Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Unwikileaks in the news (renom)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Unwikileaks in the news (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Unwikileaks in the news	Score: 9 misleading lies
Nominated by:	Funnybony  21:54, Dec 24
For: 9	For. Funnybony  21:55, Dec 24 For This is funny. And insightful. And worth it's weight in electronic gold. Aleister 23:54 24Decemb12 For. Long and shecksy SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:16, December 26, 2012 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:40, 26 December 2012 For. Brilliant. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:18, December 29, 2012 (UTC) For. Prätt Körp (talk) 04:43, January 1, 2013 (UTC) For. Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 15:28, January 1, 2013 (UTC) For. Very close to the truth. Governments do this all the time. Lantash (talk) 22:57, January 6, 2013 (UTC) For. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:13, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	It might be interesting if there was Unwikileaks creating misleading confusion (rewrite/renom). Cheers!--Funnybony  21:54, Dec 24 Yes, not only does the headline not look like a headline, the lede doesn't look like a lede, giving us background on the source before it tells us what happened. This is not a satire of current events the way Wikinews might report it; it is a satire of news analysis as Stratfor might provide (in which case, why fictionalize the name of Wikileaks)? Or is it mocking both Stratfor and Wikileaks? It might come to me in ten more minutes, but so far, it's a jumble of global-conspiracy memes, Iraqi tits, Mutaween, and New World Order. Spıke ¬ 01:23 26-Dec-12

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.