Nom+For. Don't be deceived, this isn't one of those "Hey, let's make fun of Jesus" articles. This article reveals a completely new look at Jesus and the New Testament. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM20:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
gzus4eva: That was the username that got me banned for 5 years from Conservapedia before I even got a chance to make my first wholesome, family-friendly edit. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 16:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
For As per my review. Saberwolf116 19:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
For. A bumper sticker in front of me this morning on the way to work (work? I'm at work? Oh, shit!) said "Jesus Rules". No way, man this rules. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 17:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Against. Hmm. It feels like it lacks oomph. Maybe it's the tone. Yeah. I think that's it; the whole wisecracking Jesus makes me go "meh." Not that it didn't have its good parts, but still, not feature worthy. •••Necropaxx(T){~}19:15, Jun 27
Against. per above. Mn-z 01:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Featured. MrNFork you! 01:00, Jul 3 This article has passed VFH and was featured on 3 July 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.