Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Chance meeting between acquaintances causes awkward moment

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

UnNews:Chance meeting between acquaintances causes awkward moment (history, logs)

Article: UnNews:Chance meeting between acquaintances causes awkward moment

Score: 12.5

Nominated by: Wilytank 21:25, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
For: 15
  1. Symbol for vote Nom + For --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:25, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. For. David Gerard 13:03, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Weak For. Spot-on clever, but could still use some improvement. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:15, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Slightly tepid for. Pretty much per Guildy - I like it enough as it is, but I think it could do with another good chuckle or so, which wouldn't be too tricky to add. --UU - natter UU Manhole 11:41, Nov 30
  5. For As above. --Sog1970 12:17, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Self non-objective for mAttlobster. (hello) 18:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Symbol for vote For. Sir SockySexy girls Mermaid with dolphin Tired Marilyn Monroe (talk) (stalk)Magnemite Icons-flag-be GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:01, 3 December 2010
  8. Symbol for vote For. Yes, and I had a good laugh, then I added a bit to the page if the author doesn't mind too much. The initial laugh felt very good, and I would like to do it again. Tomorrow? Aleister 13:52 4 12
  9. For. brilliant ... no more than brilliant. Subtle and nice and a NON fart joke article and truly funny and DEEP kind of laughing moment !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shabidoo 02:45, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
  10. 'Symbol for vote For.' I really liked it. I thought it had pleanty of jokes and used formal language to great effect. :D    Orian57    Talk   Union pink 16:52 11 December 2010
  11. 'Symbol for vote Fucking For' Why not?--If you're 555 then I'm Number of the Beast Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:20, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. For. Hopefully, this'll never become a real news article. Subtle and well written. Scofield 09:23, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
  13. For. I thought I had already voted on this - jeez! Better late than never. Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 15:54, Dec 18 15:54, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
  14. Didn't really get me laughing until the half-way point, which for a short article is obviously a shame. But the point is, I did laugh. --Black Flamingo 21:44, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
  15. Wow. This is awkward. <_< -- Kip > Talk Works Puzzle Potato Dry Brush CUN Icons-flag-us 13:59, Dec. 19, 2010
Against: 2.5
  1. Against. Good for Unnews feature, but not the front page. Dr. Fenwick 21:26, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. against -- 00:59, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Against -- not funny enough 10:41, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
  4. against -- 07:59, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote Abstain. It's a humorous idea and thingy, but it all comes out kind of meh. Like pancakes that ain't quite solid inside. ~ Pointy *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101204 - 01:39 (UTC)
  • I dunno why it's OK for IP's to log-in just to vote for or against a page, especially against. People work hard to polish and put up a good page, work the page while it's on VFH to correct any weaknesses voters have discussed, and then a couple of IP's from nowhere and going back to nowhere come in and asplode a nom. Outta be a law. Aleister 1:37 15 12
  • I agree with Aleister. It looks really dodgy! Really scummy! Really poopy those IPs. I would only agree with it if I hated the article, which I dont. Screw those IP negative voters in the face! And except for articles I really hate, IP addresses should not be able to vote. --Shabidoo 11:48, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Especially if some of them could be sock puppets. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:09, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
    The 124.<blahblahfuckingblah> IPs are Australian, the 77.<shittyshitshitisdelicious> IP is Polish. Just throwing that out there. MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 20:29, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
    And is Dr Fenwick a real doctor? I have my doubts. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:19, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment. I am not sure why UnNews would be interested in a story like this. Was it a very slow news day? LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:47, December 17, 2010 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Personal tools