not Thinkerer, incidentally)
For! Because I claim total ownership of the meme, as its creator and proprietor (along with EnzoAquarius) --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Against. What RAHB said, minus the bit about creating it. And I'm upset at having my lack of Thinkerishness pointed out. 'Tis funny though. --SirUnder User(Hi,HowAreYou?)VFHKUN 11:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Meh It's not so much that it's bad as it's primarily an audio. As was the case with the (albeit significantly worse) Dirty Potter scandal, it is the page that will go on the front, not the audio. To be honest, not many people will find it in their hearts to listen to the audio, even if the lyrics promise something vaguely amusing. Now, unlike Dirty Potter, this does not insult me as a feature-article writer because the lyrics are of a considerably high quality, but it's just....well, I guess "meh" is the right way to put it.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 23:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
EXTREME LESBIAN AGAINST, and give me one good reason not to delete it per UN:VAIN.
No memes anytime --GeneralInsineratehymn 23:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Against I strike my abstain, because against is the only way I can vote. -RAHB 07:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Against too inside joke-ish for the front page. --MrMetalFLower 08:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Self Abstain The fact that it's an inside joke, and I don't find it particularly of high quality (though that could just be the natural human reaction to one's own creation) keep me from voting for -RAHB 03:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm -5SirModusoperandiBoinc! This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 08:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.