For. Good ol' article with a tone of formality promising to produce serious articles that is actually funny. It's hilarious in its own style too. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 02:00, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
I was half-way through this, wrinkling my forehead and saying "what the hell is this shit?" when the joke hit me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 17:09 (UTC)
Against/Resubmit. As he did recently on VFD, Bizzeebeever's For vote above was the first hint I didn't stick with this UnNews long enough to see that its point is not merely "untruths" (in my Comment below) and is delightfully non-partisan. Happily, its point will remain valid for the foreseeable future, though the current nomination is languishing. Author, please tighten this up, cut back the long quotations (Don't really want a study of Gingrich and Santorum, even if it provides texture), make every sentence serve a purpose, and re-nominate it. Spıke¬ 12:58 13-Nov-12
Comments
If this were music, it would be jazz improv: Although all the notes are on-key, any second verse might sound nothing like the first. A dense collection of untruths and anachronisms is not as intensely funny as a perverse reading of the truth. Spıke¬ 15:15 12-Oct-12
The nomination was not successful.RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 12:33, November 15, 2012 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.