Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Abby Martin ‘non-notable’ Wikipedia ban boosts notability (2nd nomination)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

UnNews:Abby Martin ‘non-notable’ Wikipedia ban boosts notability (history, logs)

Article: UnNews:Abby Martin ‘non-notable’ Wikipedia ban boosts notability

Score: 3

Nominated by: LaurelsRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:37, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
For: 4
  1. Symbol for vote For. The more I read it, the more I saw in it. And it would be a terrible action to leave an article with its soul and not to vote for it. No, I am joking, but it was a really nice one, even if I left such a comment! Anton (talk) 17:58, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
  2. for --ShabiDOO 18:26, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol for vote For. I support Abby Martin in her side of this dispute. Funnybony, not so much. Aleister 23:08 19-2-14
  4. Symbol for vote For. Funnybony Icons-flag-th Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 09:22, Feb 20
Against: 1
  1. Symbol against vote Against. As before. The article resembles polemics, not news; it deals with an internal dispute at another website; and featuring it will tend to get Uncyclopedia cited as "independent" opinion supporting one side in that dispute. Spıke Ѧ 16:31 19-Feb-14
  1. I don't know. I agree that even a humour article should have a point of view to defend. But this one sometimes seems too factual. Yes, the situation is ironic, but to write a humourous article, I think, you should do a lot more than just recount it. I found many sentences too "true", as if you were just telling the reader what was happening in order to make him understand a "big" joke, which as I understood was just the situation itself. Maybe I am wrong though, and your comments will be welcome! Anton (talk) 17:07, February 19, 2014 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools