For Well, as per Thinker, it isn't the same classic Lj humor, this is true. However, I do think this particular piece is feature-worthy, and overall enjoyable and good. The RAHBunal has spoken. -RAHB 21:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Sigh.. I really don't want it to seem like I'm down Lj noms, because that is not my aim, but it just doesn't seem that funny to me. A good mocking of Ludlum-type literature absolutely, but just not the same classic Lj humor I enjoy so well. --THINKER 16:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Against. I hate fisher price and all spinoffs--MNM5150 01:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
"...at its heart, this is a Robert Ludlum book parody, nothing more..." If you had read the article, then you would realize that it is not a spin-off of Fisher Price at all.-SirLjlego, GUNVFHFIYCWotMSGWHotMPWotMAotMEGAEDMANotM+ (Talk) 02:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Featured. And Lj's back on top. Enter STM in 3... 2... 1... TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 21 January 2008. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.