Self-nomination and For after a rather positive review whose suggestions I have attempted to implement since. Something more for the American population of Uncyc. SirMacManiaGUN—[00:45 27 Aug 2009]
Weak for. I read this last night and LOL'ed at parts, although at times it felt a little overlong and imperfect. Good enough to feature now, I guess. pillow talk 21:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
For. This is great! --—Mazaka(talk) 21:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
For. At first I thought I was only laughing because of my fondness for the game, but it was Mac's writing alone that made me laugh. Good job. •••Necropaxx(T){~}22:43, Aug 28
For. Liked the idea and the strange pix. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:04, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 0
No against votes
Comments
Abstain. See, for me, this is what abstains were invented for: I don't get this, but I have a strong feeling that if I had experienced what it was referring to, it would be very good. So I don't think it deserves an against, but I can't vote for either. --UU - natter10:13, Sep 1
Featured. ~ 07:28, September 3, 2009 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 3 September 2009. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.