Uncyclopedia:VFH/Toaster

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Toaster (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Toaster	Score: 22 slices of bread stalked and ruthlessly toasted
Nominated by:	Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 20:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 22	Nom + For. I peed, I liked, I thought it was worthy of highlight, I decided to see if others felt the same. That's not an exciting story, but it has truth on its side. This is an excellent rewrite. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 20:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Self-For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC) For. Im down with this article. Kathumandu 21:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC) For --THE 21:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC) F☭R, Fore I always liked dis--Moneke 06:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Toast!--Dr. Fenwick 19:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC) For. the additions since my review really put this one over the top. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC) For. --- -Stevo the Human, I'm baaa-aaack! :D 23:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Dig --THINKER 20:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Dug -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC) All toasters toast your face --General Insineratehymn 21:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC) 'Toasted     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   05:44, 13 October 2007 (UTC)   For I had problems and they were fixed. Necropaxx, I salute you, for being such an efficient and humorous writer! -- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 22:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC) For--Sir Manforman 00:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC) For -RAHB 22:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC) For despite poor photoshops and a deplorable lack of Balrog. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 23:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 23:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC) For - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:46, Oct 19 For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 00:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC) For --333pet 17:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	Weak Against. Just not really enjoyable as an idea. Could be well done, but not quite. With a little work, it could get there. Just not this time. -- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 20:26, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Example, please? I'd like to make the article as good as possible. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.