Article: UnNews:Virgin Shark gives birth to Aquatic Messiah
Score: 13 Hydrocephalic Angels on the head of a pin
Nominated by:
This is an excellent example of an evil UnNews article, and therefore worthy of nomination Rev. Zim (Talk ) Get saved! 21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 19
Mostly, because it makes fun of Christianity. Rev. Zim (Talk ) Get saved! 21:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
"Those foolish scientists are so blinded" - now that is good comedy -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 02:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Weak for , just 'cause it's awfully short. Still, I think it's FA-able. - P.M. , WotM , & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock ) (Contribs ) 03:20, Jan 19
Weakish, but still Forish, For - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 14:16, Jan 19
For - That one picture just does it to me. Humourly. -- B r i g a d i e r G e n e r a l S i r Z o m b i e b a r o n 19:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
For. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk )[citation needed ] 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN ) 14:47, Jan. 20, 2008
Fo --THE 14:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
For Go Kip!-S i r Ljlego , GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk ) 15:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
For. Awesome pictures, especially for such a small article. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 18:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
For , though she wasn't a virgin when I was done with her. -- T K F U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
for. this one suprised me.--Sir Gerrycheevers Gun Talk 20:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
For This article is sooo much better than Jesus mAtt lobster . (hello ) 20:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
For. Weasel 3689
For. This article might get even more popular than Jesus. (But not as popular as The Beatles!)-->: ( 21:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
For. Behold, the King of the Jaws! - classic Sir DJ ~ Irrev erent
For. --MNM5150 21:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
For. --Moneke 11:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Meh. ~ Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex ! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEE ING • HP • BFF (@ 01:35 4 Feb, 2008)
Against: 6
Meh It's a noble effort and alright concept. I just think the execution is weak as hell. -RA HB 23:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Also meh . It's got steak but no sizzle. I loves the sizzle, I does! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Meh - I reread it and I don't think it's FA worthy. I agree with MO and RAHB here--Æ 23:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Meh per above. --Dexter111344 22:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Meh Perfectly good article; not great. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Meh . Just not enough spark. • • • Necropaxx ( T ) {~} 21:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Abs per RAHB, but slightly less. And per MO, as I too love the sizzle. --THINKER 20:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Self-abstain - I've changed my mind as well. This article is okay , but not feature worthy. It's not that satirical, instead making easy jokes against religious people. -- K i p > Talk • Works • • 01:46, Jan. 29, 2008
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH