Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation" (new version!)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia.
| Article: UnNews:An Open Letter from "Protect the Overtly Offensive Foundation"
|
Score: 8 people adding rude words
|
| Nomination:
| <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 02:46, 10/09/2009
|
For Votes: 11
|
Nom and For. - There's a few pee reviews floating about the place by both Chief and Miley. Think I've fixed most of the againsts. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 02:46, 10/09/2009
For. I peed on it and gave it a 39 before Puppy made many improvements. Now, go POOF! Dame Pleb Cpt. Miley Spears (talk) 03:07, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY 17:56, 10 September 2009
███ Sir MacMania GUN—[23:59 10 Sep 2009]
- For. per above Mn-z 02:28, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- For raping jews with pineapples and sicking pig ears up a Muslem's bottom. Loved the article too. Orian57 Talk
02:39 12 September 2009
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
CUN13:33, 12 Sep
- For. ChiefjusticeDS 07:47, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
- For Now excellent instead of merely very good --Sog1970 09:46, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
- For Saw this a while back, good stuff --Morgz789 11:25, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
- For There's lots of good stuff in here. I think it could be a lot better but still good enough.mattlobster. (hello) 11:24, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Wow There's a whole lot of stuff here. Unfortunately, it doesn't add up to FA. --THINKER 09:32, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Not offensive enough. --RomArtus Imperator(talk). 12:55, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah! FUCK NUGGET. <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 22:49, 17/09/2009
- against. it's ok, but i can't see it as a feature. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:57, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- That was unexpected <span class="GenOberst"> PoopyOnTheRadio </span>t 05:47, 11/09/2009
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH