Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Jim Carrey to star in Liar Liar 10 Year Anniversary Edition

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

UnNews:Jim Carrey to star in Liar Liar 10 Year Anniversary Edition (history, logs)

Article: UnNews:Jim Carrey to star in Liar Liar 10 Year Anniversary Edition

Score: 14 movies identical to every movie Jim Carrey has ever done

Nominated by: sirErr.gifsysrq @ 14:22 Dec 18
For: 17
  1. Symbol for vote N♥m && w♥v. Absolutely. RAHB is amazing. I've been aware of this article for some time and now that it's finally finished it's time for the world to appreciate it. Nice work, RAHB. sirErr.gifsysrq @ 14:22 Dec 18
  2. for. look, i'm a yes man. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:10, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. For. 16:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  4. For One Word....Brilliant Picton 17:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
  5. Yeah Sure. Cheers for the nom. My favorite part is the real-world coincidence of the similar posters. That's classic. -RAHB 02:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  6. For - I knew this freaking article was going to be nominated before I even clicked on the link. Intuition, baby. -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 02:27, Dec. 19, 2008
  7. Yes! IronLung 04:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  8. For. 06:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  9. For. Djdorama 23:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  10. For. Good enough. Style Oranssiviiva Guide 08:52, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  11. For. RabbiTechno 09:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  12. For. 14:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  13. For. I say yes Asahatter (annoy) 22:45, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
  14. For. Meta 500 20:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
  15. Dig Too true. --THINKER 00:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  16. For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
  17. For. One of the few funny things on this stie. Why am I on here so much? 20:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
  18. For Finally, Jim Carrey has made me laugh. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
  19. I approve of this article. I am the Supreme Ruler of Reality, kneel before my presence!
Against: 3
  1. Against. This is just stupid. A poster is not a joke. Ryuinfinity 22:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
  2. Against. ^As above Ryuinfinity 20:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  3. Against It's stupid and unfunny. Ryuinfinity, don't double vote. I would strike out your second vote, but I'm not an admin... All of you who abstain, quit being pussies. Vote against if it isn't funny enough to feature!!! You're not voting against because it's RAHB's article. Wussies. --MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 00:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
    I'm pretty sure you don't need to be an op to strike a vote if it's for good reason/against an article you like. I'm going to be gutsy and strike it myself under the assumption that the next op to see it would have done the same. sirIgnignokt.gifsysrq @ 01:19 Dec 28
    I'm gonna leave my abstain right where it is, thanks. I vote for if I want an article featured, I vote against if I feel strongly enough that it shouldn't be featured. If it doesn't tickle me but I don't object to its featuring, I abstain. And then I go and cry because I've been called a wussie. Seriously, that's ruined my Easter. --UU - natter UU Manhole 22:49, Dec 30
  4. Against Dexter is right. The only important thing here is whether it is funny or not on this here comedy website. I don't think its funny enough for feature. Thank you sir, for helping me to see the light. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain.. Mmm... I'm gonna have to abstain. It's not bad, I just didn't find it feature-funny. Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:58, Dec 18
  • Yeah... Its really well written, which is keeping me from voting against. It's just not funny enough for me. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 14:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I have to agree with the above - this just didn't tickle me. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:35, Dec 20
  • Abstain ok for unNews.--Mnbvcxz 17:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools