#{{For}} Whoring UnNews is always good. Poor taste sealed the deal for me. {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 04:05, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
#{{For}} Whoring UnNews is always good. Poor taste sealed the deal for me. {{User:Zim_ulator/sig}} 04:05, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
#'''For'''. And I hadn't heard this story before. {{User:Cap'n Ben/sig}} 06:03, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
#'''For'''. And I hadn't heard this story before. {{User:Cap'n Ben/sig}} 06:03, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
−
#'''For'''. i havent actually read this, but i was told to go vote for it {{ User:Teh_pwnerator/sig }} <small><span style="color: black; font-family: 'Serif';font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 10px"><b>06:08, Sep 2 </b></span></small>
+
#'''For'''. i havent actually read this, but i was told to go vote for it {{ User:Teh_pwnerator/sig }} <small><span style="color: black; font-family: 'Serif';font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 10px">'''06:08, Sep 2 '''</span></small>
#'''For''' Finally, an UnNews that can be featured in '''a timely fashion. Hopefully tomorrow.''' [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 11:40 2 9
#'''For''' Finally, an UnNews that can be featured in '''a timely fashion. Hopefully tomorrow.''' [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 11:40 2 9
−
#'''For'''. By gosh, topicality. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>11:51, Sep 2</i></font></small>
+
#'''For'''. By gosh, topicality. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy">''11:51, Sep 2''</font></small>
#'''For''' {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 17:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
#'''For''' {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 17:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
#'''For'''. An Ayatollah ordered me to. I can't refuse. {{User:Fredd The Mahmauscher/Sig}} 03:25, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
#'''For'''. An Ayatollah ordered me to. I can't refuse. {{User:Fredd The Mahmauscher/Sig}} 03:25, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
Line 37:
Line 37:
#'''Against'''. UnNews page lead but not a feature. {{User:Romartus/sig}} 12:13, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. UnNews page lead but not a feature. {{User:Romartus/sig}} 12:13, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against''' Didn't make me laugh. Not very good. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 18:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against''' Didn't make me laugh. Not very good. {{User:Matt lobster/sig}} 18:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. Per Mhaille. {{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 07:07, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. Per Mhaille. {{User:ChiefjusticeDS/sig}} 07:07, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. What Hype & Mhaille said. Its basically retelling a story but saying a terrorist is a hero. {{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 02:51, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
#'''Against'''. What Hype & Mhaille said. Its basically retelling a story but saying a terrorist is a hero. {{User:Mnbvcxz/sig5}} 02:51, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
Line 43:
Line 43:
*'''Comment'''. I did read this. {{User:Romartus/sig}} 07:37, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. I did read this. {{User:Romartus/sig}} 07:37, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
*:Cool. :P {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 17:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
*:Cool. :P {{User:Dexter111344/sig}} 17:19, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
−
*'''Comment'''. I still haven't read this. Can somebody tell me if it's any good? {{ User:Teh_pwnerator/sig }} <small><span style="color: black; font-family: 'Serif';font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 10px"><b>03:54, Sep 5 </b></span></small>
+
*'''Comment'''. I still haven't read this. Can somebody tell me if it's any good? {{ User:Teh_pwnerator/sig }} <small><span style="color: black; font-family: 'Serif';font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 10px">'''03:54, Sep 5 '''</span></small>
*{{For|I protest!!! And take hostages! This should have been in the feature que a couple of days ago, but it's been allowed to linger and picked up a few no votes in the meantime. Hostages!}} [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 12:16 5 9
*{{For|I protest!!! And take hostages! This should have been in the feature que a couple of days ago, but it's been allowed to linger and picked up a few no votes in the meantime. Hostages!}} [[user:Aleister in Chains|'''Aleister''']] 12:16 5 9
*{{Comment}} The title is boring. --[[User:Wilytank|Wilytank]] 15:10, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
*{{Comment}} The title is boring. --[[User:Wilytank|Wilytank]] 15:10, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
Self-For The Fred Phelps of environmentalists. Also, it's my baby. <3 - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at01:29, Thursday 02 September 2010 -
I had feared that would be a bit of a problem, not much can top that. :P - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at01:48, Thursday 02 September 2010 -
For. So if "The Turner Diaries" == Timothy McVeigh, then "An Inconvienant Truth" == James J. Lee? Sirrah CatshirEChess the Striker2117 14:21, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Not front page worthy, sorry maybe the feature on UNnews. Dr. Fenwick 17:11, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
Against. I do not understand the popularity of this article. It basically just retells the story of what some psycho did and then asserts that he is a hero. It's also very short. What am I missing, here? pillow talk 17:50, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
For one thing, we'd probably be one of the only (un)news organizations providing a link to his interesting manifesto. The press is only reporting a very tiny part of it, the population rant, without the other material. And he actually wrote "Froggies", so we should give his corpse a platfom, ay? Aleister 19:08 2 9
No Per Hype, it just tells the story of what he did albeit in a rather good sarcastic tone. However if I wanted lines like Good night, sweet prince, I'd go to ED and get a bucket of badly photoshopped penises and jokes about black people for a dollar extra. --Nikau 05:16, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
Wow, you've impressed me. That's the second most dickish and condescending against reason I've ever seen. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at23:04, Saturday 04 September 2010 -
Against. Hype is right.--HM(T) 04:02, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Against. UnNews page lead but not a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:13, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Against Didn't make me laugh. Not very good. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Nah. Didn't laugh, etc. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Thursday, 08:50, Sep 16 2010
Against. Per Mhaille. ChiefjusticePS2 07:07, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
Against. What Hype & Mhaille said. Its basically retelling a story but saying a terrorist is a hero. Mn-z 02:51, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
Comment. I still haven't read this. Can somebody tell me if it's any good? -- SoldatTeh PWNerator(pwnt!)03:54, Sep 5
I protest!!! And take hostages! This should have been in the feature que a couple of days ago, but it's been allowed to linger and picked up a few no votes in the meantime. Hostages!Aleister 12:16 5 9
Comment. The title is boring. --Wilytank 15:10, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
The nomination was not successful. rm low health, 23%ChiefjusticePS2 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 16:14, October 4, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.