I would like to see it worked on a little more, but hell, it is funny as is. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 06:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
this article is superb!!! my golly, I just couldn't contain myself. Nothing this exciting has ever happened before.!! it's such idiotic but also funny. 115.147.97.85 13:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
for. bad on the first read through, hilarious on the second. also, great caption. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For hahaa, hilarious! and reported by a puppy! nope, nothing this exciting has ever happened before, OH MY GOD!!! Iateyourgranny 20:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
#Against good unnews, but its not feature worthy, too stream of consciousness-y. --Mnbvcxz 23:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
#:What's wrong with stream of consciousness? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Against I disagree with Mnbvcxz's reason as I think the stream of conciousness is great, but it was a one trick article. with a bit of re-writing (to sound more like a column, say) I think it could be excelent. Come talk to me for further feedbac if you want. ~Orian57~~Talk~23:30 1 February 2009
ur so lunatic p-ple, such bloody, blithering, fucking ,scandalous, idiotic morning!!!!!!!! 115.147.97.85 13:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Time for bedtime 115.147.97.85 :) Mommy will tuck you in and tell you a story.Saberwolf116 13:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 08:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 17 February 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.