For. This is a bit late though. It would have been nice if this had been featured earlier. –sumone10154(talk) 09:47, November 9, 2012 (UTC)
For. Perfect amount of swearing, and the broadness is there for a reason: the candidates don't give a drowned rat about anything other than getting elected. It saddens me that we didn't have enough users hanging around and voting to get this featured on Erection Day. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 9 '12 15:00 (UTC)
Against. Way too sweary and broad to be a fun parody of a real debate - for me. I also think undebate suffers like unnews from the delay between publishing and featuring - and if you choose a big story, it almost inevitably suffers from the wait and loses its impact. ~Leverage 11:32, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
Comment. Ar the rate we're going, this might actually featured by election day! :D ~jcm 02:05, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
Can we please feature this today while it is still relevant. --ShabiDOO 11:23, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comment. You can pack up the cheese, boys. We failed. Ron Paul failed. ~jcm 00:02, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
Featured. Better late than never RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:02, November 9, 2012 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 9 November 2012. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.