N♥m && w♥v. Absolutely. RAHB is amazing. I've been aware of this article for some time and now that it's finally finished it's time for the world to appreciate it. Nice work, RAHB. sirsysrq@ 14:22 Dec 18
For One Word....Brilliant Picton 17:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Yeah Sure. Cheers for the nom. My favorite part is the real-world coincidence of the similar posters. That's classic. -RAHB 02:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
For - I knew this freaking article was going to be nominated before I even clicked on the link. Intuition, baby. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 02:27, Dec. 19, 2008
Against. This is just stupid. A poster is not a joke. Ryuinfinity 22:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Against. ^As above Ryuinfinity 20:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Against It's stupid and unfunny. Ryuinfinity, don't double vote. I would strike out your second vote, but I'm not an admin... All of you who abstain, quit being pussies. Vote against if it isn't funny enough to feature!!! You're not voting against because it's RAHB's article. Wussies. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 00:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure you don't need to be an op to strike a vote if it's for good reason/against an article you like. I'm going to be gutsy and strike it myself under the assumption that the next op to see it would have done the same. sirsysrq@ 01:19 Dec 28
I'm gonna leave my abstain right where it is, thanks. I vote for if I want an article featured, I vote against if I feel strongly enough that it shouldn't be featured. If it doesn't tickle me but I don't object to its featuring, I abstain. And then I go and cry because I've been called a wussie. Seriously, that's ruined my Easter. --UU - natter22:49, Dec 30
Against Dexter is right. The only important thing here is whether it is funny or not on this here comedy website. I don't think its funny enough for feature. Thank you sir, for helping me to see the light. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain.. Mmm... I'm gonna have to abstain. It's not bad, I just didn't find it feature-funny. •••Necropaxx(T){~}15:58, Dec 18
Yeah... Its really well written, which is keeping me from voting against. It's just not funny enough for me. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 14:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. I have to agree with the above - this just didn't tickle me. --UU - natter11:35, Dec 20
Abstain ok for unNews.--Mnbvcxz 17:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Featured. So that the queue is actually a queue, and not just a fancy way of accomplishing the old "everybody screams for an admin at 7pm EST" system. Also, because it has a few votes, or something. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 00:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 4 January 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.