Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Post-structuralist engineer blamed for bridge disaster

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Post-structuralist engineer blamed for bridge disaster (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Post-structuralist engineer blamed for bridge disaster	Score: 15 Failed Bridge Supports
Nominated by:
For: 16	Nom & For, even though the idea of 'nominating' a 'text' for 'featuring' is very modernist. -- grue-like Ape (pass) (Riot Porn) 00:27, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For. Clever and funny. I feel like maybe another paragraph could be written, but it's still pretty good the way it is. -- Sf13 2042 EST 23 JAN 2011 For. I meant to nominate this about a week ago, actually. Oops. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:31, January 24, 2011 (UTC) Silly nutters. 1234 ~ 02:38, 24 January 2011 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:48, 24 January 2011 Three thumbs straight up. Aleister 9:22 24-1-'11 For. Yes, this works. --UU - natter 09:50, Jan 24 For Same as TKF. My bad. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:43, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For--Sog1970 13:47, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For like a G6...like a G6. I like this, much like a G6. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:12, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 17:35, January 24, 2011 (UTC) Not that it matters at this late stage, but I really liked this. --Black Flamingo 21:06, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For, per my Pee Review. pillow talk 22:11, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For. I love this article. I wanted to do the pee review on it, but I just couldn't find anything major to critique about it. Excellent job on this one. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   23:04, January 24, 2011 (UTC) For. ~  17:18, January 25, 2011 (UTC) For. frkin helare! Shabidoo 02:15, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 1	Joke Against Original news reports CANNOT get a +14 score on VFH! They just CANNOT!!! Scofield 07:34, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. This does not work - you have a too many elements in there, and the parody is lost. It's a real shit, as I'd love to vote for this. Sorry Ape.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, January 24, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:41, January 25, 2011 (UTC) Going to have to lovingly beg to differ with the "real shit" comment and agree with Aleister's "three thumbs up". From someone with a useless Philosophy degree, some of the only fun I get out of it is people parodying post-modernism. This does a quick, non pretentious and VERY funy job of it. This is SUUUUUUUPER funny, witty and helare! --Shabidoo 03:23, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.