SelfNomAndFor: I wrote this article for The Article Whisperer competition before I read the rules. It seems like I write one article every 2 years so this will probably be my last article for the next couple years. And I like it. I think it's really great. Probably my best work so far. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 18:39, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Very For This is one of the best short pages I've read on the site, and it has one of (it not the) funniest pics I've seen here. Not to build up your expectations or anything. Aleister 22:44 18 10
For. I only voted against to see if he'd ban me. Now that I have my answer... eh, it's actually pretty good. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 03:18 (UTC)
For.Fantastic! Superb! A true tour-de-force. Right now, The Onion is shitting it's pants in jealousy, because they wish they thought of something this brilliant. I highly suggest a strong for, now dammit. It'sMrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 04:46, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. In-jokery. Not a feature in my view. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:24, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Isn't too bad but I feel dwells too much on some aspects and too little on others, also it is an in-joke, so, it's a good article but not a feature in my view. ChiefjusticePSX 17:34, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
Against. lame --58.170.186.7 05:01, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
Aw, c'mon. Readers won't know it's the authors user name, they're just think the book is written by someone named Zombiebaron, which is funny by itself. No inside knowledge needed to appreciate the name. And the panda pic, what about the panda pic! Aleister 1:33 19 10
I vote with curiosity. In fact, I do most things with curiosity... around here, I'm surprised it doesn't get me banned more often. I was going to change my vote either way, though. Sometimes in-jokes are funny. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 14:05 (UTC)
Hey, wait a sec... it hasn't been reviewed! Take this down, mon, take this down! *thumps ceiling* This has nothing to do with anything. ~*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101020 - 17:30 (UTC)
Featured. ChiefjusticePSX 21:48, October 31, 2010 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 2 November 2010. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Very For This is one of the best short pages I've read on the site, and it has one of (it not the) funniest pics I've seen here. Not to build up your expectations or anything. 
Against. Vanity. 
