Yeah Didn't read it either, but I think it's great. Would read again. Also, since it's released under a Creative Commons license, I'm going to edit in a bunch of references to kitten huffing. Because I can. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 05:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) Okay, I'm going to hold off on voting until I actually read it. --Pleb SYNDROMECUNmedicate(butt poop!!!!) 17:08, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Ribbit I read it, it's hilarious, and absolutely awesome. The guy who wrote this is really a totally annoying douchebag...I mean, great guy. Also - ribbit. Love,
Amazing. DrS, you are one talented motherfucker. sirsysrq@ 21:41 Jul 28
I hope the sequel's tagline goes along the lines of "Mark Flavian has been fucked by the universe. At last, it's finally time... for him to fuck back." (In bold, because movie trailer announcer guy speaks in bold.) - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 22:16, Jul 28
Christ, how long has this been here? I really should start paying closer attention. Anyways, I've been reading this on a certain blog and it's just as good here. That would be a For. -OptyCSucks! CUN21:17, 30 Jul
For I can't believe I just read that whole thing. This is Uncyclopedia after all, I can usually click a link, read an article, and go back to vote on it without being logged out due to inactivity. None of that makes me bitter enough to vote otherwise though. Solid writing. -RAHB 12:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Against It's kinda funny. But it doesn't have pictures, and, without pictures, it looks like walls of boring text. --MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 05:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Against; Wonderful prose. Terrible formatting. You might consider requesting some decent image for it. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 12:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Against tl;dr... Actually I read this ages ago (a few times)... I do really like it, but I don't think it works as a feature. MrNFork you! 13:46, Jul 28
Against. - As per MrN9000--Sycamore(Talk) 14:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Against. per DJ Irreverent. I'm speaking here for all of us with ADHD, this is too long for a feature (You should totally make a cliff notes version, and I might vote for that).--<<>> 12:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Against. Nice, but I didn't find it funny. OrangeAipom 00:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain Funny but goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on... --SirDJ~Irreverent 06:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Abstain. I abstained on that last thing Mooses did before vanishing for similar reasons: it's a hell of a read, but I'm not sure it's right in this format. It took me 5 goes to finish this on Skull's blog - I get headaches trying to read something that long on the screen. Then the voices start, which is another worry. Anyway, as a short story, I love it. As an article on Uncyclopedia, I don't know. --UU - natter14:59, Jul 29
That one mooses did was epic... it was also only about a quarter of the length of this. This would work as a short story but just doesn't translate that well into an article. --SirDJ~Irreverent 05:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Featured. Is it considered bad form to feature your own article? In related news, do I care? –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 21:34 Aug 05, 2008 This article has passed VFH and was featured on 6 August 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For per 
Against. - As per MrN9000--
Abstain and evil grin 
